Other authors found reduction values of these compounds in higher proportions than the one obtained in the present study, varying between 87, 81 and 95% for copper, chromium and arsenic, respectively [12; 13; 14; 15]. The extraction of metals in this process of electro-removal is linked to several factors, according to the research of [6], where they reported that the size adopted in the particle, during the process, is a determining indicator in the removal. Thus, the result obtained in this study, when compared to the authors cited above, can be better understood, since they used fractional material for electrochemical extraction, while in this research the samples were in solid condition and of considerable volume.
Also observed stronger metal reduction values than those obtained in the present study, being above 80% for copper, chromium and arsenic, however, they used a differentiated electrolysis system, combining different acids from those applied in this research and introduced the application of temperature during the process [16].
In a similar experiment [13], obtained a removal of 57, 66 and 85% for copper, chromium and arsenic, respectively, also using fractionated material, and affirmed that they reached even more satisfactory values of removal in the treatment in which they increased the voltage used. Also, they tested greater distances between the electrodes and greater volume of mass in the electrorremoval, making these conditions reduce the efficiency of the extraction of metals from wood.
The fungal development and, consequently, the loss of mass, although they do not show statistical differences, occurred in greater proportion in the material with electroremotion, indicating that the fungus had a greater progress in the material with the extraction of the metals, although it was not 100% or close to that.
Even so, the percentage of removal obtained was not enough for the biological organism development to occur properly, which in the case of totally decontaminated material would be close to 60% of mass loss, according to the result obtained for the witness, being Eucalyptus grandis wood without chemical treatment.
Such results, when compared to each other, can be explained by the mild removal rate of Chromium, which acts as a fixer of the chemical treatment of Chromated Copper Arsenate in the wood, and consequently, due to its smaller scale extraction, the removal of the other metals (Copper and Arsenic). In the electro-removal technique, with the application of electricity, the process of chromium release from the lignin is accelerated, and with this, the exit of other metals is possible.
It is also worth mentioning that the present study was based on recently treated wood, which received the condom treatment with CCA especially for the experiments. The investigation of the electroremotion technique in treated wood taken out of service could present a greater removal of the metals, due to the leaching of the same that occurs over time, along with natural weathering. Also, the electro-removal applied to this type of material may be a solution to the accumulated waste of CCA-treated wood that has been removed from use all over the world, expanding its reuse applications.