3.1. Effect of Morus alba leaves on taste TAS2R receptors
The key aim of this study was to observe the response of taste sweet TAS1R2/ TAS1R3) and bitter (TAS2R13, TAS2R3) receptors to the Morus alba leaf extract. The results are summarized in the graphs below (Fig. 1, 2, 3). The final results of the experiment was presented as the ratio of the increase in fluorescence of cells exposed to the tested extracts (not diluted WML1, diluted WML1:10 ) with reference to the control sample.
The study used bitter taste receptors type 2 which belong to a subgroup of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of family A. They are crucial in the perception of bitterness, and are increasingly finding therapeutic use. These chemosensory GPCR receptors are found in the plasma membrane of type II taste receptor cells (TRCs) in the taste buds of the tongue, pharynx, larynx, soft palate and several other tissues throughout the body such as the intestinal epithelium (in enterocytes, tuft cells, cup cells, Paneth cells, microfollicular cells) [20].
The final product of the entire project carried out was to identify a substance that adequately modulates sweet taste (preferably enhancing), which would enhance the functional activation effect for sucralose by at least several times. As an added value, it was assumed that such a substance from a natural source could simultaneously inhibit (reduce) the perception of bitter taste.
The study showed that from both WML variants, which were selected based on our previous research [3], the closest to achieve basic criterion in its effect on TSA1R2/TSA1R3 sweet taste receptors were conditioned leaves (WML/4). At basal concentration (WML/41) it enhanced sweet taste over three times (3.35-fold), and at 10-fold dilution (WML/41:10) – 3.8-fold, comparing to sucralose, after 1 min of interaction. A similar effect was observed after 2 min of interaction, but to a lesser extent (Fig. 1).
Simultaneously, it was observed that conditioned mulberry leaf extract (WML/4) deactivated the bitter receptor TAS2R13, both after 1 min and 2 min (Fig. 2), but enhanced bitter taste in TAS2R3 receptor (stronger in samples WML1:10) (Fig. 3).
Ligands from WML/0 samples also enhanced sweet taste, stronger after 2 min of interaction with TSA1R2/TSA1R3 than those from WML/4 sample (Fig. 1). When comparing both bitter taste receptors, mulberry extracts activated TAS2R3 (with chlorokin as positive) receptor better than TAS2R13 (with denatonium as positive).
In the context of the above results, it is worth bearing in mind that powdered mulberry leaf extracts are themselves characterized by a relatively bitter taste. However, the substances they contain react with taste receptors to some extent. The food industry points to the bitter taste of the leaves precisely as a major problem in their industrial processing. This bitter taste of mulberry leaves is difficult to eliminate even as a result of technological processing. Despite some similarity, the mechanism of bitterness formation in mulberry leaves is quite different from that in tea leaves. It was showed that intensity is a result of the interaction of many health-promoting compounds (amino acids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, alkaloids) on one hand, and sugar alcohol metabolites on the other hand [21].
A similar study to ours was conducted by Szczepaniak et al. [19] where authors recorded several times lower effects against receptors for the cornelian cherry, than the white mulberry leaves studied here. This raises hopes that white mulberry leaves in this area provide an interesting solution for the palatability of food products.
3.2. Stability of phenolic acids and flavonols from Morus alba L. leaves during in vitro digestion process.
According to the research model, the digestion process of WML/0 and WML/4 was simulated, mapping the human digestive tract. The digested samples were collected sequentially at six stages (from the stomach to the large intestine) of the process and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively for the content of phenolic acids and flavonols, as presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Average amount (± standard deviation) of phenolic acids and flavonols in white mulberry leaves (digested samples) at each step of in vitro digestion.
[µg * ml− 1] | WML/0 | WML/4 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | A | B | C | D | E | F |
rutin | 103,88 b | 100,08 b | 84,95 b | 76,84 b | 51,01 b | 0,68 a | 33,39 a | 39,12 a | 25,91 a | 26,83 a | 33,60 a | 11,51 b |
± 0,39 | ± 0,16 | ± 4,80 | ± 0,24 | ± 0,49 | ± 0,11 | ± 0,49 | ± 0,24 | ± 0,03 | ± 0,82 | ± 4,46 | ± 0,19 |
isoquercitrin | 32,60 b | 29,91 b | 30,33 b | 32,30 b | 21,09 b | 1,28 a | 11,00 a | 14,63 a | 11,58 a | 12,25 a | 16,99 a | 18,39 b |
± 0,93 | ± 1,64 | ± 2,18 | ± 1,32 | ± 1,30 | ± 0,55 | ± 0,09 | ± 0,03 | ± 0,03 | ± 0,04 | ± 1,34 | ± 0,19 |
quercetin 3-O-(6”-O-malonyl)-β-D-glucoside | 82,12 b | 71,73 b | 83,36 b | 92,47 b | 61,34 b | 41,88 b | 30,61 a | 37,39 a | 31,26 a | 35,29 a | 44,18 a | 24,75 a |
± 0,21 | ± 0,06 | ± 1,81 | ± 1,11 | ± 2,90 | ± 0,15 | ± 0,07 | ± 0,06 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,04 | ± 1,27 | ± 0,14 |
astragalin | 11,98 b | 11,10 b | 11,20 b | 12,87 b | 6,93 b | 5,07 a | 4,58 a | 6,23 a | 5,06 a | 5,14 a | 4,79 a | 6,86 b |
± 0,16 | ± 0,08 | ± 2,31 | ± 0,66 | ± 0,54 | ± 0,16 | ± 0,12 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,04 | ± 0,10 | ± 0,09 |
myricetin | 13,919 b | 13,90 b | 15,00 b | 19,86 b | 15,70 b | 1,61 b | 5,35 a | 6,44 a | 5,49 a | 6,26 a | 8,00 a | 2,43 a |
± 0,09 | ± 0,08 | ± 3,19 | ± 0,63 | ± 3,11 | ± 0,31 | ± 0,09 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,00 | ± 1,01 | ± 0,96 |
quercetin | 0,33 b | 0,30 a | 0,37 b | 0,82 b | 0,81 b | 0,63 b | 0,26 a | 0,31 a | 0,33 a | 0,27 a | 0,32 a | 0,58 a |
± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,07 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,06 | ± 0,03 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,02 |
kaempferol | 0,18 a | 0,17 a | 0,19 a | 0,32 b | 0,41 b | 0,16 a | 0,16 a | 0,17 a | 0,19 a | 0,16 a | 0,17 a | 0,20 b |
± 0,02 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,03 | ± 0,09 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,01 |
isorhamnetin | 0,58 a | 0,58 a | 0,59 a | 0,60 b | 0,58 b | 0,58 a | 0,58 a | 0,59 a | 0,57 a | 0,56 a | 0,55 a | 0,55 a |
± 0,04 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,02 |
TOTAL amount of flavonols | 245,59 | 227,77 | 225,98 | 236,08 | 157,87 | 51,89 | 85,94 | 104,89 | 80,38 | 86,76 | 108,61 | 65,27 |
gallic acid | 7,96 b | 7,35 b | 7,42 b | 7,32 b | 4,59 b | 2,72 a | 2,43 a | 3,29 a | 2,79 a | 3,09 a | 3,09 a | 4,2 b |
| ± 0,03 | ± 0,07 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,07 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,02 | ± 0,01 |
protocatechuic acid | 0,59 b | 0,54 b | 0,46 b | 0,41 b | 0,35 b | 0,13 b | 0,23 a | 0,28 a | 0,20 a | 0,22 a | 0,20 a | 0,05 a |
| ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
4-hydroxybenzoic acid | 0,03 b | 0,04 a | 0,03 b | 0,04 b | 0,03 b | 0,08 b | 0,02 a | 0,03 a | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,01 a |
| ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
vanillic acid | 0,03 b | 0,04 b | 0,05 b | 0,07 b | 0,07 b | 0,09 b | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,01 a |
| ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
chlorogenic acid | 2,56 b | 2,40 b | 1,68 b | 1,41 b | 0,55 a | 0,00 a | 0,71 a | 0,98 a | 0,77 a | 0,72 a | 0,62 b | 1,07 b |
| ± 0,02 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,55 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,24 | ± 0,01 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
caffeic acid | 2,18 b | 1,88 b | 1,80 b | 1,40 b | 0,78 b | 0,58 a | 0,60 a | 0,83 a | 0,55 a | 0,63 a | 0,56 a | 0,97 b |
| ± 0,02 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,03 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
syringic acid | 0,04 b | 0,03 b | 0,02 b | 0,01 a | 0,00 a | 0,00 a | 0,02 a | 0,02 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,00 a | 0,00 a |
| ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
p-coumaric acid | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 b | 0,01 b | 0,01 b | 0,004 b | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,00 a | 0,00 a | 0,00 a | 0,00 a |
| ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
ferullic acid | 0,03 b | 0,03 b | 0,03 b | 0,03 b | 0,02 b | 0,01 b | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a |
± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
sinapic acid | 0,02 b | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,02 b | 0,01 b | 0,00 b | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,01 a | 0,00 a | 0,00 a |
± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 | ± 0,00 |
total content of phenolic acids | 13,44 | 12,32 | 11,51 | 10,69 | 6,41 | 3,63 | 4,05 | 5,48 | 4,37 | 4,72 | 4,51 | 6,34 |
WML/0 – non-conditoned white mulberry leaves; WML/4 - conditoned white mulberry leaves; A - initial stage in stomach, B - final stage in stomach, C - stage in duodenum (pH 6.0), D - stage in small intestine (pH 7.4), E - initial stage in large intestine, F - final stage in large intestine; a, b – different letters indicate statistically significant differences in a ANOVA test. |
Table 1. Average amount (± standard deviation) of phenolic acids and flavonols in white mulberry leaves (digested samples) at each step of in vitro digestion.
/table attached/
The gastrointestinal tract plays the role of a gateway to the human body for ingredients obtained from the meal. Given that taste receptors have been identified in the extraoral area of the gastrointestinal tract, checking the stability of bioactive compounds after the digestion process from white mulberry can determine the real strength of this effect. After all, the presence of receptors plays a key role in the protection of the human organism, including the induction of appropriate motor and secretory responses, elimination of dangerous products (vomiting, diarrhea, temporary anorexia) [20].
Quantitative changes in different sections of the simulated gastrointestinal tract were evident for phenolic acids present in model. With reference to retention times and UV-VIS spectra, ten phenolic acids were identified. Gallic acid predominated at all stages of the digestion process, while chlorogenic acid together with caffeic acid were also measured in quite high amount. Thus, this confirmed the previously identified relationships for phenolic acids in the characterization of Polish variety white mulberry leaves [3].
Statistically higher contents of each phenolic acids were determined in WML/0 than in WML/4 samples. Moreover, the quantitative changes in these compounds were more intense in the case of WML/0. The WML/ 0 variant showed also highest total phenolic acids content. This was clearly evident at stages A, B, C, and D, where, relative to analogous digested WML/4 samples, 2–4 times as many phenolic acids were recorded.
The in vitro digestion process resulted in fairly regular changes in the amounts of flavonols. Starting from the small intestine stage (D or E), the amounts were gradually reduced, the greatest at the terminal stage of the large intestine. For many flavonols, the decreasing content over the course of the process was preceded by an initial increase in their content at the A-D sections. Among the eight identified flavonols, rutin and quercetin 3-(6-malonyl)-glucoside were found in the highest amounts at the beginning of the digestion process. In addition, smaller amounts of isoquercitrin, astragalin and myricetin were found. The amounts of quercetin, kaempferol and isoramnetin were at levels lower than 1 µg*ml− 1 at all stages of digestion. The smallest variations in content between stages were recorded for isoramnetin and quercetin (WML/0). Leaves conditioned for 4 hours (WML/4) also showed the lowest contents of each flavonols, and there were almost 3 times less total amount of flavonols comparing with WML/4 samples. The greatest quantitative losses of total flavonols were observed at stage F.
The observed different trends (increase or decrease) in the content of individual polyphenols at the initial stages of the simulated digestion process are supported by the literature. Some studies have pointed to the loss of polyphenols during the task of oral and gastric conditions [22], while in others, authors have emphasized the stability of compounds during the passage through these stages. This was explained by too short exposure of the samples to the acidic environment of the stomach, which did not involve hydrolysis and release of polyphenols from cellular structures. In addition, it is speculated that low pH has a protective effect on polyphenol structures [23, 24].
After incubation under conditions simulating the stomach, the intestinal stage was conducted in a bioreactor. At the duodenal stage, pancreatic extract and bile acid salts were administered while increasing the alkalinity of the environment. A further pH increase to 7.4 corresponded to conditions in the small intestine, while holding at pH 8.0 for 18 hours – to conditions in the large intestine. The greatest reduction in phenolic acids and flavonols was observed after F stage (large intestine). Polyphenols when reaching the colon are intensively transformed into smaller forms by the intestinal microflora. Their presence can also affect the growth of major strains of intestinal bacteria [25, 26]. It is increasingly emphasized that the antioxidant capacity of plant-derived foods is evidenced not only by polyphenol content, but also by the activity of phenolic metabolites of bacterial origin, high concentrations of which are recorded precisely within the colon [27].
Polyphenols are generally poorly absorbed during digestion, as they are converted through the action of digestive enzymes and intestinal microflora to lower molecular weight compounds. Animal and human studies showed that relation to many polyphenols, including chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid and rutin [28].