Of the 167 raw accelerometry data files, 157 had valid data for at least one weekday and one weekend day. Once combined with the questionnaire and biological data, 139 participants had complete data.
Females consumed more sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), experienced poorer sleep quality, and were more physically active and insulin resistant (Table 1, p≤0.07). Males were leaner, used more alcohol and tobacco products and experienced lower people-to-bedroom density (p≤0.040). The JIS high risk group had a higher socio-economic status (SES), a lower HIV+ prevalence, were mostly obese, more insulin resistant, and likely to be in a partnered relationship (Table 1, p≤0.040).
[Insert Table 1 here]
In bi-variate analysis, sex, SES, CI, WC, BMI, SSB and WASO were significantly associated with HOMA-IR (p≤0.05). SES, BMI, CI, WC and HIV status were significantly related to MetSz (p≤0.027).
All models were significant (Figure 1A-F, Figure 2A-F. p≤0.0095) and there was no evidence of multicollinearity (VIF <1.5, Tolerance >0.75). The binary logistic regression models (Figure 1A-C, Figure 2A-C) showed good fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow: p≥0.3744; AUC: 0.808-0.877). The full models (OR±95% confidence intervals) for Figure 1A-F and Figure 2A-F are available in Additional File 1.
In binary logistic regression models (Figure 1A-C) males had significantly lower odds for JIS-MetS high risk (OR≈0.15, p≤ 0.006), and similarly for HIV+ status in the NST and SFI models (OR=0.25, p≤0.0035). Once adjusted for adiposity (CI), sex was no longer a significant factor (p≥0.097). However, HIV+ status remained a significant factor in most models (OR≈0.26, p≤0.048) (Figure 1A-C).
There was a significant non-linear trend (U-shaped) between JIS-MetS risk and NST (p=0.0196) (Figure 1A), such that for NST Q2, there was 80% less likelihood of being at high risk for JIS-MetS. There was also a significant difference in frequencies between NST Q1 and Q2 (p=0.021) (Figure 1A).
[Insert Figure 1 here]
There was a significant positive, linear trend between JIS-MetS risk and SFI (p=0.0001) (Figure 1C). The odds of high risk JIS-MetS for SFI Q3 was high (OR= 69.81, 8.44; 577.63), however the confidence intervals were wide. There were significant differences between the frequencies for Q3 versus Q1 and Q2 (p<0.001) (Figure 1C).
Being a current user of both alcohol and tobacco products carried a significant higher odds for JIS-MetS high risk in the NST (OR=4.51, p=0.034) and SFI (OR=6.55, p =0.023) models (Figure 1A-C).
In ordinal logistic regression models (Figure 1D-F), being in the VM Q2 level, significantly decreased the odds of being in HOMA-IR Q3 by a factor of ≈0.31 (p≤0.039). In contrast, for both CI Q2 and Q3 levels, the odds of being in HOMA-IR Q3 were significantly increased; Q2 OR≈2.9 and Q3 OR≈3.79, respectively (p≤0.045) (Figure 1D-F).
There was a significant linear trend between TST and HOMA-IR levels (p=0.0444) (Figure 1D). Compared to TST Q1 and Q2, being in TST Q3 (longest sleep time) increased the odds of being in the highest HOMA-IR level (Q3) by a factor of 2.84 (p=0.044) (Figure 1D).
There were significant linear relationships between SE and WASO, and HOMA-IR (p≤0.007) (Figure 1E). A high SE (Q3) was 85% less likely to result in HOMA-IR Q3 (p=0.001). Being in WASO Q2 and Q3 significantly increased the odds for HOMA-IR Q3; OR=3.17 and OR=6.75, respectively (p≤0.019).
SFI and AC were significantly associated with increasing HOMA-IR levels (p≤0.0201) (Figure 1F). Being in SFI Q2 and Q3 significantly increased the odds for HOMA-IR Q3, OR=4.67 (p=0.004) and OR=10.91 (p<0.001), respectively. For AC Q3 the odds of being in the HOMA-IR Q3 was 3.01 (p=0.020) (Figure 1F).
In the TST, NST, SE, WASO and AC models (Figure 1D-E), being in SSB Q2 and Q3, increased the likelihood for being in HOMA-IR Q3 by a factor of 3.51 to 4.77, but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.068 to p=0.098).
Sleep quantity and quality measures featured concurrently and significantly in the TST, SE and SFI models (Figure 1D-F) (p≤0.044).
Expressing sleep quantity and quality parameters in terms of sleep health guidelines, we found significant non-linear associations with JIS-MetS risk (p≤0.0308) (Figure 2A-F). The relationship between sleep categories for both TST and NST, and JIS-MetS risk were U-shaped, the nadir at 7-9 hours of sleep (Figure 2A-B).
[Insert Figure 2 here]
In binary logistic regression models (Figure 2A-C) males had significantly lower odds for JIS-MetS high risk (OR≈0.14, p= 0.004), and similarly for HIV+ (OR≈0.26, p≤0.0034). Once adjusted for adiposity (CI), sex was no longer a significant factor (p≥0.121). However, HIV+ status remained a significant factor in most models (OR≈0.23, p≤0.045) (Figure 2A-C).
In ordinal logistic regression models (Figure 2D-F) physical activity (VM Q2) significantly reduced the odds of being in HOMA-IR Q3 by a factor of ≈0.26 (p≤0.010). For both CI Q2 and Q3 levels, the odds of being in HOMA-IR Q3 were significantly increased (Q2 OR≈3.16, Q3 OR≈3.89, p≤0.022). For SE ≥85%, there was a 76% lower likelihood of being in HOMA-IR Q3 (p=0.010). Significantly more participants were classified as low HOMA-IR (Q1) in the SE ≥85% category (Figure 2D).
In the TST, NST and SE models (Figure 2D and 2F), being in SSB Q2, increased the odds for being in HOMA-IR Q3 by a factor of 3.24 to 3.65, but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.074).