In this study we explored the prevalence and the effect of baseline comorbidities on lung disease progression and lung transplant/mortality in a cohort of patients with IPAF. We also assessed the performance of two well-established comorbidity indices, CCI and RDCI, in predicting outcomes in this population. We found that comorbidity indices provide comprehensive information regarding a patient’s prognosis, including lung disease progression.
Hypertension and GERD were the most prevalent comorbidities in our cohort. This was consistent with a study by Oldham, et al., where GERD was the most prevalent (52.8%) comorbidity in an IPAF cohort raising suspicion for a potential contribution of GERD to disease pathogenesis in IPAF (3). In addition, COPD, depression, and DM were found to be common comorbid conditions in our cohort, a finding which was not discussed in prior IPAF literature but has been demonstrated in other forms of ILD (12, 30, 31).
When evaluating the effect of comorbidities on lung disease progression, this study revealed that multiple comorbidities such as a history of CVA/CVD, moderate to severe CKD and fracture, specifically that of lower extremity or vertebrae, were associated with a faster onset of relative FVC decline of ≥ 10% or more from the time of cohort entry in patients with IPAF. Conversely, a history of GERD was associated with a longer time to lung disease progression.
Although it is difficult to ascertain the association between the various comorbidities, prior studies have commented on the effects of these comorbidities on lung disease progression in patients with other forms of ILD. For example, CVD is a treatable comorbidity frequently observed in IPF and has been linked to worse outcomes, with proposed mechanisms including systemic inflammation, hypercoagulability, platelet activation, and oxidative stress (32–34). A complex relationship between CKD and lung disease progression, particularly through alterations of fluid homeostasis and acid-base balance, has also been demonstrated (35, 36). A potential explanation for the observed association of fracture and lung disease progression, in this study, is the increased prevalence of steroid use in patients with more severe disease which can thereby increase fracture risk. However, fracture was a baseline comorbidity in the cohort and thus steroid use would not be expected to contribute significantly to its prevalence at the time of baseline data collection. To evaluate this possibility, data regarding osteoporosis was also collected, but did not demonstrate a significant association with the studied outcomes. In other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteopenia and osteoporosis have correlated with higher mortality and fracture risk, when compared to the general population (18). Interestingly, GERD was found to be a protective factor for lung disease progression in our cohort, a finding which varies from prior studies that considered GERD to be a risk factor for ILD development (37). One consideration is the high prevalence of proton pump inhibitor use, an intervention hypothesized to slow lung disease progression in patients with IPF (38, 39). Based on our results, the association of CVD, CKD, fracture risk, and GERD with lung disease progression in patients with IPAF warrants further investigation.
Importantly, few prior studies have explored the prognostic impact of comorbid conditions in IPAF. Two studies suggested that hypothyroidism was associated with greater mortality (7, 8), but a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was correlated with better survival when compared to IPAF patients without these conditions (7). Malignancy was noted to be a serious comorbidity associated with faster progression of fibrotic lung disease in RD-ILD and IPAF (9). In our study, OSA and hypothyroidism were not significantly associated with outcomes, but lymphoma, as well as CKD and DM, were associated with shorter time to lung transplant/mortality. Similar to other studies, increasing age, male sex, and smoking history were also associated with shorter time to lung transplant/mortality in our cohort (40–44).
We evaluated the performance of the CCI and RDCI in patients with IPAF and found that both CCI and RDCI were helpful in predicting lung function and transplant/mortality outcomes, even after adjusting for UIP pattern. However, the performance of indices was variable for both outcomes when adjusted for both ILD-GAP and UIP pattern. Notably, CVA/CVD and fracture, which are components of RDCI, but not CCI, were important comorbidities associated with poor outcomes in our study. Additionally, depression was highly prevalent in our cohort but is only reflected within the RDCI score. These findings suggest that both CCI and RDCI may be useful tools for prognosticating outcomes in IPAF patients.
Our study has several strengths. We had a large, diverse IPAF cohort and the ability to explore numerous comorbidities. Sixteen percent of our cohort included Black patients, increasing the external validity of our findings. Comorbidities have been variably explored in cohorts of patients with IPAF, resulting in highly heterogeneous data of the prevalence of multiple comorbidities. In our study, we systematically and rigorously assessed the comorbidities used to calculate two commonly used comorbidity indices, particularly in autoimmune diseases, making our findings relevant to presumably autoimmune-related ILD such as IPAF. Our study was the first to use comorbidity indices CCI and RDCI to assess the comorbidity burden in this specific population and demonstrate their usefulness in assessing functional and survival outcomes. Specifically, this study supports the use of RDCI in this population, a possible advantage for rheumatologists seeing these patients. Our results also emphasize the need for comprehensive evaluation of IPAF patients and multiple tools for optimal management and monitoring, including HRCT imaging, PFT monitoring, and ILD-GAP and comorbidity assessments.
We acknowledge several limitations of our study. Given the retrospective nature of the study, the variables were collected by medical record review which can lead to misclassification bias, attrition bias, and the presence of missing data. We used precise and consistent definitions of the key comorbidities and variables to guide the data collection by two clinical researchers (with familiarity with both the medical record and management of these conditions and comorbidities) to mitigate the effects of misclassification bias and imaging data by an experienced ILD pulmonologist. However, loss to follow-up could have introduced selection bias. Patients who did not have repeat PFT data were excluded from the study, which could have been due to unknown death or a different cause that was not recorded in the medical record. Finally, while our study emphasizes the need for comorbidity screening for patients with IPAF, we were unable to evaluate whether controlling comorbidities would mitigate the often detrimental association with disease outcomes.