Our study shows that MDCTA made it possible to evaluate anatomical variations of the intracranial VA. We found that variation is common in the population studied, with a total prevalence of 36.5%. The most frequently observed is VA hypoplasia. The incidence of hypoplasia in the present study (8.3% on the right and 6.5% on the left) is similar to the report of Ergun et al. 12. These authors defined VA hypoplasia using diameter criteria of ≤ 2 mm and reported an incidence of 7.1% on the right and 9.4% on the left among 254 patients in their angiographic series 12. By contrast, Songur and co-authors in their autopsy study reported a relatively high incidence of 20.2% on the right, 14.4% on the left, and 4.3% bilaterally using a similar definition of VA hypoplasia 7. Sometimes it is challenging to compare data from different populations and research groups due to the differences in study modalities, distribution of data, and average diameter. According to a recent report, an individual's VA diameter may depend on anthropometric parameters such as height 13. All these factors may contribute to the wide range of differences reported in the literature. VA hypoplasia is a congenital anatomical variation that has been previously described with a cut-off diameter between 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm 14.
In addition to hypoplasia, we also noticed that the hypoplastic terminal portion of the unilateral intracranial VA is a common anatomical variant of the studied population (Fig. 2b). The VA seems to divide at a spot along its courses to a PICA branch and a tiny branch that joins the contralateral VA. Pekcevik and co-author proposed another terminology for this type of variation; vertebral artery continued as PICA 15. In our own opinion, this suggested anatomical term can be confused with VA terminating as PICA or VA ending as PICA (atresia). We suggest that this variant anatomy can be simply described as hypoplastic terminal VA.
The reduced diameter of hypoplastic VA has been associated with an increased probability of spontaneous dissection 16 and ipsilateral PICA and lateral medullary infarctions due to suspected atherosclerosis as a result of abnormal hemodynamics 17. Recently, VA hypoplasia has been associated with an aneurysm of the contralateral dominant VA, most especially at the site of PICA origin 18. Knowledge of pathologies associated with VA hypoplasia can provide some clues and help diagnose pathological processes in the posterior circulatory territory.
In our series, the percentage of patients having VA atresia is 6.7% (Fig. 2a). Prevalence of VA atresia has previously been reported as up to 9% 5,19. Our results were in accordance with the range of the reported prevalence but most similar to that reported by Liu et al. (6.3%) 5. Clinically, VA atresia has been previously linked to rotational vertebral artery syndrome (RVAS) 20 and bow hunter’s syndrome 2,21, which may result from compression of this variant vessel.
Another important finding in the present study is the variant origin of atretic VA from the aortic arch (Fig. 2a). Some authors have previously reported this type of co-existing anatomical variation 19. However, the true prevalence has not been established. Out of the 554 patients in our series, 38 left VA directly originated from the aorta arch, and 4 of the 38 VAs were atretic (11%). Knowledge of this variant anatomy is essential when planning for thoracic aortic surgery. Obstruction of this type of VA can increase the risk of posterior circulatory stroke 19. In addition, VA atresia has been suspected to contribute to ischemic events in the vertebrobasilar system (Liu 2017).
We also observed fenestration at the right intracranial VA in one of the patients (Fig. 3b) and the proximal part of the basilar artery in another patient. Our observation is similar to the report of Dzierzanowski et al., which reported two fenestrations in the Caucasians 1. Fenestration of the vertebrobasilar artery is a congenital anomaly that involves lumina division of an artery with a single origin into two separate channels that later reunite distally. Embryologically, the VA and the basilar artery develop from different primitive vessels. The VA is formed from the cervical intersegmental arteries, while the basilar artery develops from the longitudinal neural arteries. As a result of these, fenestration at the V4 segment of the VA is due to the absence of obliterations of two intersegmental vessels that fused 22. Fenestration of the proximal basilar occurs due to partial failure or incomplete fusion of the longitudinal neural arteries and regression of the bridging arteries connecting the longitudinal arteries 23. Fenestration may predispose to aneurysm around the fenestrated portion of the artery 7,15, and it has also been previously associated with unexplained subarachnoid hemorrhage 24. In addition to the associated pathologies, knowledge of this variation is essential in clinical diagnosis as fenestration may be misinterpreted as an aneurysm or a dissection on magnetic resonance imaging 15.
In the present study, duplicate PICA origin was registered in one of the patients. It is important to note that duplicate PICA origin is different from the duplication of the PICA. In the duplicate origin, the PICA has two separate origins that later converge distally in the course of the artery (Fig. 3a). Whereas in duplication of the PICA, there is no distal arterial convergence 25: each artery courses separately. Duplicate PICA origin is a rare congenital morphological variation of the PICA with a prevalence of roughly 1.45% previously reported in the Western population (White and Asian) 25. Clinically, duplicate PICA origin has been previously reported to highly predispose to intracranial aneurysm formation with an associated incidence between 50% and 71% 25,26. Embryologically, Lesley and co-authors hypothesized that duplicate PICA origin might be a manifestation of underlying deficient vascular developmental disorganization, which may upraise the tendency toward formation of an intracranial aneurysm 25. Considering the unique embryogenesis, adequate perfusion of the regions supplied by the PICA may rely on flow from both origins 26. Since duplicate PICA origin is an uncommon variation with few previous reports, it should not be overlooked when evaluating the diagnosis and surgical intervention images. Because visualization of branches of the intracranial VA (PICA and spinal arteries) is usually beyond the limits of MDCTA, the frequency of PICA on the left, right, and bilateral PICA in the present study is low (15.7%, 13.9%, and 14.8%, respectively). We also observed bilateral and unilateral double PICA in 5 patients. Therefore, we cannot appropriately quantify the frequency of the PICA in all the VAs.
The average diameter and length of the VA in our result is consistent with the previous report on a South American population (Diameter Left- 3.12 ± 0.85 mm, Right- 2.94 ± 0.77 mm; Length Left- 33.86 ± 5.59 mm, Right- 32.47 ± 4.8 mm) 27 based on autopsy samples and another angiographic study of the Caucasians (Diameter Left- 3.16 ± 0.63 mm, Right- 2.78 ± 0.44 mm; Length Left- 31.51 ± 6.51 mm Right- 24.25 ± 6.76 mm) 1. We observed a significantly larger diameter on the left compared to the right VA, which is comparable to the previous reports mentioned above. Interestingly, there was no significant difference across the racial groups and gender in our series. By contrast, a previous histological study of a South African population (Witwatersrand region) reported an average diameter (Left- 2.68 ± 0.86 mm, Right- 2.53 ± 0.75 mm) 9 that was lower than the present study. The differences in the study modalities (CTA vs. cadaveric) may be responsible for the contrariety noticed in the results. Tissue shrinkage associated with histological tissue processing may be the reason for the reduced diameter.
We described the pattern of dominance using the criterion of any size difference between the left and right VA; 45.3% showed left dominance, 32.7% showed right dominance, and 18.4% showed codominance. Using a similar criterion, Ozdemir et al. reported similar results of left dominance in 64% of patients and right dominance in 31% of patients 28. In contrast, Ergun and co-authors reported right VA dominance in 49.5% and left dominance in 47.2% of patients using a similar criterion as described above 12. Our result shows that most of the patients have left dominant VAs. Noticeably, we observed more VA hypoplasia and atresia on the right. Knowledge of the dominant VA is required for some endovascular procedures. It is also important to preserve the dominant VA since they are likely to predominates the basilar artery. This information is vital to reduce the risk of neurological symptoms that may results from iatrogenic injury.
The angle at the vertebrobasilar junction in the present study is comparable with the report of Songur et al. (52.2 ± 18.2°) 7. On the contrary, other authors reported a larger mean angle (85.45 ± 10.76°) 1. The disparity may have resulted from the confluence of the bilateral VA, which can either be a sharp or blunt edge depending on the pattern and frequency of asymmetry. It is essential to consider the geometry of the vertebrobasilar junction while planning for surgical interventions in this region. This region is of particular interest to neurosurgeons and radiologists due to various interventional neuroradiological procedures conduct in the area to treat vascular diseases such as arterial dissections, aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, dural fistula, or repair of an occlusive disease 29. In atresia, the VA did not fuse with the contralateral VA but terminated as PICA. The contralateral VA solely proceeds to form the basilar artery. In the case of hypoplastic terminal VA, the contralateral VA predominates the basilar artery with little contribution from the tapering end of the hypoplastic terminal VA. In addition to asymmetry, these two conditions can also cause the basilar artery to bend from the midline (Fig. 2b, also known as bending basilar) 30. Deviation and prominence of a vessel, such as bending basilar due to dominance of one of the VAs, may cause compression of cranial nerves 15.