The content of soil K, Mg, Fe and Ca vary across elevations in R. delavayi natural shrub forest
We found that the content of K, Mg and Fe were significantly different between two different elevations (Fig. 1a, 1b, 1c), but the content of Ca was remained unchanged (Fig. 1d). Mg and Fe level were clearly decreased along increased elevation. The change of K content was V-shaped along the increase of elevation. Interestingly, the change trend of Ca content was opposite to K content.
Effect of elevation on the content of soil Cr, Ni, Cu, Cd, Pb and Zn
The content of soil Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb and Zn were decreased along the elevations gradient increased (Fig. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2e, 2f). The content of soil Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb and Zn had no obvious change between 1448 m and 1643 m, but they had significant difference between 1448 m and 1821 m. The content of Ni, Cu, Pb and Zn were increased by 629%, 123%, 101% and 124% at 1448 m than 1821 m, respectively. However, soil Cd content was not significantly different between two elevations (Fig. 2d).
The differences of soil enzyme activity at different elevations
As Fig. 3 showed that with the elevation increase, the activity of invertase showed an increasing trend. The invertase activity showed no clear difference between 1448 m and 1643 m, 1643 m and 1821 m, but it was obviously different between 1448 m and 1821 m (Fig. 3a). The variety trend of urease and phosphatase activity was the same, increased first and then decreased as elevation increased. The activity of them showed the significant difference between two different elevations. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in urease activity between 1448 m and 1643 m (Fig. 3b, 3c). Soil catalase activity was reduced along elevation increased, and catalase activity at 1643 m and 1821 m decreased by 1.05 and 2.80 times compared to 1448 m (Fig. 3d).
Effect of elevations on Shannon index and structure of soil bacterial communities
As Figure S1 showed that Shannon index firstly increased and then decreased along the increase of elevations, but elevations were not able to influence the Shannon index change of soil bacterial communities. Furthermore, our results indicated that the number of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria dominated regardless of the elevations (Fig. 4a). Acidobacteria (55.43%), Actinobacteria (9.95%), AD3 (9.08%), Gemmatimonadetes (1.15%), Proteobacteria (20.27%) and Verrucomicrobia (1.42%) were the main bacteria phyla with relative abundance more than 1% at 1448 m (Fig. 4a). Similarly, the relative abundance greater than 1% of dominant bacteria phyla were Acidobacteria (48.45%), Actinobacteria (11.56%), Bacteroidetes (1.37%), Proteobacteria (32.35%) and Verrucomicrobia (1.46%) at 1643 m (Fig. 4a). In addition, Acidobacteria (45.38%), Actinobacteria (13.15%), Bacteroidetes (1.7%), Chlamydiae (1.34%), Proteobacteria (31.96%), TM7 (1.26%) and Verrucomicrobia (1.56%) at 1821 m (Fig. 4a).
When we investigated the bacteria communities of R. delavayi at genus-level, we found that there were more variation patterns of classified genera between different elevation gradients (Fig. 4b). Our results showed that Bradyrhizobium (6.61%), Burkholderia (1.13%), Candidatus Koribacter (2.95%), Candidatus Solibacter (12.76%), Mycobacterium (1.94%), Pedosphaera (2.92%) and Rhodoplanes (20.01%) were the main bacteria genera with relative abundance more than 1% at 1448 m. Additionally, the relative abundance greater than 1% of dominant bacteria genera was Bradyrhizobium (3.09%), Burkholderia (3.2%), Candidatus Koribacter (1.96%), Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia (2.0%), Candidatus Solibacter (7.65%), Mycobacterium (1.07%), Pedosphaera (2.74%), Phenylobacterium (1.83%) and Rhodoplanes (15.34%) at 1643 m. Moreover, we found that the relative abundance greater than 1% of dominant bacteria genera were Acidopila (6.49%), Bradyrhizobium (1.37%), Burkholderia (7.77%), Candidatus Koribacter (2.54%), Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia (2.82%), Candidatus Solibacter (8.19%), Pedosphaera (1.41%), Phenylobacterium (1.22%), Rhodoplanes (17.2%) at 1821 m (Fig. 4b).
To explore how bacterial communities varied with elevations, the results of β-diversity showed that the first principal coordinate and the second principal coordinate explained 30.29% and 22.27% of the total variation of soil bacterial community at three elevations. The soil bacterial communities of three elevations were obviously dispersed, but the points of the same elevation were aggregated. It indicated that the structure of soil bacterial communities clearly separated at 1448 m, 1643 m and 1821 m (Fig. 5). In addition, the heat maps at the phylum and genus level also suggested patterns of bacteria communities at different elevations similar to the grouping pattern observed in PCoA (Figure S2, S3). The relative abundance of the top 22 phyla at 1643 m and 1821 m was higher compared with 1448 m (Figure S2). However, the relative abundance of the top 45 genera at 1448 m, 1643 m and 1821 m was similar (Figure S3).
Redundancy analysis of the correlation between soil metal and soil enzymes with soil bacterial communities at the phylum-level and genus-level
The first and second axis of RDA explained 65.15% and 16.50% of the total variance at phyla level, respectively, for soil mineral elements and soil bacterial phyla at three elevations (Figure S4a). The RDA showed that Mg, Fe, Zn, Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb had a strong positive effect on Gemmatimonadetes; the K was positively correlated with Acidobacteria, AD3 and Chloroflexi; the Ca had a positive effect on Chlamydiae, Bacteroidetes, TM7 and Verrucomicrobia; while the Cd had a positive effect on Actinobacteria (Figure S4a). In particular, the Fe (p = 0.001) was the top factor correlated with the differences in the composition of soil bacteria communities, explained 22.3% of the variance of the observed variation between elevation gradients (Figure S4a). For soil mineral elements and soil bacteria genera at three elevations, the first and second axis of RDA explained 43.54% and 21.84% of the total variance (Figure S4b). The Cd, Pb, Ni and Cr were positively correlated with the genera Pedosphaera and Candidatus. Koribacter; the K, Fe and Mg were positively correlated with Mycobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Rhodoplanes and Candidatus. Solibacter; while the Ca had a positive effect on Phenylobacterium and Candidatus. Rhabdochlamydia. Further, the Fe (p = 0.001) was also the top factor correlated with the differences in the composition of soil bacteria communities, with 18.7% of variation explained (Figure S4b). The first and second axis of RDA explained 78.53% and 15.18% of the total variance at phyla level, respectively, for soil enzyme activities and soil bacterial phyla at three elevations (Figure S4c). The RDA showed that the urease and catalase were positively correlated with Gemmatimonadetes and Acidobateria; the phosphatase was positively correlated with Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and TM7; while the invertase had a positive effect on Chlamydiae, Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia. Moreover, the invertase (p = 0.13) explained the most variation, with 50.8% of variation explained (Figure S4c). The first and second axis of RDA explained 62.35% and 21.15% of the total variance at genus level, respectively, for soil enzyme activities and soil bacterial genera at three elevations (Figure S4d). The invertase was positively correlated with Phenylobacterium and Candidatus. Rhabdochlamydia; while the phosphatase, urease and catalase were only positively correlated with Bradyrhizobium. In particular, the urease (p = 0.029) explained the most variation, with 29.5% of the variation explained (Figure S4d).
Correlation between soil mineral elements and soil enzymes with soil bacterial phyla
The Mantel test and correlation analysis showed that Fe and urease significantly affected bacterial OUT at 1448m. However, there no significant correlation between soil variables and bacteria communities on bacterial OUT at 1643m and 1821m (Fig. 6). The response of bacteria phylum level of different elevations to the change of soil mineral elements was different (Figure S5a, b, c). At 1448 m, we found that K content had a negative effect on Gemmatimonadetes; Fe content had a negative impact on Chloroflexi; the content of Cr and Ni had a negative effect on TM7. However, the content of Mg, Ca, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb had no significant impacts on the type of bacteria. At 1643 m, Mg content had a negative impact on Bacteroidetes and Chlamydiae; Ca content had a negative impact on TM7; Ni content had a negative on Chloroflexi; the content of Cu and Pb had a negative impact on Chlamydiae. Interestingly, the content of K, Fe, Cr, Zn and Cd had no significant impact on the type of bacteria. At 1821 m, K content also had a negative effect on Gemmatimonadetes; Fe content had a positive effect on Acidobacteria; the content of Cr, Cu, Zn, Pb had a negative effect on Acidobacteria, but positive effect on Actinobacteria; Ni content had a positive effect on Actinobacteria; the content of Mg, Ca and Cd had no significant impact on the type of bacteria. (Figure S5a, b, c). RDA also showed that at different elevation gradients, the content of Fe, Cr and K were the main factors affecting soil bacteria communities at 1448 m; Ca content was the main factor affecting the bacteria communities at 1643 m (Figure S4a). The response of bacteria phylum level of different elevations to the change of soil enzyme activities was different (Figure S5d, e, f). At 1448 m, Invertase activity had a positive effect on Chlamydiae; Urease activity had a negative effect on Chloroflexi; Phosphatase activity had a positive effect on Actinobacteria; Catalase had a negative effect on TM7. At 1643 m, there were no significant effect between all soil bacteria communities and soil enzyme activity, except catalase activity had a positive effect on Acidobacteria. At 1821 m, Invertase activity had a positive effect on Chloroflexi; Phosphatase activity had a positive effect on Chloroflexi, but negative on Proteobacteria. Only urease and phosphatase activities were no significant effect on the type of bacteria (Figure S5d, e, f). RDA also showed that urease and catalase activity were the main factors affecting soil bacteria communities at 1448 m, and phosphatase activity was the main factor affecting soil bacteria communities at 1821 m (Figure S4c). These variables were considered as potential factors affecting these communities.
Different biomarkers of phyla and genus level are present at different three elevations
LEfSe analysis revealed that there were different biomarkers in soil at different elevations. For example, at 1448 m, enrichment of Acidobacteria, Bradyrhizobium, Gemmatimonadetes and Mycobacterium were significant; at 1643 m, only Proteobacteria was significance enriched; the abundance of soil bacteria of R. devalayi at 1821 m, enrichment of Burkholderia, Acidopila, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, TM7, Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia, Desulfovlbrio, TM6 and Telmatospirillum were significant (Fig. 7).
Co-occurrence Network characteristics of soil bacterial communities at three elevations
In the co-occurrence network analysis, a node in network indicated a phylum, while a link indicated a relationship between two nodes (Fig. 8). The total nodes in the network were 1448 m (291), 1643 m (317) and 1821 m (345). At the bacterial phyla level, the total edges were 2153, 317 and 345 at 1448 m, 1643 m and 181 m, respectively. And the positive (99.91% edges) and negative (0.09% edges) were identified at 1448 m and 1643 m. Interestingly, the positive edges were identified with 100% at 1821 m (Table 1). The abundance of Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were high at three elevations was 1448 m (40.55%, 23.71%, 19.24%), 1643 m (41.64%, 22.71%, 17.98%) and 1821 m (39.71%, 22.32%, 16.81%) respectively.
Table 1
The co-occurrence network properties of soil bacterial communities
Degree | 1448m | 1643m | 1821m |
Total nodes | 291 | 317 | 345 |
Total edges | 2153 | 2236 | 2815 |
Average degree | 14.80 | 14.11 | 16.32 |
Positive edges | 99.91% | 99.91% | 100.00% |
Negative edges | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0 |