Neurosensory Rehabilitation and Olfactory Network Recovery in COVID-19-related Olfactory Dysfunction

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-304849/v1

Abstract

Background

Non-conductive olfactory dysfunction (OD) is an important extra-pulmonary manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Prolonged COVID-19-related OD is a serious neurosensory disability. Treatment for the restoration of smell is urgently needed.

Case presentation

Two patients presenting with prolonged COVID-19-related OD underwent structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) brain scans. Two healthy controls were recruited for radiological comparison. One patient received olfactory treatment (OT) by the combination of oral vitamin A and smell training via the novel electronic portable aromatic rehabilitation (EPAR) diffusers. After four-weeks of OT, clinical recuperation of smell was correlated with interval increase of bilateral OB volumes [right: 22.5mm3 to 49.5mm3 (120%), left: 37.5mm3 to 42mm3 (12%)] and the enhancement of mean olfactory functional connectivity [0.09 to 0.15 (66.6%)].

Conclusions

Olfactory network functional defects and OB volume loss were identified in patients presenting with prolonged COVID-19-related OD. Preliminary evidence demonstrated that the combination of oral vitamin A and smell training may induce neurogenesis at the olfactory apparatus and achieve olfactory neurosensory rehabilitation. This observation should be validated in large scale randomized–controlled trials.

Background

Non-conductive olfactory dysfunction (OD) is an important extra-pulmonary manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).1 Immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors in the human olfactory epithelium (OE), supporting the pathological potential for SARS-CoV-2 binding and infection.2 Furthermore, the neurotropic properties of SARS-CoV-2 have been demonstrated in U251 cell line, Tuj1+ Pax6+ Nestin+ human brain organoids, and hamster models.35

OE is a pseudostratified columnar epithelium which consists of olfactory sensory neurons, non-neuronal supporting cells (for example: sustentacular cells, Bowman’s glands and ducts), as well as progenitor and stem cells. The OE is maintained continuously by globose basal cells (GBCs) throughout life. After substantial tissue injury, OE regeneration is further supported by the differentiation of multipotent horizontal basal cells (HBCs).6 In an attempt to harness the regenerative potential and neuroplasticity of the OE, oral vitamin A (VitA) in combination with the novel electronic portable aromatic rehabilitation (EPAR) diffuser (SOVOS, Hong Kong, China) technology were used in the treatment of prolonged COVID-19-related OD.

Case Presentation

In this case study, two patients diagnosed with prolonged COVID-19-related OD were recruited to undergo structural and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) brain scans. Non-clinical staff were invited to participate as controls (Table 1). COVID-19 patients received nasoendoscopic assessments. Detailed functional olfactory evaluations (supplementary tables 1 and 3) and SARS-CoV-2 virologic assessments can be found in supplementary notes 1.

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients and controls.

 

COVID-19 patients (n = 2)

Controls (n = 2)

Characteristics

Patient 1 (P1)

Patient 2 (P2)

Control 1 (C1)

Control 2 (C2)

Age (years)

19

41

26

29

Gender

Male

Female

Male

Female

COVID-19 Disease Status

Mild

Mild

Not applicable

Not applicable

Respiratory condition

       

SpO2 (room air)

98%

97%

   

Dyspnoea

0

0

   

Cough

0

0

   

Sputum production

0

0

   

Radiological lung changes

Nil

Bilateral patchy ground glass opacities

   

Systemic symptoms

       

Fever

0

1

   

Chills

0

0

   

Rigor

0

0

   

Malaise

0

0

   

Myalgia

0

0

   

Vomiting

0

0

   

Diarrhoea

0

0

   

SARS-CoV-2 Investigations

       

RT-PCR (Ct value)

Positive (23.79)

Positive (22.06)

Negative

Negative

Date of RT-PCR virologic diagnosis

31 March 2020

16 March 2020

   

Date of RT-PCR virologic clearance

2 May 2020

6 April 2020

   

Serology (MN titre)

Positive (1:40)

Positive (1:40)

Negative (< 1:10)

Negative (< 1:10)

Nasoendoscopy Assessments

No anatomical abnormalities

No anatomical abnormalities

Not available

Not available

Olfactory Function Assessments

Onset of Olfactory Dysfunction

25 March 2020

23 March 2020

   

BTT score (baseline)

       

Baseline

0.5

0.5

6.5

4.5

2 weeks

1.0

Not available

Not available

Not available

4 weeks

2.0

Not available

Not available

Not available

Smell Identification Test

       

Baseline

Ansomia

Severe Microsmia

Not available

Not available

4 weeks

Severe Microsmia

Not available

Not available

Not available

Smoking Status

Non-smoker

Non-smoker

Non-smoker

Non-smoker

Drinking Status

Social drinker

Non-drinker

Non-drinker

Non-drinker

Past Surgical History

       

Head injuries

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Neurosurgery

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Maxillofacial surgery

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Past Medical History

GPH

GPH

GPH

GPH

BTT: butanol threshold test; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; Ct value: cycle threshold value; GPH: good past health; MN titre: microneutralization assay titre; RT-PCR: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SpO2: oxygen saturation.

 

All participants underwent MRI brain scans using a 1.5T MR scanner (SIGNA; GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, United States). Structural and three-dimensional (3D) arterial spin labeling images were acquired. Volumetric analyses of the olfactory bulbs (OB) were performed. MR spectroscopy was performed using the single voxel point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) at the gyrus rectus (GR) and superior frontal cortex (SFC).

rs-fMRI brain scans were collected using a gradient-echo echo-planar sequence sensitive to blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast. Hypothesis-driven region of interest (ROI) approach was applied. The olfactory network seed regions were defined at the caudate nuclei.7 With reference to the automated anatomical labeling template, rs-fMRI data were segmented into 90 regions, of which 28 out of 90 regions were associated with the functional olfactory cortical networks (OCN; Fig. 1A). The functional connectivity (FC) between seed regions and OCN ROIs were obtained by extracting the average time series from individual ROIs and calculating the correlation. Detail methodology of the MRI data acquisition can be found in the supplementary notes 2.

Serial rs-fMRI FC images of the olfactory network are shown (Fig. 1B–D). Olfactory network FC were reduced in COVID-19 patients when compared to controls. FC were homogenously decreased in the right and left caudate seed regions for patient 1 (P1) and patient 2 (P2), respectively (supplementary tables 4).

Structural MRI brain scans showed OB volume defects in COVID-19 patients (supplementary table 5) when compared to controls. MR spectroscopy confirmed neuronal loss (supplementary Fig. 1C), as evident by reduction of N-acetylaspartate levels at the GR and SFC.

After baseline rs-fMRI assessments, olfactory treatment (OT) was initiated for patient 1 (P1). Oral VitA 25,000IU [7,500µg retinol activity equivalents (RAE); Carlson Laboratories, Illinois, USA] soft gels were prescribed daily for two weeks in combination with smell training (ST) thrice daily for four weeks via the novel EPAR diffusers. Video demonstrations and methodological details of ST can be found in the online supplementary information (supplementary note 3; supplementary materials 2 and 3).

Clinical improvements in olfaction were documented serially by subjective questionnaires (supplementary tables 1 and 2) and objective olfactory quantitation (Table 1) for P1 after OT. Butanol threshold test (BTT) revealed improvement in olfactory sensitivity from more than 4–1%. Smell identification test (SIT) confirmed categorical improvement in olfaction from anosmia to severe microsmia. Notably, there were measurable increase in the bilateral OB volumes [supplementary table 5; right side: 22.5mm3 to 49.5mm3 (120%), left side: 37.5mm3 to 42mm3 (12%)] in P1 after OT.

Olfactory recovery in P1 was correlated with significant improvements in the mean olfactory FC [0.09 to 0.15 (66.6%); supplementary table 4], when compared with pre-OT baseline scans. FC improvements were documented in both primary [left piriform cortex (PC), and right amygdala] and secondary (bilateral GR, and medial orbitofrontal cortices) OCN areas (Fig. 1B–D). Importantly, there were corresponding increase in regional CBF at the bilateral PC (left: 17.43%, right: 10.99%) and multiple secondary OCN regions (supplementary table 6), demonstrating robust neurovascular coupling.

Discussion And Conclusion

In this case study, COVID-19-related OD was correlated with OB volume loss and abnormal MR spectroscopy findings, indicating neuronal destruction in the central nervous system (CNS) secondary to COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, rs-fMRI demonstrated olfactory FC impairments, thereby providing further insights into the underlying neuropathological process of COVID-19-related OD.

In the treatment for COVID-19-related OD, one patient was successfully challenged with oral VitA and ST, as demonstrated by (1) interval improvements in olfactory function; (2) structural restoration in OB volumes; as well as (3) olfactory network recovery and (4) enhanced cerebral perfusion. We hypothesis that VitA is an important metabolic substrate for robust neurogenesis at the olfactory apparatus and enhancement of olfactory functional neural connectivity. However, due to the limited scope of this report, the therapeutic efficacy of oral VitA and ST in the restoration of smell should be validated in large scale randomized–controlled trials.

The integrity of the mammalian OE is preserved by the mitotically active GBCs and dormant HBCs. The dormancy of HBCs is maintained by Notch1 signaling which is correlated with the expression of transcription factor protein 63 (ΔNp63α). During extensive OE injury, Notch1 signals and ΔNp63α expressions are downregulated, leading to HBCs activation and differentiation.8 Retinoic acid (RA), the active metabolite of VitA, has been shown to reduce ΔNp63α expression in HBCs, thereby promoting the differentiation of multipotent Sox2+ and Pax6+ progenitors via the canonical Wnt signaling pathway in the OE.6 Furthermore, the neurophysiological importance of RA signaling in the OE has been further demonstrated in the maintenance and survival of Ascl1+ GBCs.

Within the CNS, RA machineries have been identified in the murine and human brains, especially at the hippocampus and dentate gyrus. RA increases neurogenesis in the rodent subventricular zone (SVZ)–OB pathway, as demonstrated by increased bromodeoxyuridine-positive (BrdU+, proliferating cell marker) cells in SVZ neurospheres and altered cellular migration to the olfactory bulbs.9 In addition, depletion of doublecortin-positive (DCX+, immature neuronal marker) cells in the adult murine dentate gyrus was evident in the retinoid–deficient mouse model, indicating the crucial role of RA in the survival of neural progenitors.10

Olfactory stimulation via ST, as non-pharmaceutical intervention for post-infectious OD, was used to complement the therapeutic effects of oral VitA. MRI studies in ST-treated patients have demonstrated functional network improvements and structural increase of cortical thickness in the frontal cortex, where the olfactory apparatus is located. The exact therapeutic mechanism of ST is unknown; however, olfactory stimulations remain essential to the neuro-rehabilitation processes. Reversible and irreversible olfactory occlusion experiments in murine models have shown that olfactory stimuli are contributory to olfactory neurogenesis and glomeruli maturation. In this report, ST was delivered by the novel EPAR diffusers, which utilized ultrasonification to generate aerosolized essential oils for olfactory stimulation. The EPAR diffuser technology enhances the ST experience by facilitating the physiological penetration of aromatic molecules through the olfactory meatus to the OE at the roof of the nasal cavity, therefore providing potent olfactory stimulation and neurosensory rehabilitation.

In conclusion, structural and functional olfactory defects were identified in patients presenting with prolonged COVID-19-related OD. Preliminary evidence suggested that combination treatment by oral VitA and ST may induce robust neurogenesis at the olfactory apparatus, attain restoration of functional network connectivity, and achieve olfactory neurosensory rehabilitation. The therapeutic efficacy of oral VitA and ST for COVID-19-related OD should be validated in large scale randomized–controlled trials.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent

This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority–UW 20-454. Written informed consents were obtained.

Competing interests

S.S. has received speaker’s honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis Hong Kong Limited and Abbott laboratories Limited. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Shaw Foundation Hong Kong; Michael Seak-Kan Tong; Richard Yu and Carol Yu; May Tam Mak Mei Yin; Jessie & George Ho Charitable Foundation; Perfect Shape Medical Limited; Respiratory Viral Research Foundation; Hui Ming, Hui Hoy and Chow Sin Lan Charity Fund Limited; Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen, China (SZSM201911014); High Level-Hospital Program, Health Commission of Guangdong Province, China; Consultancy Service for Enhancing Laboratory Surveillance of Emerging Infectious Diseases and Research Capability on Antimicrobial Resistance for the Department of Health of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government; Theme-Based Research Scheme (T11/707/15) of the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, China. The funding sources played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Authors’ contributions

T. W.-H. C., I. H.-F. N., and H. K.-F. M. conceived the study. T. W.-H. C., H. Z. and H. K.-F. M. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript draft. T. W.-H. C. and F. K.-C. W. performed the olfactory assessments. H. Z. and H. K.-F. M. conducted the rs-fMRI scans and analyses. T. W.-H. C. and K. H. C. performed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and serology tests and analyses. S.S, V. C.-C.-C, I. H.-F. N., and K. Y. Y. were involved in the patient recruitment, data analysis, and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence and request for materials

should be addressed to H. K.-F. M., T. W.-H. C., or I. H.-F. N.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank SOVOS (Hong Kong, China) for their non-monetary donations of essential oils and EPAR diffusers for the purpose of smell training in the olfactory treatment.

References

  1. Chung TW, Sridhar S, Zhang AJ, et al. Olfactory Dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: Observational Cohort Study and Systematic Review. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;7(6):ofaa199. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa199 [published Online First: 2020/06/18]
  2. Chen M, Shen W, Rowan NR, et al. Elevated ACE2 expression in the olfactory neuroepithelium: implications for anosmia and upper respiratory SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication. European Respiratory Journal 2020:2001948. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01948-2020
  3. Chu H, Chan JF, Yuen TT, et al. Comparative tropism, replication kinetics, and cell damage profiling of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV with implications for clinical manifestations, transmissibility, and laboratory studies of COVID-19: an observational study. Lancet Microbe 2020;1(1):e14-e23. doi: 10.1016/s2666-5247(20)30004-5
  4. Zhang B-Z, Chu H, Han S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects human neural progenitor cells and brain organoids. Cell Research 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0390-x
  5. Zhang AJ, Lee AC, Chu H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects and damages the mature and immature olfactory sensory neurons of hamsters. Clin Infect Dis 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa995 [published Online First: 2020/07/16]
  6. Fletcher RB, Das D, Gadye L, et al. Deconstructing Olfactory Stem Cell Trajectories at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Stem Cell 2017;20(6):817-30.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.04.003 [published Online First: 2017/05/17]
  7. Kollndorfer K, Fischmeister FP, Kowalczyk K, et al. Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss. Neuroimage Clin 2015;9:401-10. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.004 [published Online First: 2015/11/26]
  8. Herrick DB, Lin B, Peterson J, et al. Notch1 maintains dormancy of olfactory horizontal basal cells, a reserve neural stem cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(28):E5589-e98. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701333114 [published Online First: 2017/06/24]
  9. Wang TW, Zhang H, Parent JM. Retinoic acid regulates postnatal neurogenesis in the murine subventricular zone-olfactory bulb pathway. Development 2005;132(12):2721-32. doi: 10.1242/dev.01867 [published Online First: 2005/05/20]
  10. Jacobs S, Lie DC, DeCicco KL, et al. Retinoic acid is required early during adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(10):3902-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511294103 [published Online First: 2006/03/01]