As biomedical devices contact blood after implantation, it is vital to evaluate their antithrombotic properties in vitro and in vivo. The aggregation and activation of platelets on the surface of samples is the key step, closely associated with in-stent restenosis and LST (24). In vitro, the anticoagulant ability of uncoated, PDA-PEI-coated, and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n-coated PLA was evaluated by the platelet adhesion test (Fig. 3A). After 2 h of incubation, there were severe platelets adhered to the surface of bare PLA and the PDA-PEI coating with a full spread shape or a typical pseudopodia shape, indicating that the platelets were highly activated. However, platelet adhesion on the surface of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings reduced significantly and showed a spherical shape with excellent anticoagulant effect; this effect was related to rhCol III escaping the hydroxyproline (O) sequence, which may induce platelet adhesion and activation (Fig. 3B). Quantitative analysis also confirmed that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n groups (with concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4) could significantly inhibit the adhesion and activation of platelets (Figs. 3C and 3D). Notably, the area coverage and the adherent number of platelets on the surface of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n groups decreased sharply with n ≥ 2, indicating the importance of sufficient rhCol III content for platelet inhibition.
Cell proliferation and morphology of vascular cells
The blood vessel wall is inevitably damaged during vascular stent implantation. This behavior would provoke a series of pathological reactions, including thrombogenesis, inflammatory reactions, and excessive smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration and proliferation, which may lead to in-stent restenosis (ISR). The dense and healthy EC layer could effectively contribute to the excellent thromboresistance of the endothelium and its positive functions in vascular wall remodeling (25). In a previous study, it was demonstrated that rhCol III was bound to stents by stepwise physical LBL assembly to guarantee that the materials possessed great anticoagulant activity, inhibited the adhesion and proliferation of SMCs, and selectively promoted the adhesion and proliferation of HUVECs (7). In this work, we developed an optimized protocol in which an amplified functionalization coating of a single component rhCol III was prepared by covalent bonding, as outlined above in Fig. 1. Based on the above considerations, we first evaluated the growth of vascular cells on different surfaces. The attachment and proliferation of ECs were investigated by fluorescence images. Compared with the bare PLA substrate, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, 4) coatings loaded with different amounts of rhCol III all showed better coverage of ECs according to the results of rhodamine fluorescence staining and FDA staining after 1 day and 3 days of culture, indicating good EC compatibility (Figs. 4A and S2). The above phenomenon occurred because rhCol III retained the highly adhesive fragments GER and GEK of humanized collagen type III. Moreover, the number of attached ECs was counted. As shown in Fig. 4B, the number of ECs on the surface of (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings was higher than that of the control group after 1 day and 3 days of culture. The CCK-8 assay was used to detect cell viability, and the results were shown in Fig. 4C. Importantly, compared with the rest of the samples, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 sample showed the best cell activity; however, the cell viability of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)4 group did not increase consistently with the increase in rhCol III concentration from 2 mg/mL to 4 mg/mL. This might be because the surface potential of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)4 coating was approximated and tended to approach 0 mV with the increase of rhCol III loading, which was similar to the zwitterion surface behavior, thus discouraging cell adhesion.
Based on the above results, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating was selected to further clarify the changes in gene expression after coculture with ECs by global gene expression profiling. Compared with the control group, 62 upregulated genes and 147 downregulated genes were detected in the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 group, as shown in the volcano plot (Fig. 4D). Multiple databases, including the Gene Ontology (GO) database and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database, were used for gene set enrichment analysis to identify the pathways involved. Compared with the control group, cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and apoptotic pathways were obviously upregulated in the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 group (Fig. 4E). Unexpectedly, CCL5 (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5), CEACAM6 (carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6), GATA3 (GATA binding protein 3), and XBP1 (X-box binding protein 1) were involved in all the above-mentioned signaling pathways, suggesting that they might regulate the fate of EC (Figs. 4F-4H). These results suggested that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating might activate the related signaling of ECs to induce intima formation.
Inhibiting excessive proliferation of SMC early in implantation could effectively prevent subsequent late thrombosis, late restenosis, and material failure. The attachment and proliferation of SMCs were investigated by fluorescence images. Compared with the PLA group, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, and 4) coatings all suppressed the adhesion and proliferation of SMCs to varying degrees according to the morphology results of rhodamine fluorescence staining after 1 day and 3 days of culture (Fig. 5A), and the number of SMCs adhered to the surface of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings decreased significantly. The FDA results were consistent with the results of cell fluorescence staining described above (Fig S2). In addition, the results of the cell count and the CCK-8 assay also confirmed that the cell adhesion and proliferation of the PLA group were significantly enhanced compared with those of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n groups (Figs. 5B and 5C). In particular, the extent of inhibition of SMC proliferation remained almost unchanged between the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, and 4) coatings. This phenomenon was attributed to the surface potentials of the coatings gradually approaching 0 mV with increasing rhCol III loading, as investigated in ECs. The diverse growth trend of (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, and 4) coatings on ECs versus SMCs might be due to the different sensitivity and responsiveness that interact between the material surface/interface and cells. The mechanism of rhCol III interaction with SMCs was remained under further investigation.
In summary, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating not only suppressed the excessive proliferation of SMCs but also supported the growth of ECs, which was beneficial for maintaining the blood vessel patency rate and provided evidence for the blood-contacting devices to achieve neointimal healing.
In vitro and in vivo inflammatory response
After stent implantation, the tissue is damaged, macrophages accumulate and adhere to the stent surface, and distinctively respond to slight alterations in the microenvironment by mediating transformations in the M1- and M2-polarized phenotypes (26, 27). Classical M1 polarization, associated with the proinflammatory response, could be characterized by the expression of CD86. Conversely, M2 polarization could be defined by the expression of CD206, which is associated with anti-inflammatory properties. CD68, as a specific marker, was utilized to define all macrophages (28). Furthermore, activated macrophages secrete a high level of inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-10 and IL-23) to enhance the inflammatory response and cell damage, which could induce subsequent impaired endothelialization, excessive proliferation of SMCs, and intimal hyperplasia, leading to implantation failure (29–31). Therefore, it is essential to reduce the inflammatory response for implant/interventional devices.
To investigate the anti-inflammatory function of tailored rhCol III, the fluorescein diacetate (FDA) was first performed. As shown in Fig. S3A, there were a large number of macrophages with extended pseudopods adhered to the PLA substrate. However, only a few macrophages on the surface of (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, and 4) coatings in the inactivated states were observed owing to the anti-inflammatory effect of rhCol III, as investigated in previous work (7). The results of the CCK-8 assay and the cell increase rate also confirmed that the adhesion and proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells on the surface of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n group were inhibited (Figs. S3B and S3C). In particular, with increasing rhCol III loading, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)4 coatings showed no significant difference in terms of anti-inflammatory properties. The above phenomenon might be attributed to the fact that as the rhCol III loading increased, the surface of the PLA substrate was completely covered by rhCol III, and accompanied by the surface potential of (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 2 and 4) approximated to 0 mV, thus displaying constant and comparable anti-inflammatory properties.
Immunofluorescence staining of RAW 264.7 cells was conducted to further investigate the mechanisms of inflammatory regulation of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coating (Fig. 6A). In the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, and 4) groups, the immunofluorescence signals of CD86 were significantly reduced, while the immunofluorescence signals of CD206 were markedly enhanced compared to that of the control group (Fig. 6B). Correspondingly, quantitative statistical results also revealed that the proportion of M1 polarization and the number of macrophages decreased and the proportion of M2 polarization increased in the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n groups compared to the control group (Figs. 6C and 6D). Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and the proinflammatory cytokine IL-23 were employed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory behavior of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings. As expected, compared with the PLA group, the macrophages attached to the surface of (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings released more 1L-10 and less IL-23, implying a better anti-inflammatory effect than that of the bare PLA (Figs. 6E and 6F) (32). Combining the above immunofluorescence staining results, it could be concluded that both the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)4 groups exhibited great anti-inflammatory activity with no significant difference, which was ascribed to the loading of sufficient amounts of customized rhCol III, as investigated above. Based on the results of all anti-inflammatory assays in vitro described above, (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 2 and 4) coatings were demonstrated to remarkably suppress the inflammatory response by suppressing macrophage adhesion and proliferation, promoting the polarization of macrophages toward the M2 phenotype, and modulating the expression of inflammation-related proteins.
The in vivo anti-inflammatory ability of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, and 4) coatings was further performed with subcutaneous implantation in rats. The tissue around the surface of the samples was harvested after 15 and 30 days of implantation. The inflammatory response of the samples was reflected by the thickness of the fibrous encapsulation and the number of infiltrating inflammatory cells. Generally, inflammatory cell infiltration increase, granulation tissue development increase, and a thicker fibrous encapsulation indicate a more severe tissue response (33). After 15 days of implantation, the PLA group exhibited the most severe inflammatory cell infiltration and the thickest fibrous capsule (56.6 ± 5.6 µm) compared with the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 1, 2, 4) groups (Figs. 7A and 7D). In addition, the relative intensity of CD68 fluorescence on the fibrous capsule was 72.0 ± 4.2 a.u. for control, 37.2 ± 2.9 a.u. for (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)1, 33.3 ± 2.9 a.u. for (rhCol III /PDA-PEI)2 and 22.0 ± 1.3 a.u. for (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)4, respectively (Figs. 7B and 7E). After 30 days of implantation, the inflammatory response of unmodified PLA was further strengthened. While the infiltration of inflammatory cells around the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n samples was still poor, and thin fibrous capsules were visible with thicknesses of 28.3 ± 1.7 µm, 23.6 ± 1.2 µm, and 11.3 ± 0.6 µm. In total, the in vivo anti-inflammatory results, which were consistent with those in vitro, further substantiated that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n (n = 2 and 4) coatings could effectively improve the in vivo inflammatory response of PLA substrates, displaying good tissue compatibility.
The healing of the injured endothelial layer involves complex interactions between inflammatory cells (including neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes), ECs, and SMCs, and dysregulation of these responses could result in adverse vascular remodeling, neointimal proliferation, and restenosis (34). Combined with the results of in vitro anticoagulation and vascular cell growth (ECs and SMCs) assays, it can be concluded that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating, in addition to exhibiting superior anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory potential, is also efficient both for rapid endothelialization and suppressing the excessive proliferation of SMCs. The combination of these functions is of great significance to positively induce normal and healthy repair of the damaged endothelium. Therefore, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating was utilized to further evaluate endothelialization in vivo.
In vivo endothelialization and neointima formation
To further evaluate whether our developed (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings could effectively promote in situ endothelialization while inhibiting intimal hyperplasia, long-term stenting tests in rabbit and porcine models were conducted (Fig. 8A). After 3 months of implantation in the abdominal aorta of rabbits, the stents made of bare PLA, modified with rapamycin-eluting (RAPA) and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 PLA surrounded by the neointima were harvested. As shown in the SEM images (Fig. 8B), the PLA stents were completely covered by the neointima, and the cell morphology on the inner surface of the neointima was randomly distributed, which meant that the cells covered on the bare PLA stents were not oriented. Both the RAPA- and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-modified PLA stents were completely covered by a layer of regularly arranged cells, with more cells on the surface of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated PLA stents compared to RAPA group. The cells presented an irregular state on the surface of the PLA, suggesting that the surface of the neointima was composed of different cells and secreted extracellular matrix, while the cells on the surface of RAPA- and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated PLA stents were cobblestone-like, typical of endothelial cells (35).
HE staining and immunohistochemical staining of CD68 and α-SMA were conducted to verify the luminal stenosis rate, the intensity of the inflammatory response, and the SMC phenotype of the neointima (Figs. 8C-8E). The neointima formed around the bare PLA stents was thicker than that around the RAPA and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 stents, suggesting that both RAPA and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coatings could effectively inhibit intimal hyperplasia (Fig. 8C). In addition, quantitative statistics of the lumen stenosis rate and the area of the neointima showed that compared with bare PLA stents, the restenosis rate of RAPA- and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated stents decreased sharply to 30.9 ± 0.25% and 20.4 ± 0.39%, respectively. The area of the neointima of bare PLA stents was 1.7 ± 0.02 mm2, higher than that of the RAPA (1.5 ± 0.03 mm2) and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated stents (1.1 ± 0.01 mm2) (Figs. 8F and 8G).
The inflammatory response after stent implantation further exacerbates endothelialization disorders, excessive proliferation of SMCs, and restenosis. As shown in Fig. 8D, the inflammatory response of RAPA-modified stents sharply decreased compared with that of the PLA stents, which was attributed to the anti-inflammatory properties of RAPA. In addition, lower inflammation scores were visible on (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated stents owing to the excellent anti-inflammatory activity of rhCol III (Fig. 8H), indicating that its histocompatibility and host integration are optimal.
Some literature has reported that SMCs exhibit a contractile phenotype in healthy mature organisms, which mainly maintains the elasticity and contraction of blood vessels. However, SMCs with a contractile phenotype shift to a synthetic phenotype in some pathological states (4). The in vitro vascular cell growth (including ECs and SMCs) of the single rhCol III component at different concentrations (10, 50, 100, 500 µg/mL) was first investigated. After 1 day of culture, no significant changes in EC and SMC viability were observed in any group. The groups with different concentrations of rhCol III exhibited a significant promotion of vascular cell proliferation compared to that of the PLA group after 3 days, consistent with the enhanced cell adhesion activity of rhCol III (Figs. S4A and S4B). Unexpectedly, the results of in vivo stent implantation assays demonstrated that the expression level of α-SMA-positive around the RAPA-(50.5 ± 1.5 au) and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated PLA stents (66.0 ± 2.7 au) was higher compared with the bare PLA group (32.6 ± 1.5 au), revealing that both RAPA and (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 could promote the contraction SMC phenotype and thus suppress intimal hyperplasia (Figs. 8E and 8I). The above different results of SMC growth in vitro and in vivo might have occurred because, in contrast to the mild and simple cell culture conditions in vitro, the proliferation and the regulation of the phenotype of SMCs in vivo resulted from a series of complex biochemical reactions involving coagulation, inflammation, and delayed healing, especially in the abnormal physiological environment triggered by stent implantation. The above-mentioned results confirmed that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating possessed improved anticoagulation, reduced anti-inflammation, and accelerated rapid endothelialization, which was responsible for the subsequent suppression of the excessive proliferation of SMCs and intimal hyperplasia in vivo.
To further investigate the cell types growing on the neointima, immunofluorescence staining of CD31, eNOS, and DAPI was conducted (Fig. 8J). The CD31 expression of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated PLA stents was much higher than that of the PLA and RAPA groups (Fig. 8K). The reason for the above phenomenon was that the RAPA-eluted stents inhibited the growth of SMCs and inhibited the adhesion and proliferation of ECs, resulting in intimal immature healing. Quantitative statistics of the expression of eNOS, which is the key function of endothelial cells, could reflect the degree of total endothelialization (36). As shown in Fig. 8L, the eNOS signal was much lower on PLA (41.8%) and RAPA (78.6%) stents than on (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 stents (88.5%). According to DAPI staining, the cell density on the surface of the PLA (1632 cells/mm2) and RAPA (2917 cells/mm2) stents was lower than that of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 group (3114 cells/mm2) (Fig. S5). These results suggested that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)n coatings could achieve in situ endothelialization rapidly and showed potential to realize ideal remodeling of blood vessels.
Our (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 stent illustrated advantages over RAPA-eluted stents in rabbit abdominal aorta stenting experiments. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated stents could be extended to large animal studies or even clinical trials. In response, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated CoCr stents were implanted in the coronaries of miniature pigs for 3 months to explore the safety and effectiveness of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating in vivo. As shown in Fig. 8M, the neointimal area of the implanted (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2- and RAPA-coated stents was markedly reduced compared with that of bare stents, consistent with the optical coherence tomography (OCT) results (Fig. 8N). As shown in Fig. 8O, HE staining results revealed that the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2-coated stent (1.26 ± 0.02 mm2) markedly reduced the neointimal area compared with the bare stent (4.87 ± 0.2 mm2), while there was no significant change compared with the RAPA-coated stents (1.28 ± 0.1 mm2), which was consistent with the lumen stenosis rate result (Fig. 8P). The results indicated the clinical feasibility of the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating of therapeutics for the healing of the neointima.
In conclusion, in the rabbit model, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating reduced the inflammatory response, accelerated the endothelialization process, and inhibited the transition of SMCs from a synthetic to a secretory phenotype, thereby reducing restenosis and facilitating long-term stent patency. Hence, the (rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2 coating exhibited a potential surface modification strategy to realize ideal vascular neointimal healing. Surprisingly, in the porcine animal model, the neointima formed on the surface of drug-free ((rhCol III/PDA-PEI)2) stents was slightly thinner than commercially available RAPA stents, which further increased the clinical interest in developing next generation drug-free stents.