This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
Comparison of the effects of intravenous and inhalational anesthesia on postoperative pulmonary complications after oral and maxillofacial surgery with free flap reconstruction: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
Xi Zhu
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-8831
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The effects of intravenous and inhalation anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative pulmonary inflammatory responses have been reported in many studies. The differences in clinical postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) have been also studied in cardiac and lung resection surgery. However, there are few relevant reports and the findings remain controversial. Clinical evidence for the effects of these two anesthetics on PPCs in other types of surgery is still missing. The main goal of the current study was to assess the impact of sevoflurane and propofol on the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 220 adults at intermediate-to-high risk of pulmonary complications after oral and maxillofacial cancer surgery with radial forearm or fibular flap reconstruction to either propofol or sevoflurane as a general anesthetic. The occurrence of pulmonary complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score was defined as the primary (within 7 days after surgery) outcome.
Results: The two intervention groups had similar characteristics at baseline. The PPCs incidence during 7 days after surgery was 32.4% and 18.2% in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.22 to 0.91; P = 0.027). The corresponding incidence of PPCs in patients who underwent tracheotomy at the end of surgery in the two groups was 44.8% and 24.5% (adjusted relative risk, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.91; P = 0.030). In addition, the Clavien-Dindo classification showed significant differences between groups in minor complications (grade I and II) but not in major complications (grade III to V). Intergroup difference in the time to occurrence of the first PPC after surgery was significant (P = 0.021). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups.
Conclusions: Compared with intravenous anesthesia, the administration of sevoflurane reduces the incidence of minor PPCs (grade I to II) in moderate- and high-risk patients who have undergone tracheotomy after oral and maxillofacial cancer surgery with radial forearm or fibular flap reconstruction.
Keywords
Intravenous anesthesia, Inhalational anesthesia, Postoperative pulmonary complications, Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Figure 1
Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 3
Posted 18 Oct, 2019
No community comments so far
No comments provided
No comments provided
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research article
Comparison of the effects of intravenous and inhalational anesthesia on postoperative pulmonary complications after oral and maxillofacial surgery with free flap reconstruction: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
Xi Zhu
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-8831
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 3
Posted 18 Oct, 2019
No community comments so far
No comments provided
No comments provided
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The effects of intravenous and inhalation anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative pulmonary inflammatory responses have been reported in many studies. The differences in clinical postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) have been also studied in cardiac and lung resection surgery. However, there are few relevant reports and the findings remain controversial. Clinical evidence for the effects of these two anesthetics on PPCs in other types of surgery is still missing. The main goal of the current study was to assess the impact of sevoflurane and propofol on the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 220 adults at intermediate-to-high risk of pulmonary complications after oral and maxillofacial cancer surgery with radial forearm or fibular flap reconstruction to either propofol or sevoflurane as a general anesthetic. The occurrence of pulmonary complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score was defined as the primary (within 7 days after surgery) outcome.
Results: The two intervention groups had similar characteristics at baseline. The PPCs incidence during 7 days after surgery was 32.4% and 18.2% in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.22 to 0.91; P = 0.027). The corresponding incidence of PPCs in patients who underwent tracheotomy at the end of surgery in the two groups was 44.8% and 24.5% (adjusted relative risk, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.91; P = 0.030). In addition, the Clavien-Dindo classification showed significant differences between groups in minor complications (grade I and II) but not in major complications (grade III to V). Intergroup difference in the time to occurrence of the first PPC after surgery was significant (P = 0.021). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups.
Conclusions: Compared with intravenous anesthesia, the administration of sevoflurane reduces the incidence of minor PPCs (grade I to II) in moderate- and high-risk patients who have undergone tracheotomy after oral and maxillofacial cancer surgery with radial forearm or fibular flap reconstruction.
Figure 1
Figure 2