This preprint is under consideration at BMC Neurology. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Yuanyuan Wang
Xijing Hospital
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-8785
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The purpose of the study is to assess the vestibular and oculomotor function in patients with vestibular migraine(VM).And we also investigate the relationship between test resultsandeffectiveness of prophylactic medication.
Methods: We recruited 41 patientswith VM. They were examinedwith vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials(VEMP), video head impulse test(vHIT) and videonystagmography(VNG), including spontaneous or positional nystagmus, gaze-evoked nystagmus, smooth pursuit and caloric irrigation testing.All VM patients were treated withprophylactic medications. Theintensity of vertigo were evaluated with dizziness handicap inventory(DHI) before and after treatment. After 6 months, we evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic medication. We analyzed the relationship between test resultsandeffectiveness of prophylactic medication.
Results:In vestibular function test,71% of VM patients showed abnormal result. 20% showed abnormal air-conducted cVEMP and 42% showed abnormal air-conducted oVEMP. 32% showed abnormal vHIT and 56% showed abnormal caloric irrigation test.The abnormal rate of oVEMP was significantly higher than cVEMP (p<0.05). And the abnormal rate of caloric irrigation test was significantly higher than vHIT(p<0.05). In oculomotor function test, 42% showed pathological result. The abnormal rate of oculomotor function test was significantly lower than vestibular function test (p<0.05). After 6 months follow-up, rate of good effectiveness was significantly higher in normal vestibular function test group compared with the abnormal vestibular function test group (p<0.05). Rate of good effectiveness was no statistically significant difference between normal oculomotor function test group and abnormal oculomotor function test group (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Abnormal vestibular and oculomotor function are commonly observed in VM patients. And VM patients with abnormal vestibular function have a weak effectiveness of prophylaxis medications.
Keywords
Vestibular migraine, Vestibular function, Oculomotor, Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, Video head impulse test, Caloric irrigation test, Videonystagmography, Prophylaxis,Medications
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Revision
Version 1
Posted 08 Jun, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Revise before sending to peer reviewers
On 04 Jun, 2020
First submitted
On 26 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at BMC Neurology. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Yuanyuan Wang
Xijing Hospital
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-8785
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Revision
Version 1
Posted 08 Jun, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Revise before sending to peer reviewers
On 04 Jun, 2020
First submitted
On 26 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The purpose of the study is to assess the vestibular and oculomotor function in patients with vestibular migraine(VM).And we also investigate the relationship between test resultsandeffectiveness of prophylactic medication.
Methods: We recruited 41 patientswith VM. They were examinedwith vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials(VEMP), video head impulse test(vHIT) and videonystagmography(VNG), including spontaneous or positional nystagmus, gaze-evoked nystagmus, smooth pursuit and caloric irrigation testing.All VM patients were treated withprophylactic medications. Theintensity of vertigo were evaluated with dizziness handicap inventory(DHI) before and after treatment. After 6 months, we evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic medication. We analyzed the relationship between test resultsandeffectiveness of prophylactic medication.
Results:In vestibular function test,71% of VM patients showed abnormal result. 20% showed abnormal air-conducted cVEMP and 42% showed abnormal air-conducted oVEMP. 32% showed abnormal vHIT and 56% showed abnormal caloric irrigation test.The abnormal rate of oVEMP was significantly higher than cVEMP (p<0.05). And the abnormal rate of caloric irrigation test was significantly higher than vHIT(p<0.05). In oculomotor function test, 42% showed pathological result. The abnormal rate of oculomotor function test was significantly lower than vestibular function test (p<0.05). After 6 months follow-up, rate of good effectiveness was significantly higher in normal vestibular function test group compared with the abnormal vestibular function test group (p<0.05). Rate of good effectiveness was no statistically significant difference between normal oculomotor function test group and abnormal oculomotor function test group (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Abnormal vestibular and oculomotor function are commonly observed in VM patients. And VM patients with abnormal vestibular function have a weak effectiveness of prophylaxis medications.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Loading...