Plasma jet discharge diagnosis
The emission spectrum of cold plasma consisting of Ar and O2 was measured at 5 mm from the electrode during the discharge. The measurements were conducted in the wavelength range of 200-900 nm. The spectrum exhibited dominant peaks corresponding to Ar emission at wavelengths ranging from 555.9 nm to 810.4 nm (Chung et al., 2012), and O2 emission at 777.53 nm. Additionally, two peaks were observed at lower intensity, which were associated with the optical transitions of excited NO at 283 nm (Attri et al., 2018) and N2 in the range of 336.2-397.3 nm. A high-intensity peak corresponding to OH was also evident at 309.8 nm (Limsopatham et al., 2017), as shown in Figure 2.
Effect of PAW on H2O2 concentration and the percentage of microbial inactivation for seafoods
PAW was produced, and the concentration of H2O2 was measured using the spectrophotometric method. The experimental results revealed that the optimal parameters for producing PAW with the highest H2O2 concentration were an Ar flowrate of 25 L/min and a duration time of 120 min, the average H2O2 concentration was found to be 13.10 mg/L (Table 1 and Table 2).
PAW with the highest concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was tested for the decomposition rate at different temperatures every 2 days over a period of 20 days. The decomposition rate was measured using a spectrophotometric method to determine the duration for which the PAW produced can be utilized. The results revealed that increasing temperature had a decreasing effect on the H2O2 concentration. Storage of PAW at 4°C maintained the highest H2O2 concentration compared to storage at 25°C and 30°C. After 2 days of storage, the H2O2 concentration decreased to 5.86 mg/L at 25 and 5.06 mg/L at 30, while the concentration of PAW stored at 4 remained higher at 11.42 mg/L. (Table 3 and Figure 3).
The obtained experimental results were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the appropriateness of the experimental design and identify significant effect on the experiment. This involved analyzing the experimental effects, checking the suitability of the model, validating the model, creating mathematical equations, optimizing the factors, and developing a response surface.
The factors of the experiment were analyzed using the experimental results presented in Table 2. This analysis enabled the determination of the total effect value, which includes both main effects and interactions effects. The P-Value was calculated with a 95% confidence level. Factors with a P-Value lower than the significance level α (0.05) were considered statistically significant, as shown in Table 4.
The analysis of the experimental results presented in Table 4, which is consistent with the Normal Probability Plot, demonstrates the effect on the H2O2 concentration in PAW. From this analysis, it can be concluded that the factors significantly influencing the change in H2O2 concentration in PAW are gas flow rate (A), discharge time (B), and the interaction between the two factors, gas flow rate and discharge time (AB). This conclusion is supported by Figure 4.
Based on the information provided, mathematical equations can be generated to predict experimental results and facilitate the comparison of results across different factors. The model is constructed by considering factors that have significant effects, while eliminating unaffected factors to simplify the prediction process (Table 4). The equation used to predict the experimental results of the H2O2 concentration in PAW is a linear regression model, formulated as follows equation (2):
H2O2 = 5.416 + 1.600A + 3.948B+ 1.470AB (2)
H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide concentration in PAW
A = gas flow
B = time
AB = gas flow * time
The experimental data were used to construct simulated equations to verify the reliability of the model. An idea model should include the necessary factors and be capable of predicting results close to the actual experimental data, as depicted in Figure 5.
The Normal Probability Plot indicated a linear distribution of the data, while the histogram chart displayed a bell-shaped curve. The stability of variance (Versus Fits) demonstrated that the data was distributed freely, with both positive and negative values but without any sequence related to the experiment. The graph showed an indeterminate distribution of data without any discernible pattern. From these observations, it can be concluded that the residual data followed a normally distributed, exhibited constant variance, and was freely distributed.
The statistical analysis in Table 4 revealed that the adjusted R-square coefficient of determination for the experiment results was 98.64%, indicating a relatively high level of effectiveness. Therefore, the model derived from the analysis can be used as a mathematical model. Additionally, considering the Curvature analysis results, the Curvature test value was found to be 4.15 with a P-value of 0.064 for the H2O2 concentration in PAW. When the P-Value is greater than or equal to 0.05, it indicates that the main hypothesis is accepted. Furthermore, the sum of quadratic is zero, indicating that the experiment is appropriate, and no additional experiments are required.
Response optimizer analysis
The optimum H2O2 concentration in PAW was determined using a plasma solution system with a mixed Ar: O2 plasma discharged. Response Optimizer from Minitab 18 program was utilized for the analysis. The results indicated that the optimal value for Ar-O2 mixture gas flow rate was 25 L/min, and the discharge time was 120 min. These settings resulted in the highest concentration of H2O2, which was measured at 13.30 mg/L.
Response surface
When comparing the result of the response optimizer analysis with the significant factors, gas flow rate and discharge time, as shown on the Contour Plot and Surface Plot, it is evident that specific levels of these factors can lead to the maximum concentration of H2O2. By setting the initial gas flow rate from the lowest level of 20 L/min to the highest level of 25 L/min and the initial duration time from the lowest level of 30 min to the highest level of 120 min (Figure 6), the optimal conditions for achieving the highest concentration of H2O2 can be determined.
These graphs indicate the region with the highest value, which corresponds to the optimal conditions for obtaining a high concentration of H2O2 in PAW. The boundary area represented by the dark green color indicates the specific combination of gas flow rate and discharge time that significantly affects the H2O2 concentration. In this case, the highest concentration of 13.30 mg/L was achieved with a gas flow rate of 25 L/min and a discharge time of 120 min (Figure 7 and Table 6).
Results on plasma treated seafood.
The effect of PAW on microbial inhibition
Based on the preliminary results, the optimal conditions for achieving the highest H2O2 concentration in PAW involved using a mixed Ar: O2 plasma discharge with a gas flow rate of 25 L/min and a discharge time of 120 min. To evaluate the inhibitory effect on microorganisms in white leg shrimp and splendid squid, PAW treatment was compared to a control group treated with DI water for varying durations of 1, 3, 5, and 10 min. The experimental results demonstrate that the samples of white leg shrimp and splendid squid treated with PAW exhibit inhibition of microorganism growth (Figure 8). Specifically, when both types of samples were soaked in PAW for 10 min, the most effective inhibition of microbial growth was observed, with rates of 41.64% for white leg shrimp and 23.04% for splendid squid. The corresponding microbial growth rates were measured at 3.49 Log CFU/g and 5.31 Log CFU/g, respectively (Figure 9).
Examination of nutritional quality
The nutritional content, including protein and lipid analysis, was conducted on samples of white leg shrimp and splendid squid. The samples were analyzed in three conditions: initial (untreated), soaked in DI water, and soaked in PAW for 10 min. The results indicated that the protein content of the samples soaked in DI water and PAW was reduced compared to the untreated samples. For white leg shrimp samples, the protein content showed a slightly decreased when soaked in DI water and PAW, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) compared to the untreated samples. The protein percentages for the treated samples were measured at 18.73%, 18.74%, and 18.90% respectively. In contrast, the splendid squid samples soaked in DI water and PAW showed significant different (P < 0.05) in protein depletions compared to the untreated sample. The protein percentages for the treated samples were recorded as 14.19%, 14.59%, and 16.07% respectively (Figure 10).
The lipid content analysis of white leg shrimp and splendid squid samples, including the initial samples, those soaked in DI water, and those soaked in PAW for 10 min, revealed that the lipid percentages in the white leg shrimp samples treated with DI water and were slightly lower but not significantly different (P > 0.05) compared to the untreated samples, with lipid percentages of 1.76%, 1.78%, and 1.80% respectively. On the other hand, the lipid percentages in the splendid squid samples treated with DI water and PAW showed an increase and significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to the untreated samples, with lipid percentages of 2.18%, 2.08% and 1.97% respectively (Figure 11).
Visual assessment
Visual assessment was conducted to evaluate the color uniformity and chromatic aberration of white leg shrimp and splendid squid samples before and after a 10 min treatment. The results indicated that the color of both PAW-soaked samples and DI water-soaked samples did not exhibit any noticeable changes shown in Figure 12. Therefore, it can be concluded that soaking the samples with DI water and PAW had no significant effect on the color change of both white leg shrimp and splendid squid samples.