The benefits and risks of opiate use during therapeutic hypothermia remain controversial. While some pre-clinical models suggest that morphine may enhance the neuroprotective effects of TH by reducing oxidative stress, other animal studies have suggested that morphine induces neuronal apoptosis which could be harmful (2, 15, 16).
The aim of this study was to examine short-term outcomes in neonates requiring TH and exposed to no or minimal doses of opioids compared to higher MME at three academic medical centers. The results of this study suggests that higher cumulative doses of MME during TH for NE (often via continuous infusions) is associated with a greater need and longer duration of mechanical ventilatory support, vasopressors to support blood pressure, and a longer hospital stay. The TH protocols at the three centers are very similar except for the approach for sedation. At TMC intermittent morphine doses (0.05–0.1 mg/kg) are used only as needed while NCH routinely administers morphine by continuous infusion throughout the 72 hours of TH, and WF administers fentanyl by continuous infusion. Our analysis demonstrated that the cumulative MME dose was significantly different among the three sites which was somewhat unexpected since the general perception is that continuous infusion decreases the cumulative MME amount required for pain control and comfort. The substantial difference in the cumulative MME dose at WF compared to the other two centers is related to the preferential use of fentanyl, with significantly higher potency (100 times) compared to morphine.
Although patient demographics at the three centers were similar, some differences were seen, related to the geographical and socio-economic environment. Most neonates receiving TH at all three centers were outborn which is consistent with current evidence (14). There was a higher number of mothers with substance use disorder in the NCH cohort (17). The higher incidence of anxiety and depression diagnosed among mothers in the TMC group could be related to better access to mental health resources in Massachusetts (18).
The data showed minor differences among sites with respect to modes of ventilation, fluid resuscitation, laboratory data, and initiation of feeds (Table IIIA), likely due to variation in practice patterns between the three sites.
Even though neonates exposed to antiepileptics required a longer hospitalization, a greater need for vasopressors and duration of vasopressor use as well as need for invasive ventilation, none of these differences were found to be statistically significant.
Given the retrospective nature of this study and the real-world data that was obtained, the differences in clinical practice at the three institutions were inherent. But this is a pragmatic study which enabled the comparison of effect of opioids on short term outcomes at three centers with similar TH management, despite some differences in clinical practice. The difference in pressor use could be partially related to variations in the approach to blood pressure measurement at the three institutions. At TMC and WF, the use of intraarterial lines for blood pressure monitoring is less common than at NCH. Intraarterial line blood pressure measurements are considered the gold standard and values tend to be lower than those measured by a sphygmomanometer (19). This may result in more vasopressor use at NCH which could also impact the need and duration of central line use. Higher use of vasopressors would also result in slower advancement of feeds and could partially explain why the NCH group started trophic feeds later.
The main limitations of our study include the relatively small sample size, retrospective data collection (with some data collected that is approximately 10 years old), and inherent clinical practice variations between the three institutions despite very similar TH protocols. Since the concomitant use of anti-seizure medication could be a confounding variable with impact on the primary and secondary outcomes, this variable was adjusted for in our final analysis and the differences were not found to be statistically significant. Another limitation was the lack of an objective tool to more accurately compare the severity of NE and the pain/discomfort associated with TH. Information used as a surrogate biomarker included: APGAR scores, blood gases, the presence of multiorgan involvement, and Sarnat scoring. Data collected in this study showed that neonates with a diagnosis of severe NE did not consistently have evidence of multiorgan involvement or the most severe MRI findings.
Although the use of MRI as a biomarker of underlying brain injury is still being debated, MRI findings do correlate with future neurodevelopmental outcomes associated with NE (20). The discrepancy between unfavorable short-term outcomes and MRI results as a long-term prognostic tool emphasizes the need for long-term outcome data to definitively determine benefit or harm of opioid use in the management of neonatal NE during TH. For this study’s subjects, each center’s MRIs were interpreted by their own pediatric neuroradiologist. We were not able to have a single blinded radiologist interpret the results for all the MRIs and this prevented us from formulating statistical conclusions regarding the MRI findings.
The cumulative impact of opioids on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after TH could not be analyzed given the limited amounts of follow-up data available from the three centers. Long-term outcomes are critical to establish safety of these medication practices. The optimal therapeutic approach to neonatal pain management using opioids is still unresolved and a standardized approach is lacking. Newer sedatives such as dexmedetomidine are emerging as alternative options and their use in neonates is becoming much more widespread without sufficient compelling data on safety and dosing, especially during TH when the metabolism of many drugs changes (21).
This study is one of the few involving the generation of real-world data, an important approach for more evidence considering the current paucity of data on the safety and efficacy of opioid use in neonates (especially those with underlying brain injury). While the current results raise concerns regarding the use of opioids in neonates undergoing TH, a larger prospective multicenter trial with detailed pharmacokinetic analyses and comprehensive neurodevelopmental follow-up will ultimately be needed to further investigate the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of opioids during TH.