We found that suicide deaths during the COVID-19 outbreak in the US (March 1, 2020-June 30, 2022) were statistically lower than expected. This change was most pronounced in the West, where statistically significant decreased suicide mortality persisted during the entire study period. Contrary to other reports, we found that suicide deaths in children and adolescents ages 5–17 were unchanged during the study, and a statistical decrease was observed in the first half of 2022. Increases were seen in younger adults ages 18–34 (which moderately correlated with contemporaneous COVID-19 waves), while decreases were seen in adults ages 50–64, driven by marked decreases among males in this age group (who otherwise continued to comprise the higher rates of suicide than females).
Our findings contextualize suicide deaths in the United States (and elsewhere), finding little change in suicide death rates during the pandemic period, despite rising death rates from alcohol poisonings, accidents, and other non-medical deaths.2,10 In some instances, our data confirm other previously published findings. However, our findings contradict reports which concluded that increases in suicide mortality in pediatric/adolescent populations occurred.6–8
This study adds to the existing literature in several ways. First, we provide increased granularity with respect to demographics and time periods. Second, we account for pre-pandemic trends in suicide mortality and provided several sensitivity analyses, both of which are important in strengthening or weakening conclusions regarding epidemiologic data with relatively low event rates.
Pediatric/Adolescent population
The impact of COVID-19 interventions and the pandemic itself on the potential suicide deaths in school-aged children has been discussed in public forums but studied comparatively little. The present analysis suggests that school-aged children did not experience an increase in suicide deaths during the pandemic, despite fears.11
Some other groups have reported transient increases in suicide deaths among children and adolescents during the pandemic.7,12 Those studies reported either descriptive increases (i.e., lacked modeling, which fails to account for secular pre-pandemic trends) or failed to provide sensitivity analyses with multiple models, a crucial step for low-event rates. For example, our primary model found statistically lower suicide mortality in some groups during some periods, but other models (based on projections calculated from 3- or 4-year pre-pandemic baseline periods) had uncertainty estimates which call the statistical significance of the findings into question. In addition, the use of certain selective age groupings raises the possibility of a positive finding in non-traditional age groupings that would not be present if typical groupings had been used, which would undermine the validity of any generalized conclusions about the data. Genuine epidemiologic changes should be robust to small changes in demographic boundaries, and our findings suggest that statistical differences found in some previous studies may hinge on the age group choices.
Indeed, our findings come in contrast with a recent published study which reported increases in suicide deaths in some youth age groupings, and there are likely reasons for this discrepancy.7 First, their general summation of 5–24 included mostly older suicides (18–24) due to the increasing frequency of suicides by age. Our grouping (5–17 years) removes young adults from the analysis, making the finding more reflective of the school-aged population. Second, in their age group analysis, data suppression likely led to falsely lower point estimates for expected deaths (and thus overestimates of excess suicide mortality). For example, in the 5–12 years age group, suppression occurred in 16 of 62 months in the pre-pandemic period (all prior to 2018). This likely led to an underestimate of expected deaths (did owing to failure to account for a nonstationary upward trend). By contrast, their analysis of adolescents aged 13–17 years did not have this problem—and which would make up the bulk of suicides in ages 5–17; the observed numbers of suicide in that age group were not different from to the expected numbers. Third, our modeling shows that pre-pandemic trends anticipated a continued steady rise in suicide mortality in this (and other) demographics, meaning that some increases described in other studies were not related to the pandemic but, rather, reflected existing systemic issues. Studies that simply divided 2021 suicides rates by rates from 1–2 years prior (including 2020, a time in which suicides are known to have been down in the US) were not equipped to capture this finding.6,8
Still, there have been reports of increases in suicidal thoughts and suspected attempts in adolescents during the pandemic, and an increase in the share of emergency visits owing to mental health conditions.13–15 We note that the increases in suicidal thoughts and suspected attempts occurred mainly in 2021, after the initial pandemic period, and corresponded to schools re-opening in the United States, comporting with prior research.16,17 In addition, the increase in the share of mental health visits in emergency departments in younger persons likely reflected decreases in medical-related visits, rather than an increase in mental-health related visits. Unlike other age groups, adolescent suicide is highly associated to the academic calendar, with more suicides occurring during school months than non-school months, making predictions during adolescent suicide rates during school closures difficult. Therefore, our research need not be seen as entirely contradictory to the above reports–suicidal deaths are rare outcomes of suicidal thinking or attempts in youth, and influences on what results in deaths versus ideation or attempt are likely distinct.
Young adults
Comparatively less media and research focus has been given to suicide in youth of transitional age (18–24 years) and young adults (24–34 years). Our findings of excess suicides based upon trends in the ages 18–34 years group implies the need to target interventions to these ages, in whom statistically significant increases in suicide mortality (beyond what was expected during the period) were observed here. Indeed, the excess suicide mortality in those aged 18–34 during the pandemic represents an augmentation of a pre-pandemic trend seen. This finding is in keeping with data reporting that this age group as having had the largest increase in depression and anxiety early in the pandemic.18 However, this increase may also be attributable to increases in substance use; fatal substance use disorders are known to have increased during the pandemic and precise cause of death attribution is not always attainable. Studies have shown that adults ages 18–34 were highly vulnerable for mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, with lower resilience relative to other groups, owing to high levels of loneliness and stress.19 Additionally, poorer mental health in this demographic may be attributable to higher career demands, financial concerns and parental responsibilities, as noted in previous investigations in the oncology literature.20
Non-geriatric older adults
The reversal of a general increasing trend of suicide during the pandemic for adults 50–64 years of age is of particular interest. Despite a higher overall risk for COVID-19, older adults showed a more positive mental health profile compared with younger adults which could in part explain the finding of lower from expected suicide mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic period in this group.19,21,22 Alternative explanations include the benefits of short-term economic support (government-supplied paycheck relief) or early retirement, which could have reduced related stressors associated with suicide mortality in this age group.23–25
Overall findings/historical context
There are several possible explanations for the overall absence of increased suicide mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite initial concerns raised by mental health professionals. An early “pulling together effect” may have given people a shared sense of purpose, which correlated to a period of decreased suicide death overall.2 Later, mental health stressors may have mounted but increased care demands were counterbalanced by newly increased access to psychiatric resources previously unavailable, including telehealth and, in 2022, access to a universal national suicide hotline (988).26 Additionally, mental health received more media attention during the pandemic, possibly decreasing stigma for seeking care, thereby leading to patient engagement with psychiatric resources, rather than suicidal behavior.27
Decreases in suicide mortality has been observed in prior pandemics, possibly related to the “pulling-together” effect described during previous periods of disaster; lower than expected suicide deaths appear to have been most pronounced when shelter-in-place orders were in effect in most US jurisdictions.28,29 Moreover, in our study, we mostly did not see a correlation with Covid-19 deaths and suicide deaths; in fact, our data confirmed previous modeling showing decreased suicide mortality during the early shelter-in-place period in the US, all of which implies that suicidal ideation and suicide completion may be influenced by markedly different stressors. In addition, there was not increased suicide in the Northeast, where mitigation was longer lasting (i.e., more social isolation), reflecting the multifactorial nature of suicide deaths.
Whether changes in healthcare delivery during the pandemic may in part explain the present findings warrant consideration. Telehealth accounted for less than 1% of all ambulatory care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. At its peak, this shifted to encompass 40% of mental health and substance use outpatient visits (March-August 2020). As the pandemic progressed, in-person care returned with an overall decrease in telehealth visits but notably, for mental health and substance use treatment, telehealth has persisted—representing 36% of these visits.26 Additionally, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states expanded coverage of mental health services provided via telehealth through their Medicaid programs including expansion of types of services and the allowance of increased provider types to be reimbursed for these services. Additionally, some private insurers have also removed pre-pandemic telehealth coverage restrictions, thereby expanding access to care.
This study has several limitations. One confounding variable may be manner of death adjudication; some deaths assigned to unintentional overdose may have actually been suicides, and vice versa, as previously.30 However, baseline rates of misattribution are unlikely to have changed during the pandemic. We were unable to assess suicide by race and ethnicity, due to our model’s reliance on 5 years of pre-pandemic data (the CDC no longer publishes race/ethnicity data in categories used until 2020). Also, while some data used in this study (2022) are provisional, they are unlikely to change dramatically.
In sum, suicide deaths are lower in the US since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Future work on suicide mortality should take both pre-pandemic and pandemic trends into account.