3.1 Characterization
3.1.1 XRD analysis
The type of nanocatalysts, texture, crystal orientation, and crystallite size were determined using XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) analysis. Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. By use of the JCPDS No. 00-003-0862, the diffraction at 2θ = 30.17°, 35.5°, 43.3°, 53.6°, 57.6°, and 62.3° corresponds to (220), (311), (400), (422), (511) and (440) crystalline plates of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts [22,23] respectively. Consequently, the production of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts could be concluded (Fig. 1-A). During synthesizing Fe3O4 nanocatalysts, NH4Cl is formed as a by-product and released by washing the nanocatalysts. However, in some conditions of syntheses, NH4Cl was not removed by washing. The purity is specified in each of the samples (Table 2). XRD analysis was also performed to determine the crystallite size distribution. The average crystallite size of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesized using the Scherer equation (Eq.s1) in different synthesis conditions is estimated between 8 and 12 nm. The magnetic behavior of iron oxide nanocatalysts is very sensitive to crystallinity size. Smaller particle sizes may lead to an increase in saturation magnetism and improve the efficiency of nanocatalysts.
According to Fig. 1-B, with increased power and time in microwave-assisted synthesis, a peak shift towards larger angles appeared in nanocatalysts, which raised the distance between the plates (311) and the lattice constant. During the synthesis by microwave, with the growth in power and radiation time, the temperature also rises, which induces doping NH4Cl in the Fe3O4's nanocatalysts [25]. It is primarily due to the extensive ionic radius of NH4+ (143 pm) compared to Fe+ 3 (64.5pm) which is predicted to extend the crystal [26,27]. Furthermore, doping has influenced and decreased the intensity of diffraction peaks to peak displacement. It indicates that doping could decline the crystal order of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. This tendency of modifications is compatible with the results of the XRD analysis.
As mentioned, with the increased time and radiation power in the performed syntheses, the presence of NH4CL Increased in the structure of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. It should be noted that in the process of electromagnetic or microwave heating, with rising radiation power and irradiation time, the sample temperature, amount of heat produced, and the depth of penetration of waves into materials, especially in electromagnetic absorbers, will increase [28,29]. According to the results presented in Table 1, this increase in temperature during synthesis is confirmed by raising the power and irradiation time. Therefore according to the proposed results, it could be concluded that with increasing the time and power of microwave radiation, the synthesis temperature rises, which causes an increase in impurities in the samples and dopping NH4Cl to the Fe3O4 nanocatalysts.
According to Fig. 1-B and Table 2, it could be found that increasing the time and power of microwave radiation during the synthesis of impurities NH4Cl is seen ascending in the five samples (No 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). It should be noted that all samples have been washed frequently using sufficient deionized water to conclude that NH4Cl is not eliminated by washing, and it dops on the Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. The prominent peaks' intensity and displacement would be examined to investigate and prove this issue [25,26] The most substantial diffraction peak from the plane (311) to investigate the peak shift by altering the purity of the samples was determined to examine the structural changes of the crystal unit. Figure 3 shows the magnification of the diffraction intensity from the plane (311). According to Fig. 1-B, the top of the peak changes with increasing impurity towards a greater angle. It means that the network space between the planes (311) changes, and the network space diminishes with further development of impurities [30].
3.1.2 FESEM analyses
According to the results obtained from the XRD results and the purity of the samples, the synthesized sample was further investigated at a radiation time of 1 minute and radiation power of 400 watts using FESEM (Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope) analysis. Figure 2-A shows the representative FESEM image of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesized by microwave-assisted at a power of 400 watts and an irradiation time of 1 minute, which had the most promising result in terms of purity. The spherical structure of synthesized Fe3O4 nanocatalysts is observable in the figure. It emphasizes the high efficiency of the synthesis method in this work for producing Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. The average size of synthesized Fe3O4 nanocatalysts can be 25 nm (Fig. 2-B).
3.1.3 Electromagnetic properties
The Electromagnetic properties of the synthesized sample (at a radiation time of 1 minute and radiation power of 400 watts) were examined. The expression ε' describes the dielectric constant and displays the ability of a compound to polarize due to an external electric field. The term ε'' is the dielectric loss, the efficiency of transforming EM energy into warmness. The electrical conductivity changes of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts versus frequency are illustrated in Fig. 3-A. According to the figure and slope of the dielectric constant actual part curve (ε'). The nanocatalysts are satisfactorily affected by the electromagnetic field and are well polarized under these conditions, and similar results were reported by Gharibshahi et al. [14].
The imaginary term electrical permittivity (dielectric loss: ε'') indicates the ability of materials to absorb electromagnetic waves. According to Fig. 3-B, the actual part of the electrical permittivity (ε’) demonstrates the polarization of the nanocatalysts under the electromagnetic field. The imaginary part has a significant slope. Therefore, iron oxide nanocatalysts have acceptable efficiency in absorbing electromagnetic waves.
The loss tangent (tanδ) determines the ability of a material to convert electromagnetic energy into heat at a specific frequency and temperature. Figure 3-C indicates the changes in the loss tangent in a frequency range. The more the tangential substance losses, the more time it could absorb more energy during the electromagnetic heating process and transmit more heat and energy to its surroundings. One of the effective parameters in increasing the capacity of nanocatalysts to absorb and scatter heat in the electromagnetic process is their particle size distribution. According to the results presented in Fig. 3-C and the smaller crystallite size of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesized by microwave compared to Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesized by the co-precipitation method used by Gharibshahi et al. [21]. Therefore, Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesis by microwave has more ability to absorb and dissipate heat in the electromagnetic heating process. These nanocatalyst has a hopeful potential for use in the electromagnetic heating process and could assist in dissipating heat in heavy oil reservoirs, cracking heavy component, reducing viscosity, and enhancing increasing heavy oil recovery.
3.1.4 Magnetic property measurements
To examine the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 samples synthesized-assisted microwave at 400 watts and for 1-minute irradiation, the magnetic curves of Fe3O4 samples were analyzed by VSM analysis at room temperature (300 K) by applied field − 6000 to 6000 Oe (Fig. 4). The synthesized sample was found to have a strong magnetic response to a variable magnetic field. In Fig. 6, according to the VSM results of Figure S-type of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts, it could be seen that all of these nanostructures are supra-magnetic, and the M-H curves of the Fe3O4 samples show a nonlinear characteristic with residue ( Fig. 4). The Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesized under these conditions had a saturation magnet (Ms) of 46.33 emu/g. The quantity of saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4 nanocatalysts synthesis-assisted microwaves is 34.5 emu/g [31]. According to Fig. 4, Fe3O4 nanocatalysts dispersed in an aqueous solution are rapidly separated from the solution in the vicinity of a permanent magnetic field to the bottle. This way, these nanomaterials can be easily and quickly separated from the solution by creating a magnetic field using a permanent magnet. It indicates the appropriate magnetic response of the synthesized nanocatalysts.
3.2 Data analysis
As stated, the synthesis of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts was carried out according to the general factorial design. The results of the ANOVA Table are presented in Table 2-S. Figure 5 shows the interaction between the power and time of radiation during the synthesis of the purity of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. Based on this figure and the parallelism of the two graphs, it could be concluded that the interaction between the power and the radiation time is low. Also, with increasing power and time, the amount of purity has decreased. It is because with the growth in power and time, the amount of heat produced during the synthesis boosts, and the opportunity for nucleation and growth of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts decreases. As a result, the final purity will decrease. Finally, the optimal point was determined with the conditions of radiation power: 400 watts, radiation time: 1 minute, purity of Fe3O4:99.74, and Desirability: 0.99. Also, the optimal point validation test was performed, and its results are presented in Table 1-S.
3.3 Examination of the influence of irradiation time and power in microwave-assisted synthesis
Since in the first stage of the synthesis, the synthesis by power conditions of 400 watts and the irradiation time of 1 minute had a satisfactory result and was free of impurities, the repeatability of this synthesis was investigated, and its results are presented in Table 1-S. Also, considering that by raising the irradiation time of microwave waves during synthesis to more than 1 minute and the irradiance to more than 400 watts, to ensure the effect of power and irradiation time in microwave-assisted synthesis, two syntheses were performed with the conditions presented in Table 2-S. The results of the relevant analysis are presented in Fig. 6. By improving the time and power of microwave radiation, the amount of heat produced during the synthesis process increases, and this issue causes unwanted compounds (NH4Cl) to dope on the Fe3O4 crystallite network. According to the results presented in Fig. 6 and the comparison of the synthesis conditions, it can be seen that the effect of radiation power on microwave-assisted synthesis is more critical than the time of microwave radiation. By increasing the power from 400 to 800 watts, even though the irradiation time is reduced to 30 seconds, NH4Cl has doped on the Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. At a fixed time of one minute, with the increase of power from 400 watts to 600 watts, the presence of NH4Cl can be seen again. Due to the peak intensity at 2θ = 32.65, Associated with NH4Cl, It could conclude that the effect of growing the power in creating NH4Cl and its doped Fe3O4 nanocatalysts would be more significant than improving radiation time.
3.4 Effect of electromagnetic radiation on temperature and viscosity deviation
Figure 7-A presented temperature variation under MW radiation (400 watts) with 0.1% wt and without Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. The electromagnetic field causes movement in free and bonded charges (electrons and ions) and dipoles, resulting in resistance to induced motion, which will lead to energy loss due to friction, elastic and inertial forces, and heating of materials. During microwave heating, the material's absorption of electromagnetic energy will enhance the sample's temperature. The capability to absorb electromagnetic waves is an essential parameter in raising the efficiency of the electromagnetic heating process [12].
According to Figure 7-A, with the increase in the radiation time of the waves, the temperature of both samples increased because the amount of heat produced during the process raised, which led to an increase in the temperature. Also, increasing the temperature causes cracking heavy componenets and a reduction in the viscosity of the samples. That, in the Figure 7-B, this issue is quite clear. On the other hand, the oil sample containing Fe3O4 nanocatalysts has a more significant decrease in viscosity than the sample without nanocatalysts. Since Fe3O4 nanocatalysts are electromagnetic wave absorbers with a high ability to absorb electromagnetic waves and convert them into heat, the viscosity also decreases as the temperature increases.
Furthermore, another experiment was designed and performed to compare the effect of the synthesis method (microwave-assisted and co-precipitation method) on nanocatalyst efficiency in the electromagnetic heating process with microwave waves. It should be mentioned that Fe3O4 nanocatalysts were synthesized by the co-precipitation method according to the method presented in [21]. According to Figure 7-B, the highest viscosity reduction was reported in 4 minutes and then the viscosity was rised. Therefore, this time could be the optimum point to check the effect of the type of synthesis method. In 4 minutes and 0.1% wt of nanocatalysts, the effect of the nanocatalyst synthesis method and the presence of waves were investigated.
It should be noted that after 4 minutes of microwave irradiation, the temperature of the crude oil sample, the temperature of the crude oil sample with the Fe3O4 nanocatalyst synthesized by the co-precipitation method, and the temperature of the crude oil sample with the Fe3O4 nanocatalyst synthesized with microwaves-assisted were 45, 50 and 53°C respectively. That, the amount of weight, loss of the samples due to the increase in temperature was very negligible. The results have been presented in Figure 8. According to Figure 8, the crude oil sample , the crude oil sample containing the nanocatalyst synthesized by the co-precipitation method and the crude oil sample containing the nanocatalyst synthesized with the help of microwaves caused a decrease in viscosity by 11, 23 and 28%, respectively. The nanocatalyst synthesized with the microwave-assisted has caused a more considerable viscosity reduction than the nanocatalyst synthesized by the co-precipitation method, and it is more effective in reducing viscosity and upgrading heavy oil with microwave heating.
This difference could be because the nanocatalysts synthesized with the microwave-assisted have a smaller crystallite size and more prominent absorbing microwaves than the nanocatalysts synthesized by the co-precipitation method. The crystallite size of the nanocatalyst synthesized with the help of microwave waves in this research was 8 nm (Table 2). The crystallite size of the nanocatalyst synthesized by the co-precipitation method was 18 nm. It is the cause of the higher efficiency of these particles in the microwave heating process, increasing the temperature and reducing viscosity.