3.1 The production and characterization of biochar from lignocellulose by ALBH
In this study, poplar, pine and corn stover were selected as carbon precursor to produce biochar with ALBH treatment. Vaughn et al. reported that the composition of carbon precursor was an essential factor influencing the production of biochar (Vaughn et al., 2013). Lignocellulose as the carbon precursor, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin are the main components. The chemical composition of pine was analyzed as 41.2 % cellulose, 18.1 % hemicellulose, and 27.3 % lignin. Poplar was composed of 42.9 % cellulose, 24.3 % hemicellulose, and 24.2 % lignin. And that for corn straw was 32.6 % cellulose, 13.9 % hemicellulose and 17.1 % lignin (Lu et al., 2016). It reported that the linkage of hemicellulose was easily cleaved with thermal treatment, and cellulose could endure relatively high temperature with decomposition temperature from 315°C to 400°C during pyrolysis process (van Zandvoort et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). Lignin, aromatic polymer in nature, was reported to be thermally stable (Ragauskas et al., 2014; van Zandvoort et al., 2013).
Table 1 showed the elemental composition of biochar produced from corn stover, pine and poplar. The carbon content of biochar prepared from pine wood was 64.49 wt%, that for poplar was 63.46 wt%, and that for corn stover as 61.81 wt%. It suggested that the carbonization was carried outed during the ALBH treatment and biochar was formed from lignocellulose (Kołodyńska et al., 2012; Wang & Wang, 2019a). The yield of biochar was affected by the biomass types, in which 46.71 wt% of biochar yielded from pine, 47.63 wt% biochar was produced with poplar, and that was 40.44 wt% for corn stover. Because of the thermal stability of lignin, high lignin content of pine (27.3 %) and poplar (24.2 %) may be the reason for the high yield of biochar.
Table 1
Element analysis of biochar produced from corn stover, pine and poplar respectively (%)
|
Mesh number
|
C
|
H
|
O
|
N
|
Corn stover
|
> 60
|
61.11
|
4.76
|
23.00
|
4.76
|
|
40–60
|
61.81
|
4.87
|
25.17
|
4.87
|
|
20–40
|
62.85
|
4.59
|
26.78
|
4.59
|
Pine
|
40–60
|
64.49
|
4.83
|
28.27
|
4.83
|
Poplar
|
40–60
|
63.46
|
4.93
|
29.84
|
4.93
|
Figure 1 showed the morphology of biochar, in which the obvious carbon sphere structure was formed, especially for the biochar prepared from corn stover (Fig. 1-a, b, c). It presented uniform and dispersed for the carbon sphere-cron stover. For the biochar prepared from wood pine (Fig. 1-d) and poplar (Fig. 1-e), only few carbon spheres were observed on the biochar surface, and those carbon spheres were cross-linked together. Due to the more resistance structure of pine and poplar, the incomplete carbonization may lead to the irregular morphology of carbon (Simsir et al., 2017). The BET analysis also confirmed the results as showed in Table 2. The biochar prepared from corn stover obtained 83.89 m2/g surface area, and poor surface area was observed for the the biochar-pine (42.85 m2/g) and biochar-poplar (45.80 m2/g).
Figure 2 showed the functional groups on the surface of biochar was analyzed by FTIR. It suggested that no obvious difference was existed for the chemical groups types in biochars (Fig. 2- a), in which the wide peaks of 2900 cm− 1 and 3400 cm− 1 indicate the possible existence of O-H vibration, the partial peaks of 1000 cm− 1-1600 cm− 1 indicate the existence of -C-O and -C = O vibration, and the peaks of about 700 cm− 1 indicate the existence of -C-H vibration. The FTIR analysis suggested that a large number of hydroxyl and carboxyl oxygen-containing groups were presented on the surface of ALBH biochar (Lu et al., 2020). Wu et al. reported that the oxygen functional groups on the biochar, such as hydroxy, carbonyl, ester and ketone groups, could provide the interaction sites for the removal of metal ions (Wu et al., 2019).
3.2 the forming of nanosphere from lignocellulose during ALBH
It reported that during hydrothermal carbonization process, the lignocellulose would be firstly hydrolyzed to oligomers and glucose, and that was further dehydration to furans and then condensed and polymerized to carbon particles (García-Bordejé et al., 2017; Mi et al., 2008; Sevilla & Fuertes, 2009). In the carbonization, high temperature and long residual time was need. As reported by Hamza et al. nanospheres were obtained from glucose upon 200 ℃ for 48 h, and cellulose (as the carbon precursor) resulted in a lower degree carbonization because of the less degradation(Sevilla & Fuertes, 2009). Because of the natural resistance of lignocellulose, hydrothermal carbonization was hardly processed with lignocellulose. Acidic concentrated LiBr hydrolysis was reported in many researches on the dissolubility and hydrolysis ability to lignocellulose (Deng et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2017; Li et al., 2016; Mosier et al., 2005; Pan & Li, 2015). Recently, Li et al. reported that the cleavage of ethers and demethylation of lignin during acidic concentrated LiBr (Li et al., 2020). From those reports it is possible to construct the process of the formation of carbon nanosphere from lignocellulose during acidic LiBr treatment. That was schematically illustrated in Graphical abstract. Firstly, the cellulose from lignocellulose was able to be dissolved, and part of lignin particles was cleaved from lignin surface in the LiBr solution. At this stage, the LiBr made an important role (Wang & Wang, 2019b). With the present of hydronium ions, the dissolved cellulose was completely conversed to glucose, which could be occurred at mild conditions as reported by Pan et al.(Pan & Li, 2015). Then, the yield of sugars was further carbonized to form carbon spheres as HTC process. In briefly, with the heat treatment, subsequent reactions were occurred from the glucose to form fructose, furfural like compounds, acids and phenols respectively (Sevilla & Fuertes, 2009). By the intermolecular hydration or condensation reaction, soluble polymers from glucose were formed. At the meantime, the polymers were aromatized and the aromatic nuclei were formed. The various species presented in the solution diffused to the surface of the aromatic nuclei and linked to the nuclei by the oxygen functionalities. As a result of growth process, the carbon spheres were formed and a high concentration of reactive oxygen groups were distributed on the surface of the carbon spheres. From that, the aromatic nuclei was essential for the spheres forming. The self-assembling lignin particles in the solution could provide more hydrophobic spheres core for the growth process. As well as, because of the cleavage of β-O-4 linkages more active -OH was showed on the surface of core providing more linkage. Thus, the cleavage ability of ALBH to cellulose and lignin was favored the forming carbon spheres, in which carbon spheres was formed similar as HTCs.
To verify the mechanism of formation of carbon nanospheres, homocellulose (cellulose and hemicellulose), lignin, and homocellulose-lignin mixture (2:1 w/w) were respectively used as the precursor to produce biochar by same treatment condition, as showed in Fig. 3. It suggested that carbon nano-spheres were formed from homocellulose with irregular diameters from 50 nm to 100 nm (Simsir et al., 2017). With the lignin as the only substrate, some spheres and microporous morphology were observed on the surface of lignin, in which the part of linkage between lignin was cleaved, the hydrophobic lignin link was self-assembled and colloid spheres were formed (~ 100 nm diameter) in the aqueous phase (Lai et al., 2014). From that, the colloid spheres were formed and released from the surface of lignin, and the porous structure of lignin were observed. In the homocellulose-lignin mixture system, the carbon-particles with 100–200 nm diameter were produced, which showed a similar carbon-particles morphology with lignocellulose. Lignin was the main restriction during the hydrolysis of biomass. As described above, corn stover obtained lower content of lignin than that of pine and poplar, which led to the relatively poor yield of production, however, the lower content of lignin in corn stover was in favor to the decomposition of cellulose to glucose. Without pretreatment, glucose was easily produced with corn stover and was further dehydrated to form carbon nano-spheres. As carbon precursor, corn stover performed better than pine and poplar, and it was more available and costless in China. Thus, the production of carbon spheres-corn stover was discussed following.
3.3 The production of carbon spheres from corn stover
The effect of substrate size on the carbon spheres formation was analyzed. The various sized feedstock was prepared as 20 mesh (> 830 µm), 20–40 mesh (380–830 µm) and 40–60 mesh (250–380 µm) sized corn stover. Figure 1a-c showed that carbon spheres could be formed in three sized corn stover. By reducing the feedstock size, the carbon sphere surface appeared rupture and crosslinkage among spheres were being strengthened. The large-sized spheres have been formed for the biochar prepared from the corn stover sized in mesh number less than 60. It indicated that too small particles might not favor the preparation of biochar. The surface area confirmed the results, in which the poor surface area was detected for the biochar from the corn stover in size less than 60 mesh number (< 250 µm), showed in Table 2. It also found that less oxygen function groups were distributed on the surface of biochar prepared from the corn stover with less size, as showed in Fig. 2b. By comparison, the biochar from 20–40 mesh sized corn stalks (380–830 µm) was elected to further study.
Table 2
Surface area of biochar from corn stover, poplar and poplar by BET analysis
Feedstock
|
Corn stover
|
Pine
|
Poplar
|
Mesh number
|
20–40
|
40–60
|
> 60
|
40–60
|
40–60
|
Surface Area (m2/g)
|
75.53
|
83.89
|
63.84
|
42.85
|
45.80
|
Table 3 showed the different reaction conditions used to synthesize ALBH biochar from corn stover, as treatment 1 to treatment 7 (T1-T7). The surface morphology of biochar prepared under T1-T7 reactions was observed by SEM showed in Fig. 4. It showed that the carbon spheres on the surface of the biochar are distributed more uniformly under the conditions of T1 (140°C) and T4 (200°C), the particle size of the carbon spheres is severely dispersed under the conditions of T2 (160°C) and T3 (180°C). Under the condition of T4, some of the carbon spheres are cross-linked. The effect of various acid concentration (as T5, T6, T7) on the ALBH reaction was further explored at 140°C. Figure 4b showed that the acid conditions showed slightly effect on the morphology of the biochar. By comparison, the carbon spheres under the condition of 0.8 M acid concentration (T6) showed more uniform morphology. From that, the carbon spheres could be formed and showed well properties under low temperature 140°C for 150 min with 0.8 M of HCl from 20–40 meshed corn stover.
Table 3
The different reaction conditions used to synthesize ALBH biochar from corn stover, as treatment 1 to treatment 7 (T1-T7).
Test
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
T4
|
T5
|
T6
|
T7
|
Solid loading (%)
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
Acid (M)
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
1.0
|
Time (min)
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
Temperature (°C)
|
140
|
160
|
180
|
200
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
3.4 the recyclability of the LiBr solutions
After reaction, the biochar was separated from the reaction system by filtering, and the solution were analyzed by HPLC. No sugar compounds were detected in the filtrate from T6 treatment (20–40 meshed corn stover treated by 140°C for 150 min, 0.8 M HCl). It reported that the production of glucose could be dehydrated and decarboxylated to form furans or humins in high HTC treatment severity (Lu et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2019; Pan & Li, 2015). The dehydration production of sugars, such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), furfural and levulinic acid (LA) were detected with an ultraviolet spectrophotometer at 285 nm, in which only slight LA was detected in the filtrate, and almost no 5-HMF and furfural were detected. During the ALBH treatment in this study, the saccharides were mainly reacted to form humins with slight furans. Li et al. reported that lignin and products from lignin were distributed as solid (Deng et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016). Thus, the filtrate after treatment may be reused directly.
Fig. 5 showed the morphology of the biochar prepared from the LiBr solutions with fifth runs recycling, in which carbon spheres with uniform size was observed. The filtrate recovered after the reaction was reused and the biochar was formed and obtained desired yield as 36 %-40 % (40 % for run 1, 38 % for run 2, 38 % for run 3, 38 % for run 4 and 36 % for run 5). The biochar obtained abundant functional groups on the surface for the biochar prepared by the five recycling, showed in Fig. 6. The results verified the recyclability of the treated solution and it confirmed the practical use of ALBH method to produce biochar in commercial applications.
3.5 the removal ability of biochar to heavy ions and methyl orange
Currently, biochar as the adsorbent was usually used in the removal of heavy ions and organic chemicals in environmental remediation(Bai et al., 2018; Dai et al., 2020; Kazakis et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2017). The Cr(VI), as one of the most toxic metal ion, could cause many diseases, such as dermatitis and lung cancer, highly threating human health (Gao & Xia, 2011; Kazakis et al., 2018). But Cr(VI) was wildly used in industrial areas, including leather, electroplating, wood preservation, petroleum refining (Gao & Xia, 2011). The biochar as an adsorbent showed efficiency in the removal ions of the waste water. The agriculture residues such as the corn cob, the rice husk and apple peels were used as feedstock to produce biochar. But as reported before, the biochar produced from pyrolysis corn cob with ZnCl2 and NH4Cl only obtained 34.48 mg/g theoretical maximum adsorption ability to Cr(VI) at 45°C (Tang et al., 2016). 25.02 mg/g maximum adsorption capacity to Cr(VI) was got by the biochar produced from rice husk heated at 700°C with NaOH for 5 h got. (B.D. Mukri, 2016). As well as the biochar was pyrolyzed from apple peels with the adsorption capacity of 36.01 mg/g to Cr(VI) (Enniya et al., 2018). Lu et al., used to reported that the adsorption of elephant grass-ALBH biochar obtained maximum adsorption capability of 99.43 mg/g biochar(Lu et al., 2020). Table 4 showed the adsorption capability of biochar to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with 265 mg/L initial Cr(VI) concentration. The biochar with corn stover treated in T6 condition obtained 110.99 mg/g adsorption capability to Cr(VI). It suggested that the removal ratio of corn stover-ALBH biochar was high than the elephant grass-ALBH biochar in this study. And the recycling showed slight effect on the adsorption capability of biochar to heavy ions, in which 94.71 mg/g adsorption ability was obtained after fiive recycling runs. As an adsorbent, the surface area and the functional groups played an important role in the interaction between the ions and the biochar. In this study, the morphology spheres provided more binding sites for the ions, meanwhile, the abundant functional groups also improved the adsorption of biochar to heavy ions.
Table 4
The adsorption capacity of biochar to Cr(VI) during five runs of continual recycling of LiBr solution
Runs
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Adsorption capacity (mg/g)
|
110.99
|
105.01
|
104.98
|
103.13
|
95.09
|
94.71
|
Figure 7 showed the removal ratio of biochar for methyl orange. Methyl orange as a water-soluble azo dye is widely used in the industrial. The adsorption was an effective technology used for methyl orange removal due to the low cost, simple preparation technique, easy to recycle. Herein, the corn stover-ALBH biochar got high potential in the removal methyl orange than many reported carbon spheres (Siyasukh et al., 2018). It indicated that a well linear correlation was detected between the concentration of methyl orange and the adsorption capability of biochar, in which the adsorption capability of biochar to methyl orange was increased with the initial dosage of methyl orange. With the further increase of the dosage of methyl orange to 2000 mg/ g biochar, 84.81 % removal ratio was obtained to methyl orange.