Inflammation plays a double-edged role in the body, protecting it from pathogens and monitoring abnormal cells. But chronic inflammation can lead to tissue damage. Previous research have identified how inflammation leads to cancer. Cancers of the stomach, liver and cervix are thought to be associated with inflammation definitely. In recent years, the relationship between chronic inflammation and autoimmune disorders and cancer has attracted more and more attention, but there are few studies in the field of prostate cancer. In this study, we conducted Mendelian randomized analysis on 18 chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disorders and prostate cancer to systematically and comprehensively demonstrate the correlation between the two diseases. By using Mendelian randomization, we further corroborate previously reported observational findings, laying the foundation for exploring deeper associations. In order to prove the reliability of the results of this study, we apply a series of analysis methods to make the results meet the three core assumptions of Mendelian randomization analysis, and improve the robustness and validity of the results.
Based on the method of Mendelian randomization, we comprehensively explore the causal association between chronic inflammatory diseases and autoimmune disorders and prostate cancer from the genetic level.
Previous observational studies have found the association between rheumatic diseases and prostate cancer. Wheeler.AM et al. published a retrospective cohort study in 2022 which is the largest clinical research of RA and prostate cancer, involving 283,798 patients (>56,000 RA patients) and 6,550 prostate cancer patients (RA patients>1,400 cases). They found that RA was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (adjusted for HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.06 - 1.22]), but cohort bias were inevitable[25]. We further support that rheumatoid arthritis may be a risk factor for prostate cancer through Mendelian randomized analysis. Another study found that higher cytokine/chemokine concentrations in RA patients were associated with an increased risk of cancer, particularly lung cancer and lymphoproliferative cancer, suggesting that elevated circulating cytokines and chemokines predicted risk of cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[26]. Two meta-analyses showed that systemic lupus erythematosus might reduce the incidence of prostate cancer, which was inconsistent with our findings[27, 28]. This may be because men with SLE tend to have low levels of androgens, which is an important mechanism that leads to the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. However, it is worth noting that Song-L et al. found that SLE was positively associated with most cancers, and only prostate cancer and cutaneous melanoma were negatively associated. At present, several important co-stimulators have been shown to play an important role in the carcinogenic process of SLE[29]. Thus, these stimulators may neutralize or reverse the effects of testosterone levels on prostate cancer. However, observational studies have not been able to exclude the effect of rheumatic drugs such as NSAIDs, which is confused due to horizontal pleiotropy[30]. At the same time, because SLE is more common in females, observational studies on male cases are relatively insufficient. Similarly to our conclusion, Ward.MM et al. found that older patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) or ankylosing spondylitis were more likely to develop prostate cancer in a retrospective cohort study based on US Medicare data from 1999 to 2015[31]. Our study found no association between ankylosing spondylitis and prostate cancer after removing the SNPs that lead to pleiotropy, so there may be confounding factors interfering. A large matching clinical study showed that patients with rheumatic myalgia were 6 percent more likely to develop cancer in the six months following diagnosis than patients without rheumatic myalgia[32]. There was a slight increase in prostate cancer, but the number of cases was too small to be directly compared. And that association weakens over time[33]. So a larger clinical research is needed to support it.
Epidemiological studies also suggest an association between gastrointestinal immune diseases and prostate cancer. In addition to an increased risk of gastrointestinal malignancies, patients with inflammatory bowel disease may also have an increased risk of extraintestinal tumors[34]. A matched retrospective cohort study showed that inflammatory bowel disease was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer[35]. A meta-analysis further demonstrated that patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) had a higher risk of PCa by subgroup analysis, while Crohn's disease (CD) was not associated with PCA[36]. Although the cohort study selected 1; 9 cases, but only 1000 cases of IBD, limited data. Current studies suggest that intestinal microecological environment may affect prostate inflammation and the occurrence of prostate cancer[37, 38]. The meta-analysis selected were both cohort studies and case-control studies, so we could not infer whether inflammatory bowel disease caused the occurrence of prostate cancer or whether the incidence of cancer was caused by immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel patients. More targeted studies are needed for further verification. Primary sclerosing cholangitis(PSC), celiac disease, and irritable bowel syndrome, which are associated with the development of inflammatory bowel disease, were also included in the study to explore their association with prostate cancer. PSC has a low incidence and is characterized by multifocal bile duct stenosis and advanced liver disease. No previous studies have reported an association between PSC and prostate cancer. One reason that may prevent prostate cancer from developing is that PSC disrupts male estrogen levels in patients by causing liver failure.
For central system immune diseases, studies on systemic sclerosis and prostate cancer are ambiguous. However, a newly published meta-analysis that pooled the results of all studies showed no association between systemic sclerosis and prostate cancer[39]. But it is important to note that testosterone levels are significantly reduced in people with MS, which may have implications for the development of prostate cancer[40].
For chronic diseases, Harding.JL et al. found that type 1 diabetes was associated with a reduced incidence of prostate cancer, but not with mortality[41]. In contrast, Kang.J et al. found that type 1 diabetes was associated with a higher morbidity of a Gleason score of 8 to 10 rather than 7 PCa[42]. Hyperimmune function and hyperglycemia may promote the proliferation of tumor cells. In addition, exogenous insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) can promote cancer[43, 44]. But a high insulin state also leads to a drop in testosterone levels, which seems to lower the risk of prostate cancer[45]. In order to solve the current disputes, we selected the largest GWAS data of T1D for Mendelian randomization analysis, and finally found no causal correlation between them.
Severi et al., who first conducted a cohort study in Melbourne in 2010, found a small increased risk of prostate cancer in patients with asthma (HR: 1.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.05-1.49). It is important to note that long-term follow-up is difficult to separate the effects of glucocorticoids from the effects of asthma on prostate cancer risk[46]. A recent meta-analysis of 14 clinical studies on asthma and prostate cancer showed no association between asthma and prostate cancer in the general population, white population or Asian population by subgroup analysis[47].
We also found for the first time that autoimmune hyperthyroidism and psoriatic arthropathies may act as potential protective factors for prostate cancer. Due to the few number of cases of both diseases, larger samples and prospective studies are needed to explore this.
Our study is currently the most comprehensive Mendelian randomized study to explore the association between immune diseases and prostate cancer, but still has several shortcomings. First the GWAS data we selected are all from European ancestry, and the results of this study need to be further verified by demographic stratification before they can be generalized to other races. Second, the exposure variance explained by SNPs is small, so a large sample size is needed to ensure the robustness of the results. For some exposure data, the insignificance of the results may be false negative due to insufficient sample size which lack efficacy, such as rheumatic myalgia. There are still some immune diseases or chronic inflammatory diseases where MR analysis cannot be performed due to the absence of appropriate GWAS data. Third, mendelian randomization can only make rough judgments about causality, so it is difficult to explore the underlying physiological mechanism. Autoimmune disorders or chronic inflammation represent a complex state of the human body, involving more biological mechanisms than a single biomarker signaling pathway. More research is needed to explore the deeper mechanisms behind their association. Fourth, we do not have access to the raw data, so we cannot conduct subgroup analysis, so it is difficult to draw more detailed causal conclusions. Larger sample and long-term trials are needed in the future to verify these results.