Preoperative circulating tumor cells to predict microvascular invasion and dynamical detection indicate the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-31585/v3

Download PDF

Research article

Preoperative circulating tumor cells to predict microvascular invasion and dynamical detection indicate the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31585/v3

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 31 Oct, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Cancer →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: This study explored the diagnostic power of preoperative circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for the presence of microvascular invasion (MVI) and the relationship between dynamic changes in postoperative CTCs and prognosis.

Methods: A total of 137 patients were recruited for the study. Preoperative blood samples of all patients were collected to detect CTC. The time points for blood collection were before the operation, during operation, and at one week, one month, two months, three months, six months, and one year after surgery. The power of predicting the presence of MVI was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). According to the survival status, 137 patients were divided into three groups: no recurrence, early recurrence, and non-early recurrence.

Results: A threshold CTC value of 5 showed the most significant power to predict the existence of MVI. In a multivariate analysis, the parameters of preoperative CTCs, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and tumor diameter were independent predictors of MVI ( P < 0.05). A CTC value greater than or equal to 5 has better predictive value than AFP > 400μg/L or tumor diameter > 5 cm. The number of intraoperative CTCs in the three groups did not increase compared to before surgery ( P > 0.05). The number of CTC in the non-recurrent group and the non-early recurrent group decreased significantly one week after surgery compared with intraoperative values ( P < 0.001), although there was no statistical significance in the group with early recurrence ( P = 0.95). Patients with mean CTC ≥ 5 had significantly worse long-term outcome than those with mean CTC < 5 ( P <0.001).

Conclusion: The preoperative CTC counts in peripheral blood of patients with HCC is closely correlated to MVI. Intraoperative manipulation for the lesion by the surgeon does not increase the number of CTC in peripheral blood. Surgical removal of the tumor decreases the number of CTC. The persistence of CTC at a high level (≥ 5) after surgery suggests a risk of early recurrence.

Cancer Biology

Oncology

circulating tumor cells

microvascular invasion

isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells

hepatocellular carcinoma

hepatectomy

extrahepatic metastasis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies, and its high mortality makes it the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide.[1]. The dismal prognosis of HCC has improved significantly over the last decade due to the increased knowledge of its behavior, improvements in staging systems and multiple therapeutic options.[2]. Nevertheless, the prognosis of HCC remains very poor due to the high incidence of recurrence and metastasis; the 5-year recurrence rate after curative treatment remains high (70%), with 15% of patients with HCC developing extrahepatic metastases.[3]. One important reason is that tumor cells are able to penetrate the microvasculature, disseminate through the bloodstream to other sites and finally form metastatic tumors. Studies have suggested that microvascular invasion (MVI) in HCC is one of the most significant risk factors for recurrence and metastasis following curative surgical resection.[4]. MVI is defined as clusters of cancer cells observed microscopically in vessels located in the tumor capsule and surrounding liver parenchyma[5]. When a major lesion is removed, residual micrometastases could form postoperatively and result in early recurrence. Recent studies have demonstrated that tumor diameter, tumor number, degree of differentiation and serum level of prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II) were predictors of MVI[6]. One study reported that independent predictors of MVI included tumor diameter > 2 cm, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 200 ng/mL and PIVKA-II > 40 mAU/mL[7]. Previous research has reported that the incidence of MVI ranged from 15% to 57% in HCC specimens and was associated with tumor size, AFP and typical imaging features[8]. The presence of MVI increases the risk of recurrence and dramatically shortens long-term survival[9]. Although preoperative imaging can evaluate macrovascular invasion and is helpful for selecting the appropriate therapy, MVI is almost impossible to predict by traditional preoperative imaging and is confirmed only by histopathological diagnosis after surgery. Therefore, the application of predictors of MVI is still very limited when selecting therapeutic strategies and predicting prognosis[10].

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that circulate in the bloodstream after being shed from the original tumor or metastatic foci, leading to new metastasis[11]. By virtue of the properties of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, CTCs eventually evolve into a proportion of mesenchymal HCC cells, which are more metastatic than epithelial cells[12, 13]. In addition, several CTCs aggregate to form CTC clusters, which have a significantly greater potential to play an important role in cancer metastasis than single CTCs[14]. The liquid biopsy technique represented by CTC detection has great potential to contribute to the implementation of precision medicine in patients with HCC [15]. CTCs obtained by the liquid biopsy technique can be used to evaluate the presence of MVI. A meta-analysis showed that CTC positivity was significantly associated with vascular invasion [risk ration (RR) 1.99, 95% CI: 1.43–2.77; P < 0.001)][16].

In addition, resection and liver transplantation are still the mainstream methods for the treatment of HCC. Some studies have shown that tumor cells tend to disseminate from the vascular portal and are driven into the bloodstream when moving and rotating the liver[17]. Previous studies showed that an increase in postoperative CTC counts was associated with liver resection [18]. An increased number of CTCs after surgery was an independent predictor of recurrence[19]. In contrast, some studies observed a significant decrease in CTCs after the primary tumor was resected when the values were compared to those taken during the preoperative stage[20]. Therefore, the correlation of postoperative CTC counts with surgical procedures remains controversial.

At present, there are few studies on preoperative CTC counts as a predictive indicator of the presence of MVI, and there are also few studies on the changes in postoperative CTC number. In this paper, the optimal cut-off value of CTCs for predicting MVI was evaluated through preoperative CTC counts, and the change in the number of CTCs after surgery explained how postoperative recurrence and death were affected. This information will contribute to understanding the impact of changes in the number of CTCs on prognosis. In the future, CTCs may be used as a clinical indicator to monitor recurrence and death.

Trial design

This study was an observational clinical study. The patients were divided into MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups to evaluate the diagnostic power of parameters for the presence of MVI. We divided the patients according to the recurrence interval with regard to the relationship between postoperative CTC count and recurrence. The same inclusion and exclusion criteria, surgical criteria, and CTC testing criteria were followed throughout the study. No criteria were changed during the study..

Patients

Patients were recruited from the Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) definitive pathological diagnosis of HCC based on the World Health Organization criteria; 2) curative resection, defined as the complete macroscopic removal of the tumor with negative margins (R0)[21]; 3) no prior anticancer treatment; and 4) age between 18 and 80 years. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) distant metastasis; and 2) Child-Pugh C liver disease. In addition, 18 patients with benign liver disease were enrolled as negative controls. All procedures performed in this study abided by the Declaration of Helsinki. The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and all patients provided written informed consent.

Surgical methods

All surgeries were accomplished by a team who was able to professionally implement hepatectomy. The surgical principles, including anatomic resection and partial resection, were followed according to the corresponding TNM classification. Proper hepatic vascular control techniques, including the selective inflow occlusion (SIO) maneuver and intermittent Pringle maneuvers (IPs), were used to reduce bleeding during liver resection. The SIO maneuver is described by the following procedure: dissecting the portal vein, proper hepatic artery, right and left hepatic arteries, and bile ducts followed by continuously blocking the hepatic artery in the tumor-bearing lobe with a bulldog clamp[22]. IPs encircling the hepatoduodenal ligament were performed with cycles of clamping and unclamping times of 15 minutes and 5 minutes, respectively. We enrolled twenty-eight patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT): 19 were type I, 6 were type II, 3 were type III, and none were type IV. The following definitions of PVTT were used: type I, tumor thrombus involving segmental branches of the portal vein or above; type II, tumor thrombus involving the right/left portal vein; and type III, tumor thrombus involving the main portal vein trunk (Cheng’s new classification system). The different therapeutic schedules of PVTT were schemed according to the corresponding type. Segmental hepatectomy was performed for type I, hemihepatectomy was performed for type II, and hepatectomy plus thrombectomy was performed for type III.

CTC Detection

The CellSearch^TM system is the gold standard for capturing CTCs based on epithelial cell adhesion molecules (EpCAMs), which represent aggressive stem cell-like CTCs. [23, 24]. However, a recent study showed that in the blood of a total of 14 HCC patients, the percentage of EpCAM-positive CTCs was only 8.03%[25]. The principle of the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET) method is to isolate tumor cells by analyzing their morphology and deformability and then identify tumor cells by special staining methods. In addition to the CellSearch^TM system, the ISET method is a relatively mature technology used to study CTCs. As early as 10 years ago, the ISET method was applied in breast[26] and lung cancer [27] clinical research. For HCC, the advantage of the ISET method is that it can capture EpCAM-negative tumor cells. However, it also has obvious disadvantages. In the whole study, the leucocytes and thrombus could have possibly blocked the filter pores. In our study, CTC detection was carried out in a total of 1032 blood samples (82 blood samples could not be drawn because of the patients, and the blood collection was missed). According to our statistics, due to blocked filter pores and polluted backgrounds, 8.2% (85/1032) of the blood samples failed at the isolation stage. As a result, tumor cells could not be identified. Therefore, a total of 167 CTC counts were missing from the data.

Blood samples (5 mL) were drawn to detect CTCs by the ISET method. The time points for blood collection were before surgery (30 minutes before anesthesia), during surgery (30 minutes after tumor removal) and at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. This method involves blood filtration and analysis by microscopy using standard histopathological/cytomorphological criteria[28, 29]. The ISET instrument filtered the blood to capture CTCs with a polycarbonate membrane with an 8 µm pore, and at least two experienced cancer cytologists finally independently analyzed and synthesized the captured CTCs. CTCs were defined with respect to the following six characteristics: a) abnormal karyotypes, such as lobulated nuclei; b) cell diameter larger than 15 µm; c) irregular, dented or shriveled nuclear borders; d) nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratio > 0.8; e) giant nucleoli; and f) nonhomogeneous nuclear staining. Cells meeting at least four of these criteria were identified as CTCs. In addition, if giant nucleoli or abnormal karyotypes appeared and at least two other criteria were met, the cells were also identified as CTCs. Fig. 1 shows typical microscopic images of CTCs.

Follow-up and Tumor Recurrence

The patients were followed up every month with ultrasonography and AFP during the first six months after surgery and every three months thereafter. The patients were scheduled to have a CT scan every six months and an MRI scan every year. Recurrence was diagnosed by computed tomography scans, magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. Follow-up was terminated on October 30, 2019. We defined recurrence within one year after surgery as an early recurrence[30]. The time to recurrence was defined as the interval between resection and the diagnosis of intrahepatic recurrence or extrahepatic metastasis. Governmental death registration and telephone follow-ups were used to determine the patient's survival status. The mean follow-up time was 25.2 ± 6.6 months (median, 25.5 months; range, 11.6-34.3 months). Among the 137 patients, 60 were in the nonrecurrence group, 35 were in the non-early recurrence group, and 42 were in the early recurrence group. Among all 77 patients in the recurrence groups, 65 had intrahepatic recurrence only, while 12 had both intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis.

Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative peripheral blood CTC count for the presence of MVI. Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between groups where appropriate. Multivariate analysis was performed using the logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare patient survival between subgroups; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0 for Windows (IBM).

Patient Characteristics

Table 1 details the clinical and tumor characteristics of the 137 patients with HCC. The mean patient age was 53 ± 12 years (range, 21–74 years). Of the patients, 89.8% (123/137) were male and 10.2% (14/137) were female. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was positive in 83.2% (114/137) of the patients, and six patients were positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In all, 77.4% (106/137) of the patients had liver cirrhosis, and 29.9% (41/137) of the patients had an AFP level > 400 ng/ml. The ICG-R15 (%) was 7.2 ± 4.0. The tumor diameter was 5.5 ± 3.9 cm, and 29 (21.2%) patients had multiple tumors. Portal vein thrombosis was present in 20.4% (28/137) of the patients. Tumor stage was stratified by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Of the patients, 56.9% (78/137) were stage 0+A. Eight patients (5.8%) had Child-Pugh score B and received short-term liver protective therapy before surgery; the remaining patients had Child-Pugh score A..

Correlation between MVI and clinicopathological features

Table 2 shows the correlations between MVI and the clinical and tumor characteristics of the 137 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that AFP > 400 ng/ml, tumor size, and preoperative CTC count are independent risk factors for the presence of MVI.

The clinical value of CTCs in predicting the presence of MVI

The preoperative blood sample CTC counts of patients with HCC and benign tumors are shown in Fig. 2a. A total of 18 patients with benign hepatic tumors had 0 CTCs (P < 0.001). A comparison of CTC counts between patients who were MVI-positive and patients who were MVI-negative is shown in Fig. 2b. The difference in the mean blood CTC levels between the MVI-positive group and the MVI-negative group was statistically significant (6.8 ± 5.1 versus 2.9 ± 2.5, P < 0.001). The analysis of the optimal cut-off value of CTCs is shown in Fig. 3a. The optimal cut-off value of CTCs can be calculated from the CTC value table. When CTC = 5, the sensitivity and specificity were 91.4% and 79.7%, respectively, and the Youden index reached its maximum value of 0.711. AFP, tumor diameter and preoperative CTC count were included in the model to predict the presence of MVI. The ROC curves of AFP, tumor diameter, preoperative CTC count and multiparameter combination were drawn (Fig. 3b), and the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of these variables were 0.636, 0.604, 0.856, and 0.900, respectively. The results indicated that a tumor diameter cut-off value of 5 and a preoperative CTC cut-off value of 5 showed the most significant power for predicting the presence of MVI. The sensitivities of AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml, tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, preoperative CTC ≥ 5 and multiparameter combination were 44.8%, 50.0%, 91.4%, and 91.4%, respectively, and the specificities were 82.3%, 70.9%, 79.7%, and 79.7% (Table 3). By comparing the ROC curve features and AUCs, the results showed that compared with AFP, tumor diameter and CTC, the multiparameter combination had the most significant power for predicting the presence of MVI.

The Impact of the presence of MVI on the prognosis of HCC

Of the 137 patients, 59 were MVI positive. The MVI-positive group showed significantly shorter OS than the MVI-negative group (median OS 19.2 months, 95% CI 17.8-22.1 months versus not reached, P = 0.005) (Fig. 4a).

Comparison the change of CTC count caused by surgery in the Subgroups

All patients were divided into three groups: no recurrence (n = 60), non-early recurrence (n = 35) and early recurrence (n = 42) groups. Fig. 4b shows the CTC counts at each time point for the three groups. Fig. 4c shows that the intraoperative CTC counts did not increase across the three groups compared to the preoperative values (2.7 versus 3.1, P = 0.233; 4.9 versus 5.5, P = 0.169; 7.3 versus 7.5, P = 0.714). The number of CTCs in the nonrecurrent group and the non-early recurrent group decreased significantly 1 week after surgery compared with that in the intraoperative group (1.1 versus 3.1, P < 0.001; 1.2 versus 5.5, P < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in the early recurrence group (7.6 versus 7.5, P = 0.950). Using a mean CTC count of 5 as the cut-off value, all patients were divided into two groups. The survival curve showed that the survival time of the CTC count ≥ 5 group was significantly shorter than that of the CTC count < 5 group (14.7 months, 95% CI 12.1–15.6 months versus not reached, P < 0.001) (Fig. 4d). The proportion of early recurrence cases in the CTC count ≥ 5 group was also higher than that in the CTC count < 5 group (84.8% versus 3.3%, P < 0.001). When the mean value of CTCs is greater than 5 and remains greater than 5 after surgery, it strongly indicates a risk of early postoperative recurrence. Extrahepatic metastasis occurred in 12 of the 137 patients. We defined the difference between the CTC count 1 week after surgery and the intraoperative CTC count as ΔCTC. We found that the number of CTCs in the non-extrahepatic metastasis group decreased 1 week after surgery, but the number of CTCs in the extrahepatic metastasis group increased abnormally 1 week after surgery (-2.4 ± 2.5 versus 2.3 ± 2.8, P < 0.001).

An absolutely safe surgical margin is a prerequisite for the complete removal of residual microtumor thrombosis. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with tumor diameters ranging from 2 cm to 5 cm, which is probably due to the elimination of MVI in the resected domain[31]. However, the excessive removal of non-neoplastic liver parenchyma can lead to liver dysfunction and the comorbidities of ascites, jaundice and hypoalbuminemia. Therefore, it is important to identify the subpopulation of patients with HCC at high risk of MVI preoperatively to instruct precise hepatectomy. In the present study, we found that patients with preoperative CTC counts ≥ 5 were more likely to have MVI. Compared to AFP, tumor diameter, and preoperative CTC count, the multiparameter combination was the most significant predictor of MVI and helped to guide the options for surgical methods. It is controversial whether surgical manipulation can drive CTCs into the blood, resulting in the dissemination of tumor cells. Previous studies showed that the CTC value tended to decrease postoperatively until it was maintained at normal levels[20, 32]. Other studies have demonstrated that an increase in postoperative CTCs indicates a poor prognosis[33, 34]. We found that the intraoperative CTC level of the patients in the three groups did not increase compared to the preoperative CTC level. The results showed that intraoperative manipulation by the surgeon does not drive CTCs into the bloodstream, resulting in the dissemination of tumor cells. In the nonrecurrence and non-early recurrence subgroups, we found that the level of CTCs at one week after surgery decreased sharply compared to intraoperative levels and remained at a low level until recurrence. The results suggested that the removal of the tumor was one of the reasons for the decrease in CTCs one week after surgery and that recurrence will lead to a subsequent increase. However, in the early recurrence subgroup, the CTC levels did not decrease one week after surgery and remained at a consistently high level. In addition, in the extrahepatic metastasis group, CTC increased abnormally 1 week after surgery. However, in the early recurrence subgroup, the CTC levels did not decrease one week after surgery and remained at a consistently high level. In addition, in the extrahepatic metastasis group, CTCs increased abnormally 1 week after surgery. In our data, of the 12 patients with extrahepatic metastasis, nine experienced extrahepatic metastasis within one year after surgery. By analyzing the dynamic changes in the number of CTCs, we found that the average CTC level of patients with early recurrence was higher than that of patients in the other subgroups; patients with an average CTC level greater than 5 had a significantly higher risk of early recurrence and a significantly shorter survival time than those in the other subgroups. The limitations of this study are the small sample size, short follow-up time, and single study center. A multicenter, large sample, randomized clinical trial should be designed to illustrate the prognostic significance of CTCs in HCC.

The preoperative CTC counts in the peripheral blood of patients with HCC are closely correlated with MVI. The intraoperative manipulation of the lesion by the surgeon does not increase the number of CTCs in peripheral blood. Surgical removal of the tumor decreases the number of CTCs. The persistence of CTCs at a high level (≥ 5) after surgery suggests a risk of early recurrence.

ALT: alanine transaminase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; AFP: alpha fetoprotein; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system; CTC: circulating tumor cell; CT: computerized tomography; EMT: Epithelial and mesenchymal transition; EpCAM: epithelial cell adhesion molecules; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; ISET: isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells; ICG-R15: indocyanine green 15 minutes retention rate; IPs: intermittent Pringle maneuvers; MVI: microvascular invasion; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; OS: overall survival; PIVKA-II: prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II; PVTT: portal vein tumor thrombosis; ROC: receiver operating characteristic curve; SIO: selective inflow occlusion maneuver; TBiL: total bilirubin;

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Xi Wang (Department of pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) for her technical assistance of pathology

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2016YFC0106004. The CTC detection, detailed pathological report, such as MVI detection and other pathological information related to the project and patient follow-up were funded by funders.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All procedures performed in this study abided with the Declaration of Helsinki. The reference number is TJ-IRB20181101. All patients included in the study wrote informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

HHZ, CL, BWH, JLW, CYZ, XSH managed patients which included recruiting patients, performing operations and making follow-up. JMZ analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. ZWZ and XPC designed the research route and modified the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ Information

Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030,China.
Translational Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

Clinical trial registration

Registration number is ChiCTR-OOC-16010183, date of registration is 2016-12-18 and the website is http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=17259.

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015, 136(5):E359-386.
Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver D: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011, 53(3):1020-1022.
Tabrizian P, Jibara G, Shrager B, Schwartz M, Roayaie S: Recurrence of hepatocellular cancer after resection: patterns, treatments, and prognosis. Ann Surg 2015, 261(5):947-955.
Yamashita Y, Tsuijita E, Takeishi K, Fujiwara M, Kira S, Mori M, Aishima S, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, Ishida T et al: Predictors for microinvasion of small hepatocellular carcinoma </= 2 cm. Ann Surg Oncol 2012, 19(6):2027-2034.
Shirabe K, Toshima T, Kimura K, Yamashita Y, Ikeda T, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Abe K, Aishima S, Maehara Y: New scoring system for prediction of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2014, 34(6):937-941.
Pote N, Cauchy F, Albuquerque M, Voitot H, Belghiti J, Castera L, Puy H, Bedossa P, Paradis V: Performance of PIVKA-II for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and prediction of microvascular invasion. J Hepatol 2015, 62(4):848-854.
Yamashita YI, Imai K, Yusa T, Nakao Y, Kitano Y, Nakagawa S, Okabe H, Chikamoto A, Ishiko T, Yoshizumi T et al: Microvascular invasion of single small hepatocellular carcinoma </=3 cm: Predictors and optimal treatments. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2018, 2(3):197-203.
Renzulli M, Brocchi S, Cucchetti A, Mazzotti F, Golfieri R: Can Current Preoperative Imaging Be Used to Detect Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Radiology 2015, 279(2):150998.
Du M, Chen L, Zhao J, Tian F, Zeng H, Tan Y, Sun H, Zhou J, Ji Y: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a poorer prognostic predictor for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2014, 14(1):38-38.
Zhou J, Wang Z, Qiu SJ, Huang XW, Sun J, Gu W, Fan J: Surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of resection and liver transplantation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010, 136(9):1453-1460.
Ye Q, Ling S, Zheng S, Xu X: Liquid biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma: circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Mol Cancer 2019, 18(1):114.
Sun YF, Guo W, Xu Y, Shi YH, Gong ZJ, Ji Y, Du M, Zhang X, Hu B, Huang A et al: Circulating Tumor Cells from Different Vascular Sites Exhibit Spatial Heterogeneity in Epithelial and Mesenchymal Composition and Distinct Clinical Significance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018, 24(3):547-559.
Lee HM, Joh JW, Seo SR, Kim WT, Kim MK, Choi HS, Kim SY, Jang YJ, Sinn DH, Choi GS et al: Cell-surface major vault protein promotes cancer progression through harboring mesenchymal and intermediate circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinomas. Sci Rep 2017, 7(1):13201.
Suo Y, Xie C, Zhu X, Fan Z, Yang Z, He H, Wei X: Proportion of circulating tumor cell clusters increases during cancer metastasis. Cytometry A 2017, 91(3):250-253.
Ahn JC, Teng PC, Chen PJ, Posadas E, Tseng HR, Lu SC, Yang JD: Detection of circulating tumor cells and their implications as a novel biomarker for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic monitoring in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2020.
Fan JL, Yang YF, Yuan CH, Chen H, Wang FB: Circulating Tumor Cells for Predicting the Prognostic of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta Analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015, 37(2):629-640.
N YE, Okamoto ; S, Fujihara ; T, Kato ; J, Fujimoto ; T, Oriyama ; M, Mitsunobu ; A, Toyosaka ; K, Uematsu ; K, Yamamoto;: Do the tumor cells of hepatocellular carcinomas dislodge into the portal venous stream during hepatic resection? Cancer 2015, 70(9):2263-2267.
Yu JJ, Xiao W, Dong SL, Liang HF, Zhang ZW, Zhang BX, Huang ZY, Chen YF, Zhang WG, Luo HP et al: Effect of surgical liver resection on circulating tumor cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2018, 18(1):835.
Ha Y, Kim TH, Shim JE, Yoon S, Jun MJ, Cho YH, Lee HC: Circulating tumor cells are associated with poor outcomes in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Hepatol Int 2019, 13(6):726-735.
Sun YF, Xu Y, Yang XR, Guo W, Zhang X, Qiu SJ, Shi RY, Hu B, Zhou J, Fan J: Circulating stem cell-like epithelial cell adhesion molecule-positive tumor cells indicate poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Hepatology 2013, 57(4):1458-1468.
Poon, T.-P. R: Tumor Microvessel Density as a Predictor of Recurrence After Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2002, 20(7):1775-1785.
Zhu P, Zhang B, Wang R, Mei B, Cheng Q, Chen L, Wei G, Xu DF, Yu J, Xiao H et al: Selective Inflow Occlusion Technique Versus Intermittent Pringle Maneuver in Hepatectomy for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015, 94(50):e2250.
Yang JD, Campion MB, Liu MC, Chaiteerakij R, Giama NH, Ahmed Mohammed H, Zhang X, Hu C, Campion VL, Jen J et al: Circulating tumor cells are associated with poor overall survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2016, 63(1):148-158.
Chen F, Zhong Z, Tan HY, Wang N, Feng Y: The Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-Time Monitoring and Moving Targets for Cancer Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020, 12(7)
Wang L, Li Y, Xu J, Zhang A, Wang X, Tang R, Zhang X, Yin H, Liu M, Wang DD et al: Quantified postsurgical small cell size CTCs and EpCAM(+) circulating tumor stem cells with cytogenetic abnormalities in hepatocellular carcinoma patients determine cancer relapse. Cancer Lett 2018, 412:99-107.
Pinzani P, Salvadori B, Simi L, Bianchi S, Distante V, Cataliotti L, Pazzagli M, Orlando C: Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer: correlation with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction results and feasibility of molecular analysis by laser microdissection. Hum Pathol 2006, 37(6):711-718.
Hofman V, Bonnetaud C, Ilie MI, Vielh P, Vignaud JM, Flejou JF, Lantuejoul S, Piaton E, Mourad N, Butori C et al: Preoperative circulating tumor cell detection using the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method for patients with lung cancer is a new prognostic biomarker. Clin Cancer Res 2011, 17(4):827-835.
Laget S, Broncy L, Hormigos K, Dhingra DM, BenMohamed F, Capiod T, Osteras M, Farinelli L, Jackson S, Paterlini-Brechot P: Technical Insights into Highly Sensitive Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Fixed and Live Circulating Tumor Cells for Early Detection of Tumor Invasion. PLoS One 2017, 12(1):e0169427.
Vona G, Sabile A, Louha M, Sitruk V, Romana S, Schütze K, Capron F, Franco D, Pazzagli M, Vekemans M et al: Isolation by Size of Epithelial Tumor Cells: A New Method for the Immunomorphological and Molecular Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells. The American Journal of Pathology 2000, 156(1):57-63.
Shah SA, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Cattral MS, Dixon E, Kim RD, Taylor BR, Grant DR, Vollmer CM: Factors associated with early recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2006, 202(2):275-283.
Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Ikai I, Kudo M, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M et al: Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery 2008, 143(4):469-475.
Kaifi JT, Li G, Clawson G, Kimchi ET, Staveley-O'Carroll KF: Perioperative circulating tumor cell detection: Current perspectives. Cancer Biol Ther 2016, 17(8):859-869.
Gueller U: Disseminated single tumor cells as detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction represent a prognostic factor in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Annals of Surgery 2002, 236(6):775-776.
A QD, B JH, C YZ, D LL, A GB, A JF, A HS: Hematogenous dissemination of lung cancer cells during surgery: quantitative detection by flow cytometry and prognostic significance. Lung Cancer 2002, 37(3):293-301.

Table 1 Clinical Characteristics of 137 patients

Clinical characteristics	No. of patients
Age years	Mean 53 ± 12 (21-74) Median 55
Sex
Male	123
Female	14
ALT (U/ml)	Mean 37 ± 30 (8-96)
AST (U/ml)	Mean 30 ± 15 (14-197)
TBiL(μmol/l)	Mean 15.9± 9.2(6.1-48) Median 13.4
Child-Pugh score
A	129
B	8
HBsAg
Positive	114
Negative	23
Liver cirrhosis
No	31
Yes	106
ICG-R15（%）	Mean 7.2 ± 4.0 (1-22.4) Median 6.6
AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 400	96
> 400	41
Tumor diameter(cm)	Mean 5.5 ± 3.9 (1-15.7) Median 4.5
No. of tumor
Single	108
Multiple	29
Portal vein tumor thrombosis
No	109
Yes	28
BCLC stage
0+A	78
B+C	59

Table 2 Factors for microvascular invasion on univariate and multivariate analyses.

Variables		Univariate Analysis			Multivariate Analysis
Variables	OR	HR (95% CI)	P	OR	HR (95% CI)	P
Age	1.009	0.981~1.038	0.545		NA	NA
Sex, male versus female	0.734	0.232~2.317	0.598		NA	NA
HBsAg, positive versus negative	1.173	0.469~2.930	0.733		NA	NA
Liver cirrhosis, yes versus no	1.738	0.747~4.044	0.200		NA	NA
Child-Pugh score, B versus A	1.389	0.333~5.800	0.652		NA	NA
ALT	1.016	0.993~1.039	0.169		NA	NA
AFP(ng/ml) ≤ 400 versus > 400	14.571	5.718~37.135	< 0.001	6.702	2.149~33.354	0.002
ICG-R15（%）	0.988	0.907~1.076	0.781		NA	NA
Tumor size	1.170	1.063~1.288	0.001	1.213	1.031~1.427	0.020
No. of tumors, multiple versus single	6.286	2.456~16.090	<0.001	2.059	0.470~9.010	0.338
Tumor encapsulation, yes versus no	0.773	0.383~1.562	0.473		NA	NA
Edmondson stage, III-IV versus I-II	1.133	0.572~2.244	0.032	1.484	0.571~4.259	0.463
Ki67 (%)	1.027	1.011~1.044	0.003	0.994	0.968~1.021	0.664
PVTT, yes versus no	7.435	2.771~19.950	<0.001	2.413	0.351~16.590	0.370
Satellite lesion, yes versus no	8.437	2.673~26.630	<0.001	2.169	0.340~13.826	0.413
BCLC stage, 0+A versus B+C	3.984	1.941~8.177	<0.001	0.683	0.163~2.866	0.602
Preoperative CTC^5ml	1.935	1.500~2.488	<0.001	1.757	1.344~2.295	< 0.001

Table 3 The parameters for predicting the presence of MVI

	Sensitivity	Specificity	AUC	Cut-off value
AFP	44.8%	82.3%	0.636	400ng/ml
Tumor diameter	50.0%	70.9%	0.604	5cm
Preoperative CTC	91.4%	79.7%	0.856	5
Multi-parameter	91.4%	79.7%	0.900	-

CONSORT2010ChecklistMSWord.pdf

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 31 Oct, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Cancer →

Editorial decision: Accept
01 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
22 Sep, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
21 Sep, 2020
Editor invited by journal
21 Sep, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

Preoperative circulating tumor cells to predict microvascular invasion and dynamical detection indicate the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 3

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 3