Because of its short duration, simple measures, and parallels to human OA, MIA-induced OA is a popular experimental animal model for preclinical research; this experimental animal model is used with a high degree of validity for evaluating the anti-osteoarthritic properties of various agents [36]. On day 3, the mean clinical score for arthritis of the injected ankle was the greatest in the present study. Edema at the injection site decreased over time, and the lowest swelling was reached in the sixth week. These findings are consistent with those of Ma et al. in a previous investigation [37]. The elevated clinical score was significantly lower in the BMMSC, HA, and BMMSC + HA-treated rats than in the osteoarthritic control at the end of the experiment.
In this experiment, the right hind leg paw circumference was used as a measure of paw edema and gross swelling rate. Classically, anti-inflammatory effects in OA have been assessed via a change in paw volume [38]. In comparison to the rats in the normal group, all osteoarthritic control and osteoarthritic-treated rats displayed considerable swelling of the injected ankle three days after MIA injection. Treatment with BMMSC, HA, or BMMSC + HA effectively decreased the enlarged right hind paw circumference in osteoarthritic rats. The reduction in circumference as a result of treatment with BMMSC and HA reflects a reduction in swelling rate, which could be attributed to improved edema, attenuation of the inflammatory process, and suppression of synovial hyperplasia, as confirmed by the histopathological results of joints in this study and as revealed by previous investigations [2, 39, 40].
Inflammation and inflammatory responses are essential contributors in the development and progression of OA. Pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines have long been recognized as important mediators in the development and progression of OA [10, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44]. The dysregulation of these CD4+ T cells cytokines has been identified as a crucial role in the pathogenesis of OA [Figure 14] [45]. T-helper 1 [Th1] cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, interferon-gamma [IFN-], IL-2, IL-12, IL-6, and IL-8, whereas T-helper 2 [Th2] cells release anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [46]. In addition, Th17 secret another proinflammatory cytokine, IL-17. In the current study, the osteoarthritic rats exhibited a profound elevation in the serum concentrations of Th1 cytokine [TNF-α] and Th17 cytokine [IL-17] and a significant depletion in Th2 cytokine [IL-4] level after 6 weeks of MIA injection in comparison with normal control. These findings confirmed the dominance of Th1 and Th17 on Th2 in MIA-induced OA [Figure 14] and are in parallel with the data of Li et al. [47], who revealed that after MIA treatment, serum TNF-α and IL-17 expression was considerably higher in rats with OA than in healthy rats. The increased amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines may indicate their important impacts in the pathophysiology of experimental arthritis [41, 44]. TNF-α is a key inflammatory mediator implicated in the induction of chronic inflammatory conditions [48] and it has been reported to be linked to the progression of OA and rheumatoid arthritis [7, 8, 47, 49, 50, 51]. IL-17 has the potential to cause matrix damage and inflammation in OA patients [52]. The present results are also in accordance with Ahmed et al. [9], Saber et al. [51], Ahmed et al. [53], Ahmed et al. [54], and Zhang et al. [55] who reported a significant drop in IL-4 expression in arthritic rats in relation to normal control.
The administration of BMMSC, HA and BMMSC + HA to osteoarthritic rats, in the present study, significantly downregulated the elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines, TNF-α and IL-17, and upregulated the anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-4. These finding confirmed the dominance of Th2 on Th1 and Th17 in osteoarthritic rats treated with BMMSC, HA, or BMMSC + HA, which have anti-inflammatory effects [Figure 14]. Despite the effects of BMMSCs, HA and BMMSCs + HA on serum IL-4 levels were similar, the effects of BMMSCs and HA on serum TNF-α and IL-17 levels were more efficient than their combination. When Th2 predominates in inflamed tissues, IL-4 is produced in high amounts to counteract the inflammatory effects by lowering the production and activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines [56]. IL-4 is thought to have chondroprotective properties by reducing both proteoglycan breakdown and MMP production in articular cartilages [57]. The results in the present study was consistent with Ahmed et al. [7] and Ahmed et al. [9] who revealed a significant downregulation of ankle TNF-α expression and serum TNF-α level respectively and with Abd-Elhalem et al. [58], Endrinaldi et al. [59] and Ahmed et al. [8] who reported a significant rise in IL-4 expression and its blood levels in arthritic rats treated with MSC. Furthermore, Mao et al. [60] reported that MSC therapy successfully suppressed the expression of IL-17 in collagen-induced arthritis in mice, according to a prior study, suggesting that MSCs may achieve their immunosuppressive activity by downregulating IL-17 expression. In concurrence with the presented study, Wang et al. [61] also found that the treatment of osteoarthritic rats with HA and human amniotic MSCs separately or in combination effectively reduced TNF-α levels and increased IL-4 levels in plasma and synovial fluid in knee of osteoarthritic rats after 28 days and 56 days after MIA injection. Overall, these findings show that the three therapies in the current study reduce MIA-induced inflammation during OA by downregulating pro-inflammatory mediators and increasing anti-inflammatory effects [Figure 14].
Oxidative stress appears to play a role in the pathogenesis of OA. Oxidative stress affects both cells and extracellular matrix. In the presence of antioxidant defense system attenuation, the elevated levels of reactive oxygen species [ROS] signal disease development [62]. Several studies have found that ROS not only have the capability to oxidize and thereby cause damage to many of the components of a joint, but also play a role in regulating different inflammatory processes that contribute to the disease's etiology [Figure 14] [63,64,65,66].
The level of LPO, a marker of a degenerative process in which oxidative stress destroys cell membranes and other lipid-containing structures, increased considerably in the serum of osteoarthritic control rats in relation to the normal group in the current study. Many studies have demonstrated that the amount of LPO is elevated in MIA-induced OA, which is consistent with our findings [8, 65, 66]. GSH and GST, for example, are key antioxidant systems that protect the cell from free radicals [67]. Endogenous antioxidant enzymes are widely known for avoiding oxidative damage by neutralizing reactive oxygen species [ROS] before any other molecules may become targets [68]. In the current study, a significant reduction in the levels of these antioxidants in osteoarthritic rats provides substantial evidence of oxidative damage's role in MIA-induced OA. GSH is an important antioxidant since it has been proven to have a vital function in cellular resistance to oxidative stress. It is produced endogenously in the liver and serves as the body's initial line of defense against peroxidation. As a result, in chronic arthritis, the amount of GSH appears to be a reflux mechanism to guard against extracellular free radicals [69]. The osteoarthritic group had a substantial drop in serum GSH content in the current investigation. This is consistent with other previous publications [70, 71]. GST is one of the most important elements of the cellular defense system against oxidative stress [72]. In the current investigation, it was discovered that GST activity was significantly reduced in MIA-induced osteoarthritic rats as compared to normal rats. Similar effects on GST and other antioxidant enzyme levels were noted by Pathak et al. [65] and Hamdalla et al. [71] in the serum of rats with osteoarthritis associated with increase in MIA level as marker of LPO. Due to enhanced turnover to detoxify extra lipoperoxidation products, GST activity was lower in MIA-induced OA. In human osteoarthritic chondrocytes, GST has been demonstrated to have a role in cellular defenses against oxidative stress-induced cell death [73]. Chemopreventive drugs that target and modulate these physiological defense mechanisms have become a part of numerous treatment regimens.
Treatments with BMMSC, HA, and BMMSC plus HA resulted in a profound downregulation in LPO levels in the current investigation. When compared to the osteoarthritic control group, GSH content and GST activity were dramatically improved and raised near to normal levels. These findings are concurrence with those of previous studies, which found that MSCs improved the oxidative stress environment by lowering LPO and increasing GSH levels [58, 74]. According to Aniss et al. [39], HA treatment decreased oxidative stress and boosted the antioxidant defense system, which is compatible with the findings of the present study. The TNF-α-stimulated gene/proteins generated by MSCs, which reduce ROS production and, as a result, reduce chronic inflammation, are thought to play a role in the antioxidant function of MSCs [75]. Other results showed that HA also decreased the harmful effects of ROS and reactive nitrogen species on mitochondrial DNA integrity and repair, ATP generation, and cell survival [76].
Numerous variables have been identified as contributing to the pathophysiology of OA. Degradation of the extracellular matrix [ECM], which is seen as a direct result of the activity of matrix-degrading enzymes, is a characteristic of OA. By reducing the extracellular matrix, matrix metalloproteinases [MMPs], such as MMP13, are important enzymes that target cartilage for breakdown [77]. This MMP is produced in response to inflammatory mediators found in tissues and OA joint fluid, such as interleukin-1-beta [IL-1] and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α] [Figure 14] [78]. MMP13 mRNA expression was found to be considerably higher in the joints of MIA-osteoarthritic control rats in our study compared to normal rats. This is in line with the findings of [79], who discovered that MIA-induced OA's high MMP-13 level implied ongoing cartilage disintegration. The enhanced inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, which were demonstrated in the current study, may have stimulatory effects that led to the rise in MMP-13 expression. BMMSC, HA, and BMMSC + HA substantially decreased the elevated MMP-13 mRNA synthesis in the joint in osteoarthritic rats. These findings concur with those of several earlier research. MMP-13 mRNA expression was dramatically reduced in rats with OA following MSC therapy, according to Song et al. [80] and Li et al. [81] research. By limiting the expression of enzymes that break down the extracellular matrix, other researchers found that administering HA to OA-affected rats led to a substantial drop in the mRNA expression levels of MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-13 [82, 83].
TGF-β is a cytokine that affects both healthy and OA-affected joints. However, the function of this cytokine in a normal, healthy joint differs significantly from that of an OA-affected joint [84]. TGF-1β signalling plays a crucial role in the growth, remodeling, and maintenance of bone and cartilage in a healthy joint [84]. In OA-affected joints, however, persistent and high levels of active TGF-β1 were noticed [85]. Chondrocyte apoptosis and cartilage degradation in OA were reported to be caused by mechanical stress-induced upregulation of TGF-β1 [Figure 14] [86]. Multiple intra-articular injections of TGF-1β, despite the fact that it appears to enhance chondrogenesis, may also worsen osteoarthritis [87]. When compared to control rats in the current investigation, MIA-induced osteoarthritic rats had a significantly higher production of the TGF-β1 protein in the joints. This effect was similar to the one observed by Waly et al. [88], who reported that serum TGF-β1 levels were significantly elevated in the OA group after MIA administration. When compared to osteoarthritic control rats, the administration of BMMSC and/or HA to MIA-induced rats dramatically reduced the production of the TGF-β1 protein. This is consistent with the findings of a prior study by Abdelmawgoud and Saleh [74], who found that injecting MSCs into arthritic rats led to a rapid reversal of tissue inflammation and a decreased tissue level of TNF-α and TGF-β1. This drastic effect was accompanied by a reduced tissue level of TNF-α and TGF-β1. The current findings are in line with those of the study by Kanazawa et al. [89], which showed that TGF-β1 was much lower in the group of arthritis sufferers treated with HA than in the group of arthritis sufferers in the control condition. Treatment with BMMSC plus HA is associated with higher joint TGF-β1 protein expression than normal. Assembly, it can be suggested that the decrease in TGF-β1 protein expression by treatments of osteoarthritic rats with BMMSCs and HA could have an important impact in the prevention of chondrocyte apoptosis and cartilage damages [Figure 14].
In this work, rats with MIA-induced osteoarthritis had detrimental histological alterations in their ankle joints, including synovial hyperplasia, degraded articulating cartilage, and pannus development. These histological alterations may be brought on by an increase in oxidative stress, a weakened antioxidant defense system, an increase in pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines [TNF-α and IL-17], and a reduction in anti-inflammatory cytokine levels [IL-4]. Histopathological analysis of rats given MIA injections revealed periarticular inflammation, severe synovitis, bone resorption, and cartilage degradation. These findings are consistent with prior research that found the MIA group to have degenerative articular cartilage alterations [e.g., synovial thickening, cartilage loss, and osteophyte development] [90]. These results are consistent with Suhaeb et al. [91], Chiang et al. [5], and Chen et al. [92], who identified the potential anti-osteoarthritic effects of BMMSC treatment. Treatment with BMMSC and/or HA was associated with a significant reduction in joint cartilage and synovial membrane inflammation, as well as a significant restoration of histopathological alterations, when compared to the osteoarthritic control group. Lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [TNF-α and IL-17], MMP-13, and greater levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines were associated with these advantages [IL-4]. According to our findings, all treatments significantly reduced paw edema, arthritic score, and system and ankle measurements. The enhancement of antioxidant defense system, as well as the repression of oxidative stress and inflammation, may be responsible for these advantages [Figure 14].
In comparison to osteoarthritic rats, treatment with HA decreased the severity of MIA-induced OA by inhibiting inflammation, pannus development, cartilage degradation, and bone resorption. This result is similar with Jimbo et al. [93], who discovered that HA had chondroprotective properties. Histological analysis showed that cartilage degradation was considerably decreased in MIA-induced osteoarthritic rats treated with HA compared to MIA-induced osteoarthritic control rats. Intra-articular HA injections are also thought to cause synovial cells to secrete endogenous HA, increasing the viscosity of the joint fluid. Another proposed mechanism is the chondroprotective impact that HA and aggrecan have when used together. This causes strongly negatively charged aggregates to form, which absorb water and improve cartilage durability. HA's biochemical actions prevent the inflammatory process from building up to the point where it destroys joints [91]. In contrast to our findings, Chiang et al. [5] found that HA alone had no meaningful therapeutic advantages in slowing the progression of OA. This ineffectiveness might be attributed to the use of sub-optimal HA dosage for cartilage regeneration, single-dose injections, or a long time between OA induction and HA injection.
In addition, when MIA-induced osteoarthritic rats were treated with a combination of HA and BMMSC for six weeks following MIA induction, OA development was significantly reduced compared to osteoarthritic rats. These findings suggested that intra-articular injections of BMMSCs paired with HA might effectively slow the development of OA while also promoting cartilage repair. These findings corroborate those of Chiang et al. [5], who found that combining HA and MSCs effectively suppressed OA-related histological alterations in rabbits. According to Wang et al. [61], HA can boost the effects of MSCs on cartilage healing in a synergistic manner. The restorative process is thought to be due to the fact that adding HA to MSCs boosts their overall activity, including chondrogenic differentiation, proliferation, colonisation, and regenerative modulation. Choong et al. [95] found that HA had no additional effect on MSC during intra-articular injections of HA-MSCs. The local tissue environment was responsible for the transition of MSCs into functional lineage-committed cells like chondrocytes. This might explain why BMMSC did not deliver the predicted better regeneration potential in the HA-BMMSC combo. The combination of the two had no extra impacts on BMMSC's ability to heal injured cartilage, as indicated by the fact that the histopathological scores in the HA-BMMSCs group were not statistically different from those treated with HA and BMMSCs independently in the current investigation.