TLC is still the gold standard in minimal-invasive surgical treatment regarding early stage glottic cancers. The efficiency has been considered equivalent to radiotherapy in point of local tumor control for a lengthy period of time [6–8]. However, several studies found TLC superior to primary radiotherapy in local tumor control and/or larynx preservation in early stage glottic cancers [9–12]. When applied as monomodality, it can ”spare” definitive radiotherapy as a salvage solution in case of transorally uncontrollable recurrences prior to total laryngectomy. Cordectomy types are well classified by the proposal of ELS. ELS recommendations clearly proposes false vocal fold removal (vestibulectomy) for improved tumor exposure starting from transmuscular cordectomies [1]. Evidently, in the lack of a false vocal fold, a laser excision line can be guided laterally, in particular, to the inner lamina of the thyroid cartilage. Despite this rational proposal, to our best knowledge, no FEES study as of yet has comprehensively investigated the possible negative impact of false vocal fold removal on swallowing including both penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue, although false vocal folds obviously play non-negligible role in airway protection during swallowing. On one hand, these folds represent a valuable sensory surface. From another perspective, false vocal folds behave as a barrier against penetration by adduction during the pharyngeal phase of swallowing.
In our study, we investigated the presence and severity of pharyngeal residue and penetration/aspiration as the primary fields of interest. PRSS and mPAS introduced by Kelly [3, 4], respectively, are considered easily applicable scales in daily routine by our team. Preoperative average PRSS and mPAS values ”0” and ”1”, respectively, referred to healthy swallow performance among our patients. In considering the mPAS value, it did not change, neither in the early nor in the late postoperative period. In regards to pharyngeal residue, during the early postoperative period, the PRSS value increased to ”1” compared to the baseline preoperative value ”0” referring to coating of the test bolus in the vallecules or in the hypopharynx. The possible explanation for the appearance of coating is a temporary sensory deficit of the pharyngeal mucosa. It can develop due to irritation of the mucosal surfaces during orotracheal intubation and during an overview of the hypopharynx with laryngoscope prior to focusing on intralaryngeal exposure of the tumor. This supposed temporary phenomenon presumably ceases, as late postoperative PRSS value returns the initial ”0”. Upon closer examination of the early postoperative mPAS values, one likely notes, some individual values show an increase when compared to preoperative and late postoperative ”normal” values. The origin of this transient swallow impairment can be the same as in the case of pharyngeal residue, since lack of the false vocal fold deprives the supraglottis from a sensory surface. Beyond sensory disturbance, due to the lack of false vocal fold, supraglottic adduction is also inadequate. It is important to notice among patients showing temporary swallow impairment based on both mPAS and PRSS, several subjects experience neurological involvement including Parkinson’s disease and poststroke conditions. Diabetes mellitus also can cause decreased sensory function due to consecutive polyneuropathy. All possible theories behind temporarily disturbed swallow performance mentioned above are to be kept in mind.
In consideration of local tumor control, TLC proved excellent among those thirteen patients who attended regular check-ups. Two patients who developed advanced tumor recurrence presented poor compliance and neglected follow-up for more than two years. At the time regarding repeated examination, one patient was diagnosed with T3N0M0 of glotto-supraglottic cancer necessitating definitive radiotherapy. The other patient was afflicted with a T4aN0M0 glotto-supraglottic cancer which only could be controlled by total laryngectomy. In the case, when T2 cancer had to be upstaged to T3 due to paraglottic involvement, the tumor as a selected T3 case also was managed transorally, yet definitive radiotherapy had to be indicated. At the conclusion of the investigational period, all fifteen patients proved tumor-free and the only exception was the one laryngectomized patient. Undoubtedly, larynx preservation proved successful in our series.
Interestingly, positive resection margins uncovered in one third of the cases (none of which were related to our two recurrent cases) did not entail local recurrence. Matter of positive resection margins and its prognostic value concerning local recurrence is an intensively investigated issue. The 1–2 mm safety margin in reference to glottic cancers proposed by NCCN Guidelines® [5] cannot be achieved in a majority of the cases. During complete or extended cordectomies, tumor removal requires reaching the thyroid and cricoid cartilage. Owing to the tumor size necessitating these cordectomy extensions, this proposed safety width can be hardly found. The other problem is the coagulational zone created by the laser, further reducing the safety zone of the specimen. The formalin-associated specimen shrinkage is the other undesirable tissue change which can unfavorably influence estimation of safety margins resulting in false-positive cases mimicking R1 resection. Therefore, positive or close/suspicious surgical margins do not necessarily predict local recurrence [13, 14]. For this reason, in the spirit of maximal patient safety, a close follow-up and/or scheduled biopsy under general anesthesia is recommended. Considering our clinical practice, similarly to other authors [15], as an additional safety step, we take multiple biopsies from the neighboring soft tissue which bears additional information regarding the quality of resection.
Nevertheless, we are aware of the disadvantages of the study, therefore we consider our investigations as a pilot study. Additionally, enlargement of our cases are needed for verifying our results statistically. Although the issue of older aged patients and associating presbyphagia as factors influencing swallowing could not be excluded in the present study, investigation of a less heterogenous patient group will be considerable since these conditions including diabetes and neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, stroke) may also distort results.