LATS was founded in 1974, with the goal of promoting “knowledge and research of the thyroid gland and its diseases”(34). In 2013 LATS published a Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hypothyroidism, recommending levothyroxine as the drug of choice to treat hypothyroidism, while routine use of combined therapy was not endorsed (5).
This is the first survey of its kind in Latin America. Of note, unlike previous THESIS publications, which reflect mainly the opinions of physicians affiliated to national endocrine societies, our study represents the attitudes of LATS members that are highly specialized in thyroid pathology. In addition, they belong to different Latin American countries.
This could partially explain the differences in the response rates. However, key opinion leaders were among the respondents suggesting that this is representative of those teaching and producing the guidelines which are followed also by other specialties, such as GPs.
The predominance of female respondents (68%) accords with what is reported in most European publications. Most participants were specialists in endocrinology and treated a high volume of patients on a daily basis.
In accordance with current international and local guidelines (5, 35), and with the results of all the national THESIS studies published so far (13–32), LT4 was the treatment of choice for the treatment of hypothyroidism among LATS members.
Monitoring of thyroid hormone treatment and combination therapy with LT4 + LT3
All respondents would re-check serum TSH level after 4–8 weeks, as recommended by guidelines, such as the one by LATS (5). No one would rely only on clinical evaluation for monitoring therapy.
LT4 was the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism for all respondents, with none opting for LT3, LT4 + LT3 combination or DTE. Nevertheless, about 60% of participants would consider combination therapy with LT4 + LT3 for patients with normal serum TSH complaining of persistent symptoms suggestive of hypothyroidism, and less frequently, for protracted hypothyroidism. This accords with that seen in a number of other countries (20, 28, 30, 32), while this propensity of recommending combination therapy was least pronounced in Italy (41.4%) and Bulgaria (40%) (17, 24).
Use of dietary supplements
Selenium supplementation decreases circulating thyroid autoantibodies in patients with chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (36). However, whether this effect correlates with clinically relevant outcomes remains to be demonstrated (37). In a survey of ETA members 80% responded that there is insufficient evidence for efficacy, but paradoxically 69% acknowledged having used selenium occasionally or routinely in euthyroid patients with antithyroid antibodies (38, 39).
Seventy percent of LATS respondents indicated that supplementation with selenium or iodine should never be used in addition to thyroid hormone replacement, which is close to the 60% figure of the Swedish THESIS survey (28), while the mean figure for all THESIS publications was 34.5%. About a quarter of LATS respondents considered supplementation in case of coexisting autoimmune thyroiditis compared to a mean of 19.2%,of other national THESIS publications (highest propensity found in Romania (56,8%) and lowest in Ireland (4%) (22, 25).
Use of different LT4 formulations
For optimal efficacy, the LT4 tablet formulation requires avoiding concomitant ingestion of food, drink and certain medications, as well as excellent patient compliance. Common gastrointestinal disorders such as Helicobacter pylori infection, chronic atrophic gastritis, lactose intolerance, and some drugs have been reported to necessitate increased LT4 doses (13). In recent years, alternative LT4 formulations, such as soft gel capsules and liquid solutions, have become available and have rapidly gained attention because of their pharmacokinetic properties (13, 40). In selected categories of patients these new formulations have shown promise in improving treatment. However, they are more costly and unavailable in Latin America (41).
Assuming that all formulations were available, most LATS respondents preferred LT4 tablets. One in four would choose liquid solutions in case of food intolerance and almost half would consider soft-gel capsules/liquid solutions. These answers are in accordance with those obtained from most other European surveys, except the Italian THESIS investigation, where 75% recommended soft-gel capsules or liquid solution for patients established on LT4 with poor biochemical control of their hypothyroidism. The Italian data probably reflect long standing availability of these formulations (24) and intense marketing activity.
Persistent symptoms in LT-4 treated patients
Most respondents found persistent symptoms in patients with hypothyroidism who achieve a normal TSH under medication to be an infrequent problem, affecting < 5% of their patients. Furthermore, the prevalence of patients with persistent symptoms was reported not to have changed over the last five years.
LATS members, in accord with other national THESIS investigations, indicated that the most common reasons for persistent symptoms in hypothyroid patients, despite normalization of TSH were comorbidities, psychosocial factors, and unrealistic patient´s expectations, rather than inability of LT4 to restore normal physiology. This impression is supported by a recent patient survey, which found a strong correlation between patient dissatisfaction with treatment and care and mistrust in healthcare professionals, while LT4 treatment (compared to LT3-containing regimens) was associated with a positive impact on daily living (42). In addition, a high prevalence of somatization was noted among hypothyroid patients and a tendency to attribute all persistent symptoms to hypothyroidism or its treatment (43), implying that personality traits may influence the propensity of hypothyroid patients being dissatisfied with thyroid hormone treatment.
Respondents with diagnosed hypothyroidism
Sixteen of 81 (19.8%) LATS respondents declared having a diagnosis of hypothyroidism requiring thyroid hormone treatment. Among them, only 3 reported persistence of symptoms such as fatigue, and only two were treated with LT4 + LT3 combination. This is remarkably at variance with half of them stating that combination therapy may be considered in various clinical scenarios, while just 16.9% would consider this treatment for themselves if they developed hypothyroidism.
Treating hypothyroid and euthyroid patients with LT4
Although not recommended, more than half of the respondents would prescribe thyroid hormones for biochemically euthyroid patients in certain situations; the most frequent being female infertility associated with elevated thyroid antibodies (46.9%), potentially to prevent risk of miscarriage and preterm delivery (44, 45). However, recent large-scale randomized studies found no impact of LT4 treatment on the rate of miscarriage, preterm delivery, or live births in euthyroid anti-TPO positive women (46, 47). Interestingly, female LATS respondents were more supportive of treatment than their male counterparts. This trend was also observed in the Czech THESIS publication (20). It could be hypothesized that female respondents were more likely to identify with this situation, also strengthened by this preference being more pronounced among respondents in the fertile age range (< 40 years).
Notably, 12% of LATS members considered the use of thyroid hormone treatment in patients with a simple goiter growing over time, compared to more than 40% in several other THESIS publications (15, 17, 18, 20, 32). The high percentage of LATS respondents not supporting the use of thyroid hormones for simple goiter is in keeping with guideline recommendations based on evidence that most patients with goiter do not benefit from LT4 suppressive therapy (48) and the potential adverse effects (7).
In accordance with the other THESIS surveys, a minority of LATS respondents (especially those who treat small numbers of hypothyroid patients), considered thyroid hormone treatment in euthyroid individuals with unrelated illnesses (morbid obesity, severe depression, unexplained fatigue, and/or hypercholesterolemia).
Strengths and limitations
As a strength of our study the vast majority of participants were endocrinologists (91.3%), specialized in the management of thyroid disorders and key opinion leaders. Another strength is that this is the first THESIS study performed outside Europe, providing important information about hypothyroidism management in Latin America. The main limitation is the low response rate. It is likely that most of non-respondents did not treat patients, given that some LATS members are not clinically active. The questionnaire was distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which might have impacted response rates negatively (49).