In the current study, we found that central resistance to thyroid hormones increased risk of high RC levels only in women, regardless of possible confounding risk factors, suggesting that gender can affect regulation of sensitivity to thyroid hormones on serum RC levels. As far as we know, this is the first study to explore the association of sensitivity to thyroid hormones with risk of high RC levels in a longitudinal cohort of euthyroid adults.
Recently, RC has attracted attention for its more abundant, larger, carrying more cholesterol than LDL-C particles. Hence, it is more likely that RC is more harmful to people’s health. Several epidemiological studies have shown that high levels of RC may potentially yield important residual risk information for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) beyond traditional lipid profiles including LDL-C and apolipoprotein B in patients without known ASCVD(1, 2), suggesting that RC is essential for the primary prevention of CVD. Furthermore, elevated RC levels were independently correlated with an increased risk of coronary artery calcium progression and adverse cardiovascular outcomes (17, 18). Further evidence suggested that elevated RC levels are also associated with metabolic diseases, such as diabetes and its complications and NAFLD (19, 20). Gene mutations, environmental factors, lifestyle, hormone homeostasis and inflammation contributed to high levels RC (21, 22). Previous studies showed that high levels RC were positively correlated with age, BMI, blood pressure and blood glucose(4, 21, 23). Consistent with that, we found that participants with high RC levels had higher age, BMI, SBP, DBP, FBG and HbA1c at baseline. We also found that low-grade inflammation makers such as WBCC and neutrophil count increased in participants with high RC levels.
Both Clinical and experimental studies support a key role of thyroid hormones even within the reference range in the regulation of lipid metabolism(24, 25). Interestingly, FT3, FT4, and TSH has been suggested to be positively associated with dyslipidemia in euthyroid individuals or some disease status(26–28). These contradictory conclusions in previous studies indicate a complex interplay between numerous mechanisms underlies the pathophysiologic links between thyroid hormones and lipid metabolism. Current literature reveals that central resistance to thyroid hormone which characterized by elevated levels of thyroid hormones and TSH can be accompanied in some disease conditions, due to homeostatic compensation. TT4RI, TSHI and TFQI have been considered to be a reliable surrogate of central sensitivity to thyroid hormones, while FT3/FT4 ratio has been proposed as a surrogate marker of peripheral sensitivity to thyroid hormones in many studies. Currently, a large multicenter retrospective study indicated that high levels of TT4RI, TSHI and TFQI increased risk of dyslipidemia, while high levels of FT3/FT4 decreased risk of dyslipidemia in patients with coronary heart disease (14). In addition, high levels of RC could be corrected by T4 replacement therapy (29). In light of this, it is plausible that sensitivity to thyroid hormones affects the risk of high RC levels. To our best knowledge, there was only one study that explored the association of sensitivity to thyroid hormones with high RC levels(13). However, this study was conducted with a cross-sectional study design. No data have been available so far on the longitudinal associations of incident high RC levels with sensitivity to thyroid hormones. In the present study, we found that FT3 levels at baseline were significantly higher in the high RC group, while FT4 and TSH levels at baseline showed increased trends in the high RC group. Together these findings suggest that resistance to thyroid hormones state may exist in the development of high RC levels. To confirm this this hypothesis, we further found that TT4RI, TSHI and TFQI at baseline were significantly higher in females with incident high RC levels, while FT3/FT4 at baseline showed decreased trends. Moreover, high levels of baseline TT4RI, TSHI and TFQI were independent risk factors for the increased risk of incident high RC levels in females, consistent with the cross-sectional study (13). However, we did not find the differences of TT4RI, TSHI ,TFQI and FT3/FT4 at baseline in males between the high RC group and the normal RC group, indicating that gender differences in the relationship between resistance to thyroid hormones and high RC levels. Therefore, the female population with central resistance to thyroid hormones need more attention in the clinical practice. Although the link between central resistance to thyroid hormones and incident high RC levels is more consistent in females, the exact mechanism behind this phenomenon has still remained unclear. One possible explanation is that estrogen modify the central resistance to thyroid hormones related to high RC levels. In the present study, females aged < 48 years old with the highest tertiles of TSHI ,TT4RI, and TFQI were 2- fold, 1.9-fold, and 1.8-fold, respectively, more likely to incident high RC levels, compared to the lowest tertiles adjusted for multiple potential confounders, but these associations did not remain significant in females aged ≥ 48 years old after adjustment for demographic and traditional risk factors. We speculate that sex hormones may be involved in the pathophysiological process of central resistance to thyroid hormones to incident high RC levels. The exact mechanism warrants investigation in future studies.
The strengths of the present study are that we designed a large longitudinal study to explore the association between sensitivity to thyroid hormones with incident high RC levels in Chinese euthyroid adults and examine gender differences in this association. However, this study has several limitations. First, participants were recruited from a single center, so whether these results are generalizable in other populations is uncertain. Second, we did not measure estrogen in females, so we could not explore the role of estrogen in the link between sensitivity to thyroid hormones with incident high RC levels. Finally, RC was indirectly calculated based on levels of TC, LDL-C and HDL-C rather than a direct measurement in our study. However, estimated RC which is well correlated with direct measurement is an affordable and inexpensive method in clinical practice.