3.1. Ligninolytic enzymes production:
Rice straw (1%) was used as a carbon source for fermentation trials. Submerged fermentation of Pleurotus ostreatus NRRL-2366 was conducted at a temperature of 28ºC for a duration of 14 days. Figure 1 illustrates the ligninolytic enzyme production ability of the screened strain Pleurotus ostreatus NRRL-2366, including Lac, AAO, LiP, and MnP. The highest activities for Lac, AAO, LiP, and MnP were recorded on the 14th day, with values of 56.60 ± 2.83 U/ml, 13.48 ± 0.55 U/ml, 10.96 ± 0.55 U/ml, and 11.09 ± 0.55 U/ml, respectively. White-rot fungi (WRF) possess a unique extracellular ligninolytic system that oxidizes and breaks down lignin, and P. ostreatus exhibits the ability to produce both hydrolytic and ligninolytic enzymes simultaneously during the fermentation of ligninocellulosic materials (Lundell et al. 2010; Ozcirak Ergun and Ozturk Urek 2017)
Table 1 Partial purification of Ligninolytic enzymes from Pleuratus osteratus.
Ligninolytic enzymes | Purification steps | Total volume (mL) | enzyme activity (U) | Protein (mg) | Specific activity (U/mg) | Purification fold | % Yield |
Lac | Crude Extract | 500 | 28300 | 166.22 | 170.481 | 1.0 | 100 |
Ammonium sulphate precipitation | 50 | 1750 | 6.86 | 255 | 1.5 | 6.18 |
AAO | Crude Extract | 500 | 6740 | 166.22 | 40.548 | 1.0 | 100 |
Ammonium sulphate precipitation | 50 | 407 | 6.86 | 59.324 | 1.46 | 6.03 60.38 |
LiP | Crude Extract | 500 | 5480 | 166.22 | 32. 968 | 1.0 | 100 |
Ammonium sulphate precipitation | 50 | 321 | 6.86 | 46.79 | 1.4 | 5.86 |
MnP | Crude Extract | 500 | 5545 | 166.22 | 33.359 | 1.0 | 100 |
Ammonium sulphate precipitation | 50 | 378 | 6.86 | 55.102 | 1.7 | 6.81 |
- Each value represents the mean ± S.D (Standard Division) and mean of three replicates
- Values in the same column with the same letter are not significantly at a significance level of P ≤ 0.05
- Lac represents Laccase, AAO represents Aryl-alcohol oxidase, LiP represents Lignin peroxidase, and MnP represents Manganese peroxidase.
3.1. Characterization of the synthesized nano-silica
SEM images were taken to examine the nanoparticles with and without immobilized catalyst enzyme (Fig. 2a, 2b). Figure 2a shows that the pure SiO2 nanoparticles were uniform, loose, and without aggregation, with a grain size ranging from 5nm to 100nm. In contrast, the SEM images of the nano-SiO2 catalyst enzyme (Fig. 2b) revealed numerous small crystal materials tightly adhered to the surface, with irregular crystal arrangement and micro holes present. This observation suggests that the SiO2 particles adsorbed a significant amount of catalyst enzymes, resulting in their irregular appearance. The nano-silica particles appeared agglomerated and in an amorphous form without clear boundaries. Hence, the SEM analysis confirmed that the size of the silica particles synthesized from rice husk falls within the nano range of 1-100 nm.
The FTIR spectrum of the nano silica powder and the nano-silica immobilized with catalyst enzyme is shown in Fig. 3(a, b). Figure 3(a) exhibits strong absorption peaks at 463, 621, and 791 cm− 1, corresponding to the Si–O–Si bending, Si–H, and symmetric Si–O–Si stretching modes of vibrations, respectively. These peaks confirm the presence of highly pure nano silica powder obtained from rice husk using a 2.5N NaOH purification treatment. Additionally, a peak at 1069 cm− 1 is observed, which is assigned to Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching vibration. This further supports the amorphous nature of the nano-silica synthesized from rice husk. In contrast, Fig. 3(b) displays additional functional groups at 1348, 1124, 992, and 888 cm− 1, which are attributed to sulfonamide groups (S = O), secondary alcohol (C-O), alkene (C = C), and alkene (C = C) groups, respectively. These additional functional groups indicate the presence of the immobilized catalyst enzymes.
The findings suggest that the enzymes laccase (Lac), aryl alcohol oxidase (AAO), lignin peroxidase (LiP), and manganese peroxidase (MnP) derived from Pleurotus ostreatus (NRRL-2366) were successfully immobilized onto nano-silica supports through the utilization of glutaraldehyde as a cost-effective and straightforward method. This immobilization technique, which involves activating the supports with amino groups and employing a glutaraldehyde spacer arm, is commonly used in the biotechnology field to enhance the stability of various enzymes for diverse applications (Hwang et al. 2004; Barbosa et al. 2013). The overall process is depicted in Fig. 4.
The efficiency of enzyme immobilization was assessed by determining the immobilization-activity yields, which were found to be 86.22 ± 4.55%, 76.11 ± 3.22%, 78.16 ± 1.82%, and 60.21 ± 3.98% for laccase (Lac), aryl alcohol oxidase (AAO), lignin peroxidase (LiP), and manganese peroxidase (MnP), respectively (Fig. 5). Covalent binding, using glutaraldehyde as a spacer, offers several advantages in terms of enzyme stability and minimized enzyme leaching. The ordered mesoporous silica provides an ideal platform for covalent immobilization due to its well-defined silanol groups, which offer reactive sites for enzyme functionalization and adjustable surface properties. This enables precise control over the positioning and density of the immobilized catalyst (Alptekin et al. 2011; Nadar et al. 2016a; Abdel-Sater et al. 2019). Furthermore, the five-atom carbon chain of glutaraldehyde serves as a spacer for enzymes, facilitating easier accessibility of their active sites to substrates. Glutaraldehyde exhibits rapid reactivity with amine groups, particularly at neutral pH (7), making it more effective than other aldehydes in forming crosslinks that are both thermally and chemically stable (Nimni et al. 1987).
3.2. Biochemical Characterization of nano-silica immobilized enzymes biocatalyst
The impact of pH on the activities of the immobilized enzymes (Lac, AAO, LiP, and MnP) was examined using spectrophotometric analysis. The activities of the immobilized enzymes were measured in various buffer solutions, including 0.05 M Glycine-HCl buffer (pH 3, 5, 7, 8), 0.05 M Sodium acetate buffer (pH 4, 5, 6), and 0.05 M Tris-base buffer (pH 8, 9). A total of 30 mg of immobilized enzyme was used for the activity assays. To evaluate the stability of the immobilized biocatalyst at different pH levels, the immobilized enzymes were incubated in buffer solutions ranging from pH 3.0 to 10.0 for 3 hours at room temperature. After incubation, the residual activity of each enzyme was determined using the standard assay method. As depicted in Fig. 6a, purified laccase (1 mg/mL) exhibited maximum activity at pH 3.0, whereas the immobilized enzyme (30 mg/mL) showed a shift of one unit towards higher pH values after cross-linking of laccase on nanosilica. This shift can be attributed to the alteration of the microenvironment of laccase by nanosilica, including ionic interactions between the enzyme and charged surfaces of nanosilica. According to (Jiang et al. 2005), immobilization can create a microenvironment around the enzyme where unequal partitioning of H+ and OH− concentrations, resulting from electrostatic interactions with the support, can cause
A change in the optimal pH was observed after covalent immobilization of laccase on different supports. For instance, a shift of 0.5 and 1.5 units towards higher pH values was reported when laccase was immobilized on Fe3O4-CS-CCn and Fe3O4-CS-EDAC supports, respectively (Kalkan et al. 2012). (B. Yang et al. 2021) also demonstrated a shift in the optimum pH for the oxidation of catechol upon immobilization of laccase on magnetic mesoporous nanosilica. In the pH stability test, it was found that the relative activity of the immobilized laccase was retained at approximately 30% at pH 8.0, while the purified laccase was inactive. The silica-laccase nanoparticles exhibited over 90% residual activity within the pH range of 3–5, whereas the purified laccase showed a significant decrease in residual activity within the same pH range (Fig. 7a). Similar findings have been reported by several researchers, indicating that the pH stability of laccase improved within the pH range of 2.0–7.0 after immobilization on DEAE-Granocel 500 and sol–gel matrix supports (Kalkan et al. 2012; Muhammad Nasir Iqbal and Asgher 2013; Gahlout et al. 2017).
The catalytic rates of immobilized aryl alcohol oxidase (AAO) on nano-silica (30 mg) were compared to those of free AAO (1 mg/mL) at various pH values under the same conditions (Fig. 6b). The optimal activity for the immobilized enzyme was observed at pH 6.0–7.0, with relatively high activities retained up to pH 8.0. In contrast, the free enzyme exhibited the highest reaction rate at pH 6.0, and a 50% reduction in activity was observed at pH 8.0. Under acidic conditions (pH 3–4), both free and immobilized AAO enzymes showed similar low activities. These findings suggest that the immobilized AAO enzyme exhibited improved pH stability compared to the free enzyme under alkaline conditions. The pH stability test revealed that almost 35% of the relative activity of immobilized AAO was retained at pH 3, while the purified AAO was inactive. Furthermore, the AAO nanoparticle exhibited over 90% residual activity in the pH range of 6–8, whereas the purified AAO showed a comparable decrease in residual activity within the same pH range (Fig. 5b). These results are consistent with the findings of Kato et al. 2009, who reported improved pH stability of AAO immobilized on 3D-mesoporous silicate materials compared to the free enzyme. AAO is primarily active within a neutral to slightly acidic pH range (5.5–7.5), with only a few enzymes active in more alkaline conditions (Goswami et al. 2013). Immobilization of AAO offers new possibilities for its catalytic activity and stability, opening doors for industrial and biocatalytic applications (Jun Kim et al. 2001; Bühler and Schmid 2004; Liu et al. 2021).
Figure 6c illustrates the effect of pH conditions on the activity of free lipase (Lip) at 1 mg/mL and immobilized Lip at 30 mg. The results showed that free Lip had maximum activity at pH 3–5, while the highest catalytic activity of nano-silica immobilized Lip ranged between pH 5–7. Moreover, the immobilized Lip exhibited strong acid-base tolerance (Fig. 6c). The relative activity of immobilized Lip remained above 90.0% in the pH range of 6–7 and reached 80% and 74% in acidic (pH 4.0) and basic (pH 8.0) solutions, respectively. This enhanced pH stability can be attributed to the protection provided by the carrier and the altered protein structure of the immobilized enzyme, which reduces the influence of pH factors (Kiani et al. 2022).
Free manganese peroxidase (MnP) remained relatively stable in the pH range of 4–6, but rapid inactivation occurred outside of this range (Fig. 6d). Previous studies have reported that LiPs from white rot fungi typically exhibit higher activities between pH 2 and 5, and after immobilization, a slight shift towards more acidic conditions is observed (Asgher et al. 2012). However, LiP from Ganoderma lucidum (GRM117) exhibits optimal pH in basic conditions after immobilization (Oliveira et al. 2018). The purified MnP also remained comparatively stable in the pH range of 4.0–6.0 but was rapidly inactivated outside of this range. The enzyme is susceptible to inactivation at pH 6.5 and higher
The temperature effects on both free and immobilized enzymes were investigated in the range of 20–70°C under standard conditions for each enzyme. The optimum temperature for all free and immobilized enzymes was found to be within the range of 25–30°C (Figs. 7a, b, c, and d). After cross-linking laccase on nanosilica, there was an observed shift in the optimum temperature towards higher values. The purified laccase had an optimum temperature of 25°C, while the immobilized laccase showed optimum activity at 30°C.
To assess the thermal stability of the enzymes, the residual activity was measured after incubating the free and the immobilized biocatalyst in the absence of substrate at different temperatures (20–70°C) for 20 minutes (Figs. 7a and b). The immobilized biocatalyst demonstrated superior stability, retaining 92%, 83%, 76%, and 63% residual activity after incubation at 55°C for laccase, AAO, lipase, and MnP, respectively. However, the immobilized biocatalyst became rapidly inactivated at temperatures above this range. In comparison, the free enzymes retained only 80%, 58%, 45%, and 38% residual activity at the same temperature. The enhanced thermo-stability of the immobilized biocatalyst can be attributed to the glutaraldehyde-enzyme cross-linking, which prevents conformational distortion of the enzyme at high temperatures (Sojitra et al. 2016; Panwar et al. 2017).
In a simplified view, this strategy achieves multiple intramolecular cross-linking, where the cross-linking agent is a flat and multifunctional structure formed by the activated support surface. This approach enhances enzyme stability against various destabilizing factors, including heat, solvents, and chaotropic reagents (Inoue et al. 2019; Parui and Jana 2021; C. Yang et al. 2021). The potential of multipoint covalent immobilization to stabilize enzymes is widely accepted in the scientific community (Weltz et al. 2020). This strategy relies on maintaining the fixed positions of all groups involved in immobilization under any experimental condition, allowing only limited movement determined by the length of the spacer arm. This contributes to improved enzyme stability by reducing conformational changes. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that cold denaturation, a distinct phenomenon from thermoinactivation, can also induce conformational changes leading to inactive forms of enzymes (C. Yang et al. 2021).
3.3. Reusability assessment of the immobilized enzymes biocatalyst
The reusability of the immobilized biocatalyst was evaluated, as depicted in Fig. 7. It was found that the immobilized Lac maintained approximately 77% of its activity after the third cycle, while AAO, Lip, and MnP retained approximately 62.5%, 41.59%, and 28.21% of their activities, respectively. The biocatalyst could be reused for up to five consecutive cycles at a temperature of 30°C.
One of the primary objectives of enzyme immobilization is to enable multiple reuse cycles, thereby reducing costs in industrial processes (Abdel-Sater et al. 2019). The ability to reuse the immobilized enzyme for multiple cycles may be attributed to factors such as multipoint, multi-subunit immobilization or the creation of favorable microenvironments (Xu et al. 2014). However, a decrease in activity over successive cycles could be attributed to denaturation, enzyme leakage during use, and diffusional effects (Ye et al. 2006).
3.4.1. p,p'- DDT degradation efficiency by the immobilized enzymes biocatalyst:
To assess the efficiency of p,p'-DDT degradation, the optimal conditions determined from previous experiments were employed. The remaining residual amounts of p,p'-DDT were quantified using HPLC analysis.
Figure 8 illustrates that the immobilized multi-enzyme biocatalyst achieved complete degradation of p,p'-DDT (10 mg L-1) under the optimized conditions of pH 5.0, incubated at 30°C for 24 hours.
To validate the degradation of p,p'-DDT by the immobilized enzymes biocatalyst and gain insights into potential degradation pathways, the extracted samples were subjected to GC-MS analysis. The results are summarized in Table 2, and the corresponding figures (Figs. 10 and 11) provide visual representations of the findings.
The GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of eleven major metabolites in the experimental samples, including actual and predicted degradation products. These metabolites were compared to the parent p,p'-DDT, which had a molecular weight (m/z) of 354 and a retention time (RT) of 36.98 min. The authentic standard of p,p'-DDT listed in the library databases and the control pure compound showed identical characteristics. Notably, the mass-spectral analysis of the samples indicated the presence of a metabolite with a parent ion of m/z 316 and a molecular composition of C14H8Cl4. This metabolite corresponded to 1,1'-(2,2-dichloroethene-1,1-diyl)bis(4-chlorobenzene) (p,p'-DDE), which is the degradation product of p,p'-DDT and confirmed the involvement of the Lac enzyme in p,p'-DDT degradation. Further analysis showed the addition of (2H) resulting in the formation of a fragment ion at m/z 318 and a base peak of m/z 246, supporting the molecular composition of C14H8Cl4 and corresponding to 1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (p,p'-DDD), indicating the transformation of DDT to DDE through dehydrohalogenation and subsequently to DDD via hydrogenation.
The degradation pathway also involved the subsequent dechlorination of p,p'-DDD, leading to the formation of 1,1'-(2-chloroethene-1,1-diyl)bis(4-chlorobenzene) (DDMU) with a molecular weight of 283. DDMU then underwent hydroxylation to form p,p'-DDOH (metabolite 5), facilitated by the hydroxyl radical oxidation of peroxidases (MnP or LiP). The oxidized compound, bis(4-chloro-3-hydroxyphenyl)acetaldehyde, generated by the action of AAO, exhibited an m/z of 267 and a molecular composition of C14H10Cl2O (metabolite 6). Further oxidation reactions potentially catalyzed by AAO converted metabolite 6 to bis(4-chlorophenyl)acetic acid (p,p'-DDA) (metabolite 7). The subsequent meta-ring cleavage by MnP and/or laccase through a hydroxyl radical mechanism led to the formation of single-ring aromatic compounds, including 1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethan-1-one (metabolite 8) with m/z 154, 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (metabolite 9) with m/z 140, and 4-methylbenzoic acid (metabolite 10) with m/z 136.
The degradation pathway of p,p'-DDT exhibits primarily multidirectional characteristics, as evidenced by the detection of two major hydroxyl derivatives. One of these derivatives, (metabolite 11) with a molecular composition of C14H8Cl4O and a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 335, is identified as 2-chloro-5-[2,2-dichloro-1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]phenol. This hydroxyl derivative undergoes electron and H+ removal from the hydroxyl phenolic group through the action of peroxidases, resulting in the formation of a phenoxyl radical (Nadar et al. 2016b). Subsequent hydroxyl radical oxidation leads to the generation of a dihydroxylation product with an m/z of 352 and a molecular composition of C14H8Cl4O, identified as 3,3'-(2,2-dichloroethene-1,1-diyl) bis (6-chlorophenol), referred to as metabolite 12. Notably, peroxidase enzymes play a crucial role in initiating the oxidative dechlorination step during the degradation of various chlorinated phenols (Mohamed et al. 2023).
Enzymes produced extracellularly by white-rot fungi exhibit remarkable versatility in their ability to mineralize structurally diverse and highly persistent organic pollutants, which share similarities with lignin. Previous studies have demonstrated variations in the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis depending on the specific extracellular products interacting with different substrates (Wang et al. 2018). Peroxidases responsible for lignin degradation depend on a source of H2O2, which is supplied through the action of oxidases produced by fungi. Aryl-alcohol oxidases (AAOs, EC 1.1.3.7), also known as veratryl-alcohol oxidases, aromatic alcohol oxidases, or benzyl-alcohol oxidases, are a class of flavin-adenine-dinucleotide (FAD)-containing enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of aromatic and aliphatic allylic primary alcohols, concurrently reducing molecular oxygen to H2O2 (Urlacher and Koschorreck, 2021). The potential of AAOs to efficiently provide hydrogen peroxide for reactions catalyzed by peroxidases and peroxygenases is widely recognized. Additionally, several other flavin-containing oxidases, including vanillyl alcohol oxidase (EC 1.1.3.38) and 4-hydroxymandelate oxidase (decarboxylating; EC 1.1.3.19), possess the ability to oxidize aromatic or phenolic compounds (de Jong et al. 1992; Ewing et al. 2020; Martin et al. 2020). The mass spectra of identified by-products formed during the degradation process are presented in the supporting information (figures S1, S2, and S3).
Table 2
p,p'- DDT and identified p,p'- DDT transformation products detected by GC/MS during biodegradation by the immobilized enzymes biocatalyst
No. | Compound Name | RT (min) | Fragments (m/z) | MW | Formula |
1 | p,p'-DDT | 36.98 | 199, 214, 235,246,354 | 354 | C14H9Cl5 |
2 | p,p'-DDE | 34.06 | 165, 176, 246, 318 | 316 | C14H8Cl4 |
3 | p,p'-DDD | 32.96 | 176, 246, 318, 320 | 318 | C14H10Cl4 |
4 | p,p'DDMU | ------- | ------- | 283 | C14H9Cl3 |
5 | p,p'- DDOH | 26.31 | 199, 213, 255,267 | 267 | C14H10Cl2O |
6 | bis(4-chloro-3-hydroxyphenyl)acetaldehyde | 35.52 | 125, 246, 265 | 265 | C14H10Cl2O |
7 | p,p'-DDA | 32.96 | 199,233, 264,281 | 281 | C14H10Cl2O2 |
8 | 4-chlorobenzoic acid | 7.04 | 91,121,136, 139, 154 | 154 | C8H7ClO |
9 | 4-chlorobenzaldehyde | 7.02 | 91,121, 136, 140 | 140 | C7H5ClO |
10 | 4- methylbenzoic acid | 15.76 | 91, 121, 136 | 136 | C8H8O2 |
11 | 2-chloro-5-[2,2-dichloro-1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]phenol | 32.96 | 191, 228, 246, 334 | 334 | C14H8Cl4O |
12 | 3,3'-(2,2- dichloroethene-1,1-diyl) bis (6-chlorophenol) . | 28.74 | 123,149,222,264,352 | 350 | C14H8Cl4O2 |