Our retrospective study identified many significant differences between the pediatric refugee and the local Israeli populations (admission rates, length of stay, readmissions and health care coverage), highlight the need to tailor a specific approach to this unique and fragile population.
Israel is a committed member of the international treaty for the status of refugees, based on the ''convention relating to the status of refugees'' of 1951, which states that people who are subject to persecution based on race, religion, citizenship, political views etc. in their home countries are able to seek refuge in other countries 7,8.
The United Nations high commissioner for refugees guarantees that in addition to providing shelter, hosting countries must also guarantee basic human rights, including the ability to access basic health services. This guarantee is not dependent on an official recognition of refugee status by the state, in order to promise basic rights while refugee status is processed.
Refugees are generally considered to be a medically high-risk group. In many cases, they were deprived of basic health conditions before their arrival at the host countries, possibly as a consequence of torture, substandard sanitarian conditions, limited access to regular health services, low socio-economic status, and other problems8.
Refugees and asylum seekers differ from other immigrant populations in their vulnerability and special needs. This is particularly relevant for refugees who may be suffering from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, hepatitis, and mental health issues (such as post-traumatic stress disorder and depression) 8,9. While the majority of refugees flee from areas with limited health services, reaching a host country, does not necessarily immediately improve their access to health services. Factors contributing to this problem include language barriers, cultural gaps, lack of information, and fear of arrest or deportation9,10. According to Crepeau et al., health care personnel report that refugees often seek medical attention for their children later than would be expected, occasionally arriving in dire conditions that could have been avoidable with early intervention11.
The higher rates of hospitalization found in our refugee group support this claim although an alternative explanation could be a lower threshold to admit refugees due to lack of known medical history, and language and communication difficulties.
In addition, poor living conditions and low economic status can have a direct impact on personal health. These factors result in higher rates of malnutrition, and an inability to purchase medicine12. Families may live in sub sanitary living conditions with overly crowded homes and parents who are often forced to work for the majority of the day, leaving their children in different facilities for extended periods of time. Overcrowded and poor sanitation living conditions might also explain the high percentage of children of refugees admitted with integumentary pathologies seen in our study8.
The higher morbidity of the refugees demonstrated in our study can therefore be attributed to a range of variables including language barriers, which cause a delay in discharge due to the reluctance of medical staff to discharge children to parents who do not fully understand further instructions 9,13. Another reason for delay may be that medical personal underestimate the capabilities of the parents to manage the care of their children in a community that lacks the finances for good ambulatory medical services.
Regarding readmissions, it is tempting to postulate that the observed difference is a result of the more common use and easier access to medical services by the local population than are enjoyed by the refugee group.
In a study conducted in the United States, immigrants from the far east were found to be less likely to use health care services. The study reported that one of the reasons for this phenomenon resulted from cultural differences with respect to the perception of pain and suffering14. It is possible that this factor also plays a role in our refugee population. Nevertheless, we believe that in our populations, the concerning low rate of health-care coverage (77%) in the study group, especially compared to the excellent coverage among the local population (almost 100% coverage) plays a dominant role. This lack of health-care coverage is disadvantageous to the refugee group, adding to the general financial difficulties of a refugee state, and giving the economic burden of hospitalization further impact on the decision not to seek medical help, due to economic rather than medical considerations.
The Israeli national health insurance law of 1994 mandates that every Israeli citizen has to join one of the four national health insurance organizations and register in order to receive health coverage.
Although the Israeli government has made an agreement with one of the four health insurance organizations to provide refugees and their children with insurance for a reduced monthly payment, only 77% of the children in the study group had medical coverage, therefore there was no need to compare different healthcare providers. This may be due to legal issues preventing participation in this program (fear of arrest or deportation due to registration) or lack of financial capabilities. Choosing not to partake in a health insurance program may also be attributed to the existence of alternative solutions that do not necessitate medical coverage. Such options include free clinics for refugees which are supported by the Israeli Medical Association, Ministry of Health, and other various volunteer medical organizations10. Absence of insurance coverage can potentially delay the seeking of medical attention, thus resulting in a more severe medical presentation that entails a longer duration of hospital stay10.
Our limitations in this study include being a single center study, limited follow up regarding readmission in other facilities. However being the closest and referral hospital for most of these refugees at central Israel, we believe that our data is still valid in comparison to the local population.