3.1 XRD Analysis
X-ray diffraction design is fundamental to get the crystalline structural information on the given material. Under the investigation if the sample seems to be crystalline then it tends to be well defined peaks. While non-crystalline or amorphous systems show a broad peaks rather than well defined peaks [15, 16]. The X-ray diffraction sample of pure PVP and PVP complexed with MgBr2 with the addition of nano filler Al2O3 are displayed in Fig. 1. In the figure, the Pure PVP shows sharp peaks at an angle of 2θ = 21.8, 26.23, 30.33, 31.11, 33.630 this indicates the sample processes the semi crystalline nature [17]. The intensity of these peaks step by step diminishes with the increment of MgBr2 along with additive nano filler Al2O3. This can be because of the interruption of the PVP glass like structure by MgBr2. From the figure it is observed that the XRD peaks for the compositional ratios of (PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3) (95:5:0.1, 90:10:0.1) are found to be at 2θ = 21.34, 25.47, 27.05, 33,190. This shows a diminishing in the level of crystallanity of polymer after the expansion of salt. It is observed that; at high compositional ration (85:15:0.1) the intensity of the peaks are quietly decreases. No other sharp peaks are noticed for higher groupings, this indicates the complete dissolution of salt within the host polymer the additional peaks which are observed at 33.190 and 33.630 may be due to the addition of nano filler in the host polymer. This recommending the dominant presence of amorphous phase.
3.2. Complex impedance examination
AC impedance spectroscopy is a powerful technique which is used to measure the electrical properties of the material. The impedance (Cole–Cole) plots of PVP doped MgBr2 for the different compositions of the films with additive nano filler 0.1(Al2O3) fixations are displayed in Fig. 2. The plot comprises of a high frequency semicircle which might be because of the mass impact of the electrode-electrolyte interfaces. The block of the half circle or spike with the genuine impedance (Z') pivot gives the mass electrical obstruction (Rb) of the polymer electrolytes.
The ionic conductivity (σ) of the polymer electrolytes has been determined by using
Where “Rb” is the bulk resistance, “t” is the thickness of the film and ‘A’ is the cross sectional area of the electrolytes individually.
The ionic conductivity esteems for the various compositions of PVP doped MgBr2 with an additive fillers Al2O3 at various temperatures are introduced. More amount of salt added into the polymer matrix leads to increase in the viscosity of the polymer electrolyte films [18]. Consequently, the mobility of the charge carriers has been decreased due to free space and the ion transportation is reduced. Hence, the conductivity is decreased for higher compositions. The most elevated ionic conductivity at surrounding temperature has been viewed as \(2.64 \times {10}^{-6} to 1.25\times {10}^{-2} \text{S}/\text{c}\text{m}\) for 85 (PVP):15(MgBr2):0.1(Al2O3) NCP’s. Figure 3 addresses the intricate impedance plot of the greatest conductivity test at surrounding temperatures. The higher dielectric consistent is attributed due to the addition of nano filler in the polymer matrix which brings a more expansion in charge carriers and consequently conductivity [19]. The major role of a plasticizer in a host polymer is to diminish thickness of the electrolyte and aid the separation of the salt; this results in expanding the quantity of charge transporters. The decline in conductivity has been observed at higher grouping, this might be because of the segregation of the ions.
3.3 Dielectric properties:
The variation of dielectric constant with logerthermic frequency of polymer films for different wt% ratios of PVP doped MgBr2 with additive fillers Al2O3 at room temperature is shown in Figure.3. It is observed from the figure; as increasing the logerthermic frequency, the dielectric constant values are gradually decreased and found to be high for the sample prepared with 85 (PVP):15(MgBr2):0.1(Al2O3), this concludes that the drifting of ions is high giving raise to conductivity phenomenon. It is observed that the dielectric steady and dielectric misfortune increment with increment of logarithmic frequency. This increment builds due to the level of salt separation and dissociation of the particle bringing about the increment in the quantity of free particles or charge transporter thickness [20].
This reveals that the salt is completely dissolute in the polymer chains giving raise to mobile ions whereas dispersion of nano fillers enhance the charge carriers results in increase of an ionic conductivity. The upsides of ε" are extremely high at low frequencies and somewhat steady at higher frequencies. Such high worth of ε" might be because of the interfacial impacts inside the greater part of the sample Due to the formation of space charge region at the electrode and electrolyte interfaces a variation is observed in between dielectric constant of ε". The loss spectra characterized by peak appearing at a characteristic frequency for polymer samples suggest the presence of relaxing dipoles in the samples and also with electrical relaxation process or inability of dipoles [21]. It is evident that the peak is shifted towards higher frequency side thereby reducing the relaxation time. This tends in the improvement in charge transporter thickness in the space charge area.
3.4 DC ionic conductivity:
Conductivity estimations have been made for different wt% ratios of PVP doped MgBr2 with additive fillers Al2O3 at room temperature which is shown in Figure. 4. The determined conductivity from the qualities; it is tracked down that the conductivity increments with expanded temperature just as convergence of salts and the nano fillers [22]. It is observed that; the ionic conductivity of the 85 (PVP):15(MgBr2):0.1(Al2O3), proportion is more prominent than on account of other wt% ratios. From Figure.5i.e., log (σT) versus 1000/T plot, all blends are straightly fluctuating with temperature. At room temperature, the conductivity of Pure PVP is measured up to 1.93 x 10− 6 S/cm and its value increases abruptly up to 2.21x 10− 4 S/cm upon increasing the temp at 373K.
The Ionic conductivity and the temperature shows an Arrhenius sort of thermally initiated process. In these areas, the conductivity is measured by
Where i is the current, t is the thickness of the film, V is the applied voltage and A is the area of the cross section of the film.
Among all the compositional ratios the high ionic conductivity was found up to 1.23 x10− 2 S/cm for the 85 (PVP):15(MgBr2):0.1(Al2O3) and other compositional ratios and its ionic conductivity values are listed in Tabel.1. From the figure it is observed clearly; the conductivity values increases sharply as increase in the temperature [23]. Whereas the dispersion of the nano filler in the electrolyte films enhance the ionic conductivity. But further addition of nanocomposites the conductivity may be decreased at a higher concentration, because of segregations of ions which decreases overall mobility [24]. The increase in conductivity with respect to temperature is explained by Arrhenius plots; as the temperature increased the conductivity of the electrolyte films also increased. This favours hopping mechanism between coordinating sides, local structure relaxation and segmental motion of the polymer.
3.5 Wt% composition studies:
The variation in logarithmic conductivity sigma as a function for different wt% ratios of PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3 is shown in Fig. 5. From the graph it is observed that as increasing the salt concentration the conductivity value also increases up to an order of 10− 6 to 10− 2 S/cm. The conductivity of pure PVP is 10− 6 S/cm at room temperature and its value increases sharply to 10− 4 S/cm at higher temperature. By adding the different compositional ratios to the polymer the ionic conductivity was increased the order of 10− 2 S/cm. further up on adding of salt and nano filler in a host matrix the conductivity becomes slower. This decrement in the ionic conductivity, due to the segregation of ions and formation of charge multipliers in the polymer matrix
3.6 Transference number measurement:
To check the predominant leading species in the current electrolyte framework, Transference number estimations were done utilizing Wagners polarization technique [25]. In this strategy, the dc current was observed as a component of time on use of a decent dc voltage of 1.5 V across the cell Mg/(PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3)/(I2 + C + electrolyte). The current versus time plot of (PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3) is displayed in Fig. 6. From the figure, the transaction numbers (tion and tele) have been assessed utilizing the equation and the transference number values are presented in Table 2.
Table. 2: Transference number of PVP+ MgBr2:Al2O3 nanocomposite polymer films
The total conductivity is given by σT = \(\frac{{{\sigma }}_{ion}+{{\sigma }}_{ele}}{{{\sigma }}_{hole}}\) ---------------------- (3)
The ionic transference number is given by
\({ t}_{ion}= \frac{{{\sigma }}_{ion}}{{{\sigma }}_{T}}\) ---------------------- (4)
and the electronic transference number is given by
\({ t}_{ele}= \frac{{{\sigma }}_{ele}}{{{\sigma }}_{T}}\) ---------------------------- (5)
Where it is the initial current and iele is the final residual current for all ratios of PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3 polymer electrolyte systems. From the figure it is clearly observed that; Initially polarization, the current (it) rises up and immediately a decay of current has been observed a steady state after a long time of polarization takes place. For every one of the creations of the (PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3) electrolyte framework, the upsides of the ionic transaction number are near solidarity. This recommends that the charge transport in these polymer electrolyte films is transcendently to ions instead of electrons
3.6 Battery discharge characteristics:
The solid state battery has been fabricated with the combination of Mg/(PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3)/(I2 + C + electrolyte) at a surrounding temperature for a consistent load of 100 kω. The discharge characteristics are assessed for every one of the batteries and are displayed in Fig. 7. The underlying sharp abatement in the voltage and current in these cells might be because of polarization as well as the development of a thin layer of potassium at the terminal - electrolyte interface. Among these cells, the cell comprised of (PVP + MgBr2:Al2O3) (85:15:0.1) electrolyte is viewed as more steady than the other two cells.. From the table obviously, cell with the composition 85(PVP):15(MgBr2):0.1(Al2O3) shows preferable execution up to 180 Hrs. These outcomes are in well examination and shows longer durability with the current reports [26].