Growth performance of pompano fed different levels of MOS
Fish were similar in weight for all treatments at the beginning of the trial without significant differences (ANOVA, P = 0.512). By day 56, the weight of pompano among the treatments ranged from 10.84 to 15.69 g. At the end of the experiment (day 56), the group of fish given 0.2% MOS showed the largest weight increment (4.83 times higher compared to the weight of fish fed control), followed by fish fed diets adding 0.1% and 0.4% MOS (4.61 and 4.41 times higher than the weight of fish fed control, respectively). The lowest weight gain was observed in the group fed the control diet (3.44 times) (Fig. 1).
Significant variations in the SGR of pompano were seen between diet treatments at days 14, 28, 42 and 56 (Fig. 2). After 14 days, SGRs of pompanos fed diets adding 0.1% to 0.6% MOS were significantly higher than the SGR of pompanos fed the control diet (P ≤ 0.030). However, the SGR of pompano fed diets with 0.8% MOS did not significantly differ from the SGRs of fish fed control or other MOS levels (P ≥ 0.062). At days 28 and 42, there were significant differences among SGRs of pompanos fed a diet containing 0.1% to 0.4% MOS (P ≤ 0.032) compared to SGR of pompano fish fed the control (MOS0.0). Nevertheless, there were no significant distinctions between the SGRs of pompanos fed basal, MOS0.6, and MOS0.8 (P ≥ 0.064). Also, no statistical significance was found among the SGR of groups of pompanos fed diets containing 0.6% and 0.8% MOS compared to the SGR of groups of pompanos fed diets containing 0.1 - 0.4% MOS (P ≥ 0.071). After 52 days of feeding (end), SGRs of pompanos fed diets with 0.1 - 0.2% MOS were significantly higher than SGR of pompanos fed the basal diet (P ≤ 0.020), while feeding 0.4 - 0.8% MOS inclusion in the diet did not significantly impact SGRs of pompanos (P ≥ 0.124). SGR of pompano fed diets added any levels of MOS were not significantly different from each other (P ≥ 0.412). (Fig. 2).
Survival rate and relative survival rate
At the end of the investigation (day 56), survival rates of pompano fish fed various MOS diets ranged between 92% and 98% (Fig. 3). The fish that were given diets with 0.1 - 0.6% MOS had the greatest survival rate, which ranged from 97.5% to 98%. The survival rates of pompano fed at all levels of MOS were not significantly different (P = 0.192). Relative percentage survival (RPS) was highest in the group of pompanos fed diets that added 0.2% MOS, followed by the RPS of pompanos fed diets that added 0.1% and 0.4% MOS (both RPS were 72.5%), and pompanos fed diets that added 0.6% and 0.8% MOS had RPS of 68.75% and 50%, respectively (Fig. 3).
Haematological parameters of pompano fed dietary MOS supplementation
The haematological parameters showed statistically significant variations among the treatments. Red blood cells (RBC) of pompano fed all levels of MOS were higher than those of the fish fed the control diet, but only the fish fed diets MOS0.1, MOS0.2 and MOS0.4 had higher RBC than that in fish fed the control (P ≤ 0.039), while RBC in fish fed diets MOS0.6 and MOS 0.8 from RBC in fish fed control diet (P ≥ 0.076); and there was no significant difference in RBC among the fish fed any levels of MOS-supplemented diets (P ≥ 0.104). Pompano fed 0.1 to 0.6% MOS had a higher WBC compared to the WBC of pompano fed control (P < 0.041), but when adding higher levels of MOS (0.6 and 0.8%) the WBC did not differ from the WBC of control (P ≥ 0.073) (Table 2).
When compared to fish given the control diet, pompano fed a diet containing any levels of MOS had higher proportions of lymphocytes (P ≤ 0.042), while monocytes and basophils were significantly decreased in fish fed MOS inclusion in the diet (P ≤ 0.019). In addition, dietary MOS showed no significant influence on the quantity of neutrophils and eosinophils (P ≥ 0.064) (Table 2).
Table 2. Haematological parameters of pompano fish (day 56 MOS0.0: control; MOS0.1: 0.1%; MOS0.2: 0.2%; MOS0.4: 0.4%; MOS0.6: 0.6%; MOS0.8: 0.8% mannan oligosaccharide added to the diets. The data is presented with the mean and standard error of the mean. The use of distinct letters to indicate significant differences between treatments.
|
Diets
|
|
|
MOS0.0
|
MOS0.1
|
MOS0.2
|
MOS0.4
|
MOS0.6
|
MOS0.8
|
RBC (× 106 mm-3)
|
3.56 ± 0.24a
|
4.61 ± 0.28b
|
4.91 ± 0.23b
|
4.75 ± 0.43b
|
4.07 ± 0.41ab
|
3.77 ± 0.41ab
|
WBC (× 105 mm-3)
|
0.50 ± 0.06a
|
0.87 ± 0.09b
|
0.75 ± 0.07 b
|
0.73 ± 0.07 b
|
0.68 ± 0.06b
|
0.59 ± 0.08ab
|
Monocyte (%)
|
33.76 ± 3.80a
|
26.85 ± 2.0b
|
20.68 ± 1.88b
|
23.09 ± 3.73b
|
25.75 ± 4.25b
|
22.75 ± 4.25b
|
Lymphocyte (%)
|
48.72 ± 3.76a
|
59.09 ± 2.38b
|
66.20 ± 2.30b
|
61.90 ± 4.61b
|
60.94 ±4.30b
|
62.94 ±2.20b
|
Neutrophil (%)
|
13.70 ± 2.54
|
11.16 ± 2.92
|
10.44 ± 1.53
|
12.34 ± 2.88
|
10.56 ± 2.48
|
11.56 ± 2.32
|
Eosinophil (%)
|
1.07 ± 0.42
|
1.05 ± 0.34
|
1.02 ± 0.35
|
0.94 ± 0.24
|
1.11 ± 0.21
|
1.51 ± 0.12
|
Basophil (%)
|
2.76 ± 0.48a
|
1.84 ± 0.35b
|
1.65 ± 0.44b
|
1.72 ± 0.51b
|
1.64 ± 0.51b
|
1.24 ± 0.31b
|
Intestinal microorganisms of pompano fed dietary MOS supplementation
The Vibrio counts in the gut of pompano fish fed a 0.1 to 0.4% MOS diet were significantly lower than Vibrio in pompano fed the control diet (P ≤ 0.035), while pompano fed diets containing 0.6-0.8% MOS did not significantly influence Vibrio in pompano. Vibrio counts, however, did not significantly differ among pompano fed different levels of the MOS diet (P = 0.165) (Fig. 4).
Immune response of pompano fish fed different levels of MOS
Phagocytic ratio (PR) and phagocytic index (PI) of fish fed MOS diets
At the end of the feeding trial (day 56), the pompano fed the diets added with 0.1 to 0.6% MOS had significantly greater phagocytic ratios (PR) compared to the PR of the pompano fed the control diet (P ≤ 0.015). However, the PR value of the pompano fed diet added with 0.8% MOS did not significantly differ from the PR of the pompano fed control diet (P = 0.210). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in the PR values of pompano fed any levels of MOS inclusion in the diets (P ≥ 0.162) (Fig. 5).
There were significant increases in the phagocytic index (PI) of pompano fish fed MOS diets. The PI values in pompano fed 0.1 to 0.4% MOS increased significantly compared to the PI value in fish fed a control diet (MOS0.0) (P ≤ 0.035), while no significant differences were observed in the PI of pompano fed a diet supplemented with 0.6% and 0.8% MOS compared to PI in fish fed the control (P = 0.068). Also, the PR values were not significantly different between fish fed any levels of MOS added (P ≥ 0.267) (Fig. 5).
Serum lysozyme of pompano fed different MOS concentrations
The lysozyme activity of pompano increased significantly (P ≤ 0.001) after 56 days of feeding them diets with MOS supplementation. The highest lysozyme levels were in the pompano fed diet containing 0.2% and 0.4% MOS (1.25 times and 1.24 times higher than the lysozyme of the pompano fed control), followed by the pompano fed diets containing 0.1 and 0.6% MOS, which were both 1.18 times greater than the lysozyme of the pompano fed control diet. The lowest lysozyme activity was in the pompano fed diet, which added 0.8% MOS (1.17 times higher than the lysozyme of the pompano fed control diet) (Fig. 6). The lysozyme activity in fish fed 0.1 to 0.6% MOS was considerably greater than the lysozyme activity in fish fed control (P ≤ 0.005). However, no significant difference was observed in lysozyme activities of pompano fed diet added 0.8% MOS compared to lysozyme of pompano fed control (P = 0.061). Also, no significance was found in lysozyme activity among pompano fed any levels of MOS after 56 days (P = 0.352) (Fig. 6).
Relationship between MOS concentrations and the growth of pompano over time
Results of Pearson correlation analyses showed significantly positive relationships between MOS levels and the fish's growth rate at days 14, 28, 42 and 56 (P ≤ 0.049). Among growth performance parameters, MOS levels had the strongest correlations with specific growth rate (SGR) across all time points (Table 3). On day 14, it was found that the concentrations of MOS in the diet had a significantly positive correlation with SGR (r = 0.471, P = 0.004). The correlation values (r) between SGR and MOS levels were 0.494 and 0.483 at days 28, and 42, respectively, with the significance level (P) less than 0.001. On day 56, there was a slight downward trend in this correlation, but it was still highly significant (r = 0.452, P = 0.008). At all-time points, the SGR had the highest values of correlation (r) (Table 3); thus, the SGR was used as an independent variable in the regression model to predict the optimal MOS requirement for the maximal growth rate of pompano. (Table 3).
Table 3. Pearson correlation (r) among MOS concentrations in the diet and the growth rate of pompano over time.
|
Day 14
|
Day 28
|
Day 42
|
Day 56
|
|
r
|
Sig.
|
r
|
Sig.
|
r
|
Sig.
|
r
|
Sig.
|
Mean weight (g)
|
0.454**
|
0.005
|
0.442**
|
0.007
|
0.435**
|
0.008
|
0.335*
|
0.049
|
Weight gain (g d-1)
|
0.441**
|
0.007
|
0.442**
|
0.011
|
0.447**
|
0.006
|
0.435**
|
0.010
|
SGR (% d-1)
|
0.471**
|
0.004
|
0.494**
|
0.000
|
0.483**
|
0.001
|
0.452**
|
0.008
|
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Relationship between MOS concentrations and haematological index, intestinal microbes, and non-specific immunity (day 56)
Table 4. Pearson correlation (r) between immune response, haematological parameters, intestinal microbiota and MOS levels (day 56). Mono: Monocyte, Lym: Lymphocyte, Neu: Neutrophil Eos: Eosinophil, Bas: Basophil, TAC: total aerobic bacteria, PR: Phagocytic index, PR: Phagocytic ratio, Lys: Lysozyme.
|
RBC
|
WBC
|
Mon.
|
Lym.
|
Neu.
|
Eos.
|
r
|
0.386**
|
0.362*
|
-0.383*
|
0.481*
|
-0.104
|
0.048
|
Sig.
|
0.033
|
0.035
|
0.000
|
0.033
|
0.531
|
0.695
|
|
Baso
|
Vibrio
|
PR
|
PI
|
Lys.
|
|
r
|
-0.434**
|
-0.330*
|
0.341*
|
0.421**
|
0.559**
|
|
Sig.
|
0.015
|
0.045
|
0.039
|
0.008
|
0.000
|
|
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Pearson correlation analyses at day 56 showed that the concentrations of MOS in the diet were significantly positively correlated with RBC, WBC, and lymphocytes (P ≤ 0.035) and negatively correlated with monocyte, basophil, and Vibrio counts (P ≤ 0.045). However, there were no significant correlations between concentrations of MOS in the diet and other haematological parameters of pompano (P ≥ 0.531). At the end of the experiment (day 56), the immune parameters of pompano fish fed graded levels of MOS were significantly and positively correlated with MOS concentrations supplemented in the diet (P ≤ 0.039) (Table 4). Among the haematological indices, intestinal microbes, and immune parameters, lysozyme gained the highest values of correlation (r) (Table 4); thus, lysozyme activity was used to predict the optimal MOS requirement for pompano to reach maximal immune response.
Prediction of the optimal level of MOS requirements for maximal growth of pompano fish, T. ovatus
At day 56, there was a positive correlation between MOS inclusion and growth according to the quadratic polynomial models (R2 ≥ 0.750). As fish weight rose, the predicted optimal concentrations of dietary MOS supplementation decreased. To obtain the maximal growth of pompano in the experiment, the optimum levels of MOS requirement were predicted to be 0.440%, 0.385%, 0.371% and 0.365% at days 14, 28, 42 and 56, respectively (Fig. 7, Table 5).
Table 5. Nutritional requirement of dietary mannan oligosaccharide based on specific growth rate, SGR, % d-1 (determined by the quadratic polynomial model, y = ax2 + bx + c) of pompano, T. ovatus, fed various MOS supplements in the diets.
|
a
|
b
|
c
|
R2
|
Day 14
|
-2.346
|
1.934
|
2.045
|
0.861
|
Day 28
|
-3.431
|
2.566
|
1.617
|
0.877
|
Day 42
|
-2.259
|
1.718
|
1.545
|
0.891
|
Day 56
|
-1.735
|
1.254
|
1.367
|
0.750
|
Predicting MOS level to gain maximal immune response in pompano (day 56)
At the end of the trial (day 56), in relation to haematological indices, intestinal Vibrio, and immune parameters, the lysozyme activity of pompano fish showed the highest significant correlations with MOS concentrations in the diet (Table 4). Therefore, lysozyme activity values were used as independent variables, and MOS concentrations were used as dependent variables in the regression model for prediction for maximal immune response. The procedure to find an appropriate prediction model was the same as for growth data. In this experiment, the quadratic polynomial model gained the highest (R2). Hence, MOS supplemented levels were predicted using the quadratic polynomial regression model, and the result showed that the requirement for MOS was predicted to be 0.431% for pompano to gain maximal lysozyme level (R2 = 0.817) (Fig. 8).
Cumulative mortalities, relative risk, and hazard ratio of pompano fish challenged against salinity
We used Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests to compare the number of pompano that died after being challenged to a low salinity of 1 ppt. After 4 h of challenge in a 1 ppt salinity condition, it was observed that there were significant differences in the survival rates of pompano fish among the treatments (P = 0.021). Pompano given diets added with 0.1 to 0.4% MOS had significantly higher survival rates compared to the survival rate of pompano fed a control diet (P ≤ 0.014). However, the survival rates of fish fed 0.6% and 0.8% MOS inclusion in the diets did not differ significantly from the survival rates of pompano fed control (P ≥ 0.189). Also, there was no significant difference among the survival rates of pompano fed any levels of the diets (P ≥ 0.086). (Fig. 9).
In addition, the relative risk index (RRI) was lower in pompano fed the MOS diet when exposed to low salinity than in those fed the control diet. RRI values in pompano fed a MOS-supplemented diet were less than one when compared to pompano fed a control diet, showing that fish fed a MOS-supplemented diet had a higher capacity to tolerate salinity stress.
When compared to the relative risk indices (RRI) of pompano in control diets, the RRI values and confident intervals (CI) of those fish fed MOS inclusion diet were computed as follows: MOS0.1: 0.256 (CI: 0.0791 to 0.830); MOS0.2: 0.182 (CI: 0.057 to 0.583); MOS0.4: 0.359 (CI: 0.108 to 1.195); MOS0.6: 0.547 (CI: 0.161 to 1.864); and MOS0.8: 0.598 (CI: 0.187 to 1.908). The results showed that when exposed to low salinity, the risks were significantly reduced in pompano when fed MOS inclusion diets at 0.1 - 0.4% MOS (P ≤ 0.032) (Fig. 9).