Main findings
This multicenter cohort study showed that only half of VPIs born to women with HDP received complete ANS within 48 hours to 7 days before birth. Approximately one fifth infants had no history of ANS exposure, one forth infants received partial ANS and less than 10% received repeat ANS. Compared to the complete course group, the non-use group had higher rates of mortality, mortality or NEC, and mortality or SNI,which was more pronounced in the non-SGA group. The repeated group had significantly fewer days of oxygen therapy, indicating statistical significance. Additionally, although not statistically significant, the repeated treatment group had the lowest incidence of complications and mortality, which also shows a protective trend in terms of survival rate from Kaplan-Meier curves.
Interpretation
It is well known that ANS is one of the most effective measures in reducing mortality in preterm infants by accelerating the development of type 1 and type 2 pneumocytes and modifing alveolar structure vascularization, inducing surfactant production[19].In our study, about one fifth infants had no history of ANS exposure, the occurrence of death and other severe morbidities increased significantly compared with ANS exposure within 1-7d before birth. This is similar to research on non-HDP cases, where the use of antenatal corticosteroids has been associated with an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and mortality[20,21]. When we compare the percentage of non-utilized ANS between units, the range can be from 0–46%, excluding units with less than 20 cases, the range was from 5.1–34.8%, which indicates that there is still a lot of opportunity for quality improvement.
In cases where there is an emergency delivery due to conditions such as umbilical artery blood flow disappearance, eclampsia, and preeclampsia, our study has shown that a partial course of antenatal corticosteroids (ANS) can be effective. Reliable data from the EPICE Cohort suggests that neonatal benefits begin within a few hours of ANS administration [11]. Similarly, in our study, infants born to mothers with HDP who did not receive ANS had twice the risk of death compared to those who received partial courses of ANS. Moreover, even with a reduced dosage of ANS, there was no increase in the risk of mortality and complications compared to the standard treatment group. This raises the question of whether the increased intrauterine stress response associated with maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy contributes to these outcomes, which deserves further investigation. A long-term follow-up study indicates that children born extremely preterm who were exposed to a single course of ANS had a significantly lower risk of neurodevelopmental impairment [22]. However, there is still insufficient long-term follow-up data for premature infants born to mothers with HDP.
There is controversy in different medical literature relating to repeat courses, especially their security and effectiveness[23].In our study, compared with the other groups, the repeat group has the lowest mortality rate and the minimum number of oxygen therapy days. Previous literature reported that repeat corticosteroids used ≥ 7 days after an initial course not only reduced serious neonatal morbidity and respiratory disease, but also reduced the mean birthweight and placenta weight [24]. However, in our study, repeated administration of steroids did not lead to a decrease in birth weight. Although there were some differences in birth weight among different groups, there were no significant differences in weight, head circumference, or length at discharge. Increasing number of related follow-up studys indicates that repeat ANS had no adverse effects on cardiometabolic function or other harm in mid-childhood, even in the presence of fetal growth restriction[25,26]. The number of repeat treatment courses limited to a maximum of three have the best benifit to risk ratio[27]. More research is required to determine the potential effects of repeat ANS to short and long term outcomes.
Compared to preterm births caused by other factors, pregnancies affected by HDP have a higher incidence of IUGR[28].The use of ANS for IUGR remains a topic of controversy. Some viewpoints suggest that fetal growth restriction is linked to placental insufficiency, which results in chronic malnutrition and hypoxia. The intrauterine stress may trigger the production of cortisol by the adrenal gland, which can increase the production of cortisol to adapt to the compromised intrauterine environment[29]. In our study, it appeared that the impact of antenatal steroids on the non-SGA group was more significant compared to the SGA group, which may be related to the intrauterine hormone exposure in the SGA group. However, it is important to note that our SGA sample size was small, particularly after grouping for ANS analysis, so caution is needed when drawing conclusions. Further research with larger sample sizes is still needed to investigate this further.
Strengths and limitations
This was a large, multicenter cohort study, which was designed prospectively, including robust data on mothers, neonates, the ACS courses, we implemented strict quality control measures in defining and collecting the data for our study. In addition, our study included variables such as duration of medication and classification of HDP, which provided a more detailed analysis of the impact of ANS on premature birth outcomes within the HDP population.Besides, we compared the SGA and non-SGA groups within the larger HDP cohort, which to some extent enhanced the comparability of the effects of prenatal steroids on SGA. By limiting our study population to the HDP group with similar backgrounds, we were able to better assess the efficacy of prenatal steroids on SGA. Furthermore, we placed particular emphasis on repeated and partial ANS administration, which are crucial practical considerations in the management of HDP.
However, our study does have some limitations. Restricted by the amount of data, especially the repeated group and SGA group, there was no statistical significance, further study with a large sample size is warranted. Besides, there are differences in the prenatal management of different centers, we have not yet analyzed each level of center. Apart from that, the gestational age range of enrolled infants is large, we have not conducted a more detailed analysis of premature infants in different gestational age levels.