Allele distribution
Extreme short alleles in the NCD group and not controls
The human DISP2 (CCG) repeat was located in a hypermutable region, in which CTG and CCA trinucleotides flanked the (CCG)-repeat, which were most likely the consequence of C to T substitutions in the forward and reverse strands, respectively. The substitutions interrupted a longer ancestral stretch of CCGs, and created a number of CCG-residues at the flanking sequences to the intact (CCG)-repeat (Fig. 1). One predominantly abundant allele of 8-repeats was detected in the human subjects studied in both groups (Fig. 2). At significantly lower frequencies, we detected 9 and 10 repeats of this STR across the two groups. In the NCD group, we found lengths of 5 and 6-repeats, which were not detected in the controls.
Genotype distribution
Overall genotype distribution
The overall genotype distribution at the region encompassing the (CCG) repeat was not significantly different between the two groups of NCD and controls (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the distribution of the haplotypes encompassing the (CCG) repeat and the CTG/CCA residues was not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0/05) (Table 1, Fig. 4).
Table 1
Combinatory genotypes across the intact (GCC)-repeat and residues.
Combinatory Genotypes |
R1 + R2 + R3 + Intact (CCG)-repeat | Controls (n) | NCDs (n) |
3 + 0 + 0 + 5/3 + 2 + 0 + 8 a | 0 | 1 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 6/3 + 2 + 1 + 8 a | 0 | 1 |
3 + 2 + 1 + 6/3 + 2 + 3 + 8 a | 0 | 1 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 8 | 94 | 78 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 1 + 8 | 70 | 50 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 3 + 8 | 22 | 23 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 4 + 8 a | 0 | 1 |
3 + 2 + 1 + 8/3 + 2 + 1 + 8 | 7 | 3 |
3 + 2 + 1 + 8/3 + 2 + 3 + 8 | 13 | 10 |
3 + 2 + 3 + 8/3 + 2 + 3 + 8 | 3 | 5 |
3 + 2 + 4 + 8/3 + 2 + 4 + 8 b | 1 | 0 |
3 + 2 + CTG + 8/3 + 2 + CTG + 8 b | 1 | 0 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 9 | 11 | 7 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/2 + 2 + 0 + 9 | 6 | 13 |
3 + 2 + 1 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 9 | 3 | 1 |
3 + 2 + 1 + 8/2 + 2 + 0 + 9 | 2 | 4 |
3 + 2 + 3 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 9 b | 2 | 0 |
3 + 2 + 3 + 8/2 + 2 + 0 + 9 | 4 | 3 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 10 b | 1 | 0 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/2 + 2 + 0 + 10 b | 1 | 0 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 0 + 0 + 11 | 1 | 1 |
3 + 2 + 0 + 9/2 + 2 + 0 + 9 | 2 | 1 |
2 + 2 + 0 + 9/2 + 2 + 0 + 9 b | 1 | 0 |
| 245 | 203 |
a NCD-only genotypes. b Control-only genotypes. R = residue |
Four combinatory genotypes were detected in the NCD group and not controls.
We detected four combinatory genotypes that were detected in the NCD group only (Fig. 5). Assessment of the patients harboring those genotypes through clinical interviews, neurological examinations, the course of the disease, and ruling out other major neurological and psychiatric disorders, indicated possible diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in patients 1, 2, and 4 (Table 2). In patient 3, there was a history of hypertension and stroke prior to the cognitive decline, indicating the diagnosis of vascular dementia (VD). All four genotypes consisted of repeat lengths across the intact (CCG)-repeat and the residues that were non-existent in the control group.
Table 2
Four NCD patients harboring combinatory genotypes that were not detected in the controls.
Patient No. | Gender | Age | AMTS | MMSE | Combinatory Genotype | Possible Diagnosis |
1 | M | 70 | 5 | NA | 3 + 0 + 0 + 5/3 + 2 + 0 + 8 | AD |
2 | M | 82 | 2 | NA | 3 + 2 + 0 + 6/3 + 2 + 1 + 8 | AD |
3 | F | 65 | 0 | NA | 3 + 2 + 1 + 6/3 + 2 + 3 + 8 | VD |
4 | F | 75 | 4 | 14 | 3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 4 + 8 | AD |
Six combinatory genotypes were detected in the NCD group and not controls.
Six combinatory genotypes encompassing the intact (CCG)-repeat and residues were detected in the controls only (Table 3. Figure 6). Those genotypes predominantly consisted of the 8-repeat.
Table 3
Six combinatory genotypes were detected in the control group and not NCDs.
Control No. | Gender | Age | AMTS | MMSE | Combinatory Genotype |
1 | M | 72 | 8 | NA | 3 + 2 + 4 + 8/3 + 2 + 4 + 8 |
2 | M | 71 | 10 | NA | 3 + 2 + CTG + 8/3 + 2 + CTG + 8 |
3 | F | 74 | 8 | NA | 3 + 2 + 3 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 9 |
4 | F | 68 | 8 | 29 | 3 + 2 + 0 + 8/3 + 2 + 0 + 10 |
5 | M | 79 | 9 | NA | 3 + 2 + 0 + 8/2 + 2 + 0 + 10 |
6 | M | 85 | 8 | NA | 2 + 2 + 0 + 9/2 + 2 + 0 + 9 |
RNA accessibility varied with different RNA heterodimers.
The potential RNA/RNA heterodimer structures differed as a result of exemplary combinatory genotypes. Those structures potentially altered accessibility of the RNA heterodimer structures at least across exons 1 and 2 (Fig. 7).
DISP2 (CCG)-repeat expanded specifically in primates.
Across all the vertebrate species studied, the DISP2 (CCG)-repeat specifically expanded beyond 2-repeats in primates (Fig. 8). The repeat formula was specific for each primate, and bushbaby, as the most basic primate among those primates, had 2-repeats at this locus.