Our finding suggested that the diversity of medium and large sized mammal was low compared to other studies. A total of 11 medium and large sized mammals were recorded at Debre-libanos monastery forest. Similarly, Getachew and Mesele [26] identified 12 species of medium and large sized mammal at Mengaza communal forest, East Gojam. Legese et al. [32] also recorded 12 species of mammals in Wabe forest fragments, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. In contrast, Eshetu et al. [33] recorded 20 species of large mammals in Gonde Telehimanote and Arsema monasteries in North Gonder, Ethiopia. Similarly, Meseret and Solomon [34] identified higher mammal species, which account 23 medium and large sized mammals. Habitat disturbance, human wildlife conflict, low level of attitude of local communities towards mammal and protection might contribute to the differences in the mammal species diversity and composition among the different sites.
Theropithecus gelada and Papio Anubis were the most abundant mammal species in the study area. Similarly, Berhanu and Serekebirhan [35] reported that the abundance of primate was higher than the other mammals identified in Faragosa Communal Forest, Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. In addition to this, Geleta and Bekele [36] suggested that primates had higher relative abundance than other mammals in different parts of Ethiopia. It might be primates widely distributed in different habitat types in Africa [37] and their distribution are influenced by the wealth, accessibility, and allocation of resources like sleeping cliffs/trees, provisions, and water [38]. However, the relative abundance of carnivores was low in Debre libanos monastery forest. This result is in agreement with Berhanu and Serekebirhan [35] study the abundance of carnivores was minimal. It might be their nocturnal behavior, associated with a minimal number of herbivores; they are solitary and crepuscular so their presence could not be easily recognized. Therefore, assessments need to be done in the night and contemporary data collection method should be used for instance, camera trapping is a best suit for such species.
In the present study, medium and large sized mammals showed difference in individual abundance between wet and dry seasons, but there was no variation in species composition in both seasons. High number of individual numbers of mammals recorded during in the dry season (1574) compared to the wet season (1177). In line to this work, Getachew and Mesele [26] in Mengaza communal forest, East Gojjam, Ethiopia, reported that the number of medium and large mammalian species was recorded during the dry season. Moreover, Diriba et al. [39] also reported that 1,214 (47%) of medium and large sized mammals were observed in wet season and 1,359 (53%) medium and large sized mammals were observed during the dry season. This seasonal abundance variation contradicts the more predictable trend of higher abundance during the wet season, resource availability following the rainfall is expected be higher. The possible reason for this higher number of individuals found during the dry season could be attributed to two main factors: seasonal variations in the level of human disturbances and in complication of vegetation density and structure [39].
In this study, medium and large sized mammal’s show variation in diversity between in the four habitat types. Higher diversity of mammalian species was observed in the natural forest habitats during both wet and dry seasons and followed by plantation in wet season. This is probably due to the presence of high vegetation diversity, fruit availability, cover of vegetation, tree canopy and branches for movement and resting. Similarly, Getachew and Mesele [26] in Mengaza communal forest, East Gojjam, Ethiopia, found that the high diversity of mammalian species observed in the natural forest in both wet and dry seasons. In other study, Meseret and Solomon [34] in Borena-Sayint National Park, South Wollo, Ethiopia, reported as the diversity and distribution of medium and large-sized mammal associated with where all its life necessities are fulfilled. In line to this finding, Dawud and Solomon [40] suggested mammalian species diversity is often high in areas where there were sufficient food resources and volume of habitat and available water sources. Low species composition and diversity of medium and large-sized mammals were observed in settlement habitat type. This might be high interference of human, disturbance, less fruit availability, low vegetation cover and anthropogenic activities. In contrary, Legese et al. [32] less diversity of mammalian species recorded in plantation habitat type probably related to the presence of more anthropogenic impact and plantation forest mostly contained homogenous plant species.
In the present study, high similarity of medium and large sized mammal species was recorded between natural forest and plantation. It might be good protection of both habitats and share similar vegetation types. Similarly, Rabira et al. [41] reported that mammals share different habitats that has similar vegetation type.