4.1 The δ 18 O TR records soil water use by tree growth in different regions of the Tibetan Plateau
Since the 1960s, the surface temperature of the Tibetan Plateau has shown a continuous warming trend (Duan et al. 2015), and precipitation has increased in the western and eastern parts of the plateau (Bao et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020), but weakened in the southwestern part of the plateau (Hu et al. 2021). In such a climatic change context, trees may adopt different water use strategies to maintain their growth. It has been shown that δ18OTR could reflect the seasonality and the depth of plant water uptake (Gessler et al. 2014). This means that information on the variation of soil water δ18O at different seasons and depths is stored and recorded in the tree-ring (Huang et al. 2019, Xu et al. 2020).
The δ18OTR variations are mainly regulated by a combination of the oxygen isotope composition of the source water, and the external climate that affects fractionation processes within the tree (Roden et al. 2000). In our results, the δ18OTR was more sensitive to moisture factors than to temperature factors, and in particular δ18OTR showed the significant negative response to soil moisture during the growing season (Fig. 5). The δ18OTR is derived from soil water, but that soil water δ18O varies with soil depth (Liu et al. 2017), which is consistent with our findings. In addition, water enters the leaves from the soil through the xylem and then the lighter isotope (16O) evaporates more readily than the heavier isotope (18O), leading to an enrichment of δ18O in leaf water (Farquhar et al. 1993). Trees take up soil water directly through the root system and retain the isotopic signal in soil water in the xylem through a series of intra-tree fractionation processes. Therefore, the δ18OTR is a true reflection of soil water use by trees based on the processes of water uptake, transport and dissipation in trees.
At the same time, our study found that δ18OTR values were significantly greater in arid than in humid areas (Fig. 3), due to the fact that transpiration affects leaf water enrichment by replenishing unenriched soil water to the leaves. On the one hand, the δ18OTR is mainly negatively correlated with stomatal conductance, and reduced soil moisture and humidity enhance evaporative enrichment of leaf and soil water through effects on stomatal conductance and the ratio of internal leaf CO2 to atmospheric CO2 in arid environments (Mirfenderesgi et al. 2016). On the other hand, soil water evaporation is enhanced in arid environments and the source water absorbed by tree roots becomes heavier, leading to an enrichment of oxygen isotopes in leaf water (Roden et al. 2000). Sucrose produced by photosynthesis is transported through the bast to the xylem of the trunk for cellulose synthesis, and during the conversion to cellulose, oxygen isotopes in the sugar are partially exchanged with oxygen isotopes in the source water (Zhan et al. 2021), resulting in a mixed signal of both source water and transpiration-enriched oxygen isotopes in the cellulose oxygen isotope ratio of the tree-ring (Giraldo et al, 2022). These two processes result in a higher δ18OTR in arid areas than in humid areas. Similarly, a moist atmosphere reduces transpiration and thus 18O water enrichment in needles, further leading to lower δ18OTR in humid areas than in arid areas. And precipitation δ18O is inversely related to precipitation, more precipitation leads to lower precipitation δ18O values, resulting in weaker δ18O enrichment of water from water sources absorbed by trees, both of which make δ18OTR in wet areas lower than in arid areas (Yang et al. 2012).
4.2 Difference strategies of season in soil moisture use dynamics for tree growth under different wet and dry gradients on the Tibetan Plateau
In climate-sensitive areas, soil moisture is critical to tree growth. A variety of factors can alter soil water uptake by trees, such as season (Rao et al. 2020), life history stage (Van et al. 2017), tree species (Schwendenmann et al. 2015), water availability and depth of plant access to water (Rao et al., 2020), and the amount of recent rainfall (Xu et al. 2011). In our study, δ18OTR was found to be significantly correlated with soil moisture during the growing season, but the seasonal response in arid and wet zones showed inconsistency, with tree-ring δ18O responding to soil moisture later in arid zones than in wet zones (Fig. 7).
Specifically, in the humid areas, we found that δ18OTR significantly negatively correlated with soil moisture from June to August ((Fig. 7). Because the three humid regions are influenced by the Indian summer winds and receive more precipitation from June to August, which further affects δ18OTR by influencing soil water 18O through infiltration. The JA and GA regions showed a significant negative correlation between δ18OTR and July-September precipitation, Indian monsoon index, and monsoon circulation intensity in the region (Xu et al. 2018). And we also found a significant negative correlation between δ18OTR and soil moisture during July-August in JA and GA regions. And meanwhile, δ18OTR values of different tree species in the WA region were mainly influenced by summer precipitation since 1743 (Masaki et al. 2012). In our study, we also found that δ18OTR in the WA region was significantly negatively correlated with soil moisture in July and August. We suggest that summer winds bring abundant precipitation, and that plant roots take up water in the soil through a series of transpiration infiltration processes, finally retaining the isotopic signal of precipitation in the xylem of trees expressed through δ18OTR in humid regions.
We also found the response of δ18OTR in arid regions significantly correlated with soil moisture from July to September, especially in September (Fig. 7). But the response of δ18OTR to soil moisture in arid regions was lagged compared to wet regions, which may be closely related to the extended growing season of trees due to warming and humidification of the Tibetan Plateau in recent decades (zhang et al. 2021). However, the specific response varied among the three arid regions. The δ18OTR in the MA region was controlled by hydroclimatic variables such as summer monsoon precipitation, RH and PDSI (Masaki et al. 2017). Those results suggesting that monsoon precipitation has a significant effect on tree growth. Tree growth in the KA region is mainly influenced by winter snowfall, and although trees are still affected by precipitation δ18O during summer precipitation, the melting snowfall provides a more stable water source, resulting in a much lower correlation between δ18OTR and summer soil moisture in this region than in the other two regions (Kerstin et al. 2006). In the driest DE region, the δ18OTR were controlled mainly through soil moisture and precipitation variability from May to September (Yang et al. 2006), and our study provided further evidence that δ18OTR in this region was significantly negatively correlated with soil moisture in September.
In the meantime, it has been found that precipitation has a greater effect on soil moisture than temperature on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Soil moisture is significantly correlated with oxygen isotope growing season in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau trees (Wang et al. 2023).And the δ18OTR were found to be significantly negatively correlated with growing season precipitation in the United Kingdom (Giles et al. 2015), southern Mexico (Brienen et al. 2013), northwestern Tibetan Plateau (Zhang et al. 2021), and Ordos Plateau (Li et al. 2019), which was broadly in line with our findings that summer rainfall to supplement plant water availability during the growing season (Hahm et al. 2019). We speculated that this were two reasons for the lagging response of δ18OTR to soil moisture in arid areas relative to humid areas. On the one hand, it might be because the Indian summer winds, which firstly reached the southern region, making precipitation events occur earlier in the southern region in their northward push. Therefore, they affect the tree growth process through a series of fractionation as well as plant physiological processes, then reflecting different moisture. On the other hand, this is closely related to the warming and humidification in the western and northern parts of the plateau, where warmer temperatures and increased precipitation lead to an earlier and longer growing season for trees. Moreover, precipitation in early in the growing season was not replenished in time, while both precipitation and temperature at the end of the growing season promoted tree growth, making the response of δ18OTR to soil moisture slightly later in the arid areas than in the humid areas (Guo et al. 2022).
4.3 Difference strategies of depth in soil moisture use dynamics for tree growth under different wet and dry gradients on the Tibetan Plateau
Precipitation on the Tibetan Plateau, where the natural environment is extremely fragile and sensitive, is highly spatially variable with annual precipitation decreasing gradually with latitude (Li et al. 2022). Therefore, trees might maintain their growth by altering their water use strategies to absorb soil moisture at different depths under different precipitation conditions. Most studies have shown that trees in arid environments tend to absorb deeper water to resist drought (Hu et al. 2021), whereas trees in wet environments tended to use shallow soil water (Holdo et al. 2018). While this was supported in our study, we have also found that trees in complex climatic environments may develop complex root systems with both lateral and deep roots, adjusting their water use strategies to maintain their growth in response to environmental changes.
Our study also found that, the δ18OTR in the JA region was significantly negatively correlated with 0–10 cm soil moisture in a wet environment, while that in the WA and GA regions were significantly negatively correlated with 0–10 cm and 10–40 cm soil moisture after controlling the VPD and RH (Table 2), it suggesting that trees in humid areas tended to take up soil moisture in the surface and middle layers. Other studies also found shallow soil water (35%) and precipitation (32.5%) were the main sources of water for trees in wet areas when annual precipitation was greater than 800 mm (Zhou et al. 2011). Meanwhile, the topsoil in humid areas is the most active area for microbial activity, so that it provides nutrients to the trees (Priyadarshini et al. 2016). For example, it has been shown that trees had a relatively large range of source water and a good water use strategy in the shallow soil under humid climate conditions (Sun et al. 2019).
In arid environments, the significant negative correlation between δ18OTR and 40–100 cm soil moisture in the KA and DE regions was revealed after controlling VPD and RH (Table 2), it suggesting that trees in arid environments utilize more stable deep soil moisture. And trees in DE region preferred to take up deep soil moisture through a study of cypress in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau (Grossiord et al. 2016), which validates our results. In arid environments, capillary water induces trees to form deeper root systems to absorb deep soil water and groundwater to meet higher transpiration needs during the dry season, while deep root systems provide a more consistent and reliable source of water for trees (Lindh et al. 2014). But we also found the highly significant negative correlations between δ18OTR and soil moisture at all soil depths in MA, and there might be two factors. On the one hand, soil moisture δ18O fractionation occurs when precipitation infiltrates into the soil (Oerter et al. 2014), creating an isotopic gradient in the vertical profile while vigorous evaporation may mask some of the isotopic signal (Dai et al. 2015). On the other hand, it is possible that the 'bimodal' precipitation pattern in this region encourages trees to develop lateral and deep root systems, using the surface root system to obtain water from the upper soil layer when precipitation is adequate. The deep root system is used to obtain water from deep soil or groundwater when precipitation is insufficient (zhang et al. 2017). This confirms our finding that trees adjust their water use strategies in time to sustain self-sustaining growth (Zhao et al. 2018; Nolan et al. 2018).
Trees under different environmental conditions have different coping strategies to climate extremes, and the resilience of trees to drought is closely related to regional soil moisture, diurnal temperature differences, and plant physiological characteristics (Fang et al. 2018). It has been reported that tree growth on the Tibetan Plateau is more vulnerable to challenges in the context of climate change (Zhang et al. 2021; Yao et al. 2023). Our results suggest that trees in arid areas are better able to cope with drought stress due to their use of more stable deep soil water, whereas trees in humid areas may be more vulnerable to drought stress in the context of climate variability due to their use of surface-middle soil water. As a result, trees in wetter areas will face greater challenges to survival in the context of a weakening southwestern monsoon with reduced precipitation and continued warming temperatures. Moreover, it is noteworthy that trees develop the water use strategy of absorbing moisture from different soil layers with the stronger lateral and deep root systems as the environment changes, which can more be beneficial to trees in coping with complex environment.