3.1 Evolution of surface chemical composition and structure of AlN ceramics
To confirm the metallization effect of laser irradiation on the surface of AlN ceramic, the GIXRD patterns of AlN ceramic surface after different power laser irradiation are shown in Fig. 3. The results showed that the diffraction peaks of aluminum were detected on the ceramic surface except for the diffraction peaks of AlN matrix. And the intensity of the diffraction peak of aluminum enhanced with the increase of laser power, which indicated the amount of surface aluminum production increased with the increase of laser power. The result of the XRD pattern confirmed that the AlN ceramic was thermal decomposed to form Al layer and metalized under laser irradiation.
The surface morphologies of laser-metallized AlN ceramics with different processing power levels are exhibited in Fig. 4. Microgroove structures were observed on the ceramic surface due to the solidification of the material after melting. With the increase of laser power, the depth of the micro-groove structure on the ceramic surface increases. When the power was 28 W, the recast layer formed by the melting of the material did not cover the entire ceramic surface, and the shape of the ceramic particles was exposed between the two laser scanning routes, as shown in Fig. 4 (a2). With the increase of laser power, a convex structure was formed between the two laser scanning routes, and the rows of convexes constituted the microgroove structure on the ceramic surface. Besides, the circular splash particles were observed on the convex surface, and the number of splash particles increased with the increase of laser power.
Since the intensity of the laser spot is not uniformly distributed, it is Gaussian distributed. The intensity gradually decreases from the center to the edge of speckle[32]. Therefore, when the laser power was 28 W, the energy density of the spot edge was not enough to make the AlN ceramics thermolysis. Thus, the shape of ceramic particles remained between the two adjacent laser scanning paths. With the increase of laser power, the intensity of the edge of the laser spot was also enough to make the AlN ceramics undergo thermal decomposition to form the aluminum layer. While the intensity of laser spot center was higher than that of edge, part of the material was melted and vaporized forming the gas phase recoil force and pushing the liquid phase to the sides[33, 34]. After re-solidification, the parallel aligned microgrooves were fabricated along the laser scanning direction. In addition, the splash particles were visible as the power continue increased, and the number and size were expanded.
The cross-sectional SEM images of AlN ceramic irradiated by different laser powers and corresponding profile curves are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, respectively. The microgrooves textured by laser irradiation were clearly observed. As the laser power enhanced, the depth of the grooves and the thickness of the recast layers were increased. It was noted that platform regions appeared on the ceramic irradiated at 28 W, as shown in Fig. 5(a) and Fig. 6(a). These were undecomposed regions due to the insufficient power of laser spot edge, which was in accordance with the phenomenon of Fig. 4(a1, a2). As the laser power increased, the platform areas disappeared and were replaced by regular arrangement microgrooves. The cross-sectional profiles maintained a good periodic pattern and no large deviation in the position of the wave crest and trough, as shown in Fig. 6(b, c). When the laser power increased to 70 W, the import laser flux was larger and the energy density was higher, which made the material vaporized and splashed and the profile curve irregular, as shown in Fig. 6(d). Besides, when the laser was higher, the temperature and range of heat-affected zone were higher and larger. Therefore, when the next orbital laser beam was scanned, its heat-affected zone had a re-melting effect on the previous microgrooves[34]. In this case, the solidified recast layer was re-melt and distributed, resulting in a change of the profile shape.
The average depth of microgrooves on the as-metallized AlN ceramic surfaces is shown in Fig. 7(a). The structure depth of microgrooves tended to increase and then decrease with the increase of laser power. As the laser power enhanced, the energy input increased and the laser ablation effect became stronger[24, 35]. As a result, the severe ablation made the microgroove deeper. However, as the laser power further increased to 70 W, the structure depth of microgroove turned to decline slightly. This could be resulted by the re-melting effect, which caused the microgroove to re-melt and become shallower due to the wider heat-effect zone. The surface roughness of AlN ceramics irradiated at various power is shown in Fig. 7(b). The surface roughness increased monotonically with increasing of laser power, which was different with the trend of structure depth. On the one hand, the deeper microgrooves contributed to increase the surface roughness; on the other hand, the splashed particles also played an important role in the surface roughness. Both the two conditions made the AlN ceramic irradiated at 70 W achieved the highest surface roughness.
3.2 Interfacial microstructure and properties of AlN/Cu joints
The typical interfacial microstructure and element distribution map of laser-metallized AlN/Cu joint are shown in Fig. 8, and the chemical composition of each spot in Fig. 8 (a) is listed in Table 1. Due to the laser metallization induced microstructure evolution, the joint was exhibited a wave-like structure, where the Cu and ceramic were interlaced. A band-like gray phase was detected in the interface. According to the elements distribution map shown in Fig. 8(c, d), this band-like phase mainly contained elements of Al and Cu. As shown in Table 1, spot A contained 32.45% Al, 45.44% Cu, 8.47%N, and 13.64% O, and spot B contained 41.65% Al, 32.33% Cu, 8.58% N, and 17.4%O, which indicated some Al-Cu compounds formed during the brazing process. The spot C was a Cu-rich phase and confirmed to be Cu(s, s). Therefore, the typical microstructure of laser-metallized AlN/Cu joint was AlN/Al-Cu IMCs + Cu(s,s)/Cu.
Table 1
EDS results of the chemical composition at each spot in Fig. 8(a) (at.%).
Spots
|
Al
|
Cu
|
N
|
O
|
A
|
32.45
|
45.44
|
8.47
|
13.64
|
B
|
41.65
|
32.33
|
8.58
|
17.44
|
C
|
18.21
|
76.04
|
3.51
|
2.24
|
To further determine the interfacial phase, TEM analysis was performed and the results were displayed in Fig. 9. The interface was well joined without holes or other defects, as shown in Fig. 9(a). The inset in Fig. 9(a) indicated that the lower left phase was AlN. Figure 9(b) shows the HRTEM of the region A in Fig. 9(a), and its corresponding Fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern is shown in Fig. 9(c). The results showed that the interfacial phase in region A was Al4Cu9, where the atoms were ordered along the (010) crystal plane with a crystal plane spacing of 0.882 nm. The above results were consistent with our previous conclusions[30, 31] that laser-induced metallized AlN ceramic and Cu achieved metallurgical bonding through Cu-Al eutectic reaction. It is worth noting that this method can realize the joining between ceramic and Cu without additional brazing filler alloy.
The interfacial microstructures of AlN/Cu joints under various laser powers were investigated, as shown in Fig. 10. When the laser power was 28 W, the laser input flux was too little to make the AlN ceramic fully thermal decomposed to produce a sufficient amount of Al. Therefore, the insufficient Cu-Al eutectic reaction resulted in microcracks and unbonded areas at the interface between the ceramic and Cu, as shown in Fig. 10(a2). With the increase of laser power, the generation of Al increased and the sufficient Al-Cu eutectic reaction was able to form an abundant amount of liquid phase, which formed a complete and defect-free joint interface after cooling. It was worth noting that the interfacial striped Al-Cu compounds gradually widened with increasing power. In addition, the interfacial microgroove depth also increased with increasing laser power. However, when the power was increased to 70 W, overlarge laser input flux resulted in vast splash and re-melt effect, causing the depth of microgroove decline.
The shear strength of AlN/Cu joints under various laser powers is shown in Fig. 11. It was found that the shear strength of AlN/Cu joints tended to increase and then decrease with increasing laser power, and the maximum value of 11.25 MPa was obtained when the power was 56 W. When the laser power was 28 W, the AlN/Cu joints obtained a weak combination and poor shear strength, as shown in Fig. 10(a). After the laser power was increased to 42 W or higher, the laser beam was sufficient to produce sufficient Al from the thermal decomposition of AlN ceramics. The flawless interfaces and stronger combination of AlN/Cu joints were obtained. Besides, a mechanical interlocking effect of the interface was formed, which also contributed to the strength improvement. However, when the power was further increased to 70W, the depth of the microgroove structure and the joint strength was slightly reduced.
Figure 12 exhibits the fracture morphologies of ceramic side of AlN/Cu joints being irradiated at different laser powers. It was found that the fracture surface showed microgroove structures, which was consistent with interfacial structure. Under the effect of shear force, the recast layer was peeled off, exposed the inner ceramic matrix, and the degree of peeling off was different for samples irradiated with different powers. With the increase of laser power, the peeled area was gradually increased. As mentioned in Fig. 10, when the laser input power was low, the AlN ceramic obtained a poor combination with Cu, and cracks mainly propagated along the interface. When the laser power was intense, the bonding strength of completely metallized ceramics and Cu increased. The interface bonding strength exceeded the strength of the ceramic convex structure in some areas, and the crack propagated through the ceramic convex structure. In this case, more internal ceramic particles were exposed on the fracture surfaces.
The thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity of AlN/Cu joints fabricated with various laser powers are displayed in Fig. 13. The heat transfer properties of the joints increasing first and then decreasing with the increasing laser power, which showed a similar trend of shear strength. When the laser power reached 42 W, the optimal thermal diffusion coefficient and thermal conductivity of the joint were obtained, which were 59.46 mm2/s and 162.19 W/(m·k), respectively. The flawless interfaces contributed to excellent heat transfer properties. When the laser power was 28 W, the joint got a poor joining, which led to weak heat transfer properties. When the laser power increased to 42 W or higher, the heat transfer properties of joints became better due to the flawless interfaces. However, when the laser power was increased from 42 W to 70 W, the heat transfer properties went slightly worse. As previous studies report, the Al-Cu IMCs generally have low thermal conductivity (31–37 W/(m·k)), which is supposed to deteriorate the total thermal conductivity of the joint[36]. Furthermore, the increase of the thickness of Al-Cu IMCs will act as heat transfer barrier and lead to worse thermal performance[37, 38]. Therefore, as the laser power was increased from 42 W to 70 W, the number of Al4Cu9 increased and the heat transfer properties of joints weakened.