Management of DKA requires early identification through a high index of suspicion by taking a thorough yet targeted history and clinical examination and utilization of appropriate diagnostic tools, including blood glucose, ketone, blood gas, and electrolyte measurement, alongside other supportive tests to identify predisposing/ precipitating factors, comorbidities and complications (23). Having access to multidisciplinary care through diabetes teams and the availability of well-laid-out pathways for DKA management is also highly recommended, in addition to critical care and monitoring support (23).
At the Aga Khan University Hospital, a tertiary level, private teaching, and referral facility, there is access to most of the required services and resources spite it being in a developing global region. This study found that amongst patients admitted with DKA over a 5-year period (2017–2021), including 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 to 2021), the majority had type 2 diabetes, were males, and had missed their doses of medications in the previous one week. Infection was found to be the most likely precipitant of DKA in our patients (predominantly gastrointestinal and pulmonary), followed by newly diagnosed diabetes and missed doses of medication. Mortality in our study was low at 1.3% (2 patients), and both patients who died had resolved DKA at the time of death and had underlying fatal conditions. Therefore we had no mortality directly attributable to attributable to DKA.
Desse et al. assessed the predictors and treatment outcomes of hyperglycemic emergencies at a public University hospital in Ethiopia and found that the majority of patients were male, and over 90% had DKA, though 64% had T1D (24). Our study also found a male predominance, but a higher proportion of our patients known to have diabetes had T2D (70%). In a similar study conducted in South Africa, there was no significant gender difference, and 60% of patients with DKA had T1D, similar to the Ethiopian study and a more recent study at the Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya (22, 24, 25). In all these studies, the lower cut-off age value was less at 14, 15, and 13 years in the South African, Ethiopian, and Kenyan studies, respectively, compared to 18 years in our study (22, 24, 25). The mean age was higher in our study (47 years), explaining the higher proportion of patients having T2D versus T1D. A 14-year retrospective study from Bangkok, Thailand, had a higher mean age of patients with DKA (47.4 ± 20.4 years) and found a higher proportion of patients with T2D, like our study. They, however, found a higher female predominance (61.5%) (26).
About a 10th of the patients with DKA in this study presented with osmotic symptoms, and almost one in five had altered levels of consciousness. Desse et al. found that the most common presenting symptoms in Ethiopia were polyuria and polydipsia, similar to findings from Nigeria and Libya (24, 27, 28). However, another Ethiopian study found that abdominal pain and vomiting were the prominent presenting features (29). In Kenya, an altered level of consciousness was found in over 90% of presentations for DKA in a public tertiary referral facility, with almost a quarter in coma (30). The majority of our patients presented with severe DKA (46%), and almost a quarter had mild DKA. This was contrary to the study by Desse et al., which found that three-quarters of the patients had mild DKA, with only 5.4% having severe DKA (24). A study from Thailand in similar settings found that 45.7% of their patients had mild DKA, and severe DKA was found in about a third of their patients (26). The differences could be explained by later presentations and referrals to our facility and possible lack of early recognition and detection of DKA at primary and secondary level hospitals since similar findings are noted from other studies in Kenya (22, 30). Another explanation could be the poorer glucose control (high HbAIc) in our study, indicating a lower threshold to DKA and therefore more severe DKA at presentation.
Similar to our study, in their study, Desse et al. found that hyperglycemic emergencies were most precipitated by infections (59%), poor medication compliance (32.3%), and a new diagnosis of Diabetes (23.6%) (24). However, in their study, urinary tract infections were the predominant infection, followed by pulmonary infections. In our study, gastrointestinal and pulmonary infections were the most common precipitant infections for DKA, similar to a study from Thailand, which found gastrointestinal infections (40%), urinary tract infections (22%), and pulmonary infections (15%) as the most common precipitant infections (26). In our study, pneumonia as a as the most common precipitant could be due to COVID-19 pandemic. However, a similar study from Kenya, conducted about 18 years ago in a public teaching and tertiary referral hospital, found that pulmonary and genito-urinary infections were the most common precipitant infections for DKA, similar to a recent study from the same facility (22, 30). However, compared to the previous study from Kenya, the more recent one (2018) found that a new diagnosis of diabetes was a more common precipitant of DKA than infections (22, 30). Additionally, in a study in China on DKA precipitants in patients with T2D, pulmonary and urinary tract infections were the most common precipitants (31). In our study, only 1 patient had a genitourinary infection as a DKA precipitant, though the diagnosis was chart based, not on a urine analysis. This could have missed silent/ asymptomatic genitourinary infections. Therefore, we feel that this needs further exploration.
Early recognition and prompt treatment are crucial in DKA management to avert prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality (15). The mainstay of treatment remains rehydration, early insulin initiation, identification and treatment of precipitants, and management of electrolyte imbalance (23). In our study, the mean amount of insulin used was 110 units, including both basal and short-acting. We had a 100% uptake of basal insulin during the duration of DKA, which could have contributed to a lower overall use of insulin for DKA resolution compared to other similar studies. The mean amount of insulin used in the study by Desse et al. was 136.85 ± 152.41 units till the resolution of DKA/ HHS, and they did not specify the use of basal insulin (24).
Our study's most frequently used fluid for DKA management was normal saline, followed by dextrose-saline (DNS) when the sugars were lower than 14 mmol/l. However, of note is that almost two-thirds of our patients received ringers’ lactate at some point during DKA management. The current guidelines still recommend normal saline as the first choice of fluids (23, 32) for DKA management, but there is emerging evidence on the role of balanced crystalloids like Plasmalyte and Ringer's lactate as the fluid of choice for rehydration in DKA to reduce hyperchloremia and improve renal functions (33–35). A small, randomized clinical trial conducted in South Africa, comparing Normal Saline with Ringer Lactate for DKA management revealed no difference in time to DKA resolution and that it took longer for glucose normalization with Ringer Lactate compared to Normal Saline (36)
Our study's average length of hospital stay was 4 days, with a mean of 48 hours in critical care, whereas the mean time to DKA resolution (from the presenting time to casualty) was 30 hours. The length of hospital stay was slightly more than a similar study from Thailand (3 days) but less than studies from Ethiopia (5 and 6 days) and South Africa (8.9 days) (24–26, 29). In the United Kingdom, the median length of hospital stay following adherence to the DKA protocol was 2 days, with a median time to DKA resolution of 12 hours and 6 minutes (37). The median time to DKA resolution in the study from Thailand was lower than in our study and the UK study, at only 8 hours, whereas the study from Ethiopia by Desse et al. found a mean time to DKA resolution of 64.38 hours, which was longer than in our study. The reason for the relatively long duration of DKA resolution in our study is not clear and could be due to delays in treatment initiation or maintenance, or due to patients presenting in severe DKA, requiring longer time to resolution. However, this needs further exploratory studies.
Data looking at trends of DKA in the US over a 15-year period revealed that although over the last six years, there was an increase in hospitalization for DKA at an annual rate of 6.3%, the in-hospital mortality from DKA decreased significantly from 1.1–0.4% (16). A retrospective study in a tertiary-level facility in Saudi Arabia also found low mortality rates at 1.83% (38).
However, in budget-restricted resource settings, particularly in the developing world, the case-fatality rates for DKA are higher. A recent study conducted over a 5-year duration at the Kenyatta National Hospital, a tertiary referral facility in Nairobi, Kenya, found a mortality rate of 6.9% in children aged 0–18 years presenting with DKA. The average duration of stay in this study was eight days, and factors associated with high mortality were high serum creatinine, decreased urine output, and altered consciousness level (17). A study conducted at the same facility over 15 years ago, including adults (age over 12 years) admitted with a diagnosis of DKA, found that half of the patients were newly diagnosed with diabetes, and 90% had high HBAIC (> 8%). Patients presented with complicated DKA, having altered levels of consciousness, severe hypotension, and moderate-severe dehydration. The study showed a high mortality rate of 29.8% within 48 hours of admission (30) High mortality rates of over 17% were also reported from a rural facility in South Africa (25). However, a study conducted in a multidisciplinary diabetes center in Thailand found a lower mortality rate of 4.3% but high rates of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia (26).
Overall mortality from hyperglycemic emergencies in the Ethiopian study was 9.8%. High admission creatinine, sepsis, and the presence of comorbidities were associated with high mortality (24).
In this study, despite patients presenting with more severe DKA and having poorly controlled diabetes, the much lower mortality can be attributed to several factors, including the availability of specialist endocrinologists for all DKA admissions, admission and care in high dependency and critical care units, use of a standard DKA pathway, availability of POC glucose, ketone, blood gas monitoring, and good laboratory support.
Almost 80% of patients in our study did not develop any DKA complications. The most common complication in our study was acute kidney injury (AKI) (14%), but at discharge, the mean creatinine was within the target range. Circulatory shock was recorded in 2.7% of our patients. In the study from Thailand, hypokalemia was the most common complication (26%), similar to a study from Saudi Arabia, which also found AKI as a common complication (26, 38). We did not find hypokalemia as a complication because of the high potassium supplementation in our study and the frequent monitoring of potassium through blood gases and laboratory tests.
Our study included patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, both COVID-19-positive and negative patients. Although the numbers of COVID-19-positive patients with DKA were small (23 patients), we attempted to compare DKA severity and outcomes between the three groups. We found that there was no difference in pre-diagnosis of diabetes between the groups, but there was a significant difference in the severity of DKA. More patients who were COVID-19 positive presented with moderate DKA compared to those who were negative for COVID-19 or those in the pre-COVID pandemic, the majority of whom presented with severe DKA. In our study, a comparison between the pre-COVID-19 pandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic found a significant difference in pneumonia as a DKA precipitant, but there was no statistically significant difference in DKA severity, or DKA outcomes (mortality, units of insulin used, length of hospital stay and time to DKA resolution).
A large retrospective study from the US assessing DKA outcomes pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID-19 PCR+) included 11 facilities in New York, and they also found that there was no significant difference in the pre-diagnosis of diabetes pre-pandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic. They did not find significant differences in the severity of DKA between the two periods. However, they did find a significant difference in mortality; 46.3% during the COVID-19 pandemic versus 18% pre-pandemic (39).
STRENGTHS/ LIMITATIONS
This is the first long-term study, to the best of our knowledge, to be carried out to audit the clinical presentations and outcomes of adult DKA patients in a private tertiary-level referral and teaching facility in Kenya, where adequate resources are available, including monitoring (point-of-care ketone, frequent blood glucose, blood gas, and laboratory support), availability of the recommended nurse-to-patient ratio, appropriate critical care support and sub-specialty care. This is also the first study to assess the clinical presentation and outcomes of DKA in adults during the pre-COVID and COVID-19 pandemic.
Our study has limitations inherent to Retrospective studies and could have had an information bias since the data collected was before the use of a full electronic health record system. Additionally, the diagnosis of the type of diabetes was based on clinical parameters rather than conducting auto-antibody or C-peptide tests.