Isolation of compounds 1–8 and their structural elucidation
The dried fruiting bodies of G. orientispectabilis were extracted with 80% MeOH at room temperature, and the resulting MeOH extract was successively partitioned with four representative organic solvents to obtain four main fractions. Each fraction was analyzed by LC-MS using a house-built UV library database, which revealed that the CH2Cl2-soluble fraction was rich in triterpenoid analogs with a high molecular formula between m/z 750 and m/z 850. Column chromatography procedures, including semi-preparative HPLC purification, were efficiently applied to the CH2Cl2 fraction, leading to the isolation of eight lanostane-type triterpenoids (1–8) (Fig. 1). Compound 1 was structurally determined to be fasciculic acid A (1)13 by comparison of its spectroscopic data with those previously reported and by HR-ESI-MS analysis; other compounds (2–8) were identified as new lanostane-type triterpenoids, which were named gymnojunols A-G.
Gymnojunol A (2) was obtained as an amorphous powder. The molecular formula was confirmed to be C46H71NO9 based on the molecular ion peak [M + H]+m/z 782.5207 (calcd. for C46H72NO9, 782.5207) using positive-ion high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The IR spectrum exhibited absorption bands corresponding to hydroxyl (3668 cm-1) and aromatic (1662 cm-1) functionalities. The 1H NMR data (Table S1) of 2 showed the presence of proton signals for two oxygenated methines at δH 3.13 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz), 3.35 (1H, t, J = 6.0 Hz), a de-shielded oxygenated methine at δH 4.99 (1H, ddd, J = 11.5, 10.5, 4.0 Hz), seven tertiary methyl groups at δH 0.70 (3H, s), 0.89 (6H, s), 1.04 (3H, s), 1.10 (3H, s), 1.17 (3H, s) and 1.22 (3H, s), and a secondary methyl group at δH 0.91(3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), suggesting a lanostane-type triterpenoid skeleton. The 13C NMR (Table S1) data of 2, obtained with the assistance of HSQC spectra, confirmed the presence of oxygenated methines at δC 73.8, 78.5, and 80.1, and eight methyl groups at δC 15.5, 16.3, 18.3, 19.8, 23.1, 24.1, 26.3, and 28.2. Based on this information, compound 2 was predicted to possess a lanostane-type triterpenoid backbone. In addition, signals assignable to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG) moiety [δH 1.33 (3H, s), 2.53 (2H, s), 2.39 (1H, d, J = 14.5 Hz), 2.58 (1H, d, J = 14.5 Hz), and δC 27.8, 45.5, 45.8, 70.5, 171.4, 171.7]14 were observed, and signals that corresponded to the phenylalanine methyl ester attached to the HMG moiety [δH 3.08 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 7.0 Hz), 3.18 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 5.5 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s), 4.90 (1H, m), 7.01 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.14 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.24 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.29 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), and δC 37.5, 51.4, 52.9, 126.9, 128.5, 129.0, 135.9, 172.3]15 were also observed. Collectively, compound 2 appeared to be highly similar to 1, fasciculic acid A13, with the only difference being the attachment of phenylalanine methyl ester to the HMG moiety. Further analysis of the HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra (Fig. 2) revealed the complete planar structure of 2, as shown in Fig. 1.
A comparison of the optical rotation value (\({\left[\alpha \right]}_{\text{D}}^{25}\) +10.8) of 2 with that of fasciculic acid A13 suggested that compound 2 had an absolute configuration identical to that of fasciculic acid A. Furthermore, the biosynthetic perspective also indicated that the stereochemistry of 2 was the same as that of fasciculic acid A. The NOEs between H-2/H3-19, H-3/H-5, H-5/H3-30, and H3-18/H-20, as well as 13C chemical shifts at C-24 (δC 78.9 in fasciculic acid A13 and δC 78.5 in 2) further supported the above evidence (Fig. 3). The experimental ECD spectra of 1 and 2 were compared to confirm the absolute configuration of the triterpenoid backbone of 2 (Fig. 4A). In addition, to assign the absolute configuration at C-2'' of the phenylalanine methyl ester, a computational method coupled with a statistical procedure (DP4+) was performed at the mPW1PW91/6-311* level for the two diastereomers of the phenylalanine methyl ester moiety, and the structural equivalence of 2 to 2''S-2 with 95.96% probability was confirmed (Fig. S8). Thus, the complete assignment of the absolute configuration of 2, namely gymnojunol A, was elucidated, as shown in Fig. 1, and its hypothetical biosynthetic pathway was predicted (Fig. 5).
Gymnojunol B (3), obtained as an amorphous powder, possessed a molecular formula of C45H69NO10 deduced from the molecular ion peak [M + H]+m/z 784.5006 (calcd. for C45H70NO10, 784.5000) in positive-ion HR-ESIMS. The IR spectrum exhibited absorptions corresponding to the hydroxyl (3677 cm-1) and aromatic (1660 cm-1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR (Table S1) of 3, obtained by the aid of HSQC and HMBC spectra, were almost identical to those of 2, with the absence of a methoxy group in phenylalanine residue and the presence of a hydroxyl group at C-12. Compound 3 was also highly similar to pardinol A, with the only difference being the absence of a methoxy group at the phenylalanine residue16. The complete planar structure of 3 is shown in Fig. 1. The NOESY analysis revealed that compound 3 had the same NOEs as compound 2, with an additional NOE between H-12 and H3-18 (Fig. 3). Because the presence or absence of methoxy and hydroxyl functionalities did not notably impact the Cotton effect, the experimental ECD spectrum of 3 was compared with that of 2; both exhibited a strong positive Cotton effect at 212 nm (Fig. 4A). Collectively, the absolute configuration of 3, namely gymnojunol B, was assigned, as illustrated in Fig. 1, and its biosynthetic pathway is illustrated in Fig. 5.
Gymnojunol C (4) was obtained as an amorphous powder. The molecular formula was confirmed to be C47H71NO11, based on the molecular ion peak [M + H]+m/z 826.5099 (calcd. for C47H72NO11, 826.5105) in positive-ion HR-ESIMS. The IR spectrum showed absorption bands for the hydroxyl (3666 cm-1) and aromatic (1670 cm-1) groups. The 1H NMR data (Table S1) of compound 4 was similar to those of compound 3, with two de-shielded oxygenated methines [δH 4.79 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz) and 5.11 (1H, ddd, J = 11.5, 10.5, 4.5 Hz)], an oxygenated methine [δH 4.01 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz)] and a singlet methyl attributable to an acetoxyl group [δH 1.97 (3H, s)]. Compared to compound 3, one of the hydroxyl groups appeared to be acetylated in 4. Based on the HMBC of H2-1/C-2, H2-1/C-3, H-2/C-3, H-2/C-4, H-3/C-2, H-3/C-28, and H-3/C-29, along with the cross peaks between H2-1/H-2/H-3 in 1H-1H COSY spectrum (Fig. 2), the phenylalanine-attached HMG moiety appeared to be attached at C-3, and the acetoxyl group was confirmed to be attached at C-2. Hydroxylation at C-12 was confirmed by further analysis of the HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra (Fig. 2). The complete planar structure of compound 4 was elucidated in Fig. 1. The NOESY spectrum revealed identical correlations between the protons as in 2 and 3, suggesting the same absolute configuration of 4 as that of compounds 2 and 3 (Fig. 3). Thus, the experimental ECD spectrum of 4 was compared with those of 2 and 3, and the spectrum of 4 exhibited a strong positive Cotton effect at 214 nm (Fig. 4A). Collectively, the absolute configuration of compound 4, gymnojunol C, was assigned, as illustrated in Fig. 1, and its hypothetical biosynthetic pathway was predicted (Fig. 5).
Gymnojunol D (5) was obtained as an amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was determined as C31H52O6 from the molecular ion peak [M + Na]+m/z 543.3661 (calcd. for C31H52NaO6, 543.3662) using positive-ion HR-ESIMS. The IR spectrum exhibited absorptions corresponding to hydroxyl (3668 cm-1) and alkene (1662 cm-1) functionalities. The 1H NMR (Table S2) spectrum of 5 exhibited the presence of proton signals attributable to four oxygenated methines at δH 3.03 (1H, d, J = 9.5 Hz), 3.43 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 2.0 Hz), 3.68 (1H, m), 3.71 (1H, m), a de-shielded oxygenated methine at δH 4.92 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz), seven tertiary methyl groups at δH 0.62 (3H, s), 0.85 (3H, s), 1.04 (3H, s), 1.05 (3H, s), 1.07 (3H, s), 1.16 (3H, s), and 1.22 (3H, s), and a methoxyl group at δH 3.38 (3H, s). The 13C NMR (Table S2) data of 5, obtained with the assistance of HSQC and HMBC spectra, confirmed the existence of oxygenated methines at δC 69.3, 72.4, 74.4, and 83.5; a downfield-shifted oxygenated methine at δC 99.5; tertiary methyl groups at δC 16.4, 16.8, 20.0, 23.9, 24.1, 26.1, and 28.3, and a methoxy group at δC 53.7. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 5 closely resembled those of crustulinol17, a lanostane-type triterpenoid. The only difference was the replacement of the hydroxyl group at C-21 with a methoxy group in 5, which caused a downfield shift of H-21. This was supported by the HMBC correlations of 21-OCH3 with C-21 (δC 99.5), and H-21/21-OCH3, C-22 and C-24, as well as by cross-peaks of COSY between H2-15/H2-16/H-17/H-20/H-21 and H-20/H2-22/H2-23/H-24 (Fig. 2). Further analysis of the HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra allowed the determination of the complete planar structure of compound 5, as shown in Fig. 1. The relative configuration of 5 was assigned using the NOESY correlations of H-12/H-21, H3-18/H-20, and H-20/H-24 (Fig. 3). Based on the reported structure of crustulinol17, the absolute configurations of C-12 and C-21 are S and R forms, respectively; however, NOESY analysis of 5 revealed that these carbons have different stereochemistry17. Thus, the relative configurations of 5 were unambiguously determined to be 2R*,3R*,5R*,10S*,12R*,13R*,14S*,17R*,20R*,21S*, and 24S*. Quantum chemical calculations of the ECD simulations were performed to verify the absolute configuration of 5. The ECD data of the two possible enantiomers, 5a (2R,3R,5R,10S,12R,13R,14S,17R,20R,21S, and 24S) and 5b (2S,3S,5S,10R,12S,13S,14R,17S,20S,21R, and 24R), were calculated, and the experimental ECD spectrum of 5 was in good agreement with that of 5a, as shown in Fig. 4B. Thus, the chemical structure of 5, namely gymnojunol D, was elucidated, as shown in Fig. 1, and its hypothetical biosynthetic pathway was revealed (Fig. 5).
Gymnojunol E (6) was obtained as an amorphous powder. The molecular formula was established as C47H71NO11 based on the molecular ion peak [M + H]+m/z 826.5115 (calcd. for C47H72NO11, 826.5105) in positive-ion HR-ESIMS. The IR spectrum exhibited absorption bands for the hydroxyl (3700 cm-1) and aromatic (1660 cm-1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR (Table S2) of 6, obtained by the aid of HSQC and HMBC spectra, presented high similarity with those of 5, with additional signals assignable to the phenylalanine methyl ester attached to the HMG moiety14,15. With the absence of a proton signal for H-2 in 6 [δH 3.71 (m)], which appeared to be downfield shifted to δH 4.97 (1H, ddd, J = 11.5, 10.5, 4.5 Hz), the HMG moiety was predicted to be attached at C-2. This was confirmed by careful analysis of HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra (Fig. 2); H-2/C-1', H-2'/C-1', H3-6'/C-2' and C-4', H-4'/C-5', H-2''/C-1'', 1''-OCH3/C-1'', H-3''/C-1'' and C-4''. Further analysis of the 1H-1H COSY spectrum facilitated determining the complete planar structure of 6, as indicated in Fig. 1. The relative configuration of the triterpenoidal moiety of 6 was predicted to be the same as 5 because the similar NOEs were observed between the protons (Fig. 3). In accordance with the absolute configuration of the phenylalanine methyl ester-attached HMG moiety that was previously determined as 3'S, 2''S, and based on the prediction that the phenylalanine methyl ester-attached HMG moiety does not notably affect the Cotton effect, the experimental ECD spectrum of compound 6 was compared with that of 5. As shown in Fig. 4C, the ECD spectrum of 6 exhibits a strong positive Cotton effect at 219 nm. Thus, the absolute configuration of 6, namely gymnojunol E, was determined, as shown in Fig. 1 and its biosynthetic pathway is illustrated in Fig. 5.
Gymnojunol F (7) was then obtained as an amorphous powder. The molecular formula was established as C47H71NO11, based on the molecular ion peak [M + H]+m/z 826.5128 (calcd. for C47H72NO11, 826.5105) in positive-ion HR-ESIMS. The IR spectrum exhibited absorptions corresponding to hydroxyl (3700 cm-1) and aromatic (1677 cm-1) functionalities. The 1H and 13C NMR (Table S2) of 7, obtained with the assistance of HSQC and HMBC spectra, were almost identical to those of 6, except for the chemical shifts of the oxygenated methines at C-2 and C-3. The proton signal of H-2 was upfield shifted from δH 4.97 (1H, ddd, J = 11.5, 10.5, 4.5 Hz) to δH 3.85 (1H, td, J = 11.5, 4.0 Hz), and that of H-3 was rather downfield shifted from δH 3.12 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz) to δH 4.60 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz) in 7, suggesting the esterification of C-3 instead of C-2. This was confirmed by the HMBC correlations of H2-1/C-2, H2-1/C-3, H-2/C-1, H-2/C-3, H-2/C-4, H-3/C-2, H-3/C-4, and H-3/C-5, as well as the cross-peaks between H2-1/H-2/H-3 in 1H-1H COSY spectrum (Fig. 2). NOESY analysis suggested that compound 7 possessed the same relative configuration as 5 and 6 (Fig. 3); thus, the experimental ECD spectra of the three compounds were compared. As shown in Fig. 4C, the ECD spectrum of 7 shows the same pattern as those of 5 and 6, exhibiting a strong positive Cotton effect at 213 nm. Thus, the chemical structure of 7, namely gymnojunol F, was elucidated, as shown in Fig. 1, and its hypothetical biosynthetic pathway is shown in Fig. 5.
Gymnojunol G (8) was also obtained as an amorphous powder. The molecular formula was confirmed to be C48H71NO12 based on the molecular ion peak [M + H]+m/z 854.5052 (calcd. for C48H72NO12 and 854.5055) using positive-ion HR-ESI-MS. The IR spectrum exhibited absorptions corresponding to the hydroxyl (3675 cm-1) and aromatic (1673 cm-1) groups. The 1H and 13C NMR data (Table S2) of 8, obtained from the HSQC and HMBC spectra, were highly similar to those of 7. The only differences were the absence of a methoxy group at C-21 and presence of an additional signal for acetyl functionality. Using HMBC correlations between H-2 (δH 5.11)/2-OC (δC 171.2) and 2-OCOCH3 (δH 1.96)/2-OC, the esterification at C-2 was confirmed, along with its de-shielded proton value, δH 5.11 instead of δH 3.85 (1H, td, J = 11.5, 4.0 Hz) in 7. The signal for the methoxy group at C-21 was absent, where H-21 was downfield shifted to δH 5.51 (1H, br s), while the carbon signal showed upfield shifted value, δC 93.1, compared to those of compounds 5–7 that have the methoxy functionality at C-21 (δC 99.5, 99.5 and 99.7). This was further supported by the HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra, in which HMBC correlations of H2-1/C-2, H2-1/C-3, H-2/C-3, and H-3/C-2 and cross-peaks between H2-1/H-2/H-3 were observed (Fig. 2). Using NOESY analysis (Fig. 3), compound 8 was assumed to have the same stereochemistry as the previously discussed compounds; thus, its experimental ECD spectrum was compared with those of 5–7. As shown in Fig. 4C, the ECD spectrum of 8 also showed a strong positive Cotton effect at 217 nm. The absolute configuration of 8, namely gymnojunol G, was confirmed, as depicted in Fig. 1, and its hypothetical biosynthetic pathway was predicted (Fig. 5).
Autophagy is a cellular mechanism by which long-lived proteins or damaged organelles are eliminated or recycled as energy sources. If autophagy does not proceed normally in cells, it can be the root of various diseases, such as neurodegeneration, aging, and cancer. Because autophagy is involved in both the promotion and inhibition of cancer, compounds that modulate autophagy can be strategically used in treating and preventing cancer18,19. Immunoblotting analyses of LC3B, an autophagic marker protein, were performed in HeLa cells treated with compounds 1–8 (Fig. 6) to evaluate the autophagic activity. Treatment with compounds 2, 6, and 7 for 24 h increased LC3B-II levels, similar to that induced by bafilomycin, an autophagy inhibitor. Treatment with compound 8 inhibited the levels of both LC3B-I and LC3B-II, comparable to that inhibited by rapamycin, an autophagy inducer. These results suggested that compounds 2 and 6–8 are autophagy modulators. As another method to measure autophagy, compounds 1–8 were also tested for their autophagic activities against HeLa cells stably expressing EGFP-LC3B (Fig. 7). EGFP-LC3B puncta were clearly detected in cells treated with 2 and 6–8, indicating their ability to modulate autophagy. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, autophagy inhibitor) was used as a positive control. In addition, compounds 1–8 were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity in human cancer cell lines, including HeLa (human cervical cancer), MDA-MB-231 (human triple-negative breast cancer), and HL-60 (human acute promyelocytic leukemia). Compounds 6–8 showed weak cytotoxicity against the tested cancer cell lines, whereas the other compounds exhibited no cytotoxicity even up to 50 µM (Table S3).