As a result of improvements in medical technology and the quest for aesthetically pleasing surgical incisions, minimally invasive techniques are now performed in all medical specialties. Imatani and Tobe were pioneers in proposing the concept of minimally invasive treatment of distal radius fractures8,9. Since their report, some researchers10 have utilized a 1 cm incision to do the procedure, because of ongoing technical developments. However, a minimally invasive strategy for treating distal radius fractures entails more than merely making tiny incisions. The key to minimally invasive treatment of the distal radius fracture is minimum interference with several important surrounding tissues, no harm to the PQ, no dissection of the radial artery or median nerve, and no dissection of the joint capsule or ligament appendages. In particular, the PQ can increase the distal radioulnar joint's stability, supply blood to the distal radius to aid in fracture healing, and provide 21% of the forearm's pronation strength, and an unharmed PQ will also increase the postoperative pronation angle and lessen tendon injury and irritation2,11.
Sotereanos et al.5 confirmed that the PQ muscle is a closed compartment without a muscle septum by injecting image enhancement agents into cadaveric specimens under fluoroscopy, and its muscle bundle starts from the front and medial side of the lower 1/5 of the ulna and ends on the palmar and anterior edge of the lower 1/5 of the radius. However, conventional minimally invasive treatment of distal radius fractures requires blind penetration of the plate under the PQ muscle at the proximal radius. The plate may be placed on the radial or ulnar side during the procedure, and the position needs to be confirmed and adjusted under fluoroscopy. In our clinical practice, we have learned that it takes an average of three to four adjustments to get the plate under the PQ in the correct position. There is no doubt that the process of adjustment will inevitably lead to the cutting and destruction of the PQ muscle at the starting and ending edge of the palmar surface of the lower 1/3 of the radius. In other words, this minimally invasive method of preserving the PQ is not strictly preservative and non-destructive. At the same time, due to the nature of the minimally invasive procedure used, damage to the PQ muscle during the procedure could not be verified or repaired under direct vision. Therefore, the actual soft tissue injury of the minimally invasive incision may be more severe when unrepaired as opposed to the usual large incision open reduction and repair under direct vision. In this study, the "3-point positioning method" is proposed, in which the plate was placed above the PQ muscle in advance, and the exact position of the plate was adjusted by fluoroscopy above it. Three Kirschner wires were used to position the plate, and a unique and relatively accurate dissection and placement of the plate under the periosteum of the PQ muscle was performed between the Kirschner wires at the pile-point to minimize damage to the PQ muscle.
The 3-point positioning method was used to treat patients in this clinical investigation, and it was found to have advantages for early postoperative wrist pain relief, wrist joint activity, and functional recovery. The wrist function of the patients was assessed using the Gartland-Werley scale in this study, with pain serving as the primary predictor. In the palmar approach for distal radius fractures, Itoh et al.12 compared two alternative ways to dispose of the PQ: one method preserved the muscle, while the other incise the muscle and then repair it with sutures. The outcome demonstrated that the wrist pain scores of the PQ preservation approach were lower at 2, 3, and 4 months after surgery. Häberle et al.13 also demonstrated that MIPO used to treat distal radius fractures while protecting the PQ was effective in minimizing postoperative pain within 6 weeks of surgery. Early postoperative wrist pain scores were lower with our study's 3-point positioning method patients than they were in other published studies14,15. Among the reasons may be that the technique causes less damage to the PQ muscle, less swelling of the muscle's soft tissue in the early postoperative period, and less tearing pain in the injured muscle caused by early exercise. The anatomical position and physiological function of the PQ are not impaired, which better isolates the contact of the internal fixation with the tendon and thus avoids irritating it. As a result, patients had lower levels of early pain and were able to achieve better Gartland-Werley scores.
In the early post-operative period, Mehmet et al.16 revealed an average loss in forearm pronation strength of about 18.5%, with the forearm pronation durability test indicating a loss of up to 12.9%. Lidocaine was used by McConkey et al.17 to test the contribution of the pronator quadrate to pronation by paralyzing the pronate quadrate. They found that paralysis reduced the pronation of the forearm by 16.7–23.2%. If the PQ suture was not completed it was observed that the forearm pronation strength was decreased by 22% at a 1-year follow-up after surgery18. Of course, some reports have proposed that the repair of the PQ muscle has no effect on the follow-up results of joint rotation and range of motion and believe that the weakening or loss of the PQ muscle function can be compensated for by the pronator teres muscle and the flexor carpi radialis muscle so that the forearm rotation function can be preserved19,20. However, we believe that the anatomy of each physiological presence has its distinct meaning. The PQ, if repaired or only slightly damaged, can alleviate pain in the early postoperative period, allowing patients to achieve better postoperative rom and grip strength, and reducing flexor tendon irritation. Fan et al.21 also suggested that in the early stage of recovery, the preserved or repaired PQ muscle has better pronation ability and lower pain scores.
In terms of surgical indications Kiyohito10 considered that for type C2 and C3 fractures with a comminuted articular surface, the patient should be carefully selected, and wrist arthroscopy should be assisted if necessary. However, for a type C1 distal radius fracture, they believed that a small minimally invasive incision of 1.0 cm could also achieve satisfactory efficacy. For type B2 fracture, it should be used with caution because it is difficult to effectively expose and fix with minimal invasion. According to this study, it is best to use caution when selecting a minimally invasive treatment for distal radius fractures of type C3. The traditional surgical approach should be chosen as soon as feasible if exposure and fixation are challenging throughout the procedure.
The 3-point positioning technique has the advantage of requiring only a single dissection of the PQ, thereby preventing injury to the muscle caused by repeatedly adjusting the position of the plate underneath the muscle during the traditional MIPO technique. The plate is tagged with Kirschner wires and prepositioned over the PQ muscle, which is the fundamental originality of this technique. The main innovation of this method is that the plate is placed above the PQ muscle, and the Kirschner wires were inserted as the pile-point after the correct position is confirmed. Finally, the plate was "wore" into the pile-point. If the fracture is relatively comminuted, 2 to 3 Kirschner wires (1.0 mm and 1.5 mm) can be percutaneously placed from the radial edge of the radius to the ulnar side to maintain the reduction and ensure that the plate placement is not interfered with. A modest proximal percutaneous incision should be created for implanting the most proximal screw if it is challenging to do so. Pay attention to gentle manipulation. The assistant can reduce the tension of the incision by flexing the wrist joint and drifting the gap within the incision to achieve satisfactory exposure and fixation. The plate should be carefully inspected after implantation to see if tendons, vital arteries, and nerves are entrapped before final fixation is performed. After fixation, the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint extreme extension and flexion were utilized to assess if the tendon was noticeably compressed. This study also suggests that attention should be paid to the learning curve of this method. Only proficient surgical techniques and skilled surgical team cooperation can achieve satisfactory results.