The results of this study indicate that approximately one out of every four persons who seek HIV care at the Fevers unit uses some form of TCAM. Although significantly high, this rate is lower than that observed in a similar study conducted at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Ghana, which reported the use of TCAM in 50% of clinic attendants. [19]. It is also lower than the reported rates from similar studies from the Kwazu-Natal region of South Africa (51.3%) [19], Western Uganda (63.5%)[20], and Ethiopia(43.7%)[2]. Other literature in sub-Saharan Africa reported an average prevalence rate of about 45.8%[1]. However, the results were comparable to UK studies [4]. Most study respondents were from urban and peri-urban communities, where access to TCAM may be reduced, accounting for the relatively lower prevalence noted in our study. This prevalence, however remains considerably high, considering that all participants are HIV clinic attendants who have been on ARVs for at least 6 months, and have been previously counseled on ARV compliance and avoidance of TCAM use before starting ARV treatment.
Demographic factors have long been associated with TCAM use among PLHIV [1, 20, 21]. For example, the use of TCAM among PLHIV in some was previously reported to be associated with the female gender [1, 20]. Other studies have also shown an association between age and TCAM use among PLHIV [21]. The increased risk of comorbid conditions with age has been thought of as the main reason for this association [21]. However, neither gender nor age was found to be significantly associated with TCAM use in this study. Furthermore, other sociodemographic factors such as educational level, rural or urban settlement, and type of occupation were not found to be significantly associated with TCAM use in this study, although these were reported to be associated factors in a few studies in developed and developing countries [1].
Our results also show that comorbid disease conditions were not associated with TCAM use. This is a surprising finding as TCAM use was expected to be high among participants with chronic comorbid medical conditions seeking to cure or alleviate their symptoms with the use of TCAM. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbid medical condition among study participants. The prevalence of hypertension in our study population was 21.2%, comparable to hypertension prevalence of 27% reported among PLHIV from studies in Nigeria and South Africa [22] and among the general population in Ghana of about 28%[23]. Although TCAM use among patients with hypertension in the general population is also well noted in other studies [24], a subgroup analysis of the comorbid disease conditions showed no association between hypertension and TCAM use in this study.
The use of TCAM in newly-diagnosed people with HIV was reported to be high, especially in the pre-ART era worldwide [25]. The impact of antiretroviral medications in improving treatment outcomes for PLHIV led to a gradual move away from the use of TCAM to treat HIV/AIDS. Some studies suggest that patients living with HIV for extended periods have higher odds of TCAM use due to the onset of comorbid medical conditions like diabetes and dyslipidemia [26]. The duration since diagnosis was therefore considered a predictor of TCAM use among PLHIV [25, 27]. In this study however, we found no association between duration since diagnosis and TCAM use. We note, however, that all our study participants have been diagnosed for durations greater than 6 months.
Optimum adherence to antiretroviral medications is objectively assessed by patient viral load. The results show no association between TCAM use and viral load. This suggests that the study participants who use TCAM are also highly adherent to ART treatment. The adherence rates calculated for the study participants confirm a high level of ART adherence. A high proportion of the study participants demonstrated an adherence rate of at least 95% and greater. There was no statistically significant association between the level of adherence and TCAM use. This showed that even though most patients adhered to ARV treatment, some still used TCAM. This highlights the fact that PLHIV are not using TCAM primarily to manage or cure HIV, but for other ailments. The high level of adherence at this HIV care clinic can be attributed to the level of health care staff and clinic health promotion and educative practices on adherence to ART. PLHIV who attend rural clinics were found to have a nine-fold likelihood of using alternative medicines compared to those that attended urban clinics like the Korle Bu Fevers unit [28]. The high compliance to ARV treatment and significant TCAM use among PLHIV further raises concerns of reduced drug efficacy and worse adverse effects in the event of any drug interactions between ARVs and TCAM.
This study was conducted among patients who are regular attendants of an HIV clinic in an urban teaching hospital with high levels of ART adherence. They are regularly seen and educated on avoidance of TCAM and strict ART adherence by various well-trained staff, including clinical psychologists, public health nurses, medical officers, and specialists in HIV. This may explain the lack of association between the sociodemographic factors and TCAM use seen in some previous studies. While these factors were not associated with TCAM use, there was still a high prevalence of TCAM use among study participants. There is a need to explore TCAM use further by healthcare providers and policymakers, especially with the ready availability of ARTs. New insights using a qualitative research approach are necessary to examine emerging factors that may drive TCAM use, especially among ART-compliant patients.