The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes from both sample types was found to be 26 (3.39%), which was characterized and confirmed both phenotypically and molecularly. The current finding is in line with the findings of Kramarenko et al. (2013) (2.6%), Reda et al. (2016) (2.94%), Ndahi et al. (2014) (4%), Walker et al. (1990) (4.1%), Morobe et al. (2009) (4.3%), Mengesha et al. (2009) (4.8%), Molla et al. (2004) (5.1%), Leong et al. (2014) (5.3%), Gebretsadik et al. (2011) (5.4%), and Garedew et al. (2015) (6.25%). However, it is lower than the findings of Wang et al. (2013) (12.4%), Khen et al. (2015) (17%), Zafar et al. (2020) (26.66%), and Rahimi et al. (2010) (32.7%). But it is higher than the report of Nayak et al. (2015) (1.5%).
The meat sample-based prevalence of L. monocytogenes was found to be 4.17%. This is in agreement with the findings of Gebretsadik et al. (2011) (2.6%), Nastasijevic et al. (2017) (3.3%), Ndahi et al. (2013) (3.92%), and Garedew et al. (2015) (6.66%). However, it is lower than the reports of Reda et al. (2016) (8%), Shen et al. (2013) (9.6%), Wang et al. (2013) (10.3%), Teixeira et al. (2019) (12%), Khen et al. (2015) (14%), Awadallah and Suelam (2014) (15%), Indrawattana et al. (2011) (15.4%), Kramarenko et al. (2013) (18.7%), and Demaîtrea et al. (2020) (45.6%). But it is higher than the finding of Nayak et al. (2015) (0%). Likewise, the milk sample-based prevalence of L. monocytogenes was found to be 2.6%. The current report is in agreement with the reports of Rawool et al. (2007) (0.41%), Rahimi et al. (2010) (1.1%), Garedew et al. (2015) (4.0%), Muhammed et al. (2013) (4%), Nayak et al. (2015) (4.0%), Hamdi et al. (2007) (4.29%), Kevenk and Gulel (2015) (5%), and Kalorey et al. (2008) (5.1%). But it is lower than the reports of Seyoum et al. (2015) (5.6%), Obaidat and Stringer (2019) (7.54%), Gebretsadik et al. (2011) (13%), Morobe et al. (2009) (5.3%), Reda et al. (2016) (8%), James et al. (2018) (8.8%), Kramarenko et al. (2013) (18.1%), Jamali et al. (2013) (21.7%), and Zafar et al. (2020) (40%). In general, the variation both in the overall and sample-wise prevalence rates of L. monocytogenes might be due to differences in sample types of foods of bovine origin, sources of the samples, processing plants, approaches of sample collection, sample size, methodological approaches, isolation and identification techniques, prevalence calculation/interpretation, geographical locations, hygienic conditions, handling and transportation of samples, and contamination rates from utensils and personnel. The serovars that were identified in the current study belonged to 1/2b and 4b. Demaîtrea et al. (2020) and Kevenk and Gulel (2015) were also reported these serovars in addition to some others. In general, the most common causes of human listeriosis among the 13 serotypes of L. monocytogenes are 1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b, and of these, serotypes 4b has been related to the most recent outbreaks of listeriosis, and serotypes 1/2a and 4b are commonly reported in animals (Datta et al. 2013; Doumith et al. 2004a; Doumith et al. 2004b; Kasalica et al. 2011; Kasper et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2006; Mateus et al. 2013; Roberts et al. 2006). The presence of molecular serogroup 1/2b and 4b isolates (potential serotype 4b) in food of bovine origin may pose a great health threat since L. monocytogenes 4b has caused numerous human listeriosis outbreaks (Ward et al. 2010).
In the present study, the antimicrobial susceptibility results indicated as large proportions of the isolates were found to be highly susceptible to ampicillin (88.46%) and vancomycin (84.62%). However, the isolates had shown the highest level of resistance against nalidixic acid (96.15%). The highest intermediate was observed in amoxicillin (57.69%). This is in agreement with the reports of Garedew et al. (2015) who reported a high degree of resistance against nalidixic acid (50%) and tetracycline (37.5%) but the highest level of sensitivity to vancomycin (100%); Khen et al. (2015) who reported 97% of susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin, Shen et al. (2013) who reported 100% of susceptibility vancomycin, Zafar et al. (2020) who reported 100% of susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin, James et al. (2018) who reported 100% of susceptibility to ampicillin, gentamycin, and vancomycin and 24.2% of resistance against tetracycline, Kevenk and Gulel (2015) who reported a high level of sensitivity ampicillin (78.9%), penicillin G (77%), erythromycin (71.2%), and vancomycin (67.3%), Rahimi et al. (2010) who reported 100% of susceptibility to vancomycin and 96.4% of resistant against nalidixic acid. This is contradicted by the findings of Welekidan et al. (2019) who reported a high degree of resistance against amoxicillin (50%) and vancomycin (50%), Jamali et al. (2013) who reported a high degree of resistance against clindamycin (100%), ampicillin (95.7%), erythromycin (95.7%), penicillin (91.3%), tetracyclin (82.6%), streptomycin (78.3%), and vancomycin (69.7%), Garedew et al. (2015) who reported a high degree of resistance against penicillin (66.7%) and the highest level of sensitivity to amoxicillin (100%), cloxacillin (100%), and Gentamicin (100%). It is similar to the findings of Wang et al. (2013) who reported 13.6% of intermediate response to ciprofloxacin. Moreover, 23.10%, 34.62%, and 42.31% of the isolates showed resistance to one, two, and more than two drugs, respectively. This is lower than the findings of Obaidat and Stringer (2019) who reported 96.9% of multidrug resistance. But, it is higher than the report of Garedew et al. (2015) (16.7%), and Escolar et al. (2017) who reported a 2% of resistance to two antibiotics and 2% resistance to three antibiotics, Kevenk and Gulel (2015) who reported that 15.3% of the isolates were resistant to only one drug and 36.5% were resistant to multiple drugs. But it is lower than the reports of Wang et al. (2013) who reported 72.3% of multiple drug resistance. In general, L. monocytogenes is usually susceptible to a wide range of antimicrobials. Nevertheless, the evolution of bacterial resistance towards antibiotics has been accelerated considerably by the selective pressure exerted by the over-prescription of drugs in clinical settings and their heavy use as promoters in animals husbandry (Charpentier et al. 1995). Moreover, the genes responsible for antibiotic resistance could be transferred through movable genetic elements such as conjugative transposons, mobilizable plasmids, and self-transferable plasmids to other foodborne bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. In Listeria spp., efflux pumps have also been reported as the resistant mechanism (Lungu et al. 2011). Hence, the use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine is the main cause of the development of AMR foodborne bacterial pathogens including L. monocytogenes, as AMR pathogens can easily be transported from animal to human via food consumption (Conter et al. 2009).