Thermal profile of oysters during superheated steam treatment
Figure 1 shows the temperature profiles of the tropical oyster’s muscle (at the center) and outside shell during the superheated steam (SS) treatment at 170, 210, and 250°C for 6 minutes followed by rapid ice immersion for 2 minutes compared to conventional steam. The insert shows the temperature profile of the inside shell. Increase in SS temperature rapidly increased the muscles and shell’s temperatures before rapidly dropped with ice immersion. The maximum temperature, rate of heating and cooling for the muscle and shell are shown in Table 1. The maximum temperatures of the shell ranged between 75.1 to 92.7°C for the SS and 63.3°C for the steam which were about 3 to 5°C higher compared to the muscle’s temperatures (between 72.2 to 89.0°C for SS and 58.0°C for steam). The rate of heating of the shell (0.91–2.16°C/min) was also higher compared to the muscles (0.13–1.99°C/min) considering higher thermal conductivity of oyster shell (0.9–2.27 W/m.°C) versus oyster meat (Wheaton, 2007).
The heat transfer during thermal shucking is affected by variation in shell density and thickness of the oyster’s shell. The heat capacity, thermal diffusivity, and thermal conductivity of oyster’s shell reported to vary largely in the range of ~ 1 J/g.°C, 3.22–6.89 x 10− 6 m2/s, and 0.90–2.27 W/m.°C for different species as well as sampling location (Martin et al., 2007). The oysters from Bakau Hijau estuary have flaky and thin shell structure which explains the rapid heat increment during superheated steam treatment. Interestingly, heat loss from the superheated steam treated samples after 2 minutes of ice immersion, ranged between 0.75 to 1.22°C/min were also significantly higher compared to the conventional steam at 0.63°C/min. Superheated steam does not contain moisture which can act as insulation and further increasing its thermal conductivity. Rapid heating is crucial for the muscle detachment and the rapid cooling can preserve meat quality of the fresh oysters.
Table 1
Maximum temperature, heating and cooling rates of oyster’s muscle and inner shell during superheated steam (SS) treatment at different temperatures compared to conventional steam.
Treatments
|
Oyster’s meat
|
Oyster’s shell
|
Max temperature (°C)
|
Heating rate (°C/min)
|
R2
|
Cooling rate (°C/min)
|
R2
|
Max temperature (°C)
|
Heating rate (°C/min)
|
R2
|
SS, 170°C
|
72.2 ± 0.2
|
1.24 ± 0.02
|
0.999
|
0.75 ± 0.05
|
0.996
|
75.1 ± 0.3
|
1.49 ± 0.01
|
0.986
|
SS, 210°C
|
77.9 ± 0.3
|
1.47 ± 0.01
|
0.999
|
1.13 ± 0.04
|
0.996
|
86.5 ± 0.1
|
1.62 ± 0.02
|
0.996
|
SS, 250°C
|
89.0 ± 0.4
|
2.16 ± 0.01
|
0.998
|
1.22 ± 0.05
|
0.988
|
92.7 ± 0.2
|
1.99 ± 0.02
|
0.987
|
Steam, 100°C
|
58.0 ± 0.2
|
0.91 ± 0.2
|
0.987
|
0.63 ± 0.03
|
0.998
|
63.3 ± 0.3
|
1.13 ± 0.02
|
0.995
|
Effects of superheated steam for thermal shucking of tropical oyster
The effect of superheated steam temperature and time on the relaxation of the muscles, and degree of meat quality reflecting the effectiveness of thermal shucking were evaluated using response surface methodology. Besides, the meat quality, texture, and color of the shucked oysters were also evaluated to determine the raw-like properties of the treatment. All the responses were most suitably fitted with either a linear, two factor interaction or reduced quadratic model with adequacy and significance of the model evaluated by ANOVA as shown in Table 2. The adequacy and fitness of these final reduced models were sufficiently explained by acceptable correlation coefficient, R2, adjusted R2 and significant lack-of-fit test.
Table 2
ANOVA, F-value, p-value, lack of fit, and adjusted R2of the final reduced model for nine response variables of the superheated steam treatment.
Responses1
|
Shucking quality2
|
Texture2
|
Color2
|
|
Relaxation
|
Degree of release
|
Meat quality
|
Hardness (N)
|
Gumminess (N)
|
Chewiness (mJ)
|
L*
|
a*
|
b*
|
Model
|
Quadratic
|
Quadratic
|
2FI
|
2FI
|
Linear
|
Quadratic
|
Quadratic
|
Linear
|
2FI
|
F-value
|
33.86
|
17.78
|
156.32
|
42.77
|
18.43
|
30.60
|
23.87
|
189.37
|
24.04
|
p-value
|
0.0003
|
0.0034
|
< 0.0001
|
< 0.0001
|
0.0010
|
0.0002
|
0.0017
|
< 0.0001
|
0.0005
|
A
|
62.02*
|
15.81*
|
80.37*
|
74.55*
|
30.46*
|
28.69*
|
24.75*
|
210.08*
|
16.42*
|
B
|
47.78*
|
44.10*
|
370.23*
|
40.89*
|
6.40*
|
17.63*
|
13.24*
|
168.66*
|
1.30
|
AB
|
5.81*
|
13.34*
|
18.36*
|
12.89*
|
-
|
-
|
56.00*
|
-
|
54.40*
|
A2
|
-
|
15.60*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
45.49*
|
16.62*
|
-
|
-
|
B2
|
20.13*
|
1.55*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
15.48*
|
-
|
-
|
Lack of fit
|
0.0517
|
0.7215
|
0.1439
|
0.1439
|
0.0663
|
0.3965
|
0.4349
|
0.0593
|
0.6781
|
Adjusted R2
|
0.9293
|
0.7519
|
0.9261
|
0.9261
|
0.7771
|
0.8819
|
0.9196
|
0.9741
|
0.7907
|
1 Effects are statistically significant *p-value < 0.05.
2 A: Temperature; B: Time.
Relaxation, degree of release, and meat quality
Shucking an oyster involves severing the adductor muscle from the valves, thus separating the shells of the oyster. Thermal shucking provides advantage to relax the oyster’s muscle and result in gaping to facilitate meat removal from inside the shells. Figure 2 shows response surface plot of relaxation values, degree of release and meat quality of tropical oysters as function of superheated steam treatment temperature and treatment time. These parameters are important to evaluate the easiness in shucking oysters. The muscle relaxation can be determined by giving score to the gaping between two halves of the tropical oysters. The relaxation value of 0 indicates no gapping and incremental values from 1, 2 or 3 rank the degree of gapping with 3 being fully gapped. Although high in variation, the relaxation values showed increment trend with the increase in the temperature and treatment time with maximum value at 1.5. Martin (2004) reported that heat treatment with 60 s of steam injection with 60 s of holding time on Crassostrea virginica resulted in 0.2 value of relaxation and did not show any trend with different steam injection treatment time and holding time. The superheated steam treatment resulted in higher values but also reflected similar observation of high variation in the values given by low Adjusted R2 of the response surface model.
Other important factors that determine the effectiveness of superheated steam for thermal shucking are degree of release. The value of 1 in degree of release indicates a small degree of release of the adductor muscle while the value of 3 indicated the completely release of the adductor muscle. The release of adductor muscle will lead to the ease in shucking the oysters without causing cut or ‘bleeds’ in the oysters. Figure 2b shows the degree of release significantly fitted into quadratic model. By comparing the F-values, the treatment time had the greater impact on degree of release of the adductor muscle from the scars compared to the treatment temperature. Thus, prolong treatment time can resulted in similar degree of release for different superheated steam temperatures. Heat treatment stimulate the abdominal ganglion of oysters to relax the nerves causing the release of adductor muscle from the catch contraction (Namba et al., 1995). Superheated steam can facilitate rapid heating from its higher enthalpy compared to steam which increase heat transfer rate (Fang et al., 2022). The denaturation of protein and connective tissues can take place with heat treatment which leads to disruption of tertiary protein structure and gelatin transition causing the release of adductor muscle (Voisin, 2004).
The meat quality reflects the degree of freshness of the oysters. Based on visual observation, the overall appearance of the treated oyster meat was scored for sign of cooking from 1 to 3 with 1 being unacceptably cooked appearance and 3 being raw in comparison to untreated shucked oysters. The scoring opposite to Martin et al. (2007) was applied which provided better optimization configuration when overlayed. The meat quality significantly fitted into two-factor interaction model with greater effects shown by the treatment time compared to temperature as shown in Fig. 2c. Increase in superheated steam treatment time significantly reduced meat quality with higher effects of temperature at 6 min treatment time. The combination of low temperature (170°C) and time (4 min) resulted in the highest meat quality as expected. The meat quality is a crucial parameter to determine the success of a thermal shucking process as consumer prefer a ‘fresh’ and ‘raw’ oysters in terms of taste, texture and appearance (Martin, 2006).
Texture profile analysis (TPA)
The thermal treatment is expected to impart quality changes to the texture and color of the oyster meat. Figure 3 shows response surface and perturbation plots of three texture parameters recommended as indicators to compare the differences between fresh and treated muscle oysters, which are hardness, gumminess, and chewiness as function of the superheated stream temperature and time. Hardness can be defined as the ability of the oysters to maintain its own shape through the internal binding force which can indicate the firmness of the oyster muscles (Ma et al., 2021; Wang, 2015). Chewiness of oysters represents the tenderness of oysters where it can be defined as the energy required to disintegrate a solid food to a ready state of swallowing (Ma et al., 2021; Wang, 2015). Since oysters are semi-solid food samples, gumminess is also an important parameter where it can be defined as the force required to masticate the oyster muscles (Wang, 2015). The untreated tropical oysters were at 12.26 N, 0.85 N, and 0.07 mJ for hardness gumminess, and chewiness, respectively. These values were significantly lower compared to Crassostrea virginica muscles reported by Wang (2015) at 164.4 N, 88.0 N, and 65.5 J for hardness gumminess, and chewiness, respectively.
The hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were fitted into 2FI, linear, and reduced quadratic models, respectively. All texture parameters showed stronger influence of treatment temperature with one-, five-, and three-fold higher in F-value compared to time for hardness, gumminess, and chewiness, respectively (Table 2). The significant interaction effect between superheated steam treatment temperature and time was observed only on the hardness parameter as response surface shown (Fig. 3a). Increase in superheated steam temperature reduced hardness gumminess and chewiness. However, prolong superheated steam treatment showed opposite effects for these parameters except for hardness. For hardness, increase in time resulted in great reduction at low superheated steam temperature as the hardness were comparably low at high temperature treatments. The change of muscle texture is related to muscle moisture and denaturation of protein such as myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic proteins during heating leading to color and textural changes in oyster muscle (Cruz-Romero et al., 2008). According to Lekjing et al. (2017), higher temperatures caused a higher amount of protein denaturation which will lead to the softer the oyster tissues. A higher temperature of the superheated steam treatment might induce a faster protein denaturation which will lead to a more rapid textural changes where the protein denaturation rate can be increased by 600-fold for every increment of 10°C in the treatment temperature (Anglemer & Montgomery, 1976). On the other hand, the gumminess and chewiness increased significantly with increase in treatment time. This can be explained by the increase of elastic modulus of the muscle with treatment time causing the toughness of oyster meat and hence, the oysters become gummier (Chung et al., 2021; Llave et al., 2018).
Color
Color parameter is an important attribute to identify the freshness of the oysters as it represents the appearance of the oysters. L* values indicate the brightness of the oysters; a* values which is positive indicates the redness while a* values which is negative indicates the greenness of the oysters; b* values which is positive indicates the yellowness and b* values which is negative indicates the blueness of the oysters. The color of the fresh tropical oysters from Bakau Hijau estuary was at 67.03, 2.64, and 23.68, for L*, a* and b* values, respectively. Figure 4 shows the response surface plot of L*, a*, and b* values as function of superheated steam treatment temperature and time which significantly fitted into quadratic, linear, and 2FI models, respectively. The L* and a* values showed stronger influence of treatment temperature compared to time while b* values showed stronger influence of interaction of temperature and time. The F-value of temperature effect was one-fold higher than time for the L* and a* values while the F-value of interaction effect was three-fold higher than temperature and forty-two-fold higher than time for b*values. Increase in temperature and time significantly reduced L* values. Increase in temperature significantly increase a* and b* values. However, prolong superheated steam treatment showed opposite effects for these parameters.
For L* values, increase in time resulted in great reduction at high superheated steam temperature as the L* values were comparably higher at low temperature treatments. The results of L* parameter was in the agreement with the findings of Lekjing et al. (2017) where they had mentioned that the color parameter L* was decreasing with the increment of treatment temperature. The L* values of the oysters are usually improved by protein denaturation where opaque precipitates will be formed to mask the undesirable dark pigments where increasing in temperature could lead to higher rate of protein denaturation (Chung et al., 2021). On the other hand, the a* and b* values increased significantly with increase in treatment temperature. The color changes might be due to the lipid oxidation of the oyster muscles during heat treatment causing the release of free metal ions (Fe and Cu) from the muscles (Cruz-Romero et al., 2008). Lipid oxidation and Maillard reaction can impart negative effect to L* values forming dark color products (Chung et al., 2021; Lekjing et al., 2017). The changes of a* and b* values of the oysters are mainly due to the protein denaturation, especially sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar proteins (Chung et al., 2021; Cruz-Romero et al., 2007).
Numerical optimization and model verification
The superheated steam shucking was optimized with for maximum relaxation values, degree of release, meat quality, hardness, and lightness in color (L*) to obtain product which is easier to shuck but retaining the quality of the raw oysters. Figure 5 shows the graphical optimization demonstrating the overlay plot responses within the desired boundaries with the optimum area shaded in yellow. The optimization condition was selected at 170 °C and 5 minutes with predicted responses and model validation presented in Table 3 showing no significant differences (p > 0.05) between them, implying that the experimental values agreed with the predicted values at a 0.05 level. The shucking effectiveness and quality parameters of the optimized superheated steamed samples were compared against the untreated (control) and microwave treated samples as shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Predicted and experimental values of the responses for optimized superheated steam treatment compared to control and microwave treatment.
Variables
|
Control
|
Superheated steam treatment
|
Microwave treatment
|
Predicted
|
Actual
|
p-value
|
Degree of relaxation
|
0 ± 0
|
0.51
|
0.5 ± 0.1
|
0.674
|
0 ± 0
|
Degree of release
|
0 ± 0
|
1.0
|
1.0 ± 0.5
|
1.000
|
0.6 ± 0.5
|
Meat quality
|
3.0 ± 0
|
2.18
|
2.3 ± 0.5
|
0.910
|
3.0 ± 0
|
Texture parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardness (N)
|
12.3 ± 0.4
|
13.1
|
13.1 ± 0.5
|
0.977
|
14.1 ± 0.9
|
Gumminess (N)
|
0.85 ± 0.3
|
0.79
|
0.72 ± 0.2
|
0.790
|
0.87 ± 0.4
|
Chewiness (mJ)
|
0.07 ± 0.01
|
0.07
|
0.06 ± 0.01
|
0.532
|
0.07 ± 0.02
|
Color parameter
|
|
|
|
|
|
L*
|
67.0 ± 2.3
|
70.7
|
69.5 ± 3.0
|
0.688
|
64.3 ± 3.5
|
a*
|
2.6 ± 0.2
|
1.1
|
1.1 ± 0.3
|
0.994
|
3.1 ± 0.2
|
b*
|
23.7 ± 1.0
|
20.4
|
21.4 ± 1.8
|
0.532
|
22.9 ± 2.2
|
The superheated steam treatment showed higher value of relaxation (0.51) and degree of release (1.0) compared to microwave treatment at 0 and 0.60 for relaxation value and degree of release, respectively. Moreover, the L* values of the superheated steam treated oysters (69.5) were higher compared to microwave treated oysters (64.31) which indicated brighter appearance as shown in supplementary Figure S1. However, the microwave treatment (3.00) showed a better meat quality than the superheated steam treatment (2.25) where the hardness of the microwave treated oysters possessed a higher value compared to the superheated steam treated oysters. When comparing with raw oysters, we can see that the superheated steam treatment aided in improving the degree of relaxation and degree of release but loosing on texture and color especially increase in L* values and significant reduction redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) which were better preserved by the microwave treatment.
Quality changes of shucked oysters during refrigerated storage
Total Plate Count
Figure 6a illustrates the effect of SS shucking treatment compared to microwave treatment and untreated oysters on the survival and growth of bacteria during refrigerated storage of the shucked oysters measured by total plate count (TPC). For the initial counts on day zero, both treatments showed equivalent counts with the control at 4.2x103, 4.3x103 and 5.1x103 CFU/g for SS, microwave and control, respectively. The bacterial loads vary depending on the age of the oysters, time and location of the harvest. The TPC of Crassostrea iredalei harvested from the same farm in Sungai Merbok estuary, Kedah, Malaysia throughout different monsoon of the year reported range from 5.2x103 to 1.3x105 CFU/g and absent of Escherichia coli depending on the tide and raining monsoon.
After five days of storage, the untreated and microwave treated samples already significantly tripled in levels of bacteria (p < 0.05) to 1.5x104 and 1.2x104 CFU/g, respectively while the increment in SS sample was not significant. The TPC of the untreated and microwave treated samples gradually increased along 20 days storage to final count at 2.4x104 and 1.7x104 CFU/g, respectively, which were 2 and 1.3-fold higher than the SS treated samples, although the microwave treated sample was significantly lower compared to the untreated sample. The SS treatment showed lowest TPC among the samples with significant increment showed only after day 14 to 1.1x104 CFU/g which was significantly lower than the bacteria count in the microwave treated samples at day 5. Thus, the SS treatment is more efficient in the reduction of microbial load and extend the shelf life of refrigerated shucked tropical oysters by 10 days.
Mild heat treatments have shown an ability to reduce bacteria in shellfish while maintaining an essentially raw product. Martin et al. (2007) studied the application of high steam injection with and without pre-heating and holding prior to ice water immersion with 85% muscle release of raw like oyster meat reported reduction in TPC not greater than one log difference from the untreated samples after 14 days storage at 2 ⁰C. Andrews et al. (2000) noted that the application of pasteurization at 50 ℃ for 0 to 15 min on the oysters which stored at chilled condition for 14 days had an inconsistent trend on TPC within 2 logs. Chung et al. (2021) reported longer pasteurization (50 ℃) of oysters to 20 min with lower fluctuation of TPC between 50 to 2.3x104 CFU/g for 14 days refrigerated storage. When comparing with other studies, the SS treatment is efficient to reduce the microbial load of the shucked oysters during refrigerated storage up to 20 days.
Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N)
Figure 6b shows the trend of total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) of untreated and treated shucked oysters comparing superheated steam and microwave treatments during 20 days of refrigerated storage. At day 0, the TVB-N were significantly influenced by the thermal treatment with lowest value in SS sample followed by microwave and untreated sample at 11.65, 15.73, and 20.98 mg N/100 g. The TVB-N values gradually increased during storage periods with the SS treated samples remained lowest. Drastic increment in TVB-N values of microwave treated sample can be seen at day 5 which paralleled with the increase in microbial counts which finally reaching beyond acceptable limit of 30 mg N/100 g. TVB-N is a common parameter to measure the post-mortem decomposition on both protein and non-protein nitrogenous compound from the degradation caused by the microbial activity and endogenous proteolytic enzymes (Ruiz-Capillas & Moral, 2005; Tantratian & Kaephen, 2020).
Chung et al. (2021) reported that the Akoya oysters with treatment of pasteurization at 50 ℃ for 5 to 10 min showed TVB-N values below 24 mg N/100 g with elevation of values for 14 storage days. Min et al. (2020) and Songsaeng et al. (2010) showed the same trend of TVB-N values in Crassostrea belcheri and Crassostrea gigas during chilling storage (Chung et al., 2021). A study conducted by Cao et al. (2009) reported that the pacific oyster possessed 53.33 mg N/100 g of TVB-N after 18 storages days at 4 ℃.
pH
Figure 6c shows the pH changes of untreated and treated shucked oysters comparing SS with microwave treatment during 20 days of refrigerated storage. The pH of freshly treated samples was at 6.5 for the control and microwave treatment, which is within the range of pH values for freshly shucked oysters (generally between 6.2 and 6.6) (Chung et al., 2021). The freshly treated SS sample was significantly higher at pH 6.6 at day 0. During heating, protein in oysters unfolds causing the number of acidic groups decrease where it will cause an increase in pH from the changes in free carbonyl and amino groups (Cruz-Romero et al., 2007). Both untreated and microwave treated samples fell between 5.9 and 6.0 in 20 days with significant reduction to pH 6.2 started in day 5 indicating the degradation in the quality of oysters (Cruz-Romero et al., 2007). On the other hand, the SS treated sample showed significant dropped in pH in day 11 and remained at pH 6.4 until day 20 which may explain drastic increase on the TPC value at day 11 (Fig. 6a).
A pH value above 6.0 in oysters is indicative of good quality of fresh oysters while those with pH lower than 5.0 is already decomposed (Cook, 1991). The accumulation of organic acids such as lactic and pyruvic acid as a result of post-mortem glycolysis and the degradation of proteins and nucleotides causing the reduction of pH value (Chung et al., 2021; Songsaeng et al., 2010). This suggests that the SS treatment considered to preserve the quality of shucked tropical oysters during refrigerated storage with minimal organic acids presented. Moreover, inorganic salt in oyster liquor can affect the solubility of myofibrillar protein and provide volatile bases that delay the reduction of pH during storage (Chung et al., 2021).
Texture profile analysis
The changes in texture of oysters were mainly due to the changes of pH and number of bacteria where the degradation of muscles occur due to the autolysis enzymes from spoilage bacteria and oyster tissues (Tantratian & Kaephen, 2020). Figure 7 shows the changes of texture properties of the superheated steam and microwave treated shucked oysters compared to the untreated samples during 20 days of refrigerated storage. The hardness of the oyster meat showed slight reduction but no significant changes during the storage period for all samples as shown in Fig. 7a. On the other hand, the gumminess and chewiness significantly reduced with apparent observation at day 10 for the superheated steam and microwave treated samples. The control sample started showing significant changes at day 5 for chewiness as shown in Fig. 7c.
The decrease in texture might be due to disintegration of connective tissue causing the fragment of muscle occurs (Berthelin et al., 2000; Chung et al., 2021; Hyldig & Nielsen, 2007; Kong et al., 2007). The force required is reduced due to the decomposition structure in the oyster tissues where softening is not a desirable parameter when consuming oysters (Chung et al., 2021; Lekjing et al., 2017). Other studies such as He et al. (2002) and Songsaeng et al. (2010) reported that the oysters possessed softening attributes when there was increment in storage time and this showed the similar trend with the current findings. However, on the contrary, Chung et al. (2021) reported that the firmness of Akoya oyster muscle tissue increased during 14 storage days. The contradict results might be due to the different oyster species where the chemical changes such as pH, interaction with salt, structural changes of macronutrients or effect of treatment methods (Chung et al., 2021).
Color
The changes in color of oysters were mainly due to the changes of TVB-N which is the indication of protein degradation (Tantratian & Kaephen, 2020). Figure 8 shows the changes of color properties (L*, a*, and b*) of the superheated steam and microwave treated shucked oysters compared to the untreated samples during 20 days of refrigerated storage. There was no significant difference in L* values throughout 20 days storage while the a* and b* values increased gradually which indicated increasing in redness and in yellowness, respectively. Drastic increase in a* value of the superheated steam sample on day 10 may reflects the changes observed on the TPC, TVB-N and pH. The increase in a* values was contradicted with the findings of Chung et al. (2021) and Lekjing et al. (2017) where both the findings stated that the a* values showed decreasing trend throughout the storage time. The contradict results is reasonable as the color changes are due to the mixed complex reactions where the chemical reactions would occur at different rate (Chung et al., 2021).
On the other hand, for b* values, it showed the similar result with the other findings where the b* values was in an increasing trend during storage (Chung et al., 2021; Lekjing et al., 2017). However, Plaza and Gabriel (2008) found that the application of mild thermo-treatment on the tropical oysters affect the b* values in decreasing trend. The contradict results of b* values with other studies are reasonable as b* values are normally based on the composition, sugar, amino acid, temperature, pH, and trace minerals (Chung et al., 2021; Lekjing et al., 2017). According to Chung et al. (2021), yellowness indicates the decline in quality of the oysters where the increase in b* values of the oysters showed the decline in quality of oysters during chilled storage. Lipid oxidation will also occur during heating as highly unsaturated carotenoids such as astaxanthin will be degraded which leads to color loss in oyster (Cruz-Romero et al., 2008). The use of superheated steam results in decreased oxidation losses and better product quality in terms of color, shrinkage, and rehydration characteristics (Fang et al., 2022).