Stroke patients in China are increasing at a rate of nearly 9% per year, with a high proportion of high-risk groups existing at the same time(37, 38). Ischemic stroke (IS), primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are major pathological types of stroke. Among them, IS has the highest number of cases (39).There is a gap in the utilization of health services among stroke patients covered by different health insurance schemes (40).
Our study provides clear empirical evidence that there are remarkable disparities between UEBMI and URBMI on the utilization of ischemic stroke inpatient health service in China. Health inequity and financial protection inequity exist between the two schemes at the same time. Compared with ischemic stroke inpatients covered by UEBMI, those who covered by URBMI have gotten less inpatient health care but have more OOP cost. The disparity on reimbursement rate may be the main possible explanation (41). The source and level of financing for UEBMI and URBMI are different, which affects the amount of funds available for patients and then results in different reimbursement levels and anti-risk capacity (23, 42, 43). Reimbursement rate can exert an impact on patients' psychological states. As reimbursement rate increasing and out-of-pocket costs decreasing, patients tend to use more and better health services(42, 44).
Meanwhile, the OOP cost beyond insurance of UEBMI group was higher than that of UEBMI group. Patients covered by UEBMI generally have stable jobs and higher income, and this endow them greater capacity and willingness to pay for health services (14). A study indicates that compared with inpatients covered by URBMI, those with UEBMI tend to visit higher level of medical institutions and are more likely to prescribe expensive medicines(19).
The annual frequency of hospitalization of UEBMI subgroup was higher than that of URBMI subgroup. This might associate with income and other factors. Patients with UEBMI are more likely to use inpatient services, while patients with URBMI used more outpatient services(45). Patients covered by UEBMI possibly have higher degree of education, as well as more attention to personal health(46). In that case, patients with UEBMI scheme go to the hospital more often. Meanwhile,socioeconomic status and education level are also considered as an important influential factor in pre-hospital delay, which will affect the LOS for ischemic stroke inpatients(47).
Government policies and incentives are the leading influencing factors(48) of average length of stay(ALOS) , which is also affected by immediate causes such as stroke type as well as stroke severity (49). A study (40)in the US shows that the ALOS was significantly longer for stroke patients with Medicaid than those with private insurance by more than 2 days, which demonstrates that the effect of different health insurances on the ALOS could not be ignored. Inpatients with UEBMI had longer ALOS than inpatients with URBMI in this study(12). This might be caused by higher financial protection of UEBMI. Under the protection of health insurance, cerebral infarction inpatients with higher financial supports tend to lengthen their LOS, although there is no need for more treatments (50).
We found that patients with UEBMI had higher hospitalization costs, which is consistent with existing researches (51, 52). This might be explained from doctors’ behavior. Depending on a patient's health insurance status, different therapeutic schedules would be considered by doctors, which could result in the differences in the effectiveness of stroke treatment (53, 54). Additionally, supply-induced demand may be another involved behavior of doctors. A study (55)has shown that under the influence of supply-induced demand, a higher benefit level for a health insurance scheme was associated with a stronger impact on total medical expenses. Secondly, inpatients with URBMI had obviously lower hospitalization cost. The possible explanation is that URBMI seems to haven’t offered strong financial protection. Inpatients with URBMI are unable to afford high hospitalization cost if they want to get equal health services to those with UEBMI(56) .Worrying about that catastrophic health expenditure would happen, they had reduced the use of health services. Partly due to the high economic burden of treatment, some stroke patients without health insurance and have a low family-income had given up visiting hospitals(57). Last but not least, higher hospitalization costs for UEBMI subgroup may be associated with longer length of stay(58, 59).
In order to improve fragmented social health insurance system and narrow the gap in health insurance schemes in China, the government officially launched the medical security system for urban and rural residents, covering people used to be covered by URBMI and NCMS in 2016(60). A gap between urban and rural residents in terms of contribution levels, financial subsidies and treatment had been narrowed(61). Nevertheless, the disparities between urban-rural resident medical insurance and UEBMI still exists. Consequently, to consolidate the social health insurance schemes gradually may be a long-term work. The key point is to unite the funding levels ,cost-sharing methods, standards of payment systems and service provisions of different schemes (16). All of these can play a positive role in improving health equity. However, to achieve UHC and improve the financial protection ability of health insurances, more systemic and effective strategies are in need.
Limitations
Limitation of this analysis is that we have only compared disparities in the utilization of ischemic stroke inpatient services between UEBMI and URBMI, which are also called the urban basic health insurance. Consequently, this analysis does not account for the disparities among all health insurance schemes in China. In order to have a more comprehensive compare in disparities in the utilization of ischemic stroke inpatient services between health insurance schemes in China, the NCMS should be taken account of in the future.