3.1.1 Clinical characteristics of the study subjects
The clinical characteristics of the study subjects are shown in Table 1–2. The mean age of the DMS group was 73.24 years and 67.9% were women. The mean age of the Non-DMS group was 64.82 years and 48.8% were women. Compared with the Non-DMS group (n = 246), patients of DMS in T2DM had lower serum 25-(OH) Vit D level (47.19 ± 13.01 nmol/L vs. 41.74 ± 14.60 nmol/L, p = 0.003), and in male patients (43.38 ± 12.98 vs 49.59 ± 13.70 P < 0.05), while in female patients (40.96 ± 15.38 vs 44.78 ± 11.85 P > 0.05); and had higher age (73.24 ± 7.47 VS 64.82 ± 8.16 P < 0.05), thicker WC(94.05 ± 8.33 VS 91.17 ± 10.15 P < 0.05), HDL-C(1.14 ± 0.26 VS 1.07 ± 0.25 P < 0.05), and longer history of diabetes, and lower DBP, eGFR, ALB, and HGB. There is currently no statistical difference in BMI, SBP, diabetes complications, FBG, HbA1c, TG, TC, and LDL-C between the two groups.
3.1.2. Factors associated with serum 25-(OH)Vit D levels in patients of DMS with T2DM
We evaluated correlations between serum 25-(OH)Vit D and other factors in patients of DMS with T2DM. The result shows that the serum 25- (OH) Vit D levels in T2DM patients with DMS were positively correlated with grip strength (r = 0.226, P < 0.001), Six meters Speed (r = 0.146, P = 0.001), HbA1c (r = 0.206, P < 0.001), ALB (r = 0.166, P = 0.005), SMI (r = 0.254, P < 0.001), and overall muscle mass (r = 0.219, P = 0.002), whereas Age(r=-0.150, P = 0.009) was a negative correlation(Table 3).
3.1.4 Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for DMS in a patient with T2DM
A logistic regression analysis was performed to find the independent factors associated with the risk of DMS in T2DM patients. The dependent variable is group DMS (0 = Non-DMS group,1 = DMS group), The independent variables are respectively gender(0 = female,1 = male), age, diabetic retinopathy(0 = without,1 = with), diabetic neuropathy(0 = without,1 = with), diabetic nephropathy(0 = without,1 = with) and 25-(OH)Vit D (1 = group A = the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 36.2 nmol/L,0 = group B = the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 36.2nmol/L), HbA1c, ALB, HDLC, eGFR were taken as independent variables. The result showed that the age (OR value = 1.175, 95%CI: 1.110–1.243, P = 0.000), low levels of 25-(OH) Vit D (OR value = 2.910, 95%CI༚1.357–6.242, P = 0.006), and higher levels of HbA1c(OR value = 1.288, 95%CI: 1.085–1.529, P = 0.004), they are associated with the risk of DMS’s prevalence in T2DM patients. But males reduce the risk of DMS by 51.3% (OR value = 0.487, 95%CI: 0.238–0.998, P = 0.05) (Table 5).
3.2 Tables
Table 1
Clinical laboratory characteristics of the subjects in different groups.
variable
|
Non-DMS group
(n = 246)
|
DMS Group
(n = 84)
|
t or χ2
|
P
|
Age(years) mean(SD)
|
64.82(8.16)
|
73.24(7.47)
|
-8.71
|
<0.001*
|
Gender (male/female)
|
(126/120)
|
(27/57)
|
9.16
|
0.002*
|
BMI(kg/m2) mean(SD)
|
25.30(3.30)
|
25.54(3.35)
|
-0.57
|
0.571
|
WC (cm) mean (SD)
|
91.17(10.15)
|
94.05(8.33)
|
-2.12
|
0.035*
|
SBP(mmHg)mean(SD)
|
144.13(20.16)
|
142.69(19.50)
|
0.57
|
0.570
|
DBP(mmHg)mean(SD)
|
84.05(11.26)
|
80.11(12.19)
|
2.71
|
0.007*
|
history of diabetes
|
10.08(8.63)
|
12.07(9.20)
|
-1.80
|
0.073*
|
diabetic retinopathy
|
(202/39)
|
(71/13)
|
0.023
|
0.879
|
diabetic neuropathy
|
(147/94)
|
(54/30)
|
0.286
|
0.593
|
diabetic nephropathy
|
(211/32)
|
(72/12)
|
0.067
|
0.796
|
* means that it is statistically significant. Baseline laboratory values represent the mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), WC: waist circumference; SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
Table 2
Laboratory characteristics of the subjects in different groups
variable
|
Non-DMS group
(n = 246)
|
DMS Group
(n = 84)
|
t or χ2
|
P
|
HbA1c(%)mean(SD)
|
8.83(4.55)
|
8.98(2.26)
|
-0.28
|
0.778
|
FPG(mmol/L)mean(SD)
|
8.27(3.18)
|
8.45(3.54)
|
-0.418
|
0.676
|
25-(OH)Vit D mean(SD)
|
Total population
|
47.19(13.01)
|
41.74(14.60)
|
3.00
|
0.003*
|
male
|
49.59(13.70)
|
43.38(12.98)
|
2.00
|
0.047*
|
female
|
44.78(11.85)
|
40.96(15.38)
|
1.71
|
0.089
|
TG(mmol/L)mean(SD)
|
1.90(1.29)
|
1.94(1.18)
|
-0.27
|
0.785
|
TC(mmol/L) mean (SD)
|
5.11(1.48)
|
5.28(1.38)
|
-0.90
|
0.370
|
HDL-C(mmol/L)mean (SD)
|
1.07(0.25)
|
1.14(0.26)
|
-2.17
|
0.031*
|
LDL-C(mmol/L) mean (SD)
|
3.95(18.51)
|
2.93(1.02)
|
0.50
|
0.616
|
eGFR(ml/min) mean(SD)
|
95.41(18.71)
|
84.09(23.76)
|
3.80
|
<0.001*
|
uACR(mg/mmol)mean(SD)
|
8.62(31.64)
|
11.08(21.62)
|
-0.612
|
0.541
|
ALB(g/L) mean(SD)
|
43.30(4.95)
|
41.14(14.60)
|
3.45
|
0.001*
|
HGB(g/L) mean(SD)
|
140.92(15.66)
|
132.47(15.15)
|
4.28
|
<0.001*
|
* means that it is statistically significant. FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1C: hemoglobin A1C, 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, TG: triglycerides, TC: cholesterol, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, UACR: urine albumin creatinine ratio, ALB: albumin, HGB༚ hemoglobin.
Table 3
Correlations between the 25-(OH)Vit D and other variables
variable
|
r
|
P
|
Age(years)
|
-0.150
|
0.009*
|
BMI(kg/m2)
|
0.029
|
0.621
|
WC(cm)
|
-0.026
|
0.663
|
SBP(mmHg)
|
-0.03
|
0.603
|
DBP(mmHg)
|
0.045
|
0.434
|
Grip Strength (Kg)
|
0.226
|
<0.001*
|
Speed of six meters(m/s)
|
0.146
|
0.011*
|
SMI(Kg/m2)
|
0.254
|
<0.001*
|
body muscles(g)
|
0.219
|
0.002*
|
body fat(g)
|
0.045
|
0.436
|
FPG(mmol/L)
|
-0.041
|
0.487
|
TG(mmol/L)
|
-0.031
|
0.592
|
TC(mmol/L)
|
-0.020
|
0.727
|
HDL-C(mmol/L)
|
-0.064
|
0.269
|
LDL-C(mmol/L)
|
-0.014
|
0.809
|
HbA1c(%)
|
0.206
|
<0.001*
|
uACR (mg/mmol)
|
-0.064
|
0.281
|
ALB(g/L)
|
0.166
|
0.005*
|
eGFR(ml/min)
|
0.110
|
0.075
|
Creatinine(umol/L)
|
-0.015
|
0.790
|
* means that it is statistically significant. BMI: body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), WC: waist circumference; SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1C: hemoglobin A1C, 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, TG: triglycerides, TC: cholesterol, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, UACR: urine albumin creatinine ratio, ALB: albumin, SMI: skeletal lean mass index.
Table 4
The proportion of different vitamin D levels in DMS and its branches
|
Group A
|
Group B
|
X2
|
p
|
Lower SMI (%)
|
68.5
|
60.7
|
1.436
|
0.231
|
Lower Grip (%)
|
43.8
|
23.1
|
11.718
|
0.001*
|
Higher BMI (%)
|
26.0
|
31.0
|
0.655
|
0.418
|
Fall (%)
|
11.0
|
13.1
|
0.231
|
0.631
|
Osteoporosis (%)
|
41.1
|
20.5
|
12.332
|
<0.001*
|
Lower Six meters Speed (%)
|
32.9
|
18.3
|
6.849
|
0.001*
|
DMS (%)
|
38.4
|
18.8
|
11.80
|
0.001*
|
* means that it is statistically significant. group A <36.2nmol/L, group B ≥ 36.2nmol/L; SMI: skeletal lean mass index, BMI: body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).DMS: Dysmobility Syndrome, X2: Chi-square value
Table 5
Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for DMS in a patient with T2DM
Variables
|
B
|
Odds Ratio
|
95% CI
|
p
|
Gender(male)
|
-0.720
|
0.487
|
0.238–0.998
|
0.05
|
Age
|
0.161
|
1.175
|
1.110–1.243
|
0.000*
|
25-(OH) Vit D (group A)
|
1.068
|
2.910
|
1.357–6.242
|
0.006*
|
HbA1C
|
0.253
|
1.288
|
1.085–1.529
|
0.004*
|
The dependent Variable is group DMS (0 = Non-DMS group,1 = DMS group), The independent variables are gender(0 = female,1 = male), age, diabetic retinopathy(0 = without,1 = with), diabetic neuropathy(0 = without,1 = with), diabetic nephropathy(0 = without,1 = with) and 25-(OH)Vit D (group A = the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 36.2 nmol/L, group B = the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 36.2nmol/L), HbA1c, ALB, HDLC, eGFR.