Tequila vinasse treatment by T. sanguineus
In general, the biological treatment of vinasse using fungi involves the use of diluted vinasse to enhance fungal growth and detoxify the effluent. In this study, the effectiveness of T. sanguineus was evaluated on raw vinasse and diluted vinasse. Initial assays were performed growing T. sanguineus on vinasse agar plates (100% concentration), but the fungal mycelium exhibited slower growth compared to the control medium (potato dextrose agar). However, despite the limited growth on vinasse agar plates, they did exhibit decolorization properties (data no show). As a result, the subsequent step involved assessing the growth and decolorization capabilities of T. sanguineus at different concentrations of vinasse: 100, 70 and 50% (diluted with distilled water). At the end of the culture, a significant reduction in vinasse color, phenolic content, and COD was observed. Table 1presents the physicochemical composition of treated and untreated vinasse.
Table 1
Physicochemical characteristics of the tequila vinasse before and after T. sanguineus treatment
Parameter
|
Vinasse 100%
|
Vinasse 100% treated
|
Vinasse 70%
|
Vinasse 70% treated
|
Vinasse 50%
|
Vinasse 50% treated
|
pH (25 ºC)
|
4.58
|
4.49
|
4.6
|
4.45
|
4.82
|
4.58
|
COD (mg/L)
|
55,800 ± 424.3
|
43,350 ± 919.2
|
42,700 ± 1271.8
|
27,700 ± 2545.6
|
29,750 ± 777.8
|
18,900 ± 141.4
|
Total sugar content (mg/L)
|
14.99 ± 1.51
|
18.25 ± 1.27
|
10.99 ± 0.09
|
10.29 ± 0.49
|
7.44 ± 0.38
|
6.0 ± 0.32
|
Electric conductivity (µS/cm)
|
107.5 ± 6.08
|
94.8 ± 3.26
|
87.3 ± 5.32
|
82.0 ± 3.14
|
63.9 ± 4.05
|
64.3 ± 2.66
|
Phenolic content (mg/L)
|
6.89 ± 0.30
|
2.21 ± 0.16
|
5.06 ± 1.22
|
1.50 ± 0.06
|
3.44 ± 0.28
|
1.35 ± 0.40
|
Phenolic content and COD exhibited a noticeable decrease when vinasse was treated with T. sanguineus. Other parameters, such as pH and EC, remained relatively unchanged or showed minimal variation. Ahmed et al. (2022) reported a reduction in COD (60%) and phenolic content (30%) after 21 days of culture of Trametes sp., where they evaluated vinasse at 75 and 50% concentrations with the addition of sugar. Fernandes et al. (2021) also demonstrated a decrease in phenolic content through the action of Phlebia rufa, leading to the complete elimination of compounds such as p-hydroxybenzoic, gallocatechin gallate, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, m-coumaric acid, and others.
Various organisms have been employed for vinasse detoxification, including yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and fungi such as Pleurotus ostreatus, Phanaerochaete chrysosporium or Ganoderma sp. However, some authors have reported that fungi growth is inhibited by vinasse at 50 or 100% concentrations in the medium (Ahmed et al. 2018). Herein, T. sanguineus exhibited growth and detoxification capabilities even at high vinasse concentrations. The final biomass achieved was 5.7 g/L at 50% vinasse, 5.4 g/L at 70% vinasse and 5.9 g/L with 100% vinasse.
Furthermore, phenolic content showed a reduction in all three conditions, with the highest phenolic reduction observed at around 70%. As for decolorization, the best condition was found to be 50% vinasse. In terms of COD reduction, both the 50% and 70% vinasse concentrations exhibited a 30% reduction, while a 20% reduction was achieved with 100% vinasse (Fig. 1).
One of the main parameters showing noticeable changes was the color. The production of laccase from the 2nd to the 8th day of T. sanguineus growth indicated its involvement in vinasse decolorization. Previous studies have observed that laccases secreted during fungal growth on vinasses contribute to reducing the color of vinasse (Ferreira et al. 2010; Aguiar et al. 2010). In a study by Ahmed et al. (2018) 51% discoloration and 78% phenolic reduction were observed using 10% vinasse with Pycnoporus sp. after a 12-day culture period
The color of vinasses is generally attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds and melanoidins, which can be effectively removed by ligninolytic fungi (Robles-Gonzalez et al. 2012). Fernandes et al. (2020) observed a correlation between the concentration of phenolic compounds and the color of the vinasse, with vinasse discoloration occurring when the phenolic compound levels were reduced to values lower than 10 mg/L.
T. sanguineus laccase production
Several studies have utilized fungi for the treatment of vinasse and the production of ligninolytic enzymes, primarily focusing on sugarcane vinasse. However, there is a scarcity of research concerning laccase production from tequila vinasse. In this study, T. sanguineus was cultivated under three different conditions of vinasse concentration (100, 70 and 50%), and the laccase activity was monitored throughout the cultivation period (Fig. 2).
Laccase activity was detected as early as day 2 when T. sanguineus was cultivated in vinasse 50%. However, there was a delayed onset of laccase production in other conditions. These findings align with existing literature, as it has been reported that high concentrations of vinasse can adversely affect fungal growth (Ahmed et al. 2018).
In this case, T. sanguineus demonstrated the ability to grow and produce laccase under all the conditions evaluated. The maximum laccase activity was achieved on the 6th day when grown in vinasse with a concentration of 50% and on the 8th day for growth in vinasse with concentrations of 70 and 100%. Interestingly, the maximum volumetric activity was nearly identical between vinasse concentrations of 70% (1808.9 ± 153.8 U/L) and 50% (1775.9 ± 104.6 U/L). On the other hand, raw vinasse (100%) exhibited the lowest laccase activity, although the titers were high compared to previous studies. For instance, España-Gamboa et al. (2011) evaluated the treatment of 10% sugarcane vinasse using Trametes versicolor and observed that the majority of color and phenols were removed when laccase reached its peak at 428 U/L.
Laccase activity in these kinds of materials is associated with the removal of aromatic compounds such as p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid or ferulic acid (Fernandes et al. 2021; Tapia-Tussell et al. 2015). Laccases, along with other ligninolytic enzymes, are well-known defense mechanisms against xenobiotics. Laccases can be either constitutive or inducible in response to the presence of specific compounds, including phenolic compounds and metals (Ahmed et al. 2018; Bertrand et al. 2013; Collins and Dobson 1997). Their production is triggered in the presence of these compounds found in lignocellulosic materials (Junior et al. 2020; Ahmed et al. 2020). Tapia-Tussell et al. (2015) observed an increase in laccase mRNA gene transcript levels when phenolic compounds typically found in vinasses were present in the culture media, and high laccase activity was observed in vinasse at a 10% concentration.
Various authors have supplemented vinasses to promote fungal growth and enhance laccase activity by adding substances such as glucose or copper. Ferreira et al. (2010) added glucose to raw vinasse and observed that laccase activity remained until the 15th day of culture, compared to raw vinasse (without glucose) where laccase activity declined by the 12th day. On the other hand, copper is commonly used as a laccase inducer, Junior et al. (2020) produced laccase from Pleurotus sajor-caju and achieved a laccase activity of 500 U/L by adding copper sulfate (0.4 mM) in sugarcane vinasse. It is worth noting that no copper was added to the vinasse in this study. However, chemical characterization of agave vinasse has indicated the presence of trace amounts of metals, including copper, at concentrations ranging from 1–3 mg/L (Sánchez-Lizarraga et al. 2018; Lopez-López et al. 2010). As vinasse contains all the nutrients necessary for fungal growth, the utilization of this agro-industrial waste presents a promising approach for the production of ligninolytic enzymes.
Bioassay on lettuce and tomato plants - Germination bioassays
Vinasse has been found to exert strong phytotoxic effects on seed germination and seedling development, primarily due to high concentrations of phenolic compounds and high EC. These negative effects are further exacerbated in the presence of salts or organic compounds, displaying a synergistic effect when these compounds are present in vinasse (Moran-Salazar et al. 2016; Ramana et al. 2002). Moreover, the phenolic compounds commonly found in vinasse have been shown to negatively impact soil microbial activity (Robles-Gonzalez et al. 2012).
To assess the suitability of treated vinasse for irrigation in nursery seedling production, bioassays were conducted. Lettuce and tomato seeds were used to determine the effects of treated and untreated vinasse on seed germination. No germination was observed when raw vinasse at 100, 70 and 50% was added. Additionally, treated vinasse at 100 and 70% exhibited no germination, while treated 50% vinasse showed a germination rate of approximately 50% (data not shown). Consequently, diluted vinasse at concentrations of 25 and 35% were evaluated. All three conditions (25, 35 and 50% treated vinasse) tested showed over 50% germination (Fig. 3), with treated vinasse at 25% showing a germination rate similar to the control (water). However, untreated vinasse at 50% did not exhibit any detectable germination during the evaluated time period.
In addition, tomato germination was evaluated for 14 days (Fig. 4), and the most favorable treatment was found to be treated vinasse at a concentration of 25%. This treatment exhibited an 86% germination rate by the 10th day. On the other hand, untreated vinasse at 25% showed a germination rate of 69% after 12 days. Treated vinasse at 35 and 50% demonstrated the lowest germination percentages, while untreated vinasse at these concentrations failed to show any germination.
Candido et al. (2021) demonstrated the phytotoxicity of vinasse derived from sugarcane bagasse using L. sativa as a bioindicator. On the other hand, Ahmed et al. (2022) reported a reduction in phytotoxicity when vinasse is treated with Trametes sp., the untreated sugarcane vinasse resulted in no germination. Unlike lettuce seeds, the presence of vinasse, whether treated or untreated, exhibited an impact on the germination rate of tomato seeds, causing a noticeable delay in germination. Thus, the negative effect of the vinasse can be stronger in plants with slow germination rate.
Seed germination is a regulated process which is strongly influenced by internal factors such as seed size, seed coat hardness, permeability or seed reserves (Zhang et al. 2020) and external factors such as light, temperature, presence of phytohormones or organic acids and growth media (Arancon, 2012). However, seed genetic factors, environmental conditions, and physicochemical properties of the germination site (porosity, water-holding capacity, aeration, pH, and EC) are determinants of germination success (Haase et al. 2021).
Bioassay on lettuce and tomato plants - Seedling assays
Based on the germination results, seedling assays were conducted to determine whether even treated vinasse could affect key characteristics of seedling development. Two plant species, lettuce and tomato, were selected for evaluation. Lettuce is known for its rapid growth, while tomato exhibits slower germination. Both plants were placed in substrate and watered with either water (control) or treated vinasse at a concentration of 50% every 48 h. Table 2 presents the effects on the main parameters observed in this study.
The addition of vinasse to tomato seeds did not display any significant effects on parameters related to the root, indicating that the roots were not noticeably impacted by the treatment. However, parameters associated with the shoot, such as chlorophyll content, plant height and shoot weight, exhibited significant differences between the control (water) and the treated vinasse.
Similarly, the results with lettuce seeds, as presented in Table 3, demonstrated a comparable pattern to that of tomato seeds. Parameters linked to the root system did not show significant differences between the control and the treated vinasse. On the other hand, chlorophyll, plant height, shoot weight displayed significant differences between the two treatments, suggesting an effect of vinasse treatment on the shoot development of lettuce plants.
Indeed, clear differences were observed in the shoot parameters of both lettuce and tomato plants when treated vinasse are used (Fig. 5). However, no significant differences were found in the root parameters between treatments. Candido et al. 2021 demonstrated that even a 5% concentration of vinasse had a negative impact on lettuce root growth. Sobrero and Ronco (2004) have mentioned that phytotoxicity can be observed directly on root growth, and a delay in root growth can indicate a sublethal response when concentrations are not sufficient to inhibit germination. In this case, since no phytotoxic effect was observed at root level, it suggested that the concentrations of treated vinasse were not inhibitory to root growth.
Considering that seedling production is an essential part of horticultural crop production, stillage treated to a concentration of 50% could be used in the production of tomato and lettuce seedlings. Although some negative effects remain in shoot parameters, the reduction of these effects are noticeable when vinasse is treated with T. sanguineus. Seedling root growth was similar to the control, maintaining seedling quality, a determinant characteristic that can favor early plant establishment and crop uniformity (Vastakaite-Kairiene et al. 2022).