The analysis was based on interviews with participants from pregnancy through childbirth to present-day parenting. We discussed: (1) how each participant experienced pregnancy, childbirth, and group consultation and (2) the changes in perceptions and values they gained as a result of their participation in the group consultation. TEM diagrams were created to analyze (1), and a TLMG was applied to (2). The TEM diagrams were divided into two categories: one with participant B, who participated in the group consultation during the pregnancy period, and the other with all the remaining participants who attended after the birth of their child (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).
Equifinality point
The equifinality point (EFP) is based on the idea that, regardless of the path each individual follows, there is a point that is reached equally over time (Yasuda et al., 2015a). In addition, the EFP is the setting of the research theme itself, and it is crucial to identify a meaningful isochronous point in the life story of each participant (Yasuda et al., 2015b). In this study, as the purpose of the group consultation was to increase the self-efficacy and resilience of the parents themselves and to help them feel more secure, we set the first EFP as “I can raise my child with peace of mind.”
Moreover, during our analysis, we found that the 0th EFP was at a point prior to the originally set EFP. It became clear that the participants had reached a point where they could identify themselves as mothers before they felt safe raising their children. For example, participant A said, “I had been losing confidence because of all the things I couldn't do, but now I feel like I can do normal things like talking to people”; participant B said, “I feel like what I have been doing is not a mistake,” and participant E said, “I feel like I don't have to work so hard.” Based on the above, we set the 0th EFP of agreement as “to recognize myself as a mother.”
Trajectory Equifinality Model
After creating a TEM diagram for each participant, commonalities and similarities among the five TEM diagrams were determined. Bifurcation points (BFPs) and obligatory passage points (OPP) were discussed, and the TEM diagrams were integrated. Consequently, the value transformation process in parenting was divided into three categories. During the period from pregnancy to BFP1, as marked at the beginning of the TEM diagram, the participants were confronted with various concerns related to child-rearing and struggled to overcome them. The first period was defined as a period of worry and anxiety. In the next period, from OPP1 to BFP2, the participants expected to solve their problems and relieve their anxieties by searching and applying for group consultations on their own, using the Internet. The second period is defined as the expected period. In the last period, from BFP2 to the first EFP, the participants learned from experts and shared their concerns with other participants, which stimulated their sense of value and restored their confidence. The third period was defined as the period of changing values and confidence recovery.
Social guidance and social direction
In the path of the TEM diagram (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), individuals have a variety of choices and events, and there are junctures as their life paths split. When a choice is made at a branching point, the one that acts as a helping force is called social guidance (SG). Conversely, when its action affects the choice as an inhibiting or restraining one, it is called social direction (SD). First, there were a total of five SDs involved in this study. One SD acted from OPP1 to BFP1, whereas the remaining four SDs affected each participant in BFP1.
Although all SDs emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, two categories of content were highlighted. The first was the consequences of the reduced face-to-face communication. For example, SDs including “unable to go out for COVID-19,” “no face-to-face parenting events,” and “no opportunity to talk to anyone other than their husbands” fall into this category. These SDs seem to have caused mothers to feel a sense of helplessness in their parenting, as evidenced by their reported feelings of “difficulty in child-rearing” and “not knowing what to do.” The second was “information in parenting books and on the Internet.” The participants tried to solve their parenting problems by utilizing the information disseminated to the public. However, participants C and E struggled because of a lack of useful information on their specific parenting concerns, while participant A felt that her confidence was undermined by comparing herself to the glowing parenting experiences of others posted on social media.
Whereas, there were five SGs: two that acted on OPP4, “online face-to-face” and “able to turn off the camera,” and three that acted on BFP2, “relaxed and casual,” “at-home atmosphere,” and “experts answering questions based on evidence.” The SGs that acted on OPP4 showed a positive evaluation of the group consultation format. Participants were able to join from their homes and easily participate in group consultations without having to take their children outside. They also appreciated the ability to turn off their cameras and leave temporarily for childcare. The SG that acted on BFP2 expressed appreciation for the atmosphere of the group consultation and the trust placed in experts. Participants expressed that the atmosphere was conducive to asking questions, and that the experts had the perspective of experienced fathers. The warm and empathetic attitude of the organizers toward the participants played a pivotal role in the branching point as an SG. As a result of the influence of SGs, participants felt that the discussion forum was trustworthy, leading them to choose the proactive behavior of asking questions in the BFP2.
Phase I: Period of worry and anxiety
During this period, the participants spoke of their anxieties and concerns about pregnancy or raising a child. For example, B, who was pregnant at the time of the group consultation, expressed the feeling that her own information about life after childbirth was biased. Participants raising their children talked of concerns about breastfeeding (C and E) and their children's weight (A and D). In particular, A stated, “I asked my pediatrician questions at my child's one-month checkup, but I still felt anxious,” and continued to feel anxious despite having asked and received answers from a specialist. D also noted a lack of mental capacity, “I have to find my own way to rest,” and C talked about the anxiety inherent in the COVID-19 pandemic, saying that she was worried about the COVID-19 vaccination. At BFP1, mothers had difficulties or concerns about childcare, such as “loss of confidence (B)” and “anxiety about postpartum (C),” which led them to apply for the group consultation. Furthermore, SDs were also observed at BFP1, where SDs were primarily related to COVID-19 for participants A, B, and C, while participant D mentioned “information on the Internet” and participant E expressed “having no one to talk to except my husband.”
Phase II: Period of heightened expectations
Although each participant had her own sense of anxiety and difficulty, few of them focused on it. There were two methods to register for group consultations. The first was to follow the personal accounts of organizers on social networking sites and obtain information from them. The second was to obtain an application from Mircare Corporation, which disseminates information about the group consultation, and receive the required information. It is postulated that each participant used the Internet to gather information regarding pregnancy and childcare, and subsequently encountered information about group consultations. After signing, all participants stated that they had high expectations from the group consultation. Expectations included wanting to hear from a medical expert (A, B, and C), “it would be meaningful to participate” (D), and “I thought I could praise myself for participating” (E).
Phase III: Transformation of values and recovery of self-confidence
The main comments on the day of the group consultation were that it was fun (A and E) and the atmosphere was good (B, C, and D). Each participant perceived a positive and welcoming atmosphere from the roundtable organizers. This atmosphere functioned as a SG, leading to BFP2. At BFP2, all participants were “able to consult with experts” about their problems and questions. Although this was an online roundtable that allowed for passive participation, participants chose to actively engage in communicative behaviors, such as asking questions. Consequently, the mothers had the opportunity to be told by experts that they could be just the way they were (A, C, and E) and they felt affirmed as mothers (D). B also mentioned that she was able to imagine herself after childbirth because she was able to obtain advice from other participants regarding the questions she had asked. When asked about the reason behind her feeling that everything was correct, A said, “I was able to hear from a consultant who is a doctor about his experience in seeing him for infant check-ups and also his personal experience in child-rearing” and “He answered other people's questions appropriately,” Meanwhile, C said, “I was told the source of the information,” and “ the doctor had a likable personality.” E valued the individuality of the experts’ responses, saying, “I was able to get information from the experts that was not in the parenting books,” and further described familiarity with the experts, saying, “I was able to hear interesting experiences from the senior dads.”
During the path from BFP2 to the EFP, participants reported that although their concerns themselves did not decrease, their anxiety was reduced by approximately 10% initially and continued to decrease with each subsequent group consultation (as per participant A). Additionally, they mentioned that their problems were not necessarily resolved, but they were able to relax emotionally and accept that they could only observe the situation for the time being (as reported by participant E). In other words, there was a shift in their perceptions and attitudes toward their problems, even though the problems still remained.
Additionally, C was able to resolve her doubts about the COVID-19 vaccine, stating that “I was grateful to receive information that I couldn't choose on my own.” In other words, through BFP2, participants received words of encouragement from others, which led to a change in their perspective on the problems they were facing, which, in turn, led them to the EFP of “being able to raise their children with peace of mind.”
In this study, five participants were recruited for the interviews; Yasuda et al. (2015a) suggested that setting the number of participants to 4 ± 1 can clarify both the divergent and convergent aspects of the data. This tendency was also observed in the present study. For example, in the pathway leading up to the application for group consultation, it was evident that the participants were struggling with various conflicts such as postpartum anxiety and concerns about their child's weight gain. At BFP1, the influence of SDs appeared to have contributed to the expression of difficulties such as “I can't do it” and “I don't understand.” However, from the point of applying for the group consultation, through participation in the discussion and BFP2, where they were able to ask the experts questions and receive reassurance, it seems that all participants followed a similar pathway. After BFP2, changes were observed in their perspectives toward the conflicts and difficulties they originally experienced, and it became clear that they ultimately reached the EFP.
Transformation of values
How did the participants' experiences and struggles from pregnancy to the EFP impact their values? Because diverse changes were observed in the participants, we examined each transformation individually.
Prior to participating in the group consultation, participant A expressed feelings of loneliness due to the challenges of caring for a newborn and the lack of social interaction due to the COVID-19 pandemic. She reported being unable to go out during the day because of midnight feedings, which further isolated her from others. She was also anxious that she had to do everything perfectly “according to the child-rearing book” and that she did not know if her child-rearing methods were correct. Through spontaneously asking questions about her concerns regarding her child's weight gain and receiving reassurance from experts that it was normal, she was able to feel a connection with others: “Maybe I can try,” “I feel okay now,” and “We're all in this together.” Consequently, she gained a sense of security and her parenting anxiety was gradually relieved.
B had concerns about herself and her child, such as “I might have postpartum depression,” “I was worried about my relationship with my parents because I was going to have a home birth,” and “What if my child had a congenital disease?” During the group consultations, she mentioned that hearing about other participants' episodes of postpartum depression and home birth helped her realize what she would prefer in the future. She then took action to anticipate her own postnatal changes, such as registering for public services before birth and informing her parents in advance of her wishes regarding how they should treat her and her baby.
C often took her first child outside to play, but when her second child was born, she was unable to take him out due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While she was breastfeeding her second child, a coupon for the COVID-19 vaccine was distributed, but she was hesitant to get vaccinated.
D experienced anxiety regarding her child’s weight and frustration with her husband’s parenting. She also resisted talking to others about her childcare concerns. She initially intended to only participate passively in the group consultations. However, she eventually introduced herself, saying, “I was nervous, but gradually my nervousness dissipated,” and showed an active attitude by asking the experts and other participants questions about her own anxieties and frustrations, and received “positive words” from the experts. In addition to relieving her anxiety, participation in the group consultations had a transformative effect on the way she had previously thought about communication, for example, “self-disclosure facilitates communication.” In the group consultations, a male expert shared his perspective on fatherhood and childcare, which was “quite acceptable” to D. As a result, she was able to deepen her understanding of her husband and decrease her previous feelings of irritation toward him.
E described a very high level of stress in her life with her child before participating in the roundtable, saying that she felt she might become depressed. She held values such as “there is no one to help me” and “housework and childcare is my job.” After participating in the group consultations, E was able to shift her focus toward her own well-being. She also recognized that she had someone to support her by asking questions of the specialist and was reassured by his words, “Don't worry, it's okay.” She stated that the experts' advice did not directly solve her problems but provided her with emotional relief. This was because it helped her let go of her preoccupation with child-rearing.
Prior to participating in the group consultation, the participants valued pursuing perfection and correctness, which caused them to experience stress and anxiety when confined within such a framework. However, the participants felt connected to the experts and other participants and were able to recognize themselves by affirming who they were as mothers. The results indicated that they transformed into values with which each felt comfortable (see Fig. 3).