Clinical findings
In our cohort, the clinical phenotype of most of our patients is consistent with the typical case, for example, psychomotor retardation, low molecular weight proteinuria, albuminuria, and short stature. The proportion (4/6,66.7%) of cryptorchidism documented in our study is higher than 42%, previously reported by a single Korean center[27]. We were pleasantly surprised to find that seven patients’ serum levels of muscle enzymes (CK/LDH/AST)s were elevated(7/8,87.5%). The involvement of muscles in Lowe syndrome was indicated by the initial observation of elevated blood CK levels, often accompanied by significant concentrations of MB isoenzymes. Additionally, increased serum AST and LDH concentrations were noted, while liver function remained within normal ranges[28]. A biochemical study revealed mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the causes through muscle biopsy sample examinations[29]. Eujin Park et al. conducted muscle biopsy specimens on individuals with the disease to identify primary myopathy or neurogenic atrophy[30]. Their findings confirmed that CK/LDH/AST could serve as a significant biomarker in patients with OCRL variations and potentially as a predictive biomarker in genotypes associated with Dent disease. Nevertheless, their conclusion stated that serum muscle enzyme levels could not be utilized as an indicator to infer variations in either the CLCN5 or OCRL gene.
In this study, all patients exhibited LMWP and aminoaciduria, with only two of them displaying glycosuria. As we know, Fanconi syndrome is a well-known clinical diagnosis associated with Lowe syndrome, typically emerging during the early months of life. However, several studies have discovered that LMWP is always present, but glycosuria is rarely observed[6, 31]. Due to the extensive variation in the degree of renal proximal tubular dysfunction seen in individuals with this disorder, some experts have questioned whether the label “Fanconi syndrome” accurately depicts the renal abnormalities observed in Lowe syndrome[32].
Unexpectedly, patient 1 (p.Ala857Cysfs*10) was diagnosed after both lower limb flexions were discovered when he was three years old, rather than congenital cataracts like others after birth. His parents did not take his foamy urine and psychomotor retardation seriously. We were surprised to discover that he had no vision issues. The occurrence of Lowe syndrome patients without cataracts is rare, with only a few documented cases. For instance, in one family, the p.Ile274Thr variant was identified, where the youngest sibling developed unilateral cataracts while the oldest sibling did not[14]. In another case, the intronic variant c.2257-5G > A was found in two siblings; one exhibited atypical Lowe syndrome with minimal ocular involvement, while the other presented solely with the renal phenotype[33]. Additionally, patients carrying the p.Asp523Asn variant displayed brain and renal symptoms of Lowe syndrome without congenital cataracts, with cataracts only appearing 5–10 years later[3, 34]. These uncommon milder phenotypes of Lowe syndrome, without or with minimal ocular involvement, can be attributed to specific variations, although the precise underlying mechanism remains unclear. We will continue to monitor the progress of Patient 1’s eye condition. In this case, we learned that early urinalysis could be one of the most crucial and easy-to-perform tests that help us make an early clinical diagnosis of atypical Lowe syndrome.
Analyses of OCRL variations
Approximately 360 OCRL disease-causing variants have been identified, with missense and nonsense variations accounting for 49%, splicing variants for 12%, small deletions for 20%, and small insertions for 9% as well as extensive deletions and insertions, as reported by the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD)[35]. The underlying cause of why specific mutations in the OCRL gene lead to Lowe syndrome while others result in Dent-2 disease remains unknown, despite the fact that variations in the OCRL gene are responsible for both conditions. According to previous studies[6, 14, 36–40], variants related to Lowe syndrome were primarily found in exons 8 to 24, with exon 15 being the most frequently affected. In our study, all variations were identified in exons 9–23, which contain three significant functional domains: RhoGAP-like domain, ASPM-SPD-2-Hydin[ASH] domain, and 5-phosphatase domain. These domains are believed to play an essential role in the manifestation of Lowe syndrome. Specifically, nonsense, frameshift, and splicing variations of the OCRL gene exclusively associated with Lowe syndrome were detected within exons 8–24. the ASH-RhoGAP module is responsible for regulating a majority of the currently described protein-protein interactions[14]. The proportion (6/8 alleles,75%) of variations documented in our study resulted in the generation of truncated proteins is higher than 63.6%, previously reported by Hichri et al.[14]. In comparison, 25% corresponded to missense variations.
Novel patients 1 (p.Ala857Cysfs*10) and 5 (p.Cys831*) suffered from renal hypophosphatemic rickets in our study. Both individuals exhibited reduced serum phosphate levels and a range of selective proximal tubular dysfunctions, including LMWP, aminoaciduria, and hypercalciuria. All of them were administered phosphate and alkali supplements to prevent the progression of rickets. Six of the previously published twelve Korean patients with Lowe syndrome had hypophosphatemia, and supplemental therapies were administered[27], whereas in the study by Charnas et al.[28], 14 of 23(61%) patients did not require phosphate supplementation. Lowe[41] indicated that kidney defects observed in Lowe syndrome are indicative of a defect in the protein traffic, including receptors, involved in reabsorption in the proximal tubule. Prior research suggested that impaired reabsorption in the proximal tubules observed in Lowe syndrome may be attributable to a change in the trafficking of the relevant transporters. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is an essential mechanism for membrane protein control, such as the sodium-phosphate cotransporter. It has been demonstrated that OCRL1 regulates vesicular transport by interacting with clathrin, and the specifics of this relationship have been elucidated[42–44]. These two novel variations were identified in exon23, which mapped to a region of the RhoGAP-like domain. U.Lichter-Konecki et al. discovered that variations in the RhoGAP domain of OCRL1 might impact the Arf1 signaling pathway, which plays a crucial role in Golgi function[45], We could suggest that these two novel variations are essential in inducing renal tubulopathy. The diversity of the clinical phenotype of patients with proximal tubular dysfunction in Lowe syndrome is worthy of further study.
As part of our investigation, another novel frameshift variation c.1383delA (p.A462Lfs*58) from patient 4 and two novel missense variations c.1572C > A (p.His524Gln) and c.824G > A (p.Gly275Glu) from patient 7/8 were identified in exon 9/14/15 as mapping to a region of the 5-Phosphatase domain that is responsible for recognizing PI(4,5)P2 in the membrane. These three patients with variations discovered in the 5-Phosphatase domain showed typical phenotypes, i.e., ocular signs including congenital cataracts appearing after birth, neurological symptoms including neonatal hypotonia, retardation of development, epileptic seizures and proximal renal tubulopathy. It has been discovered via research that the phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase OCRL1 is located in the kidney tubular cells and the primary cilium of retinal pigment epithelial cells[46]. They are seen abundantly in the plasma membrane, which suggests their involvement in cargo sorting and selective uptake of specific molecules[47]. OCRL1 plays a vital role as a regulator of phosphoinositide conversion, which is essential for the uncoating of clathrin and the functioning of key components involved in the endocytic machinery. Increased PI(4,5)P2 levels caused by OCRL1 loss are responsible for creating coated vesicles, which assemble numerous clathrin coat components and promote actin polymerization[48]. Hence, we infer that the variation mapped to the 5-Phosphatase domain of OCRL might have the most severe and typical clinical phenotype. Next, a meta-analysis of relevant data to confirm this hypothesis is needed. We have noticed that both missense variants in our study are inherited from their mothers. Therefore, pedigree analysis of their mother is needed to identify the sources of variation, either inherited or caused by de novo variation. One of the missense variations is p.His524Gln which has previously been identified as pathogenic and submitted to ClinVar, but there are conflicting interpretations. The level of mRNA expression of the OCRL gene and PI(4,5)P2 phosphatase activity should be measured in our two patients harboring missense variations to evaluate the functional effect of these novel variations in our subsequent work.
Although our study extensively examined the genotypic and phenotypic features of eight individuals with Lowe syndrome, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of our research. Firstly, the inclusion of a larger patient cohort from multiple provinces in southern China would have provided a more representative understanding of the diagnostic and heredity characteristics specific to children with Lowe syndrome in this region. Additionally, the limited and inconsistent follow-up duration across patients hindered our ability to determine the prolonged development of Lowe Syndrome in each individual. Moreover, the lack of a standardized and consistent process for clinical evaluations may have resulted in incomplete assessments for some patients.