Objective
This study examined the effects of two evidence-based practice (EBP) educational programs for postgraduate medical residents on their attitude, behavior, knowledge, outcome, and competencies in EBP.
Results
Thirty-nine and thirty postgraduate medical residents were recruited for the active intervention and passive intervention groups. 66.6% of the active group participants and 66.6% of participants in the passive group were males (p>0.05). Participants in the active group were significantly younger than the passive group (p<0.0001). The active and passive intervention groups were not significantly different from each other at the baseline in the EBP-KABQ questionnaire (p>0.05). However, most questions were significantly different from the pre-intervention measurement and the passive intervention group after the educational intervention. Before the educational intervention, both groups had similar ACE tool scores (4.14 ± 1.72 in the active group vs. 4.79 ± 0.94 in the passive group, p>0.05). However, educational intervention in both groups led to a significant difference between groups (8.86 ± 2.62 vs. 7.31 ± 2.92, p= 0.029, in the active and passive group, respectively). Paired t-test analysis revealed that our intervention has lead to a significant increase in ACE tool scores in both groups (p<0.000, in both groups).
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Posted 02 Apr, 2021
On 07 May, 2021
Invitations sent on 24 Feb, 2021
On 23 Feb, 2021
On 23 Feb, 2021
On 23 Feb, 2021
On 17 Feb, 2021
Posted 02 Apr, 2021
On 07 May, 2021
Invitations sent on 24 Feb, 2021
On 23 Feb, 2021
On 23 Feb, 2021
On 23 Feb, 2021
On 17 Feb, 2021
Objective
This study examined the effects of two evidence-based practice (EBP) educational programs for postgraduate medical residents on their attitude, behavior, knowledge, outcome, and competencies in EBP.
Results
Thirty-nine and thirty postgraduate medical residents were recruited for the active intervention and passive intervention groups. 66.6% of the active group participants and 66.6% of participants in the passive group were males (p>0.05). Participants in the active group were significantly younger than the passive group (p<0.0001). The active and passive intervention groups were not significantly different from each other at the baseline in the EBP-KABQ questionnaire (p>0.05). However, most questions were significantly different from the pre-intervention measurement and the passive intervention group after the educational intervention. Before the educational intervention, both groups had similar ACE tool scores (4.14 ± 1.72 in the active group vs. 4.79 ± 0.94 in the passive group, p>0.05). However, educational intervention in both groups led to a significant difference between groups (8.86 ± 2.62 vs. 7.31 ± 2.92, p= 0.029, in the active and passive group, respectively). Paired t-test analysis revealed that our intervention has lead to a significant increase in ACE tool scores in both groups (p<0.000, in both groups).
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...