Use of antibiotics in infants
The results demonstrated that 71.25% of infants younger than 2 years had used at least 1 antibiotic, which is similar to the 70% reported in a US study, lower than the 81.7% in Finland, but much higher than the 35.2% in the Netherlands (Aversa et al., 2021; Lavebratt et al., 2019; Slob et al., 2021). Regarding the types of antibiotics used, penicillins, cephalosporins, and macrolides were the main categories, consistent with relevant studies in other countries where these three types are also the most commonly used antibiotics. The usage proportions were 52.5%, 40.9%, and 15.7%, respectively. In comparison, the ratios in the US are 42.9%, 29.1%, and 19.2%; in South Korea they are 56.6%, 25.3%, and 17.0%; in Italy (Lazio region) they are 51.5%, 24.7%, and 23.2%; in Germany they are 38.4%, 42.2%, and 18.2%; in Spain they are 62.1%, 20.6%, and 17.0%; and in Norway they are 66.7%, 1.8%, and 21.9% (Youngster et al., 2017). The proportions of penicillins and macrolides usage reported in this study are approximately the same as in other countries; however, the proportion of cephalosporin is higher (except for in Germany). The usage proportions are similar to the US, perhaps due to Taiwan's medical standards mostly being based on US guidelines. The cumulative duration of antibiotic use was mainly short-term use of 1–7 days. A cumulative use of less than 14 days’ accounts for between 93.6% and 100% of cases, in line with the recommendations of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, 2015).
Regarding mother characteristics, those from location with higher levels of urbanization showed higher prescription rates, with Level 1 and 2 regions accounting for approximately 50% of the issued prescriptions. The prescription rate was highest for the group with medium insurance amounts. These results are similar to a study conducted in Canada. However, 36.2% of infants born by C-section took antibiotics within 2 years of birth, a proportion nearly twice as high as the 20.0% within 1 year in the Canadian study, and the 23.8% within 2 years in the US study. However, it is much lower than the 75% within 2 years in the Danish study (Aversa et al., 2021; Axelsson et al., 2019; Hamad et al., 2019). There are significant differences in the results of studies from different countries. The reasons for such discrepancy cannot be determined from the present literature. This issue deserves further investigation in the future.
The correlation between antibiotic use in infants and the occurrence of ADHD
The elevated risk of ADHD among those who have used antibiotics is found to be 1.32 times greater (95% CI = 1.15–1.53) than that of the study from the US, and 1.16 times greater (younger than 6 months), 1.12 times greater (6–11 months), and 1.26 times greater (1–2 years) than that of the study from Finland that grouped antibiotic exposure by age. A meta-analysis of 6 studies also showed a similar odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI = 1.1–1.27). Moreover, all these results are statistically significant, indicating that infants who have used antibiotics will indeed have an increased risk of developing ADHD (Aversa et al., 2021; Lavebratt et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2022).
Regarding antibiotic type and cumulative days of use, the US study (Aversa et al., 2021) only showed a significant difference in the HR for female infants using penicillin, which was 1.50 (95% CI = 1.14–1.96). In contrast, the Canadian study (Hamad et al., 2019) showed significant differences for all antibiotic types tested, with cephalosporins having the highest risk at 1.23 (95% CI = 1.07–1.42), and only cumulative use exceeding 21 days was found to have a significant difference at 1.38 (95% CI = 1.17–1.64). In this study, penicillin and cephalosporins showed significant differences, and the risk increased for all durations of cumulative use. Based on the results of these studies, it can be suggested that if infants need antibiotics to treat infections, penicillins and cephalosporins should be avoided whenever possible.
Regarding maternal characteristics, the lowest risk was observed in the mothers of age 30–34 years, with a risk of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.75–0.83), followed by mothers in 25–29 year group with a risk of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.78–0.86). Although these groups had the highest antibiotic usage, they had the lowest risk of developing ADHD. This may be attributed to the fact that ADHD is primarily influenced by genetic factors, and women ranged 25–35 years of age are in their prime childbearing years, where the genetic risk is reduced. Therefore, the genetic factors outweigh the impact of antibiotic usage, resulting in such outcomes.
Since this study only analyzed data from the databases, there are some limitations. First, real-life medication usage may differ from the patterns presented by the data. However, as prescription drugs, antibiotics are less likely to raise concerns over the out-of-pocket costs, and prematurely discontinuing treatment may lead to antibiotic resistance issues; therefore, the medication compliance should be consistent with that shown in the database. In addition, the NHIRD analysis could not reveal whether pregnant women and infants had taken probiotics as nutritional supplements, which would have altered the ecology of the gut microbiome and consequently indirectly affected the results. Furthermore, the database does not collect information on healthy behaviors and lifestyles, such as whether a woman smoked during pregnancy, whether the mother chooses to breastfeed, her education level, and her marital status. These variables may all affect the outcomes of the study.