In order to better describe the evolution law of water quality in the simulated section of the Baihe River, it is necessary to set monitoring points in the model. This article sets up three monitoring points (M1, M2, M3) for real-time control of the water quality of the Baihe River. Among them, M1 is located near the Baihe Exit Sluice in the middle line of the South to North Water Diversion Project, M2 is located near the main urban area of Nanyang City, and M3 is located near the Shangfanying section of Nanyang. The specific location of control points is shown in Fig. 4 − 1.
4.1 Simulation analysis of 2 times the flow rate and 1/2 water replenishment time (Scenario 1)
Scenario 1 takes 2020 as the benchmark year for the model, and the initial water quality before ecological replenishment is the Class IV water standard. The replenishment flow process and water quality at the Baihe River outlet gate in the model are set, and a hydrodynamic water quality coupling model is constructed to simulate the ecological replenishment process in Scenario 1. The spatial distribution of simulated time-mean values for the five water quality indicators in the simulation results is shown in Fig. 4 − 2.
It can be seen from Fig. 4 − 2 that after the implementation of ecological water supplement, as the ecological water supplement is continuously replenished to the Baihe River, After improving the hydrodynamic conditions of the water body, the simulation showed that the DO content in the river section increased significantly, while the concentration of CODMn, COD, NH3-N and TP decreased due to the enhanced diffusion of pollutants by the water flow. Under scenario 1, the overall concentration of DO is maintained between 3.6 and 9.2mg/L, the overall concentration of COD is maintained between 6 and 20mg/L, the overall concentration of CODMn is maintained between 4.48 and 5.04mg/L, the overall concentration of NH3-N is maintained between 0.12 and 0.68mg/L, and the overall concentration of TP is maintained between 0.056 and 0.168mg/L.
From the performance of water quality indicators at monitoring points, it can be seen that the water quality at each monitoring point meets the standards for Class III water or above, with COD and TP indicators performing the best and reaching the Class II water standards. The M1 monitoring point is relatively close to the location of the make-up water outlet, and the water quality at this point is similar to that of the make-up water, with the best performance of water quality indicators. The M2 monitoring point is close to the location of the sewage discharge outlet, and the water quality at this point varies greatly. Each water quality indicator at the M2 monitoring point is greatly disturbed by pollutant emissions. The M3 monitoring point is located downstream of the urban section, and the changes in water quality indicators often lag behind. Under scenario one, the flow of ecological replenishment is much greater than the flow during the dry season. Ecological replenishment has a significant impact on the hydrodynamic conditions of rivers, with the hydrodynamic effect of rivers being the dominant factor, and the reduction of pollutants with the diffusion of water flow is significant.
To evaluate the improvement effect of ecological water replenishment on water quality, M2 monitoring point was selected as the water quality control point of Baihe River. When the model is stable, the concentrations of various water quality indicators at M2 monitoring points are shown in Table 4 − 1. Under scenario 1, the DO concentration increased to 5.84mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, an increase of 94.67% compared to before water supplementation; The COD concentration decreased to 14.54mg/L, reaching the standard for Class II water, a reduction of 51.53% compared to before water replenishment; The concentration of CODMn decreased to 4.71mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 52.90% compared to before water replenishment; The concentration of NH3-N decreased to 0.54mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, which was reduced by 64.00% compared to before water supplementation; The TP concentration decreased to 0.10mg/L, meeting the Class II water standard, which was 66.67% lower than before water supplementation. Overall, the water replenishment plan in Scenario 1 has a significant effect on improving the water quality of the Baihe River, with all water quality indicators meeting the water quality requirements of the water function zone. Among them, the DO indicator has the best improvement effect, while the TP indicator has the highest reduction rate. The changes in all water quality indicators follow the laws of natural evolution, achieving good simulation results.
Table 4
− 1 Scenario 4 Simulation results for each control point Unit: mg/L
Monitoring points | DO | COD | CODMn | NH3-N | TP |
M1 | 9.23 | 14.26 | 4.61 | 0.37 | 0.09 |
M2 | 5.84 | 14.54 | 4.71 | 0.54 | 0.10 |
M3 | 5.65 | 14.28 | 4.66 | 0.54 | 0.11 |
4.2 Simulation analysis of standard flow rate and standard water replenishment duration (Scenario 2)
In Scenario 2, the year 2020 is taken as the base year of the model, and the initial water quality before ecological water replenishment is Ⅳ water standard. The recharge flow process and recharge water quality at the retreat gate of Baihe River in the model are set, and the coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model is constructed to simulate the ecological water replenishment process in Scenario 2. The spatial distribution of the simulated time-averaged values of the five water quality indicators in the simulation results is shown in Fig. 4 − 3.
As can be seen in Fig. 4 − 3, after the implementation of ecological recharge, with the ecological recharge water continuously recharged to the channel of the White River to improve the hydrodynamic conditions of the water body, the simulation results show that under the conditions of Scenario 2, the DOcontent in the river section was maintained between 3.2 and 8.8 mg/L. At the same time, the concentration of pollutants such as COD and TP was reduced. At the same time, the CODMn, COD, NH3-N and TP were also reduced, with COD concentrations ranging from 0 to 21 mg/L, CODMn concentrations from 5 to 5.56 mg/L, NH3-N concentrations from 0.44 to 1 mg/L, TP concentrations from 0.44 to 1 mg/L, and TP concentrations from 1.5 to 1.8 mg/L. The simulation results showed that the DO content in the river section was maintained between 3.2 and 8.8 mg/L under Scenario 2 conditions. /L, and the concentration of TP was maintained between 0.072 and 0.184 mg/L overall. These results indicate that improving hydrodynamic conditions is a very important step in water environment management, and can significantly increase the dissolved oxygen content in the water body, thus effectively improving the local ecological environment. At the same time, reducing the discharge of all kinds of pollution sources is also an indispensable part of environmental protection. Therefore, we need to reduce the discharge of pollutants through various means and emphasize on the comprehensive analysis and assessment of local water flow characteristics and ecological trends.
From the performance of the water quality indicators at the monitoring points, it can be seen that the water quality at each monitoring point meets the standard of Class III water or above. The M1 monitoring point is relatively close to the location of the make-up water outlet, and the water quality at this point is similar to that of the make-up water, with the best performance of water quality indicators. The M2 monitoring point is close to the location of the sewage discharge outlet, and the water quality at this point varies greatly. Each water quality indicator at the M2 monitoring point is greatly disturbed by pollutant emissions. The M3 monitoring point is located downstream of the urban section, and the changes in water quality indicators often lag behind. Under scenario 2, the flow of ecological replenishment decreased by half compared to scenario 1, and the impact of ecological replenishment on river water dynamics was weakened, while the reduction of pollutants with water diffusion was reduced.
To evaluate the improvement effect of ecological water replenishment on water quality, M2 monitoring point was selected as the water quality control point of Baihe River. When the model is stable, the concentrations of various water quality indicators at M2 monitoring points are shown in Table 4 − 2. Under scenario 2, the DO concentration increased to 5.61mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, an increase of 87% compared to before water supplementation; The COD concentration decreased to 16.00mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 46.67% compared to before water replenishment; The concentration of CODMn decreased to 5.37mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 46.30% compared to before water replenishment; The concentration of NH3-N decreased to 0.87mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a 42.00% reduction compared to before water supplementation; The TP concentration decreased to 0.15mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 50.00% compared to before water supplementation. Overall, the water replenishment plan in Scenario 2 has a significant effect on improving the water quality of the Baihe River, with all water quality indicators meeting the water quality requirements of the water function zone. Among them, the DO indicator has the best improvement effect, and the COD indicator has the highest reduction rate. The changes in all water quality indicators comply with the laws of natural evolution, achieving good simulation results.
Table 5
5 Scenario 5 Simulation results for each control point Unit: mg/L
Monitoring points | DO | COD | CODMn | NH3-N | TP |
M1 | 9.12 | 14.62 | 5.10 | 0.46 | 0.11 |
M2 | 5.61 | 16.00 | 5.37 | 0.87 | 0.15 |
M3 | 5.58 | 15.74 | 5.15 | 0.84 | 0.13 |
4.3 Simulation analysis of 1/2 flow rate and 2 times water replenishment time (Scenario 3)
In Scenario 3, the year 2020 is taken as the base year of the model, and the initial water quality before ecological recharge is class IV. The recharge flow process and recharge water quality at the retreating gate of the White River in the model are set, and the coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model is constructed to simulate the ecological recharge process in Scenario 3. The spatial distribution of the simulated time-averaged values of the five water quality indicators in the simulation results is shown in Fig. <link rid="fig9">4</link>–4.
As can be seen from Fig. <link rid="fig9">4</link>–4, after the implementation of ecological recharge, with the continuous recharge of ecological recharge to the channel of the White River, after improving the hydrodynamic conditions of the water body, the simulation shows that the DO content in the river section is significantly enhanced. At the same time, due to the enhancement of water diffusion, pollutants were better dispersed and diluted in the water body, which led to a reduction in the concentrations of CODMn, COD, NH3-N and TP. These results indicate that by improving the hydrodynamic conditions and taking corresponding measures to reduce the discharge of pollution sources, the quality of the local water environment can be effectively improved and the impacts of environmental pollution on the ecosystem and human health can be reduced. Therefore, the flow characteristics of water bodies should be emphasized in the future development and implementation of relevant policies, as well as the integrated management of various pollution sources. Under the conditions of Scenario 3, the concentration of DO was maintained between 3.6 and 9.2 mg/L, the concentration of COD was maintained between 6 and 20 mg/L, the concentration of CODMn was maintained between 4.48 and 5.04 mg/L, the concentration of NH3-N was maintained between 0.12 and 0.68 mg/L, and the concentration of TP was maintained between 0.056 and 0.168mg/L.
From the performance of the water quality indicators at the monitoring points, it can be seen that the water quality at each monitoring point meets the standard of Class III water or above. The M1 monitoring point is relatively close to the location of the make-up water outlet, and the water quality at this point is similar to that of the make-up water, with the best performance of water quality indicators. The M2 monitoring point is close to the location of the sewage discharge outlet, and the water quality at this point varies greatly. Each water quality indicator at the M2 monitoring point is greatly disturbed by pollutant emissions. The M3 monitoring point is located downstream of the urban section, and the changes in water quality indicators often lag behind. Under scenario three, the flow of ecological replenishment is reduced by half compared to scenario two, and the impact of ecological replenishment on river water dynamics is further weakened. The effect of pollutant reduction with water diffusion is further reduced.
To evaluate the improvement effect of ecological water replenishment on water quality, M2 monitoring point was selected as the water quality control point of Baihe River. When the model is stable, the concentrations of various water quality indicators at M2 monitoring points are shown in Table 4 − 3. Under scenario three conditions, the DO concentration increased to 5.52mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, an increase of 84.00% compared to before water supplementation; The COD concentration decreased to 18.00mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a 40.00% reduction compared to before water replenishment; The concentration of CODMn decreased to 5.98mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 40.20% compared to before water replenishment; The concentration of NH3-N decreased to 0.96mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 36.00% compared to before water supplementation; The TP concentration decreased to 0.19mg/L, meeting the Class III water standard, a reduction of 36.33% compared to before water supplementation. Overall, the water replenishment plan in scenario three has a significant effect on improving the water quality of the Baihe River, with all water quality indicators meeting the water quality requirements of the water function zone. Among them, the DO indicator has the best improvement effect, while the CODMn indicator has the highest reduction rate. The changes in all water quality indicators comply with the laws of natural evolution, and good simulation results have been obtained.
Table 4
− 3 Scenario 6 simulation results for each control point Unit: mg/L
Monitoring points | DO | COD | CODMn | NH3-N | TP |
M1 | 9.00 | 14.65 | 5.50 | 0.55 | 0.12 |
M2 | 5.52 | 18.00 | 5.98 | 0.96 | 0.19 |
M3 | 5.41 | 16.63 | 6.20 | 0.92 | 0.18 |
4.4 Future Development
(1) In this study, model parameters such as eddy viscosity coefficient and Coriolis force were set as constants during parameter setting. Future research can consider setting these parameters as variables that can change with time and space, further improving the accuracy of the model.
(2) This study does not consider the confluence of many small tributaries of the Baihe River, and the hydrological data of some years in the study area is missing. More comprehensive data can be collected later to build a large-scale basin Hydrological model, and the synergy between basins can be comprehensively considered.
(3) Due to space limitations, this article only considers three scenarios for scenario settings. We will add more scenario settings in future research to seek better ecological water replenishment solutions.