3.1. Structural elucidation
Figure 1 depicts the crystalline phase of isolated photocatalysts. In Fig. 1, the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 16.1°, 18.9°, 20.8°, 25.0°, 27.2°, 30.3°, 34.4°, 35.9°, 43.7°, 49.2°, 59.2°, 63.3° codes for (020), (120), (200), (220), (211), (231), (131), (122), (151), (242), (162), (004) diffraction planes of the pure Ni3V2O8. These results match both the JCPDS No. 74-1484 and the orthorhombic phase of Ni3V2O8 [36]. Besides, few characteristic peaks observed at 2θ = 23.5°, 39.0° and 46.2° are related to (111), (220) and (311) planes for pure AgI and seem to be well associated with the hexagonal phase (JCPDS No. 09-0374) [37]. For Ni3V2O8/AgI nanocomposites, a good coexistence of both phases of Ni3V2O8 and AgI is observed. At the same time, the peak intensity of the AgI seems to be reduced with increasing Ni3V2O8 in the Ni3V2O8/AgI composite, which indicates a successful formation of the Ni3V2O8/AgI composite. The FTIR spectra of isolated photocatalysts are displayed in Fig. 2. For AgI, the peak appears around 559 cm− 1 is a characteristic vibrational peak of Ag-I bond [38]. Pure Ni3V2O8 exhibits V-O-V stretching vibrations at 667 cm− 1. The Ni-O stretching vibration is observed at 424 cm− 1. The bands at 797 and 925cm− 1 is due to the stretching of VO4 (symmetric and asymmetric) [39]. In the case of Ni3V2O8/AgI, the peak area of Ni3V2O8 are enlarged with the reducing the weight of AgI, representing the co-existence among Ni3V2O8 and AgI in the composite.
3.2. Morphological analysis
The morphology of the as prepared photocatalytical materials is investigated by SEM and TEM, and the outcomes arrived are presented in Fig. 3(a-c) and 4(a-c). The SEM picture of AgI nanoparticle is shown in Fig. 3a, whereas the Ni3V2O8 exhibits a nanocube like morphology as seen in Fig. 3b. In addition, it is interesting to observe that AgI nanoparticles are dispersed and anchored to Ni3V2O8 nanocube walls in Ni3V2O8/AgI heterojunctions (Fig. 3(c)). The (EDS) energy dispersive x-ray spectral studies exhibits the presence of Ag and I elements in pure AgI as shown in Fig. 3d and the presence of Ni, V and O in Ni3V2O8 is presented in Fig. 3e. However, AgI/Ni3V2O8 contains elements such as Ni, V, O, Ag, and I (Fig. 3f), which prove that the prepared material has no other impurities.
The morphologies displayed in Fig. 4a-d are the TEM images which are agree well with the SEM images. In addition, the HRTEM image of a particular portion is displayed in Fig. 4d that shows the formation of an interface between the AgI and Ni3V2O8. From the Fig. 4d, AV-2 composite has the lattice fringes values of 0.285 and 0.321 nm which coincide with (122) and (111) diffraction planes of the Ni3V2O8 and AgI, respectively. In addition, the Fig. 4e displays the SAED pattern of the optimized AV-2 composite photocatalyst. The EDS pattern of AV-2 is shown in Fig. 3f, it indicates clearly the existence of Ni, V, O, Ag and I elements with no other impurities. Further, the optimized AV-2 photocatalyst images of elemental mapping in Fig. 5 supports the presence of Ni, V, O, Ag and I elements and is in good agreement with EDS results in Fig. 3f.
3.3. Optical properties
The optical performance of the pure Ni3V2O8, pure AgI, AV-1, AV-2 and AV-3 were obtained from UV-DRS. From Fig. 6a, the absorption edges of pure Ni3V2O8, pure AgI, AV-1, AV-2 and AV-3 nanocomposites are observed at 532, 451, 454, 456 and 461 nm respectively (Fig. 6a). The bandgap energy value (Eg) of the synthesised photocatalytic samples was obtained by substituting the values in the Kubelka-Munk Eq. (1) [39],
where, α, v, h and Eg are the absorption coefficient constant, frequency of light, Planck`s constant, and bandgap energy correspondingly. A graph plotted between hv vs (αhv)1/2 is presented in Fig. 6b, and the intercept of the plot hv versus (αhv)1/2 gives the Eg values. The corresponding Eg values of pure Ni3V2O8, pure AgI, AV-1, AV-2 and AV-3 are 2.33, 2.75, 2.73, 2.72 and 2.69 eV are calculated.
The visible light photocatalytic efficacy of the photocatalysts were significantly affected due to fast recombination effects of photogenerated charged carriers. The photoluminescence (PL) of prepared samples was observed at excitation wavelength 320 nm and obtained results are shown in Fig. 6c. As compared to Ni3V2O8, the PL emission peak intensity of composites Ni3V2O8/AgI is smaller. Further, the PL intensity of the composites AV-1, AV-2, and AV-3 are gradually reduced by the addition of Ni3V2O8 in AgI. This infers that Ni3V2O8/AgI composites have lower e−/h+ pair recombination.
3.4. Photocatalytic degradation studies
Visible light photocatalytic activity towards the RhB degradation using Ni3V2O8, pure AgI, AV-1, AV-2 and AV-3 photocatalysts is shown in Fig. 7a. The visible light photocatalytic degradation of pure Ni3V2O8 and AgI are ~ 10 and 40%, whereas the prepared AV-1, AV-2 and AV-3 nanocomposites displays 75, 82 and 65% of degradation efficiency respectively. As depicted in Fig. 7 (a), the prepared Ni3V2O8/AgI nanocomposite photocatalysts exhibits an excellent photocatalytic activity than the pure AgI and Ni3V2O8. The photocatalytical degradation efficiency of Ni3V2O8/AgI composites, increases with the increasing content of Ni3V2O8 upto 20 wt% after that the degradation efficiency falls down, due to the addition of Ni3V2O8 on the AgI surface which might have increased the recombination of the photoinduced charge carriers. Among all isolated photocatalysts, AV-2 seems as a superior photocatalytic degradation (82%). From Fig. 7b, the decreasing order of photocatalytic activity towards the RhB degradation can be written as follows: AV-2 > AV-1 > AV-3 > AgI > Ni3V2O8. The kinetics study of the photocatalytic degradation reaction is analysed using the below equation of first-order kinetics,
ln(C0/Ct) = kt (2)
here, Ct and C0 are the concentration of RhB at various time intervals of the photocatalytical degradation and initial concentration, k and t are the rate constant (min− 1) and irradiation time (min) and respectively. The calculated apparent k values are 0.0097, 0.0012, 0.0230, 0.0603, 0.0187 min− 1 for Ni3V2O8, AgI, AV-1, AV-2 and AV-3 correspondingly, shown in Fig. 7b. The composite AV-2 shows a greater rate constant than the pure Ni3V2O8 and pure AgI photocatalysts. This may be due to the effective formation of heterojunction between Ni3V2O8 and AgI that has certainly minimized the recombination of photoinduced e−/h+ pairs.
The degradation of RhB experiments were performed to detect the effect of catalyst amount by changing the quantity of the optimized AV-2 photocatalyst from 0.5 to 2.0 gL− 1. As shown in Fig. 7c, the visible light degradation rate of RhB increases with increasing catalyst concentration as 0.5 to 1.5 gL− 1, followed by a decrease in efficiency due to the colloidal solution obstructing the light passing through it. The optimum quantity of catalyst to achieve the highest degradation of RhB is 1.5 gL− 1. Then the radical trapping experiment is carried out to identify the major active species involved in the RhB degradation under VLI. Several scavenger agents such as IPA (1 mM), AO (1 mM) and BQ (1 mM) are used to trap h+, •OH and O2•-, radicals correspondingly [40, 41]. As a result of the experiment, the results are displayed in Fig. 7d. It exhibits that the RhB degradation is highly limited by the addition of IPA and BQ that traps O2•། and •OH radicals correspondingly. The results of the trapping experiments suggested that •OH and O2•།radicals play a vital role in the degradation mechanism of RhB. Also, noticed that no significant changes in degradation in the presence of AO. Further, in order for commercial purpose, the photocatalyst stability is expected as a main aspect. Figure 7e shows the assessment of the stability of optimized AV-2 visible light photocatalyst composite on the degradation of RhBs. The collected photocatalyst at the end of each cycle were dried for 6 h at 80 ◦C and then reused in the next run. After three successive degradation cycles, results revealed that the photocatalytic activity remained almost the same (Fig-7e). The optimized AV-2 nanocomposite was reused three times with no significant loss of photocatalytic activity, which confirmed the stability of the reused nanocomposite photocatalyst Ni3V2O8/AgI.
The photoelectrochemical (PEC) study defines the ability of migration and separation of photogenerated charge carriers. Figure 8 displays the electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and photocurrent of the bare Ni3V2O8, pure AgI and optimized AV-2 photocatalyst. Figure 8a shows the intensities of transient photocurrent of the pure AgI and Ni3V2O8 which are lower than the AV-2 optimized photocatalyst. photocurrent intensity of the optimized AV-2 composite is 1.24 and 1.13 times superior than pure Ni3V2O8 and pure AgI respectively. The observed trend reveals the increased charge separation efficiency of the AV-2 composite. In Fig. 8b, the optimized AV-2 composite shows a lesser radius semi-circular of the Nyquist plots than the bare Ni3V2O8 and AgI, which implies lower charge transfer resistance in AV-2. Electrochemical study results clearly indicate that the AV-2 optimized composite has a better electron and hole separation and an excellent charge transfer ability compared to Ni3V2O8 and AgI.
3.5. Mechanism of Photocatalytic degradation
The probable pathway of visible light photocatalytical degradation of RhB using Ni3V2O8/AgI composite is presented in Fig. 9. The maximum valence band (VB) and minimum conduction band (CB) of semiconductor materials were examined by the following Butler - Ginley Eqs. (3) and (4),
EVB = X - Ee + 0.5 (Eg) (3)
ECB = (EVB - Eg) (4)
Here, ECB and EVB are the CB and VB potentials correspondingly, Eg, Ee and X is the bandgap values of the photocatalyst, free electron energy (~ 4.5 eV) and electronegativity respectively. The assessed VB and CB band potential values of Ni3V2O8 and AgI are 2.623, 2.379 eV and 0.273 and − 0.411 eV correspondingly. Both the Ni3V2O8 and AgI gets excited from their ground state and e- on the CB surface of Ni3V2O8 are transferred to the VB surface of AgI under the VLI. Further, AgI CB potential has more -ve reduction potential than the standard redox potential E0 of (O2/O2•-) (− 0.33 eV νs. NHE), hence the free e− on the surface of CB reduces the O2 to form O2•།. Meanwhile, Ni3V2O8 VB potential is more + ve than the standard redox potential E0 of (•OH/OH−) (+ 2.4 eV vs. NHE), hence the positive holes (h+) oxidizes the H+ into •OH. The formation of both •OH and O2•།radicals contributes to the active degradation of the harmful contaminant into harmless products like H2O, CO2 and mineral acids. Accordingly, the constructed Ni3V2O8/AgI heterojunction has effectively enhanced the photocatalytic performance in terms of superior visible light absorption and the effective separation of the charged particles.