3.1. Microstructures and morphology
As shown in Fig. 2a, CNT/PEO is stably dispersed in the (0.45 mmol/L) CaCl2 solution after sonication. The SEM image of the monolayer CNT/PEO membrane (Fig. S1a) reveals that CNTs are tightly entangled together, because of the robust hydrogen bonds and orientation forces between PEO and CNT. In Fig. 2b, it is clearly shown that CNF is homogeneously dispersed in the CaCl2 solution (0.45 mmol/L), exhibiting a typical Tyndall effect. In the SEM image of pure CNF (Fig. S1b), CNF is compactly stacked together to form a uniform and smooth membrane structure.
Figure 2c and 2d show the SEM images of CNF-2&CNT/PEO-1 without and with the addition of Ca2+ (0.45 mmol/L), respectively. The CNF-2&CNT/PEO-1 membrane without Ca2+ displays severe defect and fragmentation, making it very difficult to continue increasing the number of layers in the composite membrane. Nevertheless, the introduced Ca2+ can act as a bridge to enhance the interaction between CNT and CNF, and thus gives a more complete membrane morphology.
The alternating multilayer microstructures of CNF&CNT/PEO membranes at Ca2+ concentration of 0.45 mmol/L are depicted in Fig. 2e-h, in which the different morphologies of the two adjacent layers of CNF and CNT/PEO can be clearly identified owing to the diverse intrinsic properties. Moreover, both CNF and CNT/PEO layers show tightly packed lamellar arrangement, as a result of the strong interactions in the layers such as hydrogen bonds and “Ca-O” complexation bonds [48]. CNT forms a continuous conductive network under the protection of the supporting CNF layer, which facilitates the attenuation of electromagnetic waves. The EDS mappings shown in Fig. 2i-k illustrate the regular distribution of C, Ca, and O elements in the multilayers, further validating the assembly of perfect alternating multilayers and compactly stacked structures in the composite membranes.
The crystal structures of CNF&CNT/PEO membranes and its ingredients were explored by XRD analysis, as shown in Fig. 3a. Two prominent peaks located at 22.6° and 14.8° for the pristine CNF membrane are attributed to (020) and (110) cellulose crystal planes, respectively. CNT shows the sharp diffraction peaks at 26.1° and 43.2°, corresponding to the (002) crystal plane and (100) crystal plane, respectively. For CNT/PEO membrane, new weak peaks appear at 16.5° and 22.5°, which are attributed to (120) and (112) planes of PEO, respectively. the overall featured peaks can also be traced in XRD profiles of the CNF&CNT/PEO membranes (Fig. 3b), which elucidates the crystallographic structures of CNF, CNT, and PEO are pretty preserved in the Ca2+-precomplexed vacuum-assisted filtration process.
3.2. EMI shielding properties
It is well known that the EMI shielding properties of electrically conductive materials are highly correlated with their electrical conduction [49]. Naturally, the monolayer CNF membrane is non-conductive with a high resistance value of 7.9×108 Ω·m, which is consistent with the previous report [50]. As Fig. 4a shows, the conductivity of composite membranes is significantly improved with the incorporation of CNT/PEO layer. As an example, the conductivity of CNF-2&CNT/PEO-1 reaches up to 961 S/m, which is 900 times more than the actual EMI shielding material requirement (1 S/m) in practical applications [51]. The tightly in-plane arranged CNT/PEO layer provides an interlinking conductive network for CNF&CNT/PEO membranes, which plays a decisive role in improving the electrical conductivity. The conductivity of CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane is gradually enhanced to 1513 S/m with the growing number of CNT/PEO layers, which is mainly attributed to the rising proportion of CNT in the whole membrane and the more compact lamellar structure.
As seen in Fig. 4b, pure CNF membrane has almost no shielding effect on electromagnetic waves in X-band, and the EMI SE is only 0.1 dB, which is in correlation with its inherently electrically insulating property. With the amalgamation of highly conductive CNT/PEO layers, CNF&CNT/PEO membranes illustrate excellent EMI SE (> 20 dB), satisfying the requirement of industrial EMI shielding commodity [52]. For instance, the EMI SE of CNF-2&CNT/PEO-1 in X-band is almost independent from frequency with the maximal value of 32.6 dB. The maximum EMI SE of CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 is largely augmented to 43.3 dB following the increase of layers, which is parallel to the variation of electrical conductivity. CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane exhibits an optimal shielding efficiency of 99.995%, which means that only 0.005% of EMWs can be transmitted through CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane with 99.995% attenuation.
In view of a more profound explanation of the shielding mechanism of CNF&CNT/PEO membranes, the average total EMI SE (SET), absorptive SE (SEA), and reflective SE (SER) are figured out and depicted in Fig. 4c. It is easy to find that both SEA and SER show a significant increase with the incremental total number of layers, which is due to the polarization loss caused by the increase of the polarization interface and the “zigzag” multi-reflection theory resulting from the alternating multilayer structure [53]. The SEA and SER of CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane are 26.4 and 14.3 dB, respectively, showing that SEA accounts for 64.9% of SET. Natheless, the power coefficients (Fig. 4d) display that R coefficient (> 0.9) is far larger than A (< 0.1) for all the alternating multilayer membranes, which indicates that the EMI shielding theory of CNF&CNT/PEO membranes is a reflection-dominated loss theory. This phenomenon is mainly on account that most of the EMWs are directly reflected back when they touch the surface of the shielding material, whereas only a small fraction of EMWs can traverse into the interior of the material [54]. Additionally, it is apparently discovered that A coefficient tends to drop slightly as CNT content increases, which is attributed to the enhanced impedance mismatch.
To investigate whether the introduction of Ca2+ has an influence on the shielding effect of CNF&CNT/PEO membranes, CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 membranes with different Ca2+ concentrations are also fabricated, and the EMI shielding properties are shown in Fig. 5. It is obviously seen that the electrical conductivity of CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 membranes changes little in the range of 1030–1100 S/m with the increasing Ca2+ concentration (Fig. 5a), indicating the Ca2+ pre-complexation has little influence on the construction of electrical conduction pathway. The EMI shielding properties of CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 membranes, including SET, SEA, SER, A and R, aren’t nearly affected by the Ca2+ concentration (Fig. 5b-d), which is in great consistence with the electrical conductivity. Moreover, the thickness of CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 membranes is slightly reduced from 99.6 µm to 87.4 µm with the incremental Ca2+ concentration (Fig. S4b), owing to the enhanced multilayer interaction and compact layered structures. For further investigation, the EMI shielding performances of pure CNF and alternating multilayered membranes without Ca2+ pre-complexation are also exhibited in Fig. S2. The conductivity and EMI shielding performances of alternating multilayer CNF&CNT/PEO membranes with the same layer number exhibit little difference at the Ca2+ concentration of 0 and 0.45 mmol/L, in good agreement with the analysis of Fig. 5. For instance, SET of CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane is 40.7 and 38.5 dB at the Ca2+ concentration of 0.45 and 0 mmol/L, respectively.
To demonstrate the superiority of alternating multilayer membranes in EMI shielding, the CNF/CNT/PEO composite membranes with a homogeneous structure were obtained as a control pair. In Fig. S3a, it is obvious that the electrical conductivity of homogeneous membranes also shows the enhancing tendency but is slightly lower than that of multilayered membranes at the same component contents. For example, Homogeneity-7 exhibits the electrical conductivity of 1207 S/m, which is lower than that of the corresponding CNF-4&CNT/PEO-3 (1513 S/m). Similarly, SET of Homogeneity-7 (31.1 dB) is explicitly smaller than that of NF-4&CNT/PEO-3 (38.6 dB), on account that EMWs are reflected many times during the transmission in multilayer membranes and the propagation path is prolonged (Fig. S3b-d). Taking the effect of the thickness on EMI shielding into consideration, the thickness of multilayer and homogeneous membranes is also tested and presented in Fig. S4a. Although the thickness of multilayered membranes is found to be moderately thicker than that of homogeneous membranes with the same ingredients, specific SE, SE/t (where t denotes the thickness), of multilayered membranes is obviously greater than that of homogeneous membranes, illuminating the advantage of alternating multilayered architectures to the homogeneous structures in EMI shielding performances.
To further interpret the EMI shielding theory, the transmission process of EMWs across the alternating multilayer membranes is intuitively modalized in Fig. 6. When EMWs reach to the outer CNF layer, only a small portion of EMWs are reflected due to the electrical insulation of CNF layer. Then, a large part of the transferred EMWs are reflected back at the CNF-CNT/PEO interface, because there are significant impedance mismatches between CNF and CNT/PEO layers [55, 56]. A handful of remaining EMWs entering the CNT/PEO layer are continuously consumed by immense polarization loss and conduction loss, due to the high-density electron carriers in the highly conductive networks. Afterwards, the EMWs are reflected and scattered several times between adjacent conducting CNT/PEO layers, by virtue of its unique alternating multilayer structure. Such multiple reflection can extend the transmission path and promotes the dissipation of the residual EMWs in the form of thermal energy. As a consequence, one can conclude that the eminent EMI shielding property of CNF&CNT/PEO membranes is mainly derivative from the fascinating alternating multilayer structures.
3.3. Fabrication efficiency
The fabrication time of multilayered hybrid membranes which is an important factor in the layer-by-layer self-assembly process can be significantly shortened by Ca2+ pre-complexation. The fabrication time of alternating multilayered membranes with and without the addition of Ca2+ (0.45 mmol/L) is shown in Fig. 7a. It can be obviously seen that the required time for preparing multilayer membranes is immensely lengthened with the increasing layer number. The preparation time of multilayered CNF-2&CNT/PEO-1 without Ca2+ is 204 min, while CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane without Ca2+ pre-complexation exhibits the largely increased preparation time of 1192 min with the growing layer number. In addition, the consumed time of alternating multilayered CNF&CNT/PEO is sharply reduced with the introduction of 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+. For instance, the filtration time of the Ca2+ pre-complexed CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 is greatly decreased to 756 min, indicating the saving time of 436 min and 36.6% enhancement in fabrication efficiency. The most probable reason is that a large number of polar groups including hydroxyl, carboxyl, and ester in CNF (CNT) chains can form strong interactions with H2O such as hydrogen bond and Van der Waals’ force, which retards the separation of CNF (CNT) from water to some extent. Under Ca2+ pre-complexation, the new ionic bond and complex bond will be constructed between CNF (CNT) and Ca2+, which will break the hydrogen bonds and largely weaken the intermolecular interaction between CNF (CNT) and H2O (Fig. 7c). Thus, CNF and CNT are faster filtrated under vacuum with Ca2+ pre-complexation.
The Ca2+ concentration can largely influence the fabrication efficiency of vacuum-assisted filtration of CNF composite membranes. According to Fig. 7b, the fabrication efficiency of CNF-3&CNF/PEO-2 is largely improved with the increasing Ca2+ concentration. The filtration time of CNF-3&CNF/PEO-2 is reduced from 439 min without Ca2+ pre-complexation to 249 min at 0.68 mmol/L Ca2+. Ca2+ could complex some CNF chains and break some hydrogen bonds between CNF and water, enabling CNF to separate easily from water. In addition, the filtration time of homogeneous CNF/CNT/PEO membranes is also immensely decreased with the introduction of Ca2+ (Fig. S5). Homogeneity-9 exhibits the fabrication time of 376 min at 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+ but 607 min without Ca2+, indicating the 38.1% enhancement of preparation efficiency. What’s more, the preparation time of homogeneous membranes is observably smaller than that of multilayered membranes, due to the complicated and tedious procedures. Overall, the introduction of Ca2+ pre-complexation could greatly elevate the fabrication efficiency in vacuum-assisted self-assembly process.
3.4. Mechanical properties
In addition to the wonderful conductivity and EMI SE, prominent mechanical performances also have great significance for the promising prospect of EMI shielding membranes. Fig. S6a shows the representative stress-strain curves of pure CNF membrane, and the tensile strength and fractured strain of pure CNF membrane decreases slightly with the addition of Ca2+ (Fig. S6b), as a consequence of the stress concentration points produced by the agglomeration of CNF with Ca2+ pre-complexation. Besides, the mechanical properties of alternating multilayered CNF composite membranes at 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+ are shown in Fig. 8a and d. All the alternating multilayered membranes illustrate the brittle fracture without yielding and necking. The tensile strength and strain at break of layered CNF&CNF/PEO membranes at 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+ exhibit a slight decreasing trend with the rising layer number, because of the reducing CNF loading fraction and the increasing interfaces. For instance, the tensile strength and breaking elongation of CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 are decreased to 34.8 MPa and 4.4%, respectively. Nevertheless, CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 has the superb flexibility and can be folded without cracks and/or factures (Fig. S9), which is vital to the application in bendable electronic devices.
As a control, the mechanical properties of multilayered CNF&CNF/PEO membranes without Ca2+ were also detailedly characterized and shown in Fig. S7. A moderate declining tendency in the tensile strength and fracture strain with the increase of layer number are also observed for multilayered CNF&CNF/PEO membranes at 0 mmol/mL Ca2+. Moreover, the mechanical properties of multilayered CNF&CNF/PEO membranes at 0 mmol/mL Ca2+ are mildly worsened in comparison with the corresponding multilayered membranes at 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+. Exemplified by CNF-5&CNT/PEO-4 membrane, the tensile strength and fracture strain are reduced to 31.4 MPa and 3.3% without Ca2+ pre-complexation, respectively. This indicates that the introduction of Ca2+ can effectively reinforce the stretching properties of the multilayered CNF composite membranes, owing to the largely enhanced interfacial interaction via Ca2+ crosslinking.
Figure 8b and e describe the tensile performances of the homogeneous CNF/CNT/PEO membranes at Ca2+ concentration of 0.45 mmol/L. The homogeneous membranes are also brittlely fractured with quite finite strain. It is similar to alternating multilayered membranes that the tensile strength and breaking strain of homogeneous membranes are continuously reduced from Homogeneity-3 to Homogeneity-9. The minimal tensile strength of 42.2 MPa and fracture strain of 4.5% are achieved for Homogeneity-9 with 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+. Notably, the mechanical properties of homogeneous membranes are superior to the corresponding multilayered membranes, arising from the absence of weak CNF-CNT/PEO layer-to-layer interfaces. Likewise, the tensile properties of homogeneous membranes at 0.45 mmol/L Ca2+ are also higher than those without Ca2+ pre-complexation (Fig. S8). Homonegeity-9 at 0 mmol/L Ca2+ shows the lower tensile strength of 38.1 MPa and fracture strain of 6.2%.
For sake of further investigating the impact of Ca2+ on the tensile performances of alternating multilayered membranes, Fig. 8c and f depict the mechanical properties of CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 with different Ca2+ concentration. It is obviously observed that the tensile strength of CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 is gradually enhanced from 40.2 to 43.2 further to 47.6 MPa, as the Ca2+ concentration increases from 0 to 0.23 and to 0.45 mmol/L, on account of the excellent Ca2+ crosslinking. However, the tensile strength of CNF-3&CNT/PEO-2 at 0.68 mmol/L Ca2+ is largely reduced to 40.3 MPa, which can be explained by the fact that excessive Ca2+ pre-complexation may lead to the agglomeration of CNF and induce the stress concentration points.
To visually elucidate the fracture mechanism of Ca2+ pre-complexation alternating multilayered membranes, the crack extension process under tensile action is vividly exhibited in Fig. 8g. When the multilayer composite membrane is subjected to tensile loading, the brittle CNT/PEO layer will rapture first owing to the finite strain and weak intermolecular interaction. Nevertheless, the neighboring strong protective CNF layers hinder the crack extension, which resists the tensile stress and protects the whole membrane from fracture. With the further increase of tensile stress, the cracks permeate into CNF layers in a nano-“Zigzag” path, triggering the long-chain CNF molecules to stretch in the tensile direction until fracture. Meanwhile, the cracks also slide along the CNF-CNT/PEO interlayer interfaces, inducing the micro-“Zigzag” crack path. Such a multilevel crack extension mechanism is able to dissipate a large amount of tensile energy during tension process, in aid of the substantial enhancement in the mechanical properties. Moreover, the Ca2+ cross-linking greatly improves the interfacial interaction between CNF and CNT/PEO and thus prompts the stress transfer and fracture energy absorption in the multilayer hybrid membranes.