The Effect of The Body Composition to Prognosis in Young Breast Cancer Patients

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31925/v1

Abstract

Background In cancer patients, the effect of the body composition on prognosis is a new clinical area of interest. In patients with class 2 or 3 obesity (BMI > 35), survival found to be worse control groups in a pooled analysis. BMI category is not truly representing body composition and hard to use to determine the true muscle and fat quantity. Computed tomography (CT) is a frequent method to determine body composition precisely.

Methods Axial CT images, including all abdominal muscles (psoas, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum) external and internal oblique and rectus abdominis) total skeletal muscle area (SMA), was calculated. Besides, axial CT images of the body fat subcutaneous adipose and visceral adipose tissue distribution (VAT, SAT) areas were calculated in cm2 using threshold values ​​of -30 to -190 for adipose tissue.

Results Eighty-four women included in the study. Most of the patients were normal or over-weighted. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the dominant histological subtypes, with 94% of the study population. The count of the sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients was 11 and 68 respectively. Although the median OS cannot be reached at the end of the follow-up period for both sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients, the difference between groups statistically insignificant. The median OS was not reached for both groups, the difference between low and high VAT groups was statistically significant.

Conclusion In this study, we demonstrate sarcopenia may be seen in patients with breast cancer under 40 years old, and it may not have a prognostic effect.

Background

In cancer patients, the effect of the body composition on prognosis is a new clinical area of interest.[1] Obesity is an increasing disease burden worldwide. In the USA, nearly 40% percent of the adult female population was categorized as obese.[2] The difference in body composition between sexes was observed in many studies. In both healthy subjects and cancer patients, males had higher muscularity while females had greater adipose tissue.[35]

Obesity considered to be related to both etiology, drug resistance, and decreased survival in breast cancer. In patients with high body mass index (BMI) who treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreased complete responses and survival was observed when compared with normal population.[68] Although obesity has metabolic dysregulations and predisposition for many diseases, some obese or over-weight populations remain metabolically normal which is called the ‘obesity paradox.’[9] In patients with decreased muscle volume which was masked due to an increase in BMI, ‘sarcopenic obesity’ term was defined.[10] BMI category is not truly representing body composition and hard to use to determine the true muscle and fat quantity.[11]

Cachexia is reported to be associated with increased mortality and morbidity in cancer patients.[1214] The protein catabolism which constitutes the main structure of the skeletal muscle emphasized for chronic conditions such as chronic obstructive disease and cancer.[1517]

On the other hand, low BMI may cover the low muscularity and increased adiposity in some patients. For these limitations of the BMI, the studies investigating the effect of body composition to prognosis is increasing in breast cancer.[1823]

One of the features of malnutrition was described as sarcopenia, which was defined by decreased muscle mass and quality.[24]

Computed tomography (CT) is a frequent method to determine body composition precisely. Body composition assessment with CT is a specific method for the calculation of muscle quality and adipose tissue.[25]

In this study, we try to evaluate the relationship between the sarcopenia and visceral adiposity with the clinical features and survival in women under 40 with breast cancer.

Methods

Study Participants

The archive records of patients between 2012 and 2019, diagnosed breast cancer at the Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Oncology Department were retrospectively analyzed. The patients who are under forty were included in the study. The patient characteristics, pathologic subtype, estrogen receptor (ER), Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, stage of the disease, treatment modalities, disease recurrence, and last control or death dates were recorded. The exclusion criteria were lack of adequate cancer diagnosis, CT images, and follow-up.

Ethics

The study was approved by the ethics committee at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine and carried out by the Declaration of Helsinki principles and all applicable regulations. An informed consent was not requested by ethic committee due to retrospective design of the study.

Statistical Analyze

The statistical analysis of the study performed with SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 22.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Descriptive data are presented as either means or median for continuous variables, frequencies and percentages are reported for categorical variables. ROC analysis will be performed to determine the optimal cut-off value. Pearson X2 test is used to assessing the associations in categorical variables. Overall survival (OS) curves are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Life tables established to determine the proportional survival analysis.

Body Composition Assessment and CT analyze

Axial CT images including all abdominal muscles (psoas, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum) external and internal oblique and rectus abdominis) total skeletal muscle area (SMA) was calculated. The total sarcopenia index (TSI) was calculated by dividing the square of the patient's height by the square meter (cm2/m2). Patients with a TSI lower than 38.9 cm2/m2 for female patients were considered to have decreased skeletal muscle mass.[14] Also, axial CT images of the body fat subcutaneous adipose and visceral adipose tissue distribution (VAT, SAT) areas were calculated in cm2 using threshold values of -30 to -190 for adipose tissue. The total VAT (TVAT) cut-off value was calculated by ROC analysis and accepted as 134.3 cm2

Results

Eighty-four women included in the study. Four patients’ body weight or height data cannot be established. The mean age of the participants was 34.9 years. The mean weight, height, and BMI were 69.45 kg, 1,59 meters, and 27.13 kg/m2 respectively. The BMI was categorized according to the cut-off values below 18.5, 18.6–25 and above 25.1 kg/m2. The patient distribution due to the BMI cut-off values was 1, 39 and 40 respectively. Most of the patients were normal or over-weighted. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the dominant histological subtypes with 95% of the study population. Ninety-five percent of the patients were a non-smoker. The distribution of the patients due to stages 1 to 4 ordinally at the diagnosis was 27, 29,21 and 7 respectively. Eleven disease relapses were observed during follow-up which mostly occurred with bonny metastases. Most of the patients undergoing surgery with the nearly same frequency of both mastectomy (MRM) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) (MRM/BCS:40/38). (Table-1) The mean values of the total, subcutaneous, intramuscular and visceral adipose tissue were 381.03 cm2, 272.1 cm2, 19.4 cm2, and 87.08 cm2 respectively. The mean psoas and total muscle area were 16.14 and 113.3 cm2 respectively.

When patients categorized according to the TSI, the count of the sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients were 11 and 68 respectively. Although the median OS cannot be reached at the end of the follow-up period for both sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients, the difference between groups statistically insignificant (p = 0.12). The percentage of patients who were still alive 4th year was 87% and 97% favoring non-sarcopenic group. The clinical factors smoking status, histologic subtype, ER status, HER-2 over-expression, type of the surgery, tumor size, metastatic disease at the diagnosis and disease recurrence were not significant when the groups compared. Only the nodal status at the time of diagnosis was different between groups (p = 0.03).

When patients were categorized by BMI as normal and over-weight, the median OS was not significantly different, although the follow-up period was not sufficient for both groups. (p = 0.07) The percentage of the patients were %92 and 100% favoring normal BMI group. The clinical factors among the over-weight and normal groups were similar.

Although the median OS was not reached for both groups, the difference between low and high TVAT groups was statistically significant. (p = 0.047) The four, five- and six-years survival percentage of patients were 97% for low TVAT group while the high VAT group had 87%, 78%, and 64%, respectively. The clinical factors were similar between groups except for the type of surgery, which favored BCS among the low TVAT group. The TVAT remained to be an independent risk factor for OS with a borderline significance in multivariate analysis. (p = 0.059) The OS difference between groups was disappeared when de novo metastatic patients excluded. (p = 0.14)

Discussion

In our study, TVAT was confirmed to be a prognostic risk factor that reached statistical significance. Although the median OS not reached in non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic patients, the non-sarcopenic patients had a trend to better OS. BMI status of the patients was not different in terms of OS, although a non-significant trend was favoring normal weighed patients. In patients younger than 40 years, TVAT may be a better prognostic factor than TSI due to healthy muscle structure.

In chronic conditions, decreased muscle volume was shown to be related to poor prognosis rather than obesity and fat, especially in metabolic diseases. The role of the potential role of the muscle catabolism in disease physiopathology is still under investigation.[26, 27] Sarcopenia is a frequent phenomenon in cancer patients which is also related to poor survival.[2831]

The frequently studied parameter in breast cancer patients is body mass index (BMI), which is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in squared meters. for. In patients with class 2 or 3 obesity (BMI > 35) survival found to be worse control groups in a pooled analysis. The lower levels of obesity had conflicting results in several studies.[3234]

The literature was evaluating sarcopenia and TVAT in breast cancer mainly composed of metastatic and adjuvant studies. Although multiple studies designed to evaluate the prognostic value of body composition in breast cancer, to our knowledge, our study is the first for young breast cancer patients.

Bette et al. reported sarcopenia was a better prognostic indicator than visceral adiposity. Low muscle volume related to decreased survival and considered to be a better marker than BMI. Although this trial had the largest patient number, the age factor cut-off was determined as 55 years, which was inaccurate for young breast cancer. Also, the proportion of the young breast cancers was not specified.[35]

Five studies only reported the prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer. Three studies were designed in a metastatic patient group while two studies composed by non-metastatic patients.[18, 2023] Only one of these studies demonstrated an increased risk of death in sarcopenic patients.[22] In another study, which reported sarcopenia to have a relation with over-all mortality in non-metastatic breast cancer patients, had a small number of events and evaluated TSI after chemotherapy.[23] Also, the composition of the muscle reported being an important factor in over-all mortality. Rier et al. found low muscle radiodensity was associated with increased overall mortality in the metastatic state.[21] This finding was speculated to be related to inflammatory conditions, and immune system were supported by more trials.[3638]

One previous study reported a relationship between mortality and muscle density in metastatic patients in terms of very low mean cut-off value when compared with non-metastatic patients.[21, 35] The difference was hypothesized for the accumulation of fat tissue among muscles with the increased stage and disease burden, which also explained the difference in the cut-off value of muscle density in these populations.

Our study had compatible results with earlier studies in terms of visceral adiposity. Three previous studies reported decreased distant disease-free and overall survival in locally advanced breast cancer in patients with high visceral adiposity.[18, 19, 35] Even TVAT was found to be an independent risk factor in our study for young breast cancer patients, it may be more important in the de-novo metastatic population.

Although other studies had young patient populations, our study specifically designed to investigate the body composition of young breast cancer to avoid the change in time via life-style changes and co-morbidities. The effect of muscle tissue on prognosis may be lesser important than adipose tissue in young breast cancers.

Limitations

The cross-sectional design of the study had limitations to evaluate patient characteristics. All CT or PET-CT images gathered at the time of diagnosis, which may have a difference between de-novo metastatic and recurrent patients. Also, the small patient population does not allow subgroup analysis for recurrent or de-novo metastatic patients. Small numbers of recurrences do not allow disease-free survival analysis. The effect of lifestyle interventions, tolerance of adjuvant treatment, and toxicity profiles cannot be evaluated due to the retrospective design of the study.

Conclusion

In this study, we demonstrate sarcopenia may be seen in patients with breast cancer under 40 years old, and it may not have a prognostic effect. The visceral abdominal fat tissue may have a greater effect on survival in breast cancer in the early period of life span. Although both muscle and fat tissue can be modifiable risk factors for breast cancer, more prospective studies observing the effect of body composition before and during breast cancer may determine the role of these parameters more accurately.

List Of Abbreviations

BMI: Body mass index

CT: Computed tomography

SMA: Skeletal muscle area

VAT: Visceral adipose tissue

SAT: Subcutaneous adipose tissue

TVAT: Total visceral adipose tissue

MRM: Mastectomy

BCS: Breast conserving surgery

TSI: Total sarcopenia index

HER-2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor -2

OS: Overall survival

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee at Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles and all applicable regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

Available if requested

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

This study has not any funding support.

Authors' contributions

Main Idea: IB; Review of the literature and writing the article: HD, FK; Statistics: IB

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

References

  1. Ligibel JA, Wollins D. American society of clinical oncology obesity initiative: Rationale, progress, and future directions. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016.
  2. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015-2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017.
  3. Blaak E. Gender differences in fat metabolism. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2001.
  4. Geer EB, Shen W. Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balance. Gend Med. 2009.
  5. Ebadi M, Martin L, Ghosh S, Field CJ, Lehner R, Baracos VE, et al. Subcutaneous adiposity is an independent predictor of mortality in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2017.
  6. Fontanella C, Lederer B, Gade S, Vanoppen M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, et al. Impact of body mass index on neoadjuvant treatment outcome: a pooled analysis of eight prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015.
  7. Iwase T, Nakamura R, Yamamoto N, Yoshi A, Itami M, Miyazaki M. The effect of molecular subtype and body mass index on neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2014.
  8. Litton JK, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Warneke CL, Buzdar AU, Kau SW, Bondy M, et al. Relationship between obesity and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008.
  9. Denis G V., Obin MS. “Metabolically healthy obesity”: Origins and implications. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2013.
  10. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008.
  11. Noori N, Kovesdy CP, Dukkipati R, Kim Y, Duong U, Bross R, et al. Survival predictability of lean and fat mass in men and women undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:1060–70.
  12. Johns N, Stephens NA, Fearon KCH. Muscle wasting in cancer. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2013.
  13. Fearon KCH, Glass DJ, Guttridge DC. Cancer cachexia: Mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways. Cell Metabolism. 2012.
  14. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: An international consensus. The Lancet Oncology. 2011.
  15. van de Bool C, Gosker HR, van den Borst B, Op den Kamp CM, Slot IGM, Schols AMWJ. Muscle Quality is More Impaired in Sarcopenic Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016.
  16. Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Prior S, Li G, Hafer-Macko C. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and muscle myostatin reduction after resistive training in stroke survivors. Stroke. 2011.
  17. Baracos V, Kazemi-Bajestani SMR. Clinical outcomes related to muscle mass in humans with cancer and catabolic illnesses. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2013.
  18. Del Fabbro E, Parsons H, Warneke CL, Pulivarthi K, Litton JK, Dev R, et al. The Relationship Between Body Composition and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Operable Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2012.
  19. Iwase T, Sangai T, Nagashima T, Sakakibara M, Sakakibara J, Hayama S, et al. Impact of body fat distribution on neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in advanced breast cancer patients. Cancer Med. 2016.
  20. Prado CMM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Tonkin K, et al. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2009.
  21. Rier HN, Jager A, Sleijfer S, van Rosmalen J, Kock MCJM, Levin MD. Low muscle attenuation is a prognostic factor for survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line palliative chemotherapy. Breast. 2017.
  22. Shachar SS, Deal AM, Weinberg M, Nyrop KA, Williams GR, Nishijima TF, et al. Skeletal muscle measures as predictors of toxicity, hospitalization, and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2017.
  23. Villaseñor A, Ballard-Barbash R, Baumgartner K, Baumgartner R, Bernstein L, McTiernan A, et al. Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: The HEAL Study. J Cancer Surviv. 2012.
  24. White J V., Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Schofield M. Consensus statement: Academy of nutrition and dietetics and American society for parenteral and enteral nutrition: Characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2012.
  25. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang ZM, Gallagher D, St.-Onge MP, Albu J, et al. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: Estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol. 2004.
  26. Sanchez AMJ, Csibi A, Raibon A, Docquier A, Lagirand-Cantaloube J, Leibovitch M-P, et al. eIF3f: a central regulator of the antagonism atrophy/hypertrophy in skeletal muscle. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:2158–62.
  27. Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, Gilbert A, Gomes M, Baracos V, Bailey J, et al. Multiple types of skeletal muscle atrophy involve a common program of changes in gene expression. FASEB J. 2004.
  28. Pressoir M, Desné S, Berchery D, Rossignol G, Poiree B, Meslier M, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in french comprehensive cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2010.
  29. Nishikawa D, Hanai N, Suzuki H, Koide Y, Beppu S, Hasegawa Y. The Impact of Skeletal Muscle Depletion on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. ORL. 2018.
  30. Martin L, Birdsell L, MacDonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: Skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol. 2013.
  31. O’Brien S, Twomey M, Moloney F, Kavanagh RG, Carey BW, Power D, et al. Sarcopenia and post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2018.
  32. Kwan ML, Chen WY, Kroenke CH, Weltzien EK, Beasley JM, Nechuta SJ, et al. Pre-diagnosis body mass index and survival after breast cancer in the after Breast Cancer Pooling Project. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012.
  33. Chan DSM, Vieira AR, Aune D, Bandera E V., Greenwood DC, McTiernan A, et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol. 2014.
  34. Greenlee H, Unger JM, LeBlanc M, Ramsey S, Hershman DL. Association between body mass index and cancer survival in a pooled analysis of 22 clinical trials. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2017.
  35. Caan BJ, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Prado CM, Alexeeff S, Kroenke CH, Bradshaw P, et al. Association of muscle and adiposity measured by computed tomography with survival in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018.
  36. Feliciano EMC, Kroenke CH, Meyerhardt JA, Prado CM, Bradshaw PT, Kwan ML, et al. Association of Systemic Inflammation and Sarcopenia With Survival in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the C SCANS Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017.
  37. Malietzis G, Lee GH, Bernardo D, Blakemore AIF, Knight SC, Moorghen M, et al. The prognostic significance and relationship with body composition of CCR7-positive cells in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015.
  38. Malietzis G, Johns N, Al-Hassi HO, Knight SC, Kennedy RH, Fearon KCH, et al. Low muscularity and myosteatosis is related to the host systemic inflammator y response in patients undergoing surger y for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2016.

Table 1

Table-1: Features of the patient population.

Features

 

 

 

 

BMI

<18.5kg/m2

18.6-25 kg/m2

>25.1 kg/m2

 

Number (%)

1 (1.25%)

39 (38.75%)

40 (50%)

 

Histology

Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Other

 

 

Number (%)

80 (95%)

4 (5%)

 

 

Smoking Status

Smoker 

Non-Smoker

 

 

Number (%)

4 (5%)

80 (95%)

 

 

Stage

I

II

III

IV

Number (%)

27 (33%)

29 (34%)

21 (25%)

7 (8%)

Surgery Type

Mastectomy

BCS

Not operated

 

Number (%)

40 (47%)

38 (45%)

6 (7%)

 

Oestrogen Receptor

Positive

Negative

 

 

Number (%)

68 (80%)

16 (20%)

 

 

HER-2

Positive

Negative

 

 

Number (%)

20 (24%)

64 (76%)

 

 

Adj. Chemotherapy

Received

Not-Received

 

 

Number (%)

75 (89%)

9 (11%)

 

 

Adj. Radiotherapy

Received

Not-Received

 

 

Number (%)

63 (76%)

20 (24%)

 

 

BMI: Body Mass Index, BCS: Breast-Conserving Surgery, HER-2: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2, Adj.: Adjuvant