1. CircYTHDF3 is a circRNA that is upregulated in HCC and is clinically relevant to HCC patient prognosis.
To screen the differentially expressed circRNAs in HCC, the circRNA expression profile was analyzed in four paired tissue samples by microarray. The bioinformatics analysis revealed 139 upregulated and 115 downregulated genes in HCC tissues according to the following criteria: p value < 0.05 and∣log2FC∣> 1 (Fig. 1a, b). Hsa_circ_0084620, which is derived from the linear RNA YTHDF3, was upregulated in HCC (P = 0.04; log2FC = 3.06) and was named circYTHDF3. To investigate the potential role of circYTHDF3 in predicting the progression of HCC, 50 pairs of surgical and biopsied HCC and adjacent nontumor tissues were obtained. The results indicated high expression of circYTHDF3 in HCC tissues (Fig. 1c, p = 0.001). The demographic and clinical characteristics of those patients are shown in Table 1. In addition, the association between circYTHDF3 expression and other clinical features of HCC patients was analyzed. We found that tumor numbers and microvascular invasion were correlated with the expression of circYTHDF3. Next, we investigated the correlation between circYTHDF3 expression and the prognosis of HCC patients. As shown in Fig. 1d, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with higher levels of circYTHDF3 expression had a lower survival rate (HR = 3.364, 95% CI = 1.495–7.568, p = 0.0091). The expression of circYTHDF3 was also measured in HCC cells as well as in normal liver cells. Notably, in all HCC cells, including Hep3B, SNU449, HCC-LM9, Huh7 and HepG2 cells, the expression of circYTHDF3 was significantly upregulated in HCC cells compared with LO2 cells (Fig. 1e).
Table 1
Relationships between circYTHDF3 expression and clinicopathological characters of HCC
Parameter
|
Numbers of patients
|
circYTHDF3(low)
|
CircYTHDF3(high)
|
p-value
|
Age
|
|
51.72 ± 11.71
|
46.56 ± 10.59
|
|
Sex
|
|
|
|
0.171
|
male
|
39
|
22
|
17
|
|
female
|
11
|
3
|
8
|
|
Differentiation
|
|
|
|
1.000
|
poor
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
|
Moderate + Well
|
45
|
23
|
22
|
|
Tumor size(cm)
|
|
|
|
1.000
|
< 5
|
37
|
19
|
18
|
|
≥ 5
|
13
|
6
|
7
|
|
Tumor numbers
|
|
|
|
0.023
|
1
|
41
|
24
|
17
|
|
> 1
|
9
|
1
|
8
|
|
AFP (ng/ml)
|
|
|
|
0.256
|
≤ 400
|
27
|
11
|
16
|
|
> 400
|
3 = 23
|
14
|
9
|
|
HBsAg
|
|
|
|
0.762
|
negative
|
34
|
18
|
16
|
|
positive
|
16
|
7
|
9
|
|
Cirrhosis
|
|
|
|
0.725
|
no
|
10
|
6
|
4
|
|
yes
|
40
|
19
|
21
|
|
Vessel invasion
|
|
|
|
0.776
|
no
|
28
|
15
|
13
|
|
yes
|
22
|
10
|
12
|
|
MVI
|
|
|
|
0.038
|
no
|
32
|
20
|
12
|
|
yes
|
18
|
5
|
13
|
|
Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; MVI, microvascular invasion.
|
2. The characteristics of circYTHDF3 in HCC cells
Hsa_circ_0084620 (chr8:64,098,705 − 64,100,303) is derived from regions in exon 5 of the YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein F3 (YTHDF3) locus. It is located on chromosome 8q12.3, it was named circYTHDF3, and its spliced length is 1598nt (Fig. 2a). To further explore the biological roles of circYTHDF3, we selected Huh7 and HCC-LM9 cells to perform further experiments with the aim of determining the full expression spectrum of circYTHDF3 in HCC cells. Next, the expression of linear YTHDF3 mRNA and circular circYTHDF3 in HCC-LM9 and Huh7 cell lines, respectively, was measured by qRT‒PCR. When exposed to RNase R treatment for 2 h, the YTHDF3 mRNA expression level was extremely decreased, but circYTHDF3 exhibited resistance to RNase R (Fig. 2b). The results confirmed that circular circYTHDF3 was not affected by RNase R. After exposure to actinomycin D, circYTHDF3 showed a longer half-life than linear YTHDF3, indicating its stability (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, the localization of circular circYTHDF3 was measured by qRT‒PCR (Fig. 2d) and RNA-FISH (Fig. 2e). The results demonstrated that circYTHDF3 was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm in HCC cells rather than in the nucleus.
3. CircYTHDF3 downregulation suppresses the malignant behaviors of HCC cells in vivo.
We established a circYTHDF3-knockout system in the HCC-LM9 and Huh7 cell lines by using sh-circRNA to further investigate the pathological role of circYTHDF3. Cell viability of the different groups was determined by CCK-8 and EdU assays. The CCK8 results demonstrated that knockout of circYTHDF3 markedly inhibited cell viability (Fig. 3a, p < 0.01). Subsequently, an EdU assay was conducted, which revealed suppressed HCC cell proliferation after the depletion of circYTHDF3 (Fig. 3b, p < 0.05). Subsequently, the influence of circYTHDF3 on the migration and invasion of HCC cells was determined by wound healing and Transwell assays. The wound healing experiments primarily indicated that the migration and invasion of HCC cells were inhibited (Fig. 3c, p < 0.01) when circYTHDF3 was expressed at low levels. Transwell assays showed a similar trend (Fig. 3d, p < 0.05). In conclusion, these data confirmed that circYTHDF3 could promote malignant capacities (proliferation, migration, and invasion) of HCC cells.
4. MiRNA-136-5p inhibits the malignant behaviors of HCC cells.
To better understand the molecular mechanism of circYTHDF3, we used bioinformatics tools to predict the possible miRNA target of circYTHDF3. We used CircInteractome (
https://circinteractome.nia.nih.gov/) and starBase (
http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) to predict the target of circYTHDF3. As shown in Fig.
4a, circYTHDF3 was shown to have the potential to bind to 9 miRNAs. MiR-136-5p was a potential target of circYTHDF3. The results indicated lower expression of miR-136-5p in HCC tissues (Fig.
4b, p < 0.001), and circYTHDF3 and miR-136-5p expression were negatively correlated in HCC tissue samples (Fig.
4c, p = 0.012, R = 0.123). MiR-136-5p has been previously reported to be related to non‑metastasis, early TNM stage, non‑portal vein tumor embolus and non‑vaso‑invasion
19 and to function in HCC as a tumor suppressor
20. We determined the effects of miR‑136‑5p on cell proliferation by using EdU. The results of the EDU assay showed that cells transfected with the miR-136-5p inhibitor exhibited increased proliferation compared to those transfected with the control, and miR-136-5p mimics decreased proliferation (Fig.
4d, p < 0.05). We further evaluated the effect of miR-136-5p on cell migration and invasion through Transwell assays. According to the assay results, upregulation of miR-136-5p expression promoted the migration of HCC-LM9 cells. Downregulation of miR-136-5p expression significantly induced the migration of HCC-LM9 cells. Then, we investigated the function of miR-136-5p in cell invasion in HCC-LM9 cells. After silencing or overexpressing miR-136-5p, similar results were observed in invasion assays (Fig.
4e, p < 0.05). Taken together, these results suggested that miR-136-5p served as a tumor suppressor in HCC.
5. CircYTHDF3 acts as a ceRNA to sponge miR-136-5p.
We primarily examine the expression of miR-136-5p with a decrease of circYTHDF3 and the results indicated the up-regulated levels of miR-136-5p (Fig. 5a, p < 0.01). The binding sites between circYTHDF3 and miR-136-5p are shown in Fig. 5b. The relative luciferase activity of miR-136-5p was measured by dual-luciferase reporter assay. Wild-type (wt) and mutant (mut) psiCHECK2- circYTHDF3 plasmids incorporating miRNA binding sites (Fig. 5c) were further constructed for dual luciferase reporter assays. These plasmids were co-transfected with miR-136-5p mimics or inhibitors to determine whether circYTHDF3 could bind to miR-136-5p via the predicted binding sites. The results of different luciferase intensities between the psiCHECK2-WT-circYTHDF3 and psiCHECK2-MT-circYTHDF3 groups showed that psiCHECK2-WT-circYTHDF3 could directly bind to miR-136-5p but not psiCHECK2-MT-circYTHDF3. Based on these data, we further found that miR-136-5p could be a direct target of circYTHDF3. Proliferation in the different groups was measured by EdU staining. As shown in Fig. 5d, knockout of circYTHDF3 significantly inhibited proliferation, and after co-transfection with miR-136-5p mimics, the proliferation rate decreased. In contrast, when co-transfected with miR-136-5p inhibitors, the proliferation rate increased. The Transwell assay results demonstrated that knockout of circYTHDF3 inhibited cell migration and invasion; however, this inhibitory effect was attenuated by the downregulation of miR-136-5p and amplified by the overexpression of miR-136-5p in HCC-LM9 cells (Fig. 5e). The co-transfection of circYTHDF3 lentiviruses with miR-136-5p mimics or inhibitors indicated that circYTHDF3 sponged miR-136-5p and promoted HCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, counteracting the tumor suppressive effects.
6. CircYTHDF3 enhances the malignant behaviors of HCC cells through the miR-136-5p/CBX4/VEGF axis.
The next step was to elucidate the effects of circYTHDF3 and miR-136-5p on the phenotype of HCC cells. According to analyses of miRDB, TargetScan, PicTar, miRmap and microT, the targets of miR-136-5p were identified, and CBX4 might be a target of miR-136-5p (Fig.
6a). A relationship between CBX4 and miR-136-5p was previously reported in cervical cancer
21 and bladder cancer
22. A primary exploration demonstrated that CBX4 was highly expressed in HCC tissues (Fig.
6b, S1a, p < 0.01) and predicted a poor prognosis of HCC patients (Fig.
6c, HR = 1.7, p = 0.048). The luciferase assays showed that psiCHECK2-WT-CBX4 directly bound to miR-136-5p (Fig.
6d), indicating that miR-136-5p could directly bind to CBX4 mRNA. We found that the protein level of CBX4 was markedly downregulated in the circRNA-knockout group, aggravated by the upregulation of miR-136-5p. When miR-136-5p inhibitors were transfected, the downregulated expression of CBX4 were reversed (Fig.
6e). In addition, circYTHDF3 and CBX4 expression were positively correlated as shown in Fig.
6f and opposite results happened between miR-136-5p and CBX4 (Fig.
S1b). Moreover, CBX4 was reported to regulated the expression of VEGF in HCC
23 and MHCC97L cells
24. According to TCGA database and DepMap, CBX4 and VEGF expression were positively correlated in HCC tissues (Fig.
6g, R = 0.47, p < 0.01) and in HCC cell lines (Fig.
S1c). Meanwhile, we found that the expression of CBX4 and VEGF was downregulated in the circRNA-knockout group, which could partly build a relationship between circYTHDF3 and VEGF (Fig.
6h, p < 0.01). Overall, these data indicated that circYTHDF3 regulated miR-136-5p to affect proliferation, migration, and invasion and may have an effect on the CBX4/VEGF signal pathway.
7. In vitro.
Luciferase-labelled HCC-LM9 cells transfected with sh-circRNA or sh-NC plasmid were injected into male nude mice either subcutaneously or via the tail vein. The tumors were removed from the mice, and the mice were sacrificed. Tumor weights were measured and data indicated sh-circRNA group are some smaller (Fig. 7a, p < 0.01). Tumor volume were measured during tumor growth. The results showed that in the sh-circRNA group, tumor growth was slower, respectively, than those in the sh-NC group (Fig. 7b, p < 0.05). Luciferase signals in mice treated with tail vein injection were examined using ex vivo imaging. The luciferase signals of lung metastases in the sh-circRNA group were lower than those in the control group (Fig. 7c). The lungs were removed from the mice, and the mice were sacrificed. HE staining of lung metastases indicated a reduced tumor cell number (Fig. 7d). IHC staining of lung metastases was conducted to measure the expression of CBX4/VEGFA/CD31. As we know, CD31 could work as a biomarker of angiogenesis25. As shown in Fig. 7e, CBX4/VEGF/CD31 were expressed at lower levels in the circYTHDF3-knockout group.