Xylanases have been classified as essential industrial enzymes due to their immense potential in multiple biotechnological applications in various industries (Battan et al., 2006). These enzymes with desirable pH tolerant and thermotolerant ability can be used in various processes in different industries. One of the major applications of this enzyme is found in paper and pulp industry for bleaching of kraft pulp. In order to obtain industrially compliant xylanase either natural microbial diversity is exploited or genetic engineering techniques being employed for enhanced xylanase production in host cells (Khandeparker et al., 2017; Yin et al., 2010). Various microbial sources of xylanase such as bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes and yeast have been reported (Battan et al., 2006). There are several reports found in literature describing production of xylanase using microbial systems under SmF (Hiremath and Patil, 2011; Gissesse and Gasha, 1997) but SSF technique is preferred over SmF due to its numerous advantages in production of xylanase, mainly use of inexpensive substrate (Kamble and Jadhav, 2011; Khandeparker and Bhosle, 2005a).
Bacillus sp. NIORKP76 strain used in this study was found to be an excellent producer of moderate thermotolerant and alkalitolerant xylanase under SSF. Bacillus sp. has been previously reported for the production of xylanase, which is the key hemicellulolytic enzyme among all others (Helianti et al., 2016; Kamble and Jadhav, 2011; Irfan et al., 2016; Gowdhaman et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2013; Ho and Heng, 2014; Boucherba et al., 2017; Virupakshi et al., 2004). Apart from Bacillus sp. there are other bacterial strains such as Arthrobacter sp., Lactobacillus sp., Caldicellulosiruptor sp., Glaciecolamesophila and Paenibacillus sp. which are also reported for production of xylanase (Khandeparker and Jalal, 2014; Mi et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2013; Teeravivattanakit et al., 2016).
There are various substrates used for production of xylanase which include wheat bran, tea dust, saw dust, paper waste, cassava bagasse, rice straw, rice husk, palm kernel cake, barley husk, corn cob, sugar cane bagasse, oat bran, oat spelt, beet pulp and pineapple peel, among which wheat bran reported to be the best carbon source for xylanase production (Khandeparker et al., 2008; Gowdhaman et al., 2014; Ho and Heng, 2014).
As per report of Raimbault, (1998) the free moisture content in SSF is mainly influenced by type of substrate used and its water binding ability, which subsequently has pronounced effect on growth kinetics. In current study optimum substrate to moisture ratio was found to be 1:3 (w/v) which was similar to the reports described by Kumar et al., (2017), Khandeparker et al., (2008), Khandeparkar and Bhosle, (2005a). In other reports such as Sindhu et al., (2006); Kamble and Jadhav, (2011) reported 1:1.5 and 1:1.8 (w/v) ratio for production of xylanase under SSF (Wheat bran) respectively, whereas Sanghi et al., (2007) (Wheat bran) and Virupakshi et al., (2004) (Rice bran) used 1:2 (w/v) ratio for the same. This clearly indicates that substrate to moisture ratio may vary with microbial strain used in the study.
Bacillus sp. NIORKP76 isolate produced optimum xylanase at the end of 72h incubation period using wheat bran as substrate which was also reported by Kamble and Jadhav, (2011), Khandeparkar and Bhosle, (2005b) and Virupakshi et al., (2004) in their studies. The moistening agent used in this study was a modified basal salt solution (MBSS) containing optimized salt concentration (buffer ion: 64mM; NH4Cl: 0.03%; NaCl: 1.5%). Battan et al., (2006) and Sanghi et al., (2007) described effect of moistening agent on xylanase titer under SSF. To enhance xylanase production under SSF by Bacillus sp. NIORKP76 modification in moistening agent was carried out.
SDS-PAGE analysis displayed single protein band with purified enzyme sample. Based on relative mobility of protein samples in SDS-PAGE molecular weight of xylanase was found to be ~ 28kDa. Zymogram analysis of purified xylanase sample confirmed the molecular weight with presence of active xylanase band. Xylanases of different molecular weight have been reported from Bacillus sp. Khandeparker et al., (2017) reported 23.3kDa xylanase, Kamble and Jadhav, (2011) reported 29.8kDa and Tseng et al., (2001) reported 45kDa xylanase from Bacillus sp. Xylanase isolated from Bacillus sp. by Sa-Pereira et al., (2001) reported to have high molecular weight of 340kDa.
The xylanase enzymes produced by Bacillus sp. NIORKP76 isolate exhibited optimum pH and temperature of 8.0 and 60°C respectively. Xylanases reported by Khusro et al., (2016) showed optimum pH 7.0 and temperature optima at 35°C. Chaturvedi et al., (2015) reported xylanase having pH and temperature optima of 6.5 and 45°C respectively. Teeravivattanakit et al., (2016) also reported xylanase with pH and temperature optima of 7.0 and 50°C respectively. Similarly, Boucherba et al., (2017) reported xylanase with pH and temperature optima of 7.0 and 55°C. Adigüzel and Tunçer, (2016) reported xylanase having temperature optima of 60°C which was similar to our reported xylanase but pH optima were only 6.0.
The xylanase enzyme was found to be very stable, retaining 92% of residual activity when incubated in buffer pH 8.0 and 137% residual activity was recorded when incubated at 40°C for 24h, unlike xylanase reported by Adigüzel and Tunçer, (2016) which was having half-life of 10h when incubated at pH 7.0 and temperature 40°C. Xylanase reported by Khusro et al., (2016) was able to retain approximately 80% activity, when incubated for 4h in pH 8.0 and at 40°C.
The overall cost of any product determined by the complexities of production procedure and materials used. The current study follows very simple materials and methodologies which gives cost effective products. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass is predominantly carried out by two approaches, acid or alkali hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis. These are either executed discretely or sequentially provided type of research objective. Unlike, acidic and alkali hydrolysis processes the enzymatic hydrolysis is regulated at mild conditions, eliminating corrosion drawbacks which enhances overall process feasibility (Soccol et al., 2011). As per report by Bansal et al., (2021) the saccharification efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis process does not affect significantly in terms of fermentable sugar production as compared to acidic hydrolysis process. Enzymatic hydrolysis in certain processes added as pre-treatment phase to truncate chemical wastage and energy requirements which subsequently minimizes cost and environmental problems associated with chemical hydrolysis process (Sreeraj et al., 2022). Fermentable sugar production from various lignocellulosic material by use of xylanase has been previously reported. The efficacy of xylanase in terms of dose (5U/mg) used in this study is much more superior than those which used by Parab et al., (2017): 50U/mg and Kaur et al., (2023): 10U. The xylanase dose of 5U/g generated 137.67mg/g and 141.07mg/g fermentable sugar with untreated and pre-treated wheat bran biomass, which is superior to results obtained by Mazlan et al., (2019) in which 50U/mL enzymatic dose liberated merely 174.74mg/g reducing sugars from pre-treated biomass.