Study inclusion
From the database searches, 429 citations were retrieved. After duplicate were removed, 333 underwent title and abstract screening, of which 321 were excluded. The remaining 12 studies underwent full text screening, and 6 studies providing data on 287 participants were included in the final analysis (Figure 1).
Characteristics of Included Studies
Study design and participants
Four of the included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [25, 26, 27, 28]. Two studies design were pre-post, with the participants in a control group receiving strengthening exercise [29], or different levels of aerobic exercises including low, moderate and high intensity of aerobic exercises [30]. The number of participants in each study ranged from 21 [30] and 84 [28] of adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with HIV infection (See Table 1).
Quality appraisal and risk of bias assessment
Results of the quality assessment and risk of bias of the 6 included studies are presented in table 2, and 2 studies were rated as high quality [25, 28], while the remaining 4 were rated as low quality [29, 26, 27, 30]. Source of bias were random sequence generation (n=2 [29, 30], allocation concealment (n=5 [25, 26, 27, 29, 30]), blinding of outcome assessment (n= 5 [25, 26, 27, 29, 30], attrition bias, (n= 3 [26, 27, 30], selective reporting (n= 1 [29]).
Outcomes reported in included studies
Two studies [28, 29] reported high-sensitivity CRP, and four studies reported depression [25, 26, 27, 30]. Depression outcome measurement instruments included Becks Depression Inventory (BDI) score, Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression score and Montgomery-Asberg Depression score and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The outcome measure of four of the included articles [26, 27, 29, 30] were measured twice, baseline and 12 weeks post intervention. Also, one study [25] measured at two time points: baseline and 6 weeks post intervention, while one study [28] measured at three different time points: baseline, 6 months and 12 months post intervention. The clinical characteristics between the intervention and control groups were similar at baseline for all studies included (see Table 3).
Aerobic exercise interventions
The included studies had a wide variation in the types of aerobic exercise intervention used (Table 2). All the included studies reported all the intervention parameters, FITT- frequency, intensity, time, type of aerobic exercise and duration [31]. Walking was the most common type of aerobic exercise used as an intervention in the included studies [27, 28, 29, 30]. Other type of aerobic exercise used as an intervention was stationary bicycle ergometer [25, 26].
Effects of intervention
Except where otherwise stated, the effects of an intervention are reported as comparison of the intervention versus the control group.
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Two studies provided data on hs-CRP [28, 29]. One high-quality trial [28] reported no statistically significant difference in mean hs-CRP between groups. Also, a low-quality trial [29] reported no statistically significant difference in mean hs-CRP between groups (Table 3).
Depression
Four studies [25, 26, 27, 30] reported outcomes on depression. One high-quality RCT [25], reported a significant improvement (BDI; p=0.001) in the study group. One other low-quality RCT [27], reported a significant improvement (CES-D; p=0.028) in the study group as compared to controls. One low quality clinical trial [30], reported no significant (p>0.05) changes of the Montgomery-Asberg depression scores groups. One study [26] that reported outcome on negative mood/depression demonstrated significantly lower negative mood in the study group than the control group (Table 3).
Meta-analyses- Effect of interventions
Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall effect of aerobic exercise interventions on depression (4 studies) in patients living with HIV infection.
Heterogeneity test
There was no significant heterogeneity (p>0.1) in the meta-analyses of the effects of the intervention on depression outcome. Therefore, a random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. However, a substantial heterogeneity (p<0.1) was observed in the meta-analyses of the effects of the intervention on hs-CRP. This could be as a result of variations in sample sizes and duration of the intervention. Therefore, only a narrative synthesis was reported.
Results of Meta-analyses
When the four studies [25, 26, 27, 30] that considered depression as an outcome measure were pooled together, there was an overall statistically significant (Z=3.78, p<0.0002) change in depression level between the comparison groups. There was a significant trend towards a decrease in the depression scores in subjects in the aerobic exercise (intervention) group as compared with the control group (Figure 2).
Discussion
Six trials evaluating a range of aerobic exercise interventions targeted at improving hs-CRP levels and depression in PLWH undergoing HAART were included in this systematic review. The included studies were generally of fair methodological quality. The major sources of risks of bias were lack of blinding of outcome assessment, participant and personnel, lack of allocation concealment and attrition bias. The two studies [28, 29] that evaluated the effect of aerobic exercise on hs-CRP level in PLWH reported no significant effect. Evidence from three studies [25, 26, 27] reported a statistically significant decline in the depression scores of the study group as compared to control group. However, a study [30] reported no significant change in depression scores between the groups because participants in each group was subjected to different intensity of aerobic exercises, ranging from low to high.
For the bio-psychosocial outcome (depression), four studies [25, 26, 27, 30] were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses revealed that aerobic exercise interventions had a significant effect on depression scores, causing a decline in the depression scores of the subjects in the intervention group as compared to those in the control group. This evidence is similar to the findings of a current review [32] that investigated the various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that are effective in the management of depressive symptoms in PLWH. The study included only one article on the effect of aerobic exercise interventions and concluded that exercise could be a remedy to depressive symptoms in PLWH undergoing HAART [32].
For the pro-inflammatory outcome (hs-CRP), a narrative synthesis was conducted due to substantial heterogeneity in the two studies [28, 29]. The two studies reported a non-significant effect of aerobic exercise intervention on hs-CRP in PLWH. This is in agreement with a meta-analyses of five articles that reported a non-significant effect of aerobic exercise on hs-CRP among healthy adults [9]. Also, this is similar to a recent systematic review that reported a no significant change in biomarkers of inflammation (IL-6 and IL-1β) after exercise intervention [33]. However, the results of the narrative synthesis on effects of aerobic exercise on hs-CRP in PLWH should not be concluded as ‘no evidence of effect’, because the two clinical trials included do not have sufficient power to detect treatment effects. Therefore, more homogenous studies investigating the effect of aerobic exercise intervention on hs-CRP in PLWH are necessary for an effective estimate of effects.
The meta-analysis of the four article (one high quality and three low quality) reported a significant effect of aerobic exercise on depression in PWLH undergoing HAART. The evidence suggests that aerobic exercise intervention could be effective in reducing depression; however, because of the low quality of the included articles, we suggest that exercise could be incorporated as an adjunct therapy in the care of PLWH. The recommended dosage of aerobic exercise that could elicit an intervention effect as recorded in this review considering the Frequency, Intensity, Time and Type (FITT) principle is thus; exercise frequency of 3-5 sessions/week; Intensity: 55-75% of age-predicted maximal heart rate, 60-80% of VO2 max, 50-80% of heart rate reserve (HR); Time: 24-60 minutes and Type: continuous or interval aerobic exercises involving large muscle groups. Such exercises could include, walking, cycling with bicycle ergometer, running, treadmill exercise. It is suggested that qualified professionals (e.g. physiotherapist) should administer and monitor the exercise programs. Generally, the results of this review is an addition to the existing body of evidence highlighting the benefits of exercises for PLWH undergoing HAART.
Quality of evidence
Following the specifications in the GRADE ratings for quality of evidence [24], the evidence could be rated as a moderate quality evidence. This is as a result of the identification of specific bias in the included studies. Some studies included in the review demonstrated a high risk of selection bias due to non-utilization of random sequence generation in the recruiting of participants. Some other included studies had detection bias because the assessors were not blinded. Furthermore, some studies had attrition bias due to incomplete outcome reporting and drop-out rate with the failure to conduct an intention-to-treat analysis. Only two out of the six included clinical trials were appraised as high quality, while the others were appraised as low-quality trials. All these culminated to the moderate-GRADE quality of evidence.